A Fuel Leak From a Navy Facility Could Shut Down All New Development on Hawaii's Most Populous Island
Contamination from the Navy's Red Hill underground fuel facility on Oahu has reduced Honolulu's water supply by 20 percent. Water officials are considering a moratorium on new construction to conserve water.

A leak from a World War II-era military fueling facility could shut down all new construction on Hawaii's most populous island.
For months now, water officials on the island of Oahu have been scrambling to contain the effects of a fuel leak from the U.S. Navy's 80-year-old Red Hill underground fuel storage facility into the freshwater aquifer it sits atop.
Fear of pumping contaminated water from that aquifer into people's homes has led the Honolulu Board of Water Supply (BWS) to close down several wells close to the Red Hill facility. That includes the Halawa well, which provides 20 percent of metro Honolulu's water.
The closure of wells combined with an ongoing drought has created a water shortage on the island, which is now forcing BWS to consider escalating conservation methods.
Since March 10, BWS has asked Oahu residents to voluntarily restrict their water usage by 10 percent. At a briefing of Hawaii senators earlier this week, first reported by the Honolulu Civil Beat, BWS also outlined an escalating series of conservation measures, ranging from the closure of public pools to a development moratorium on the island.
The Civil Beat reports that BWS has already started sending letters to developers informing them that they can't guarantee they'll be able to approve applications for new or larger water meters in the near future.
At Monday's senate briefing, BWS's Barry Usagawa described other restrictions the board could impose on new construction. Those could include requiring developers to recycle greywater, capture stormwater, or install high-efficiency water fixtures.
The prospects of a development moratorium are worrisome for an island and state that already suffers from the highest housing costs in the country.
Overall rents in urban Honolulu are currently the second-highest in the country, according to data from Apartment List, behind only Ventura, California. Zillow ranks the city as the ninth most expensive rental market. Either way, it's not a cheap place to find an apartment. The median home price in Oahu is $1.1 million.
An alternate approach to this kind of rationing would be to let water prices on Oahu rise to reflect the reduction in the island's water supply. Higher prices would give businesses, residents, had government agencies more flexibility and freedom in figuring out how to cope with less water. That decentralized decision-making would probably do a better job of cutting down on frivolous water use, while still hydrating truly critical activities.
Letting water prices do their job in a crisis is effectively prohibited by Honolulu's County Charter. On the one hand, it gives the BWS near-unlimited power to impose water conservation measures in a shortage. Raising water rates on everyone, meanwhile, requires public consultation and hearings. (BWS does have the power to impose fines on people who bust through water restrictions.)
However, like groundwater, markets manage to leak into everything eventually. Honolulu limits the role prices can play in rationing water, but there's no getting around the fact that a water shortage is making living on the island more expensive. If BWS goes ahead with a development moratorium, those costs will be smuggled into higher rents and home prices.
Obviously, the main bad guy in this story is the Navy and federal government more broadly. It's kept its Red Hill fueling facility open for years despite mounting criticism from water officials and environmentalists.
When local authorities tried to shut down the Red Hill facility after the leak, the U.S. Department of Justice sued to keep it open. Earlier this month, it reversed course and said that it would work to "defuel" the facility. That will take a while, however. BWS has new wells and desalination projects in the works to expand supply, but those will also take several years to complete.
In the meantime, raising prices to reflect the scarcity of fresh water would constrain consumption until more supply is available.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fucking Putin.
I blame Hirohito.
Finally a proven way of earning money online. Yes! you can earn more than you think only by working just a few hours from home regularly. I have been doing this job for like a few weeks and my last weekly payment was exactly 2537 dollars.
See More Information Here… http://jobscash.tk
Hawaii is surrounded by water. California has an ocean just off to the west. It is easily converted to fresh water. What's the hold up been?
Environmental review.
So e actlywhat the progs there demanded.
Desalinization has been tried in Hawaii for years...It just hasn't been traditionally cost effective. Desal plants typically require large portions of coast land, some sort of energy (if not using the sun) or larger land mass and capital (if using the sun). Then you have to do something with the brine that is left over after desalinization.
The biggest problem on Hawaii has traditionally been that it is cheaper to tap the aquifer and then use that precious coastal space for resorts and other coastal entertainment.
Vapor compression distillation like they use on submarines is quite energy efficient even if you don't have a reactor with lots of spare energy. The brine problem almost solves itself if you market the resulting pure sea salt exclusively produced in the "traditional ways and by the native hands" of Hawaiian islanders properly.
They did a plant in San Diego county and one of the biggest holdups was the inlet and outlets. They'd sue saying "millions of fish" would be killed, meaning random plankton and fry which are pretty much part of the water and die by the gazillion before any one gets large enough to be an adult fish. Like, a whale gulps a million krill when it eats, so the numbers seem a lot higher than they really are.
Held crap up for a decade. Water comes out, screened for most fish, then gets redeposited (saltier now) WAYYY off shore, so it's not really a big issue, but environmentalists will stop anything on principle and emotion. And if anyplace needs a backup source of fresh water, it's Southern California.
This is the same reason modern nuclear designs are mothballed all the time. Crazy anti-nuke people who don't know what the fck they're talking about.
California removed the ability to use seawater cooling for ANY power plant.
The San Onofre plant closed a few years back because they found some premature wear and decided the expense and engineering effort to make it safe was not worth it.
Diablo Canyon, however, a newer plant without those issues, is closing even though it should have 20 more years of life. The regulatory burdens to keep it running in light of the seawater cooling law have killed it. And it's WAY cleaner than even gas fired, which is what all of our Peakers are. Peakers that get turned on a lot during the summer months as we don't have a strong enough grid.
Energy for the desalination. Can’t be fossil fuel or nuclear.
Sell the fuel to Russia and send the money to Biden to make up his losses.
I will guess that was sarcasm, but if the old grifter is losing money, I am a teenage girl.
Just relocate 30% of that island population to a different island in the chain. Leaves a 10% surplus.
Or pass a law it must rain 10% more. The green new deal claims to be able to regulate weather thru legislation. (or is it climate this week?)
What do I look like a weather man?
Which way is the (political) wind blowing?
As long as Tulsi is okay.
Let this be example #10000 that the government has no business telling us about environmental standards. The federal government has long been, and will continue to be, the biggest cause of environmental degradation in the country. Even when you tend to see companies degrading the environment, it is often because they are given consequence-free rein over some federal land where desolation isn't their cost to bear.
^
Yeah I'm sure corps/military will give a fuck about polluting ground water.
My parents have a cottage with lake access to Lake Margrethe in northern Michigan that has PFAS from the national guard base on it. Can’t eat the fish, and if you see any foam you have to get out of the water.
I grew up near a Marine Corps air station and when it was decommissioned it took about a decade to clean up the jet fuel enough to even constitute a fig-leaf for developing the land in some other way. All paid for by the city, of course.
^
So what? That land is probably "sacred" to the hawaiians anyway. If they don't want a telescope, why would they want any people?
They most certainly do not want more people.
Just send money.
And Spam.
And the Navy will no doubt receive qualified immunity.
You would be wrong about that. The military is one of the few federal agencies that actually ends up paying for their environmental damages and pay for environmental regulatory compliance. Mainly because the military isn't a favored department by most progries, until they want to get us in a war to raise their corrupt, incompetent president's approval ratings. I'm betting there is a whole lot of reasons the Navy was using 80 yo technology and none of it was their decision.
The question I have is why the Navy was still using a 80 to storage tank, is it maybe because Hawaii and environmentalist sued when they tried to replace it with a newer, safer storage tank? Because that never happens. But it's easy to blame the Navy, rather than actually look at why the Navy is still using 80 yo storage technology.
I did a little research, not a lot, and it looked like money was likely the issue. We're talking about fuel tanks for ships. They're really big. And expensive.
So, congressional budgeting not Naval incompetence.
That assumes the Navy requested new tanks before learning that it had leaked fuel into the water supply. I couldn't find any information on that. Just that the cost of replacing the tanks will be in the billions.
I doubt the Navy hasn't requested to replace 80 yo fuel storage tanks, considering 80 yo tanks aren't very efficient and aren't cost effective to work. They probably also required lots of upgrades to deal with modern fuels. I am betting they requested and it was killed in committee, that would explain the lack of reporting. This happens a lot with military budgeting. You submit a list of spending, prioritize it, knowing that a good portion of it won't ever get out of committee. Building new dry socks, capable of maintaining the newer larger vessels, new air strips etc, probably had a higher priority and until this started causing a problem it would have been a lower priority because those other things were much more immediate needs at the time. Additionally, I am betting given environmentalists, there were also several protests etc sent to Congress protesting new storage tanks. I saw this kind of shit often in my ten years of service, and I was only involved at the company level with any budgeting, I can only imagine how convoluted it gets at division level or post level.
I'd agree. The funding for this was likely killed at a high level, I would guess outside of military channels.There is really only one party that consistently will rubber stamp 'environmental' considerations and red light all military budgeting. The GOP are fucked up and ignorant, and no great supporters of anything that doesn't further their power, but they can plan past the present moment, at least in the sense of the optics. Which is what it would take to comprehend the impact of voting against a bill that included fuel storage facilities from the 1960s. Storage tanks located in a wet state, in a coastal region. It's the green party's dream ticket.
I wonder if the Navy has to deal with (more corrosive) biofuels like us peons. Including ethanol, which certainly has its placein the markets but there's a reason you can't use it in antique cars
Probably, they've been pushing the green bullshit in the military much longer than they've been trying to shove it down our throats by fiat.
It's always easier to go with the narrative than ask questions. And to go with the narrative than take in new information. If the past decade or so hasn't made that abundantly clear, I don't know what else could have. This is why folks here have been off the rails over the Russian invasion, and actually accepting both Ukraine and US propaganda. Which is in no way stating that Russia is not pushing its own horseshit. And why the progressive cabal here never learn, just trot out the same canards -they will not abandon their shibboleths.
And, as best I can tell from the local, daily reporting is that they have never found contamination at the municipal well (1 mile away) and the military base's water got the all clear last week. The municipal well is the big deal for the island's water and the topic of this article. But, media reports confound the two water systems.
Now the state government (county/city too?) is trying to add another layer of environmental review for new projects. In the 80 years since it was built (decades before Hawaii was a state) there have been plenty of other regulations.
Hawaii is surrounded by water.