Snitches Get Riches From the FBI
Turning in your innocent friends and neighbors for having large amounts of cash is touted as a new source of income by the FBI.

Snitches have a new way to make money in Charlotte, North Carolina. By texting the FBI and tattling on people that have illegal cash, informants can make up to 25 percent of the money seized, according to an FBI news release. Jilted lovers, jealous friends, and nosy neighbors can now score big. The good news for anyone tempted by the offer is that federal law makes asset confiscation far too easy.
By using civil forfeiture, law enforcement agencies can take cash, cars, and other assets without convicting anyone of wrongdoing. The government doesn't have to make an arrest, develop a theory about a specific crime, or even witness illegal behavior. Agents can bypass the criminal courtroom altogether.
According to the release, the tip line is designed to help agents intercept drug trafficking shipments through Charlotte. An example campaign graphic shows two agents gazing at a large pile of cash in the trunk of a car. A glowing neon headline reads: "Shine a light on drug trafficking." The fine print focuses on the kickback, stating that if the tip "on where drug cash is being stored or transported" pans out, "you could receive up to 25% of the seized money." The message is clear: snitching can be rewarding. But the ad fails to mention four important details.
First, possessing cash is not a crime. The ad suggests that storing or transporting large amounts of currency is somehow wrong, yet neither activity is illegal. Many people conduct legitimate business in cash out of necessity—more than 5 percent of U.S. households are "unbanked," meaning no household member has access to a checking or savings account.
As a group, unbanked adults are poorer and younger than "fully banked" adults. They are also more likely to be black, Hispanic, or of another non-white race or ethnicity. Agents who vilify cash might not have racial motives, but they discriminate when they use cash as an indicator of crime without collecting real evidence.
Second, civil forfeiture rarely targets drug lords. While the campaign ad portrays a major bust, such cases are the exception. The Institute for Justice (IJ), a public interest law firm, crunches the numbers in its nationwide Policing for Profit study. Federal forfeitures must be at least $5,000 when no criminal prosecution occurs, but at the state level across the country, the median cash forfeiture is just $1,276.
An IJ survey of civil forfeiture in Philadelphia finds that police routinely take less than $100, and one survey respondent reported a forfeiture of just $25. Officers in New Jersey once seized just $11 off someone, and Illinois officers confiscated a cashier's check for 34 cents. When the police make an arrest as part of civil forfeiture, the target is usually a petty criminal.
Third, the police have financial motives. The ad mentions a generous cut for tipsters but omits where the rest of the proceeds go. Congress allows federal agencies to keep 100 percent of everything they collect, and many states have similar policies. The result is a perverse incentive that taints the entire process. The FBI Charlotte Field Office vows to expand its pay-per-tip program across North Carolina if the campaign keeps "even one shipment of drugs off the streets." But research shows that civil forfeiture does not reduce drug usage or lower crime rates; it simply raises revenue.
Lastly, civil forfeiture has never been authorized in North Carolina, but the state has made millions through the process of "equitable sharing." Here's how it works: Local and state agencies seize cash and then pass the paperwork to their federal partners for civil forfeiture, intentionally circumventing state law. Once the process is complete, the U.S. government returns a cut—usually about 80 percent—which local and state agencies keep for themselves. Between 2000 and 2019, North Carolina generated more than $293 million in forfeiture revenue from equitable sharing. That comes out to more than $40,000 per day, every day, for 20 years.
The new FBI campaign purports to shine a light on drug trafficking, but what it really exposes is the corruption of civil forfeiture.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Never discuss your income with anyone. When someone asks me I just say I do ok.
"Hmm. Evasive. *** texts FBI ***"
Civil asset forfeiture is racketeering under color of law, full stop.
By texting the FBI and tattling on people that have illegal cash, informants can make up to 25 percent of the money seized, according to an FBI news release.
And if the "tattling" is false, informants can spend up to 25 years in prison, right? RIGHT?!
In the cell next to the lying politician.
It would be easy to acquire a list of phone numbers and then spam automated texts to the FBI. If one sent in a thousand texts there are bound to be a few hits.
But research shows that civil forfeiture does not reduce drug usage or lower crime rates; it simply raises revenue.
Theft is Taxation!
Don't worry, be happy! YOU aren't being charged with a crime! It is only your MONEY that is being merely accused of belonging to Government Almighty, instead of belonging to you!
I know guys on their way to prison, currently in prison, out of prison and a lot who never got caught.
munchkinpress.com
I know guys on their way to prison, currently in prison, out of prison and a lot who never got caught.
https://munchkinpress.com/
tattling on people that have illegal cash
Having cash isn't illegal, nor is it evidence of a crime, absent any other clues.
I wonder what they would do if they got a flood of tips snitching on the head of the FBI's North Carolina office?
Or every local cop.
Or Hunter Biden...
The article is a muddled mess.
I don't see a problem with people giving tips to law enforcement about illegal cash in return for rewards. I don't see a libertarian objection to that either.
There obviously is a problem with civil asset forfeiture. But that's a separate issue.
The problem is that they seize the cash first and find out if it's illegal later. If it's illegal, you might get your cut. If it's not illegal, the cops just keep it.
Daryl James' article is timely, pertinent, and ineffective. Politicians and crooked cops amass power and wealth until the laws themselves can be shown to cause something voters abhor. Loss of freedom is not that thing, but a collapsing economy is! Failed prohibition laws—the pretext for the 1929 "Increased Penalties Act”—plus forfeiture clauses, literally wrecked the entire economy by 1932. Money fled banks to avoid confiscation, so credit collapsed. Explaining THAT cause of liquidity crises to voters will repeal drug prohibition and end ancillary looting.
If there is a difference between Asset Forfeiture, Civil Forfeiture and plain THEFT, please explain it. When will The Congress act responsibly and outlaw what is plainly Theft Under Color of Law?
Just like Cuba except Cubans get no reward!