Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

January 6 Defendant Who Says He Thought He Was Allowed in Capitol Beats Charges

Plus: "A brave new world of astonishing individual freedom," Biden threatens Amazon, and more...

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 4.7.2022 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Untitled(2) | photo from complaint against Martin
(photo from complaint against Martin)

New Mexico man becomes the first January 6 defendant to be acquitted. Matthew Martin—who faced four federal charges as a result of entering the U.S. Capitol building during the January 6 protests and riots—has been found not guilty on all counts.

The feds had charged Martin with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; disorderly conduct which impedes the conduct of government business; disruptive conduct in the Capitol buildings; and pandering, demonstrating, or picketing in Capitol buildings.

Martin contended that Capitol police had let him into the building, leading him to think it was OK to enter. "According to MARTIN, Capitol guards opened the doors to the Rotunda and let them in, though MARTIN did acknowledge seeing smashed glass," stated the government's complaint against him.

This seems reasonable—and Judge Trevor McFadden of the U.S. District Court for the District of Washington agreed. McFadden called Martin's defense "plausible" and noted that "people were streaming by and the officers made no attempt to stop the people."

The judge said that while he did not believe that an officer had actually waved Martin into the Rotunda as Martin claimed, video of the scene shows how Martin may have gotten that impression. "I do think the defendant reasonably believed the officers allowed him into the Capitol," opined the judge.

After a two-day bench trial, McFadden acquitted Martin of all charges.

While it was a "close call" on the charge of knowingly entering or remaining in a restricted building without lawful authority, "under our system of justice close calls go to the defendant," said McFadden.

The decision is bad news for the feds' cases against the many other January 6 defendants charged with illegally entering the U.S. Capitol. But it's good news for due process and justice.

Certainly not all people who entered the Capitol building that day are blameless. But neither were all of them necessarily acting with criminal intent, and McFadden's decision reinforces this.


FREE MINDS

Lol. Axios CEO Jim VandeHei warns that a decentralized internet free from government or corporate gatekeepers would "be the Wild West of speech and power." VandeHei frets that "the rule-makers America has relied on since its founding — government and business — would be replaced by a brave new world of astonishing individual freedom." Oh, no!

What Axios is worried about has come to be known as Web3. Reason TV explains what it's all about:


FREE MARKETS

Is it the president's job to get involved in unionizing employees at a particular business? President Joe Biden apparently thinks so:

"By the way, Amazon here we come."

— President Biden promotes workers' right to unionize while speaking to the North America's Building Trade Unions pic.twitter.com/BaMtywgN3b

— The Recount (@therecount) April 6, 2022



UKRAINE UPDATES

Biden said yesterday that "major war crimes" were happening in Ukraine, while the White House ordered new sanctions on two Russian banks and on Russian President Vladimir Putin's daughters. Meanwhile, authorities in Ukraine have been urging residents of Donetsk, Luhansk, and parts of the Kharkiv regions to flee the area as Russia launches another major offensive in the east.

"The sense of urgency by the Ukrainian government for civilians to flee comes days after reports emerged of executions, rape and other human rights abuses of civilians by departing Russian forces as they retreated from the suburbs of Kyiv. Russia has denied the reports and said they were staged by Ukrainian troops," reports The Wall Street Journal. "Following heavy losses, Russia pulled its troops from the vicinity of Kyiv and from the northern Chernihiv and Sumy regions last week, in a strategy shift that the Kremlin says will allow it to focus on seizing the parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, collectively known as Donbas, that remain under Ukrainian control."


QUICK HITS

• "On Feb. 22 Reynaldo Munoz became the 3,000th incarcerated person whose U. S. criminal conviction was thrown out after it was determined that he had been falsely convicted," writes Austin Sarat at The Hill, in a piece excoriating America's "scandalous false convictions record."

• Minneapolis police can no longer do no-knock raids, the city says. But the new rules still leave a lot of room for disaster, allowing police to enter just 20 to 30 seconds (depending on the time of day) after announcing themselves. They also make exceptions for a wide range of "exigent circumstances," giving police ample leeway to just barge right in by claiming they were worried about evidence being destroyed or a suspect leaving.

• The extension of the student loan repayment moratorium is now official:

Today, my Administration is extending the pause on federal student loan repayments through August 31st, 2022. pic.twitter.com/xwicA1hCW3

— President Biden (@POTUS) April 6, 2022

• A Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputy kneeled on the head of a handcuffed man for more than three minutes, and Sheriff Alex Villanueva said he is trying to bring criminal charges against the person who leaked video of the abuse. "Dude, you're in L.A. County. Don't you have more serious crimes to worry about than somebody leaking a video? And aren't you really doing this because it's embarrassing you?'" commented First Amendment lawyer Karl Olson in the Los Angeles Times.

• Ohio is now micromanaging what kinds of trees people can plant.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Atlanta Braves Won the World Series. Their Stadium Is Still a Taxpayer Boondoggle.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupJanuary 6Criminal JusticeLaw enforcement
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (261)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

    Fuck Joe Biden

    1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

      Let's Go Brandon!

      1. ElvisIsReal   3 years ago

        Let's go Brandon, I agree.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Don't bother.

      "Is it the president's job to get involved in unionizing employees at a particular business? President Joe Biden apparently thinks so"

      The labor unions already have.

      1. Utkonos   3 years ago

        Well, of course he can’t help pudding in his two cents!

    3. gaoxiaen   3 years ago

      20 or 30 seconds? It would take me longer than that to get out of the shower or wipe my ass if someone was knocking on the door.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    January 6 Defendant Who Says He Thought He Was Allowed in Capitol Beats Charges

    AND A NATION IS TRAUMATIZED ALL OVER AGAIN

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      White Mike hardest hit. Trauma counselors on their way to New York, Oragon and California.

      1. Sevo   3 years ago

        As is this asshole:

        "JasonT20
        February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
        “How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”

        Yep, murder is a valid preventative measure if someone might later do something asshole doesn't like.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

          Not judging guilt based purely on partisan ideology? Democracy has died!

    2. Cronut   3 years ago

      Has anyone checked on AOC?

  3. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    McFadden called Martin's defense "plausible" and noted that "people were streaming by and the officers made no attempt to stop the people."

    It's not Capitol Police's fault that those are the orders they were given.

    1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      Cite?

      The closest thing I see are articles saying Capitol Police were told to hold back from the most severe crowd control measures they could have chosen to use. Do you have any articles that say they were given orders to "[make] no attempt to stop the [protestors]"?

      1. JesseAz   3 years ago

        The actual videos dumbfuck. The ones the judge watched and saw.

      2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        "Cite?"'

        The prosecution's own witnesses and the actual video evidence you disingenuous fuck. Your DNC propaganda articles aren't worth spit.

      3. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

        You need to educate yourself on the machiavellian tendencies of our elected leaders when they want something - in this case, an increased surveillance state. Manipulation is the engine that drives public endorsement of incursions on individual rights.

        Turn off CNN, MSNBC and Fox News and see the light.

        1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

          So, you have no cite. Got it.

          I can assure you I am sufficiently skeptical of government. I don’t need a lecture about how I should ramp up from reasonable skepticism to mindless paranoia.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

            What's your skepticism level for fire extinguishers?

            1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

              Yes, I thought that it was possible that Office Sicknick was killed by being hit on the head by a fire extinguisher, because that was reported (incorrectly) by news sources. And because there is at least one video of a fire extinguisher being thrown at another police officer that day. It turned out I was wrong -- I admit when I am wrong.

              That it turns out the story was misreported does not mean that Fist has a free ticket to now go around making baseless claims without backing them up with a citation.

              1. JesseAz   3 years ago

                You continued the narrative for over a week AFTER being given CNN even retracting claims then went on for another couple months claiming bear spray caused the stroke.

                Lying fuck.

              2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

                You know what else was reported incorrectly by news sources that you rely on?

                1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

                  Literally everything?

              3. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

                Meh. When our cherished institutions that would at one point have been somewhat trusted (if even only in some semblance of self interest) to investigate and report on these shenanigans cede all credibility, rather than continue to be at their mercy I am, in fact, free to make claims based on obvious motivations and past behaviors.

                You're free to take it or leave it. But, seriously, you should spurn corporate news. It's garbage.

          2. R Mac   3 years ago

            It’s been presented here several times before Dee.

          3. Agammamon   3 years ago

            Cite? I see you providing no evidence of your assertion here.

          4. Nardz   3 years ago

            Mike Laursen, pathological liar

            1. R Mac   3 years ago

              Mike Liarson.

      4. Agammamon   3 years ago

        Cite?

        Where are your sources to back up your claims in this post?

      5. Granite   3 years ago

        The fbi practically admitted to being there as agents provocateurs. Look at ray epps, he was there on Jan 5th telling people to raid it on the 6th and he is former fbi. He got taken off the fbi wanted page the first day. Plus he has Mormon connections. Mormons always fw intelligence - that’s why they’re allowed to hoard a half trillion. They launder money for intelligence. Fuck Mormons.

    2. cgr2727   3 years ago

      "It's not Capitol Police's fault that those are the orders they were given."

      You know who else was just following orders?

      1. Utkonos   3 years ago

        Herman Fegelein?

  4. JesseAz   3 years ago

    Feel free to now address the other 400 or so protestors still in solitary confinement facing 52 month plea deal sentences. Or the proud boys, including one not at the Capitol, on no bail solitary confinement for 15 months without a trial.

    Or the fact an unarmed woman was shot dead. And video shows the cops probably beating another protestor to death in the tunnels.

    1. JesseAz   3 years ago

      By the way, now that this article is out expect sarc to say he was always against these prosecutions but Republicans still caused these jailing.

    2. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      I'd like to know how long this poor guy was incarcerated before he was allowed to face a bench trial. Not all of them were denied bail, so this guy might be an exception.

      1. JasonAZ   3 years ago

        Ditto

  5. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    "January 6 Defendant Who Says He Thought He Was Allowed in Capitol Beats Charges"

    WTF?!

    1 / 6 was literally worse than 9 / 11! Anyone who participated in the HEAVILY ARMED INSURRECTION should get mandatory life in prison. In fact insurrectionists are the only criminals who aren't included in the Koch / Soros / Reason soft-on-crime #EmptyThePrisons agenda.

    #FreeTheCriminals
    #(ExceptThe1/6Criminals)

    1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   3 years ago

      You're too soft on that treasonous swine! They should be executed now! No trials! If you aren't guilty, then why would someone accuse you?

    2. creech   3 years ago

      Also apparently worse than Civil War. Incarcerations are now getting close to the length that Feds held Jeff Davis in prison without trial for leading a heavily armed insurrection that took 800,000 American lives.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    "...under our system of justice close calls go to the defendant," said McFadden.

    The white judge said, winking to the white white supremacist defendant.

  7. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

    After a two-day bench trial, McFadden acquitted Martin of all charges.

    And of course he was offered compensation for his time spent in jail. Right?

    1. JesseAz   3 years ago

      He lost his security clearances, job, and access to air bnb. So he was still punished.

    2. Social Justice is neither   3 years ago

      I believe he's got to file the civil suit forms against DC, the capitol police and Nancy Pelosi first.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        A class action suit could be interesting.

        1. Cyto   3 years ago

          Might be the only way to get all the footage...
          And does anyone believe that any of the instructions from Pelosi have been preserved?

          Or that there is any way to obtain other communication between the people who did things like moving officers away from the fence on the main sidewalk exactly as "suspicious" dudes moved to remove the fencing and signage?

          You would think that would be a priority for the government, but since it isn't, perhaps there is an outside chance that these defendants can uncover it.

          1. R Mac   3 years ago

            Maybe some testimony from Capital police after Republicans take the house back?

            I know I’m dreaming here, but it’s possible.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Axios CEO Jim VandeHei warns that a decentralized internet free from government or corporate gatekeepers would "be the Wild West of speech and power."

    Decentralized power? Cats and YTMNDogs living together, etc.

    1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   3 years ago

      Lolcats

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

        Yes.

    2. JesseAz   3 years ago

      Is he trying to sat people may be able to speak freely without government approval???

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        That’s so pre-2020.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

          Anti-anti-racist.

    3. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      Yeah, we wouldn't want privately-owned social media companies to be allowed to decide what content they want to put on their own sites. Can't have that.

      1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

        LOL you are so delusional.

      2. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

        Reason writer Liz Wolfe agrees with your sarcasm.

        https://reason.com/2022/04/07/why-is-facebook-censoring-articles-about-how-blm-used-donations-to-buy-a-6-million-house/

        1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

          And I totally agree with everything she says, including when she says, “Private companies like Twitter and Facebook/Meta have every right to decide their own content moderation policies…”

          1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

            Especially after a call from the white house.

          2. Political McGuffin   3 years ago

            Do they also have the right to decide who to hire and how much to pay them, and the gender mix of board members?

      3. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        Except that's not what's happening and you know it. The Biden administration is telling them what content they want to put on their own sites.

        How much longer are you going to call yourself a libertarian when you're obviously not just an authoritarian but actively hostile to the concept of libertarianism.

      4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        Deciding between calls to sessions with Congressional committees.

        1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

          Yes, the social media sites are being pressured by Congressional committees, and state governments, and even foreign governments. And users, and investors, and advertisers.

          They are being pressured simultaneously by Democrats and Republicans, in opposite directions.

          They also seem to have a liberal bias, that would be there, even in the absence of external pressures.

          All of these things are true, but you know what: Facebook and Twitter are still private businesses, with free speech rights.

          And you know what else: While Facebook is admittedly widely used, Twitter actually has a relatively small market share and, furthermore, doesn't have much of a competitive moat. Witness TRUTH Social, which is pretty much at Twitter clone, that somehow (that still somehow managed to fuck up their user account management).

          1. JesseAz   3 years ago

            When do you admit you're for corporate fascism?

            1. R Mac   3 years ago

              Mike Laursen
              April.7.2022 at 12:34 pm

  9. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

    Regarding Ukraine....what does a successful resolution look like?

    Does Russia retain Crimea? Yes or No.
    Does Russia retain Donbas region? Yes or No.
    Does Russia retain direct land bridge from Russia to Crimea? Yes or No.
    Does Ukraine join the EU? Yes or No.
    Does Ukraine formally take neutrality pledge? Yes or No.
    Does USA/EU lift financial sanctions immediately? Yes or No.

    How do you see success for Russia, Ukraine and NATO? It could look different for each.

    1. Rich   3 years ago

      Gee, no wonder folks think this'll go on for years. 8-(

    2. Lord of Strazele   3 years ago

      Ukraine joins the EU and NATO. Putin dies. Russia continues to suck at everything.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        Someone wake up sir Strudel, he’s having a wet dream.

      2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        "Putin dies. Russia continues to suck at everything"

        So it's not just the leadership, but the Russian people that you hate. Typical lefty.

        1. Nardz   3 years ago

          It thinks and feels whatever tv tells it to think and feel

          1. R Mac   3 years ago

            Don’t forget it’s morning email.

      3. soldiermedic76   3 years ago

        Do you really think Putin's successor will be any better? And if Russia sucks so bad, why is the world economy being fractured because of the loss of the goods to the market? God, you're fucking stupid.

    3. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      There is no successful ending after all the deaths.

    4. R Mac   3 years ago

      All corrupt members of our government’s shady business deals in Ukraine are exposed?

    5. PeteRR   3 years ago

      I'm going with No on every question.

    6. Nardz   3 years ago

      1, 2, 3, 5 = yes
      4 = probably not
      6 = no

      1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

        The resolution is starting to look like what you're answering. I don't disagree, Nardz.

        That might change though, if heavy weaponry comes pouring into Ukraine (likely through Poland), and the Ukrainians can concentrate their military efforts on a smaller area (like the eastern region and the land bridge). I think by Thanksgiving, we'll know the rough outlines of what a settlement looks like - assuming it has not totally blown up.

    7. Ragnarredbeard   3 years ago

      Success for Ukraine is continuing to exist as an independent nation. They aren't getting Crimea or Donbas back and a land bridge thru Mariupol is likely to be lost as well.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   3 years ago

        An independent neutral nation.

        1. Nardz   3 years ago

          "Independent"

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

            Mostly Independent.

      2. Nardz   3 years ago

        If they want to be independent, why are they stealing billions from American taxpayers?

    8. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Could we nuke Russia and Europe?

      1. perlmonger   3 years ago

        This is a thing which would be physically possible, yes. Though probably not without retaliation.

      2. Gaear Grimsrud   3 years ago

        Might as well do China at the same time.

        1. Dogvalor   3 years ago

          Shiet, add Washington DC while you're at it.

    9. Granite   3 years ago

      Success would be the following:

      Biden and hunter and cronies get paid a ton of money

      Same with Zelenskyy and azov funder kolomoiski

      Russia china and Iran go to proxy wars with west after china is deemed responsible for lab leak

      The NWO proceeds with just the western gov’s

      Which means digital currency, passports - everything

      Possibly an intentional nuclear war to depopulate if Covid doesn’t work as well as expected on the useless feeders it kills.

      Oh, and Ukraine can’t join nato, it never could, we just wanted Russia to think that.

      I’d say that’s a pretty good victory for all the interested parties - except for Ukraine of course - Ukrainians are literally the lowest priority on any elites minds.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Is it the president's job to get involved in unionizing employees at a particular business?

    When his party enjoys union donations, it does.

    1. JohannesDinkle   3 years ago

      Teachers contribute among the most. Trial lawyers too.
      Nothing to see here.

    2. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      All success must be punished.

    3. Minadin   3 years ago

      You know, it's funny. Before, the union leaders and advocates and the majority of the left was insisting that Amazon employees be given the chance to vote on whether or not they wanted to unionize.

      Then, when they voted (rather decisively) NOT to unionize, those same people want to disregard the vote, or come up with excuses for why it's not valid.

      Democrats love them some democracy - but only when they can control it and manipulate it to work in their favor.

      1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   3 years ago

        They love democracy as long as people vote the way they want them to. Otherwise, it's up to the strong arm of the state to force them.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

          Hey, proper Democracy! has nothing to do with voting.

      2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

        Yup, and the same thing is true of Republicans, by the way.

        1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

          Cite?

        2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

          Mike always cries "both sides!" whenever the Democrats are caught doing something undeniably shitty.

      3. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

        Then, when they voted (rather decisively) NOT to unionize, those same people want to disregard the vote, or come up with excuses for why it's not valid.

        Democrats love them some democracy - but only when they can control it and manipulate it to work in their favor.

        Which is why they're constantly bringing up the same vote over and over until they get the result they want. Thinking that you've fought "the last battle" with leftists is a strategic mistake; that only stops when you've chased them out of the arena entirely, and even then, you have to constantly be on guard for entryism so they don't gain a beachhead.

  11. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    "Biden said yesterday that 'major war crimes' were happening in Ukraine"

    Calling for Putin to be removed from power.
    Accusing Russia of war crimes.
    Describing the invasion as "genocide."

    By the logic of NEVER AGAIN, hopefully it won't be long until the US military gets directly involved. We might finally get the fullscale US - Russia war I've been advocating since they attacked us in 2016.

    #LibertariansForWarWithRussia
    #SheWon

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      What kind of catchy slogans will we paint on the nuclear bombs?

      1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

        Maybe we can paint pictures of Putin and Drumpf kissing. Get it? Because they're GAY for each other. 🙂

        #MockingGayRomanceIsAcceptableInThisContext

        1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

          Gold.

        2. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

          Truly inspired, OBL.

      2. cgr2727   3 years ago

        Can't wait for woke nose art on B-52's of Rosita, the xe/xim/xer Latinx Riveter.

    2. JesseAz   3 years ago

      How can you waste time on Ukrainian genocide when there is a trans genocide occurring in Florida according to tony?

    3. Nardz   3 years ago

      When another video of Ukrainian soldiers committing atrocities drops:

      1. It's not happening
      2. Ok it's happening, but it's not common
      3. Sure it's commonly happening, but it's not unusual (or both sides) because war
      4. Yes, it's happening, it's common, it's only one side - and it's a good thing

  12. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Biden said yesterday that "major war crimes" were happening in Ukraine...

    Wake me when they get promoted to colonel war crimes.

    1. Utkonos   3 years ago

      Aren’t you over Generalizing?

  13. But SkyNet is a Private Company   3 years ago

    Let’s Go Brandon

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      Let’s Go Brandon

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        Where to?

        1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

          Anywhere except 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, DC. 🙂

  14. Rich   3 years ago

    They also make exceptions for a wide range of "exigent circumstances," giving police ample leeway to just barge right in by claiming they were worried about evidence being destroyed or a suspect leaving.

    But the police do have to knock a bit in those circumstances, right?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Does the battering ram count as knocking?

  15. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    ...in a piece excoriating America's "scandalous false convictions record."

    IN THIS HOUSE WE BACK THE BLUE.

    1. JohannesDinkle   3 years ago

      The court system involves humans at every level. Humans are misled, misunderstand evidence, and are swayed by emotion. Humans make mistakes. It is important to rectify those mistakes and make them right, but mistakes will always be made.
      The outrage at American justice being imperfect is a little like Pope Benedict saying that there must be something wrong with America because so many Catholic priests were being investigated for pedophilia. We look at our faults when others sweep them under the rug.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        Cuz the US legal system, and the Catholic Church, never have malicious intents, right?

        1. soldiermedic76   3 years ago

          Nothing is perfect, our legal system is the best system. There will be mistakes. The idea that false convictions is unique or a major problem needs to be backed by more than anecdotes and assertions. Define scandalous false convictions? Was the conviction malicious or was new evidence discovered? Did the prosecutors and cops conspire to convict someone they knew to be innocent? I am willing to bet that far more guilty people escape convictions than innocent people are convicted in the USA. And in a good number of these cases, where convictions are overturned, it tends to be more because of a legal technicality than actual proof of innocence.

          1. soldiermedic76   3 years ago

            I don't see anything wrong with overturning a conviction for a legal technicality, because the system should error on the side of caution, just saying overturned convictions in themselves aren't proof of innocence. When I see a story like this, I actually see it as a thing to celebrate, that the system allows a mechanism to overturn wrongful convictions. No, it doesn't make up for the time spent in prison, but it shows we realize the system isn't always perfect and we strive to undo what was wrong.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

              Actually, I do not agree with overturning a conviction based on mis-behavior of the judge or prosecution. Instead, I believe we should punish their illegal activity directly, not by voiding the verdict they wanted.

              If the original accused is guilty, then jail. If the cops or prosecution is also guilty, jail for them, too.

              1. soldiermedic76   3 years ago

                I would like to see the prosecutor and or judge (or police) punished. I think it depends on what the technicality is, and how it could impact the jury or proceedings. But there is enough gray area that I believe it would be difficult to adjudicate.

  16. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

    Yes, 81 million people voted for this loser.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGRxVITBGOA

    1. R Mac   3 years ago

      Embarrassing.

    2. Nardz   3 years ago

      Not really

    3. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      He won more new votes than any other president in American history, and reversed a 150 year decline in vote percentage. That's something Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Kennedy, Nixon, Reagan, Clinton and Obama couldn't even pull off.

      But Joe did it while hiding in his basement.

      Remarkable. And now everyone can bask in his glory as evidenced in that video.

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      The least Joe could have done was fetch Barry some coffee.

      BTW, isn't this the kind of misinformation that media companies are supposed to censor?

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      See? Biden and Obama can't speak at the same time. You know what that means?

    6. Weigel's Cock Ring   3 years ago

      Did you see the entire uncut video that contains the speech portion as well? Even Obama can barely hide his utter disdain and contempt for Biden. He insulted him right to his face in front of the whole assemblage, and then tried to play it off like he was joking, which he wasn't at all.

      The most hilarious part of it though is how merely being in Obama's presence causes Kamals Harris to act the way 16 year old girls of an earlier generation would act upon seeing the Beatles in person for the first time.

  17. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Minneapolis police can no longer do no-knock raids, the city says. But...

    But, invest in a reinforced entryway.

  18. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Today, my Administration is extending the pause on federal student loan repayments through August 31st, 2022.

    "...they tell me."

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      Needed more time to work out how to pay the 10% to the big guy.

    2. creech   3 years ago

      Further extensions beyond Nov. 8th are already being drafted.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Mid-terms!

    4. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      "Further, we're working on more plans to transfer money directly to voters up until the next election cycle, but only if we win."

      Government isn't paying off voters, nosireee

  19. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Don't you have more serious crimes to worry about than somebody leaking a video?

    What's his motivation for worrying about actual crime instead?

  20. JesseAz   3 years ago

    In 2017 Jill and Joe transferred millions from an S corp to their private accounts and only released their personal income statements, not how these millions were made.

    With new releases of income from foreign entities to hunter, people are starting to question these millions.

    Jill grossed $3 million (royalties plus about $700,000 from speaking fees) for a book that sold only 7,000 copies in its first week, and that from that book deal she netted more than $1 million in the two years prior to its release, but only $175,319 in the year it was published (2019).

    Joe netted $12.2 million (after expenses) in the same deal for a book that sold 300,000 copies. Excluding the $4.2 million earned from touring and speaking, that yields $8 million of income that we are to assume came from book royalties (higher if we know his gross revenues before expenses).

    For analysis purposes, consider that his book had a retail price of $27 for hardcover and $18 for paperback, and assume a reasonable mix of sales so the average price was $23 (with no discounting). On 300,000 books sold, gross revenues would’ve been just under $7 million. As an author, Joe would’ve likely received about 12 percent of that using a blended royalty rate (15 percent hardcover and 7.5 percent paperback typical from publishers), yielding about $800,000 income. Round it up to $1 million if you prefer. Double it. It’s still not close to $8 million.

    https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/06/joe-bidens-released-tax-returns-dont-explain-millions-in-income-where-did-it-come-from/

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      Oddly enough, questions like this didn’t come up after 10 years of auditing Trump.

      1. kcuch   3 years ago

        And joe hasn't been audited yet

    2. JimboJr   3 years ago

      very interesting.

      A man with a middle class, grass roots background. Spent decades in public service where the salary isnt notably impressive.

      But somehow everyone in his family is a multi millionaire.

      And his crackhead son sits on the board of an energy company. And is able to sell his crayon drawings for 100k+ a pop.

      Yup, this passes the smell test!

      Now lets get back to finding that Trump-Russia link, I know we will find it this time.

      1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

        Between book deals, speaking engagements, and immunity from insider trading laws, someone would have to be a complete and total fool to not leave Congress a multi millionaire.

        1. R Mac   3 years ago

          You continue to clown yourself by commenting in threads started by people you’ve muted.

        2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

          Nothing suspicious about a $1 million advance and $3 million in speaking fees for a person who was only an ex-vice president's second wife at that point. Right, sarcasmic?

  21. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    "Biden threatens Amazon"

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    Jeff Bezos owns a newspaper that relentlessly promotes establishment Democrats. He knows he and his company are much better off with Dems in power.

    The point of Biden's comment was to trick low-info poor voters into believing Democrats aren't the party of billionaires.

    #OBLsFirstLaw

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      ITS A TRAP!

    2. Jerry B.   3 years ago

      "Jeff Bezos owns a newspaper that relentlessly promotes establishment Democrats."

      Don't tell the Post's commentariat that. The recent articles about Hunter Biden's laptop got over 10,000 outraged comments each, mostly complaining what a Rethuglican rag the Post was.

      If you want to see what the Democrats really think, read the comments on any WAPO story. It's scary.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        If you think the Post is alt-right, you might be a retard. Or a Marxist. But I repeat myself.

  22. John F. Carr   3 years ago

    If banning invasive species is micromanagement, I must like micromanagement. Good job, Ohio.

    1. soldiermedic76   3 years ago

      Was going to say the exact same thing. I thought that was what was being referred to so I actually clicked the link and low and behold that's exactly what's happening. The problem with invasive species is they're invasive. They don't stay on your property and cost hundreds of billions of dollars each year for private, state and national entities to deal with. The also sometimes cause irreparable environmental damage, reduce agricultural production, destroy native species, introduce diseases, increase wildfire dangers. I would be opposed to it if you could guarantee it won't spread off your property, but that is never the case.
      Every state has an invasive species control list, here in Montana Russian Olive trees are on it. We can maintain the trees already on our property but we can't actively plant or transfer new ones. Once again ENB is misrepresenting a very complex subject, with her misleading take.

      Some introduced species don't do damage, or minimal damage, some are even beneficial, but many are not either. And sometimes it differs from state to state, or region to region. Baby's Breath is a huge problem on the plains. Russian Olives and Salt Cedar are a major problem in the Yellowstone River Drainage, but less so in North East Montana, because they're usually planted on dry land acres and don't propagate naturally as a result. So, Montana Weed Commission compromised on Russian Olives (but not salt cedar because no one was opposed to removing it), because in many counties Russian Olives are great for wind breaks, shelter belts and as winter feed for birds and mammals. So we get to keep our trees, but no more can be planted. Like any compromise, neither side of the issue is happy, but they accept it.

      Working with the weed commission at both the county and state level has given me a better appreciation of the complexity and process involved in getting a species listed. It is far from arbitrary and involves multiple stake holders, generally over years long process. We have a problem with Narrow-Leaf Hawksbeard, but it hasn't been listed yet, because we still haven't found a really reliable control method, so the MWC decided not to list it, because if it's listed and landowners aren't controlling it, you could be fined, and we didn't want that happening if no good control method was being utilized. Canada thistle is listed, but not to many get fined for it, because it's really difficult to control and it's pretty wide spread, so education is better (and we're working on some promising biologicals that look very promising and could cost considerably less). Tall Hemp has been listed, despite it not being in the state yet (or at least not verified), because we know it's a problem in several states, and is in North Dakota. There isn't great control methods, but the hope is that listing it, and education, it will be identified early and treated early enough to keep it from becoming a major issue (manual removal is an option when you have one or two plants, but not by the time you have acres of it).

      I know to the die hard libertarian, it will be "muh private property" but it doesn't stay on your property. Your actions, or inactions, harms others. You may think that baby's breath flower is pretty, but when it spreads onto my range, it destroys critical forage, by reducing water and nutrients to other plants with it's extremely long, fibrous and spreading roots. Wildlife and cattle won't eat it, and it spreads taking over a pasture. Canada thistle is the same way (however, cattle can be trained to eat that, and when it's younger it is actually highly nutritious for them) goats and sheep will also eat it. The best option to manage it with grazing is to concentrate your animals on a patch using fencing. So, it's time and management intensive. If given their druthers, like in most grazing systems, cattle will avoid it (for obvious reasons, they don't appreciate the thorns anymore than we do, sheep and goats, especially goats, actually like the stuff, so incorporating them into a grazing system is another possible management tool, but they need different watering and fencing systems, so that can be expensive). When the weed district asks me how I am managing Canada thistle on my place, I state I'm incorporating new fencing to better graze it, and have a few head of sheep, and hopefully will add goats soon. I also hope that the new biologicals will be approved so I can utilize them as well. It's not much of an issue, just one corner of a pasture, in a wet area, and doesn't appear to be spreading, so I don't feel I need to get more aggressive with it. Once I've finished the current fencing project, though, I may get a lot more aggressive with it through concentrated grazing in the spring for a few years to know it back. My bigger problem is lambs quarter, which isn't a listed weed, and supposedly both cattle and sheep graze it due to its high protein content, however, my cattle don't seem to like it. My horse and my sheep will graze it some, but not enough, I may have to break down and actually spray it. The problem is that it's seed can remain dormant in the soil for fifty years, so it continues to come back, when conditions are favorable.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   3 years ago

        Dude you are truly a renaissance man. Always appreciate your insight on all subjects.

  23. Minadin   3 years ago

    So, in a vote earlier this week, one of the largest school districts in the St. Louis area was flipped Republican when 2 new members were elected.

    Both women were slammed by their opponents for criticizing mask mandates, CRT, and other 'woke' education policies. They were smeared as racists in multiple campaign mailings.

    One is black. The other is an Iraqi refugee immigrant.

    1. Not Robbers=Nut Rubbers   3 years ago

      They've just internalized the racism inherent in our society and are thus the very proof that such racism is inherent in our society.

      1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

        They must be white on the inside.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

          Plantation syndrome.

    2. Idaho Bob   3 years ago

      Got a link for this?

      1. Minadin   3 years ago

        It was a story on the local news radio station this morning. They don't have a print story for it.

        The local newspaper does, but they [lean heavily left and therefore] don't cover the racism accusations. Also, if you have an adblocker running, you can't follow the link.

        https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/education/conservative-backed-school-board-candidates-win-in-rockwood-st-charles-county/article_1ac5e57f-ae1e-5280-abe9-c4a6259e579f.html

        1. Idaho Bob   3 years ago

          Thanks!

    3. Cronut   3 years ago

      Wisconsin had similar results in local and school board elections around the state. Flipped several school boards conservative, and won a bunch of local elections.

      Normal people are fed up with the rabid progressive left.

      There will be more fortifications for November, I'm sure. The dirty proles are starting to think they have a say in their governance.

    4. soldiermedic76   3 years ago

      We'll see more of this as Republicans are making a not so secret major push to attract blue collar and middle class minorities. They've opened offices in a number of minority heavy working class neighborhoods across the country and are making massive voter registration drives in those areas. And it appears to be paying off from voter registration and party registration numbers coming out of the states.

      I noted in 2016, the crowded Republican presidential primaries was more diverse than the Democrats were. Today, I note the number of minority and females running for office for the first time, that are running as Republicans. And the Democrats and the left media notes it as well, because they've stepped up their rhetoric about racism, and race traitors considerably, and almost every piece refers to this as either Potemkin diversity or a cynical attempt to hide their racist policies. I'm really starting to wonder if the racism charge is loosing it's strength (and I've noticed the left is using it less and shifting to other charges of bigotry).

      While many Republican voters still suspect malfeasance in 2020, the party seems to be working hard to broaden it's reach, to avoid such dramatic late night blue swings. Also, it would make cheating harder as the number of minority Republican voters increases. Getting 99 to 100% of votes in a district that has 20% Republican registration would be a lot less defendable than in a district that has 1-5% Republican registration.

  24. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    Days since enbs last yglasias reffrence :2

  25. sarcasmic   3 years ago

    This seems reasonable—and Judge Trevor McFadden of the U.S. District Court for the District of Washington agreed. McFadden called Martin's defense "plausible" and noted that "people were streaming by and the officers made no attempt to stop the people."

    Will the insurrectionist narrative crumble? Doubt it.

    (cut the trolls braying like donkeys hee haw hee haw lies about what I said about Saint Babbitt)

    1. JesseAz   3 years ago

      And there's the denial of his past comments. Hilarious.

      1. JesseAz   3 years ago

        sarcasmic
        March.2.2021 at 10:09 am
        Flag Comment Mute User
        Shame on Trump and his supporters for creating a permanent military presence in the capital. You guys own this.

        sarcasmic
        March.2.2021 at 10:45 am
        Flag Comment Mute User
        No, I did not misspell "protesters." Those were the ones who stayed outside. The rioters who broke into the building gave the politicians an excuse to militarize the capital. Protesters had nothing to do with it.

        I'll find all of your defenses of the murder of an unarmed woman later.

        1. R Mac   3 years ago

          I can’t see this post but I’m certain Jesse is making up lies about me.

          -sarc

        2. Super Scary   3 years ago

          I don't understand how someone can say "they are lying about me" when all I see are word-for-word quotes with timestamps.

          1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

            Because he's a troll.

            sarcasmic
            August.12.2021 at 4:45 pm
            I only show up to watch the clowns duke it out while tossing in this or that provocation. Bread and circuses. This is my circus.

            sarcasmic
            September.10.2021 at 12:14 pm
            I like to stir shit up. So what.

          2. sarcasmic   3 years ago

            I don't see anything but grey masking the braying of donkeys.

          3. sarcasmic   3 years ago

            All I see is grey. The few times I've been dumb enough to think they might be arguing honestly, I've always been disappointed. Besides, all their arguments are about me as a person. If I was to respond the topic of the conversation wouldn't be the yahoo who stormed the Capital, it would be me.

            If you want to play their childish game, go for it. But let me know so I can put you on mute and not be distracted from actual conversations with intelligent people.

            1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

              Ideas!

            2. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

              If you've got so many people muted that all you see is gray, then maybe you're the problem.

    2. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      Ideas!

    3. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

      (cut the trolls braying like donkeys hee haw hee haw lies about what I said about Saint Babbitt)

      Shorter version - 'I like grey boxes'

      1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

        Like moths to a flame, certain individuals feel uncontrollably compelled to drop personal attacks on all my posts, leaving the average person wondering "What in the hell is wrong with these people?"

        1. JesseAz   3 years ago

          Like a chronic liar sarc lies about past statements.

          You even used your favorite term to justify her shooting, using Saint Babbit in your post. Lol.

        2. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

          Ideas!

          1. Sevo   3 years ago

            Stupidity! Lies!

      2. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

        And I cannot lie
        You other brothers can't deny
        When sqrls walks in with A CAP DiaTriBe
        The comment gets shorter

        1. Minadin   3 years ago

          One of the few that I have on mute.

  26. JesseAz   3 years ago

    Catherine Herridge
    @CBS_Herridge
    CBS News has learned that +150 transactions involving either Hunter or James Biden’s global business affairs were flagged as concerning by U.S. banks for further review. @ChuckGrassley spoke exclusively @CBS_Herridge about newly public bank records.

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      And then nothing happened.

    2. Idaho Bob   3 years ago

      They could provide concrete proof of Biden family corruption and nothing would happen. See Clintons.

    3. JasonAZ   3 years ago

      Well, you see, there is a (D) after Mr Biden's name. So we can trust him without question. Icky (R) pols, we'll audit them for a decade. See Trump.

    4. Seamus   3 years ago

      The fact that this information is being allowed to come to light tells me that the Dems have come to the realization that Slow Joe is going to drag them down if they don't get him out of the White House. So more and more of this news is going to appear. Problem is: Kamala is even more of a disaster than Joe, so they have to figure out a way to get her out of the way before they force Joe to resign (or invoke the 25th Amendment to have him declared disabled).

      If Kamala can be persuaded to quit, then as long as Joe nominates her replacement before the Republicans take back one or both houses of Congress, his nominee can be confirmed, albeit with no votes to spare. Ace of Spades HQ suggests the Dems might try nominating Barack Obama (who may be pulling strings from Kalorama Road anyhow), and he could move up to president once Joe resigns or is removed under the 25th Amendment. It seems he'd be eligible because the 22nd Amendment only says that "no person shall be *elected* to the office of the President more than twice," and this wouldn't be an election.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   3 years ago

        Not sure about the long game you describe but when WAPO, NYT and CBS start reporting this stuff in the same news cycle you can be sure it's no accident. These things happen for a reason.

  27. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    Why do unions get to enjoy extra legal protections?

    1. kcuch   3 years ago

      because of the extra-constitutional NLRB enacted 100 years ago.

    2. Jerry B.   3 years ago

      Campaign contributions (read "bribes") to Democrats.

    3. R Mac   3 years ago

      They donate to Democrats.

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Cuz otherwise Democracy! would die?

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   3 years ago

        Democracy only dies in the darkness. In the light of day it gets a bad case of Omicron but survives after multiple Pfizer booster jabs.

  28. Brandybuck   3 years ago

    > would be replaced by a brave new world of astonishing individual freedom

    Oh please, it can't come soon enough. That's what the whole internet was supposed to be about. And what it was heading to for quite a while. Then government and government crony businesses got involved.

    1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      Amen.

      1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        Lol, as if. That's the last thing you want.

    2. R Mac   3 years ago

      No shit?

    3. sarcasmic   3 years ago

      The ironic part is that supposed conservatives are all about censorship and government control when it benefits their team. Individual freedom takes a back seat when there's an opportunity to harm political enemies.

      1. Agammamon   3 years ago

        The ironic part is that supposed liberals and progressives are all about censorship and government control.

        1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

          There's nothing ironic about that.

      2. JesseAz   3 years ago

        Asking for everyone's speech to be allowed is censorship how?

  29. Brandybuck   3 years ago

    As for the January 6th stuff, this guy got lucky. He was just one dude that got caught up in a riot. A bet a lot of people were like that.

    But let's go back to rule one of riots: When you find yourself in the midst of a riot, GET OUT! Otherwise you are a rioter. I don't care if it's a soccer game or a million dude march or even a political rally gone bad, GET OUT!

    1. kcuch   3 years ago

      So i shouldn't throw this tea overboard?

      1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

        It is interesting to compare and contrast the Boston Tea Party and the January 6th riots:

        - In both cases, individuals crossed a line, taking great risk. The Tea Partiers were fighting for representation in taxation decisions. The January 6th rioters were fighting for a phony theory that the Presidential election was stolen with widespread fraud.

        - The Tea Partiers disguised themselves as Mohawks and conducted their raid at night. The January 6th rioters posted selfies of themselves on social media.

        1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

          Prove the election wasn't stolen! Prove all the ballots were valid! You can't! That means the election was stolen!

          1. Agammamon   3 years ago

            Wait, are you saying that you can't prove the validity of the election?

          2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

            I admit it. I cannot prove a negative.

    2. sarcasmic   3 years ago

      What riot? I thought they were all peaceful tourists.

    3. JesseAz   3 years ago

      Someone who entered a public building with the cops not stopping him, committing no violence, and leaving 18 minutes later "got lucky?"

      1. Sevo   3 years ago

        Had to look to see which TDS-addled pile of shit would be so stupid as to make such a claim.
        Yep, the asshole brandyshit.
        Hey, brandyshit! Stuff it up your ass.

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      So totally not like antifa/BLM "gatherings".

    5. damikesc   3 years ago

      ...but punishing the BLM rioters is crossing the line.

      1. JasonAZ   3 years ago

        You RACISTS!!!

  30. Nardz   3 years ago

    Pelosi announced a trip to Taiwan, to show "strength/solidarity" or some such.
    China didn't like that, and a Chinese official released a statement saying as much.
    Lo and behold...

    BREAKING: Speaker Nancy Pelosi tests positive for COVID

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      Well to be fair it's hard on the elderly, and the old witch is like 900 or something.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        Can she still get her hair done?

    2. JasonAZ   3 years ago

      You just cannot make this shit up!

  31. Sevo   3 years ago

    "California math wars get ugly: Accusations of racism and harassment ignite battle between Stanford and Cal profs"
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/California-math-wars-get-ugly-Accusations-of-17060072.php?cmpid=gsa-sfgate-result

    Stanford prof: 'blacks are too stupid to learn math early, but I'm not a racist'.

    1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

      What is he talking about, blacks are way more adept and even start using the metric system way before other kids
      9 mm glock
      1 kilo coke
      3 gram pot

  32. Dillinger   3 years ago

    the parents of Admiral and Major War Crimes are so proud

  33. Dillinger   3 years ago

    also, vamos Gigantes! did Ken Shultz die?

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   3 years ago

      Joined up with the Ukrainian resistance last I heard. Apparently his new nickname is Ken "Rambo" Schultz.

  34. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/esi-energy-pleads-guilty-150-eagles-killed-wind-farms/

    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

    1. perlmonger   3 years ago

      It's always interesting what slips out of people...

      From that article: "In the 1970s, there were believed to be just two bald eagles left in the entire state of New York City."

      1. rbike   3 years ago

        Alaska is currently infested with way too many of them. We have a good number here in the Mississippi too.

  35. Sevo   3 years ago

    "...Certainly not all people who entered the Capitol building that day are blameless..."

    The cop who murdered the woman, obviously. Anyone else?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      Any fire extinguisher sales people?

    2. JasonAZ   3 years ago

      ENB, Mike Liarson, LeftyJeffy, GroomerTony, etc - "You mean the cheating whore that broke windows, climbed into a sacred government building and was ready to kill all the US Congress members with her bare hands?"

  36. Longtobefree   3 years ago

    " . . . worried about evidence being destroyed . . . "

    Wasn't that how this all got started?

  37. Kungpowderfinger   3 years ago

    Sacramento “mass shooting” was actually a gang shootout involving early released violent criminals:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/03/us/sacramento-shooting-updates.html

    Emptytheprisons and Coalition to Stop Handgun Violence hardest hit.

    1. Kungpowderfinger   3 years ago

      As the narrative crumbles:

      https://kcra.com/article/at-least-5-people-fired-guns-in-downtown-sacramento-shooting-during-gang-violence-police-say/39653597

    2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      It had signs of being a gang shooting all along.

      The thing is, even if you are a liberal deeply concerned about gun violence, it would be best to acknowledge that random mass shootings by crazy people and mass gang shootouts are different, in that possible solutions to those two separate problems are different. But, instead, they are obscuring what is going on by conflating the two.

      1. Kungpowderfinger   3 years ago

        “Obscuring” is putting it gently.

        “Lying to push an anti-gun agenda per SOP” is prob more accurate.

      2. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

        I can't come up with any possible solution to target mass shootings/school shootings other than abolishment of gun-free zones. Even then, exactly how do you prevent a situation like the Las Vegas shooter? There's no government policy that prevents a guy like that from doing that.

        The best remedy is to have such a strong, booming economy in which quality of life is so high, that everyone has extreme value in their own life, their own freedom, and their futures. It keeps them from feeling desperate, disenfranchised, and like they have nothing to lose.

        Public faith that there's "land of opportunity" is one of the most valuable things America ever created. It's why CRT is so evil-it's the counter-narrative telling people they CAN'T get ahead because the whole system and country is racist and is designed to keep them down, and force them to fail, and that they have no hope of ever getting beyond this system.

        1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

          Yes, random mass shootings (as opposed to gang shootings) are awful, and I have no idea what can be done about them.

          Gangs, are of course going to get their hands on guns no matter what the laws are. At least some of the guns in the Sacramento shooting are believed to be automatic weapons that aren’t legal to possess (or at least that’s what it said in the initial articles a couple of days ago).

          Not to diminish in any way that at least one innocent bystander was killed in Sacramento, but it still wasn’t because it was a psycho mass murderer. It was don’t give a fuck who gets hurt gangsters.

      3. Political McGuffin   3 years ago

        But Mike swears everything else the media reports is accurate.

    3. Dillinger   3 years ago

      Steve Kerr hardest hit.

      1. Sevo   3 years ago

        The Warriors were in Sacto that evening, and he just had to open his yap.

    4. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

      So do black lives matter?

      1. perlmonger   3 years ago

        Not ones that don't advance the narrative. :-/

      2. JasonAZ   3 years ago

        Not if other blacks harm/kill them. Then, STFU racist.

  38. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    Martin contended that Capitol police had let him into the building, leading him to think it was OK to enter. "According to MARTIN, Capitol guards opened the doors to the Rotunda and let them in, though MARTIN did acknowledge seeing smashed glass," stated the government's complaint against him.

    This seems reasonable—and Judge Trevor McFadden of the U.S. District Court for the District of Washington agreed. McFadden called Martin's defense "plausible" and noted that "people were streaming by and the officers made no attempt to stop the people."

    I need new conspiracy theories. All my old ones have come true.

  39. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    Lol. Axios CEO Jim VandeHei warns that a decentralized internet free from government or corporate gatekeepers would "be the Wild West of speech and power." VandeHei frets that "the rule-makers America has relied on since its founding — government and business — would be replaced by a brave new world of astonishing individual freedom." Oh, no!

    What Axios is worried about has come to be known as Web3. Reason TV explains what it's all about:

    I just read the original linked article, and while I agree that he writes "the dangers" if I do my best to interpret the article and tone in its entirety, it appears that VandeHei is merely describing what others declare are the dangers. The whole thing seems relatively 'neutral' as in "here's a debate that's going on, these are the things the antis are worried about, these are the things the pros are happy about, we report, you decide".

    I would probably have to read the entire body and tweet history of VandeHei to get an impression of what his own feelings are on the subject.

  40. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    "Dude, you're in L.A. County. Don't you have more serious crimes to worry about than somebody leaking a video? And aren't you really doing this because it's embarrassing you?'"

    I like it when my lawyer begins his argument with "dude..."

  41. Think It Through   3 years ago

    "On Feb. 22 Reynaldo Munoz became the 3,000th incarcerated person whose U. S. criminal conviction was thrown out after it was determined that he had been falsely convicted," writes Austin Sarat at The Hill, in a piece excoriating America's "scandalous false convictions record."

    Since 1989.

    That's less than 100 per year, out of the roughly 1.5 million incarcerated. That seems like a shockingly small error rate to me.

    1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

      I would rather 1000 blm rioters go free, than to wrongly exonerate a j6 protester.

      1. JesseAz   3 years ago

        Lulz.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      I'm going to guess the response would be, "Imagine how many if we actually cared about justice?"

    3. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      That's still only a subset of falsely convicted people-the ones who actually manage to get their convictions overturned. Because once a jury finds someone guilty, al the leverage is then turned against them and even new evidence, or evidence of lying, is insufficient to reverse things on appeal.

      It's extremely difficult to get a new trial when you're incarcerated, and if it's a 2 year sentence, you've fully served your time before you could ever get that conviction overturned so there's no incentive to shoulder the cost for so little benefit.

      1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

        That and you can appeal a plea deal. That's why they go for coerced pleas. If you looked at how many innocent people are guilty due to charge stacking it would dwarf the 3000 number

        1. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

          Yeah, I wasn't even thinking about that. But good point and worth bringing up, +1.

    4. Illocust   3 years ago

      Yeah, they really shouldn't advertise that 3,000 number. It's so miniscule for the time period it's stretched over, it undermines the whole point they're trying to make.

      1. Think It Through   3 years ago

        It's almost as if the whole point they're trying to make is not valid.

  42. Weigel's Cock Ring   3 years ago

    Plastic-faced octogenerian Speak of the House tests positive for the 'Rona:

    https://www.the-sun.com/news/5072928/nancy-pelosi-tests-positive-for-covid/

    I hope she makes a full speedy recovery, and then finally decided to retire at the end of the year and spend whatever remaining years she has left in this world relaxing on the beach in Florida with her family. She has done more than enough to, whoops I mean for, America.

    1. Winnie SC   3 years ago

      I would love to see her die of the disease. Sadly, she doesn't actually have the Chinavirus--just needed an excuse to back out from a trip to Taiwan after China threatened her.

      1. JasonAZ   3 years ago

        She's gotta keep her Chinese overlords happy.

        1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

          Hey! It's not like she fed information to a ccp spy for more than a decade

  43. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

    "I do think the defendant reasonably believed the officers allowed him into the Capitol," opined the judge.

    So are we going to see the prosecution drop charges against dozens of remaining defendants with similar fact patterns? Or will they make every single one of those people "prove" their innocence at trial? Because that's how our burden of proof works, right?

    1. JasonAZ   3 years ago

      You already know the answer to this question.

    2. JimboJr   3 years ago

      None of this is about justice. Its about sending a message to anyone that thinks about crossing the govt in the future

  44. Winnie SC   3 years ago

    Pelosi's Reichstag Fire is crumbling around her ears.

    First slowly--then all of the sudden.

    1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      Fuck off. It wasn’t a Reichstag Fire, it was a very real riot by a bunch of MAGA morons, attempting to stop the peaceful, democratic handover of a Presidential administration that lost re-election to the Presidential administration that won, with no significant fraud.

      1. JasonAZ   3 years ago

        "no significant fraud" - Keep moving that goal post Liarsen.

        1. JimboJr   3 years ago

          "mostly non-fraudulent voting" - CNN

  45. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    It's a reichstag fire

  46. Cronut   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1512208604421496832?s=20&t=jzJgF7Ns8S9r42p9IOOH-A

    Polyamorous, genderfluid witch *PRESCHOOL TEACHER* feels the need to talk to her students about how she's also a witch.

    And Shackford wonders why parents are fed up with this bullshit.

    1. JimboJr   3 years ago

      Robby on board with it as well

    2. markm23   3 years ago

      Were the kids were harmed by learning to stereotype everyone resembling her in any way as "Those people are gross and weird"? Because that's what I expect they learned. Kids that age just tune out any sex talk - straight sex or "polyamorous, genderfluid" it's all "Ewww, gross!", and it not knowing whether it is a boy or girl just puts it in the area of "really, really weird."

      As for witchcraft, they'll soon figure out the difference between reality and make believe, and will have learned the valuable lesson that you have to watch out for authority figures that have not done so. (Like the entire Biden administration on economics.)

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Did 'Activist Judges' Derail Trump's Tariffs?

Eric Boehm | 5.29.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!