Buy Cuban Minerals To Mess With Russia
The U.S. government's continued insistence on criminalizing trade with Cuba is self-destructive.

While oil and gas have gotten most of the headlines in the Russian sanctions debate, with oil being the commodity whose price changes are most obvious to the average consumer, the effect of sanctions on other Russian commodities is also important. Russia controls 4 percent of global cobalt production, for example, and 11 percent of nickel production. Following the sanctions package dropped on Russia, cobalt's price increased from $74,000 per ton to $82,000 per ton and has now more than doubled since the start of 2021. Nickel's price, meanwhile, has zoomed since the beginning of March, rising from $25,000 per ton on March 1 to a high above $45,000 briefly before settling at $32,000. Since 2019, the price of nickel has nearly tripled.
Shortages and price rises in those commodities will stymie any transition from carbon-emitting combustion engines to electric cars, since the average electric car battery contains 80 pounds of nickel and 15 to 30 pounds of cobalt. Increased gas prices due to a Russian oil collapse would not necessarily increase the adoption of green energy programs because electric cars, solar panels, and wind turbines all use nickel and cobalt to varying degrees. The rising costs of nickel and other inputs will very likely cause electric vehicle batteries, which were growing rapidly less expensive over the last decade, to stop getting more affordable until at least 2024.
Reduced access to Russian commodities will drive up the cost of renewables and electric vehicles as gas prices also increase. It's easier to increase oil production than it is to increase nickel or cobalt production; America has at least 35 billion barrels of proven oil reserves and OPEC can increase oil production whenever it wants. Pumping more oil is a faster and less arduous process than building a new nickel mine.
But the U.S. has another available source of nickel and cobalt that could be counted on when countries on the other side of the world have production difficulties due to war or internal strife, and it's a scant 90 nautical miles off the coast of Florida.
Unfortunately, this source happens to be Cuba, and American companies have been forbidden by law to do business with Cuba for most of the last 60 years.
Cuba has the fifth-largest estimated nickel reserves in the world and the third-largest cobalt reserves. Its reserves of nickel are almost as large as those of Russia (5.5 million metric tons to Russia's 6.9 million) and Cuba actually has twice as much cobalt as the Russians do. With the exception of Canada, which only has 40 percent of Cuba's estimated reserves, all the top cobalt-producing countries—Australia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Russia, and the Philippines—are on the other side of the world from America's manufacturing centers and therefore subject to potential supply chain disruption.
Three of those countries are untrustworthy as sources of cobalt because the DRC and the Philippines have serious questions regarding political stability, and there is no telling what will happen to Russian commodity production while Putinism is making it history's most sanctioned economy.
Cobalt and nickel are only going to grow more important over time and are increasingly integral to American energy policy and manufacturing. These two resources come disproportionately from sources that we cannot rely on in the long term.
The good news is that America has an available trading partner within spitting distance of Miami that is among the most nickel- and cobalt-rich places in the world. The bad news is the U.S. government's continued shocking, stubborn refusal to take advantage of this golden opportunity because of anachronistic and always-harmful Cold War–era sanctions on Cuba.
Cold Warriors might spin in their graves at the thought of America making common cause with Latin American socialists so as to shore up vital resources in a potential second Cold War with an ultra-nationalist, far-right Russian government. But America cannot afford to be beholden to the policies of the 1960s. We should scrap the Cuban sanction policies and do business with any country in the Western Hemisphere that wishes to trade with us, or we will find that resources upon which we rely cannot be accessed in times of crisis. Fidel Castro is dead; it is past time our sanction policies followed him.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why not? It worked really well with Communist China.
Gotta love when "libertarians" shill for deep state objectives.
If you want to purchase from Cuba, make the argument.
But supporting policy based on warmongering narratives is submitting your ideology/goals to the ever more totalitarian state.
This. Companies that need nickel and cobalt should be making deals with other companies. Not communist countries.
And since this is all about going green, Australia and Canada probably have more environmentally-friendly operations.
There probably wouldn't be a war in Ukraine right now if not for the US messing with Russia. This all goes back to Obama's, Clinton's, Victoria Nuland's and John McCain's 2014 Neo-nazi coup against a democratically elected pro-Russian government. And let's not forget the US funding bio-labs in Ukraine.
The US has caused so many problems with their meddling in other nations affairs. We should not be isolationist, but we should be non-interventionist.
Economic war on everyone makes zero sense! We must trade with SOME folks if we want to NOT live in utter poverty! Trade with Cuba makes shitloads more sense than trade with Russia!
Despite Vladimir Poutine, trade with Canada makes more sense than trade with Cuba.
Yes, sure, agreed, but we have limited options!
Relevant to the Reason article right here is an email forwarded to me. I am not sure who originally wrote. As an engineer, I can generally speak to "trade-offs"... Nothing is perfect! SOME price ALWAYS has to be paid for valuing one thing over another! Classic = "You want it good, cheap, and fast. Pick 2 of 3... You can not have them all 3"!
OK, the email I got...
THERE’S ALWAYS TWO SIDES TO ANY STORY.
:: MONDAY'S CLEAN-GREEN STORY TOLD ANOTHER WAY!
THERE’S ALWAYS TWO SIDES TO ANY STORY.
Batteries, they do not make electricity – they store electricity produced elsewhere, primarily by coal, uranium, natural gas-powered plants, or diesel-fueled generators. So, to say an EV is a zero-emission vehicle is not at all valid.
Also, since forty percent of the electricity generated in the U.S. is from coal-fired plants, it follows that forty percent of the EVs on the road are coal-powered, do you see?”
Einstein’s formula, E=MC2, tells us it takes the same amount of energy to move a five-thousand-pound gasoline-driven automobile a mile as it does an electric one. The only question again is what produces the power? To reiterate, it does not come from the battery; the battery is only the storage device, like a gas tank in a car.
There are two orders of batteries, rechargeable, and single-use. The most common single-use batteries are A, AA, AAA, C, D. 9V, and lantern types. Those dry-cell species use zinc, manganese, lithium, silver oxide, or zinc and carbon to store electricity chemically. Please note they all contain toxic, heavy metals.
Rechargeable batteries only differ in their internal materials, usually lithium-ion, nickel-metal oxide, and nickel-cadmium. The United States uses three billion of these two battery types a year, and most are not recycled; they end up in landfills. California is the only state which requires all batteries be recycled. If you throw your small, used batteries in the trash, here is what happens to them.
All batteries are self-discharging. That means even when not in use, they leak tiny amounts of energy. You have likely ruined a flashlight or two from an old, ruptured battery. When a battery runs down and can no longer power a toy or light, you think of it as dead; well, it is not. It continues to leak small amounts of electricity. As the chemicals inside it run out, pressure builds inside the battery’s metal casing, and eventually, it cracks. The metals left inside then ooze out. The ooze in your ruined flashlight is toxic, and so is the ooze that will inevitably leak from every battery in a landfill. All batteries eventually rupture; it just takes rechargeable batteries longer to end up in the landfill.
In addition to dry cell batteries, there are also wet cell ones used in automobiles, boats, and motorcycles. The good thing about those is, ninety percent of them are recycled. Unfortunately, we do not yet know how to recycle single-use ones properly.
But that is not half of it. For those of you excited about electric cars and a green revolution, I want you to take a closer look at batteries and also windmills and solar panels. These three technologies share what we call environmentally destructive production costs.
A typical EV battery weighs one thousand pounds, about the size of a travel trunk. It contains twenty-five pounds of lithium, sixty pounds of nickel, 44 pounds of manganese, 30 pounds cobalt, 200 pounds of copper, and 400 pounds of aluminum, steel, and plastic. Inside are over 6,000 individual lithium-ion cells.
It should concern you that all those toxic components come from mining. For instance, to manufacture each EV auto battery, you must process 25,000 pounds of brine for the lithium, 30,000 pounds of ore for the cobalt, 5,000 pounds of ore for the nickel, and 25,000 pounds of ore for copper. All told, you dig up 500,000 pounds of the earth’s crust for just – one – battery.”
Sixty-eight percent of the world’s cobalt, a significant part of a battery, comes from the Congo. Their mines have no pollution controls, and they employ children who die from handling this toxic material. Should we factor in these diseased kids as part of the cost of driving an electric car?”
I’d like to leave you with these thoughts. California is building the largest battery in the world near San Francisco, and they intend to power it from solar panels and windmills. They claim this is the ultimate in being ‘green,’ but it is not. This construction project is creating an environmental disaster. Let me tell you why.
The main problem with solar arrays is the chemicals needed to process silicate into the silicon used in the panels. To make pure enough silicon requires processing it with hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, hydrogen fluoride, trichloroethane, and acetone. In addition, they also need gallium, arsenide, copper-indium-gallium- diselenide, and cadmium-telluride, which also are highly toxic. Silicon dust is a hazard to the workers, and the panels cannot be recycled.
Windmills are the ultimate in embedded costs and environmental destruction. Each weighs 1688 tons (the equivalent of 23 houses) and contains 1300 tons of concrete, 295 tons of steel, 48 tons of iron, 24 tons of fiberglass, and the hard to extract rare earths neodymium, praseodymium, and dysprosium. Each blade weighs 81,000 pounds and will last 15 to 20 years, at which time it must be replaced. We cannot recycle used blades.
There may be a place for these technologies, but you must look beyond the myth of zero emissions.
“Going Green” may sound like the Utopian ideal but when you look at the hidden and embedded costs realistically with an open mind, you can see that Going Green is more destructive to the Earth’s environment than meets the eye, for sure.
I'm not reading a comment that is longer than a Saturday Reason article.
Batteries, they do not make electricity – they store electricity produced elsewhere
Copper cylinder, lead rod, fill with lemon juice. You have a functioning battery.
“Einstein’s formula, E=MC2, tells us it takes the same amount of energy to move a five-thousand-pound gasoline-driven automobile a mile as it does an electric one.“
No it doesnt take same amount of energy - Gas car WASTE 80% of gas heating the engine, only 20% drives car. Tesla model S takes 320 Wh/mile while a gas car (35mpg) is 940 Wh/mile.. a HUGE savings!
While extracting energy from coal is inefficient, EVEN IF 100% from coal, EV still better thanks to EV’s. greater efficiency.
Mine still works 50 years later.
But... but... but... foreigners!
"Shortages and price rises in those commodities will stymie any transition from carbon-emitting combustion engines to electric cars, since the average electric car battery contains 80 pounds of nickel and 15 to 30 pounds of cobalt."
Fake news! Electric cars (batteries included!) come from federal mandates and subsidies. Claiming that the availability and price of EVs might depend on what greedy corporations charge for metal is mis(mal?)information. Besides, digging metals from the ground is definitely not green and should be outlawed.
Hoo-Ray for the Magic Unicorn Farts as a source of energy (and energy storage devices and other magic products of the Cargo Cult ships), then! Bring ON the Magic Unicorn Farts!!!
(WHO will be the first Congress-Liar to introduce a Magic Bill to MANDATE the onset of the Magic Unicorn Farts?)
Except when going green requires strip mines and more corporate subsidies. We need to raze West VA to save the planet.
https://www.wired.com/story/biden-plays-a-national-security-card-to-fix-the-lithium-shortage/
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1509927332919885828?t=oOEq2y03j72Al7Y-2wYfCQ&s=19
BREAKING: Zelensky Purges Top Generals of Ukraine's Intelligence, Brands them Traitors
[Link]
Is Reason really advocating doing business with one totalitarian state to stick it to another?
Yep.
!
I don't care how close the plantation is to our shores, the US shouldn't do business with slaveholders.
Heavens to Julian Simon—How could Reason let this run without checking the author's numbers?
Before buying into his resource depletion riff recall that the per kilowatt cobalt and nickel needs of electric cars have fallen drastically, and production is adequate to sustain the sector's growth- a humongous tonnage of 8% nickel 'ore' overhangs the market in the form of stainless steel scrap.
Hey Jonathan Ireland AKA Turdy MacTurdface you know nothing, in fact you know less than nothing because if you even knew you knew nothing that would be something.
Nickle mining in Cuba is and has always been a mess. Anyone in the know going to Cuba knows that you should never go close to the Nickle mines without wearing a gas mask. And don't even think about driving a car there as the pollution will eat the paint off the car and if it is a rental you will be charged for the damage.
In general Cuba is known as one of the least responsible countries in the world in terms of abusing natural resources. Not to mention there have been law suits by the pinko commie loving countries that have invested in Cuba once the criminals in charge of Cuba stiffed them.
The real telling fact is that China has basically gotten out of Cuba because the Cubans are such unreliable partners and are really only looking for a sugar daddy to give them money. Bottom line is look elsewhere for everything.
Interesting comments. Now, about those sandwiches….
Old Putin just created a new gold standard taking either rubles or gold for gas/oil...I don't think the idiots in DC totally understand what this means long term..the final death of the petrodollar and end of the dollar as the uber reserve currency. The more we debase our currency the higher the rubble goes and the more likely it is used for international energy trading....time DC supports the American people..all deficit spending ends tomorrow..massive cuts in the Federal Budget, ending foreign wars, and finally taking the Fed out of the monetary game by ending it once and for all. Thomas Jefferson understood the corruption of a central bank. As Jackson said.."end the bank".
China also is pushing to have the yuan replace the dollar in traded and reserve currency.
Something about being more stable and not as prone to sudden asset forfeiture... lmfao