A Nation of Quitters?
The labor force participation rate doesn't tell the whole story.

Has America become a nation of quitters? It might seem so.
As the COVID-19 pandemic progressed, workers abandoned their jobs in record numbers. In 2020, as the virus tore through the economy, the labor force participation rate saw its largest drop ever, from 63.2 percent in the final quarter of 2019 to 60.8 percent in the second quarter of 2020, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, which also noted that the first year of the pandemic saw about 2.4 million "excess retirements," involving people who in normal times would not have been expected to stop working for good. In November 2021 alone, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a record 4.5 million people, nearly 3 percent of American workers, quit their jobs. As the end of the year neared, there were roughly 4 million fewer workers in the labor force than before the pandemic.
The industries hit hardest by the wave of quitting include tech, health care, and child care. The year 2020 saw 3.6 percent more health care employees quit their jobs than the previous year, according to the Harvard Business Review. According to the latest data available in December 2021, day care and education jobs were down 10 percent and 5.5 percent, respectively, from their pre-COVID February 2020 peaks. More than 1.5 million women were still missing from the labor force.
This phenomenon, which has been found not only in the U.S. but across the developed world, has been dubbed the Great Resignation. As the pandemic persisted, it became one of the central, inescapable traits of the U.S. economy. People are leaving their jobs in droves, reshaping the world of work in the process.
To some extent, the resignations were driven by the virus itself, especially during 2020. Many of the "excess retirees" were older workers especially vulnerable to COVID-19, who understandably decided to leave the workforce a few years early.
In addition, the St. Louis Fed noted in a 2020 report, the economic downturn that sprang from the pandemic featured an unusual twist: The value of assets like stocks and homes increased. Meanwhile, household spending on many categories, such as eating out, declined. People consequently had more money in their bank accounts. Economists typically expect that when people get richer, they will tend to work less.
Increased household wealth was also a policy choice. In the year or so following the March 2020 onset of the pandemic, Congress passed roughly $6 trillion in pandemic aid and economic stimulus—much of it, like expanded unemployment benefits, designed to put cash into people's pocketbooks. The personal savings rate spiked after federal pandemic-relief checks were sent to most households.
By summer 2021, Americans were comparatively flush, which meant that workers, especially those in lower-wage jobs, could be choosier about where (and whether) to work. Many simply chose not to, at least for a while.
As it turned out, Americans also could be choosier about how to work, and for whom. The Great Resignation is not merely a story of American workers choosing to exit the labor force. It is also a story of Americans using new tools and resources to work differently—in many cases, online and for themselves.
Since the start of the pandemic, according to Labor Department data, self-employed worker totals have shot up by half a million. Applications for federal tax identification numbers for new businesses increased by 56 percent during the first 10 months of 2021. As The Wall Street Journal reported in November, most of those new firms were not expected to hire any employees. Employment at large firms dropped for the first time in more than a decade and a half, while total self-employment hit a peak not seen in more than a decade. By most any measure, the economy is witnessing the biggest boom in entrepreneurship in a generation or more.
While the Great Resignation could be seen as an indication that Americans are tired of work, or at least tired of work under the strain of COVID, it might also be a sign that many Americans want to work differently, without the bureaucratic constraints and inflexibility of large organizations. Online tools and platforms, from Zoom to Substack to Etsy to Stripe, make this easier than ever. Some Americans, ever industrious, are using pandemic-era economic upheavals as an opportunity to reset and reorient. Americans quit, yes. But now they're getting back to work.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
John Galt was a quitter.
John Galt cast the first law-changing spoiler vote, thereby slashing the social pressure influence vector at the Twentieth Century plant by 25%. The LP is the practical application of the Solomon Asch Experiment to repealing bad laws by democratic means. See https://tinyurl.com/4dkbap3u
I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. KLA02 I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
For more detail …. http://rb.gy/u603ti
●▬PART TIME JOBS▬●◄ STAY AT HOME & WORK AT HOME FOR USA ►Check it out, and start earning yourself . for more info visit any tab this site Thanks a lot Her Open this Site For Full Detail...........MORE DETAIL.
Rent assistance
Utility assistance
Food stamps
Homestead credit
Obama phone
Your needs are met, sell some drugs on the side or get do odd jobs for a bit if cash, your needs are met. Why work?
I work teaching GED students, and someone mentioned there was a flyer on the wall. They are giving away a tablet (maybe 7x10") plus free internet for 5 years to anyone who can show up and bring an ID and proof they are a member of the "underserved population". Which means anyone on food stamps, SSI, pell grants, free school lunches -- or a W-2 showing income less than $99,000. Really. That's what counts as poor these days.
Tablets are a 100 bucks these days. 5 years of internet data, though, has some real cost, and you know as well as I do that Verizon or AT&T or whoever the vendor is isn't giving the gubbermint a break on the pricing. Nope, this is a billions dollar giveaway to the wireless companies as a way to dump huge amount of the "Infrastructure Bill" out on the people. "School lunches" implies that you can get one for each of your children: I will have to check. But it's one less reason to work, isn't it?
A Raspberry Pi is a fraction of the cost of a tablet, and is more than adequate to learn the Linux command line and programming without an internet connection. Giving a connection to children will waste their time in endless unproductive diversions.
Did you just tell these people to *learn to code*!
There's nothing wrong with leaning to code, or learning to do anything else. It's possible to learn to code without a Raspberry Pi or any other computer, but having one makes it much easier.
As someone who had Mario and Tetris on my TI-83 way back in the day, I can say that kids will find a way to get unproductive diversions no matter what you give them.
There are some pre-installed Python games included in the Raspbian OS. There's a lot more on offer for motivated users of all ages.
AA is for quitters.
As a classmate of mine (who was forced to attend AA meetings) pointed out, most of the people there either chain smoke, guzzle coffee, or weigh 300 pounds. The change addictions, they don't quit.
Of course those people might just be refusing to put up with an employer ordering them to wear a muzzle all day or undergo an experimental medical procedure.
Or forcing them to waste hours and money in commutes when their work could be done online. An acquaintance of mine is saving a couple hours a day and some $500 a month through working online.
You never realize how much time and money is involved in your daily commute until you don't have to do it anymore.
This is one dodgy link short of being spam. Well done.
My Python comment was even better.
Through much of my lifetime employers had the advantage and used it to squeeze employees. The relationship between employer and their employees, or the employer and their community was fractured. Along comes Covid19 and people have a chance to step back, reevaluate, and make decisions. It your employee is no different than a piece of machinery you cannot expect loyalty. If you are willing to move jobs and a factory to another state or another country, you cannot expect loyalty. The employee then looks at a job as a vehicle to get them to a time when they don't have to work.
"you cannot expect loyalty."
Jeff Bezos has benefited from the pandemic far far more than the wage earning shlub. In contrast to the Black Death pandemic of the Middle Ages, which helped the working class survivors at the expense of the wealthy, this pandemic seems to have got it backwards.
What's wrong with Jeff Bezos benefitting fabulously from his company being a lifeline for hundreds of millions of people?
Alexa. Alexa infections made Apple's Human CentiPad preferable to a Kindle tablet, even at thrice the cost.
During the Black Death, the people didn't rely on the wealthy for a lifeline. Those who survived found themselves in a much more advantageous situation, at the expense of the wealthy. Nowadays it's the wealthy who have benefited while the workers are increasingly restricted and dictated to.
Monopolistic Behavior.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8Jk7zuwOxg
If only we could pay more for stuff! How better off the schlubs could be.
Pay more and with fewer options - it's for your own good.
Christ, where I live would be almost unbearable without online shopping options.
There's more to life than lining the pockets of Bezos and company.
Many if the schlubs concentrated on improving their lot and increasing their power rather than getting more stuff more cheaply, a true workers' paradise could be achieved.
You are a true socialist idiot, ignorant of facts, and intentionally so; you'd rather be ignorant and not have to know why you are wrong.
Amazon improves shopping far more than merely lowering prices. There are reviews, for one. There is far more choice, for two. Comparisons are much much easier, for three. Keyword searches are still sloppy enough to find all sorts of relationships among "similar products", for four.
Someone calculated how much true innovators, like Bezos, make as a percentage of how much they improve markets. It was something like 1% or 2%, and it only lasts a few years before market competition spreads that out to shareholders generally. How much Amazon stock does Bezos still own?
I don't mind Bezos being rich enough to buy a 400 foot yacht. The amount he spends on that is far less than the amount I and millions others have saved, and when you throw in the improvement in my shopping, the better choices and the decrease in time compared to traipsing from one store to another, or buying magazines to compare reviews, I'm much better off.
Fuck off, greedy little statist. You fuckers steal far more from me than Bezos saves me.
"You are a true socialist idiot, ignorant of facts, and intentionally so; you'd rather be ignorant and not have to know why you are wrong."
I'm also evil, Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf, oh so evil. And I've never been much of a shopper, either.
Bezos is increasing your costs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8Jk7zuwOxg
"The amount he spends on that is far less than the amount I and millions others have saved,"
Interesting idea. Buying something at Amazon is actually saving money. As Orwell said, Spending is Saving.
Between masks for employees, employers demanding vaccination (even if the feds or the customers don't), dealing with evermore disgruntled customers cause you are shorthanded cause half your former coworkers would rather be on pandemic welfare and even for remote workers more time on zoom meetings than you ever had on in person meetings, work has become far more miserable. Meanwhile, unemployment has never been sweeter, you received thousands of dollars in the last 2 years in stimulus checks while you didn't have to pay rent and then a government program back payed the rent you didn't that you would supposedly have to pay back. You get less of what you disincentivize (work) and more of what you incentivize (not working). The current clusterfuck of a labor market was designed from the top and shouldn't be a big surprise.
And what kinds of businesses are these newfound "entrepreneurs" opening? webcam girl? youtube influencer? selling homemade artisanal masks on ebay? maybe instead of doing what they always did as employees to large companies they are simply now independently contracting the same type of work to these large firms? I seriously doubt they are opening up brick and mortar stores or opening up a factory to produce something new, inventing something new or even opening a tech startup.
These are glory days for disgruntled workers.
"And what kinds of businesses are these newfound "
I had the same question. The article tells us that most of the new businesses starting up have NO employees, other than the 'employer.' I can't see much potential there. Tagging photos on the internet for $5 per hour, delivering things, cleaning etc. Nothing to write home about.
Luckily for them, you don't get to make that decision for them, based on your faulty and incomplete and depersonalized knowledge of their circumstances.
These people made their own decisions based on their own circumstances and their own perception of desirability. Who are you to substitute their specific personal knowledge with your own incomplete, generic, and out of date guesses?
Oh I know who you are. A fucking statist who think your shit don't stink.
"Luckily for them, you don't get to make that decision for them"
Au contraire my dear, Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf, if that really is your name, the decision whether I patronize these new one man businesses is all mine to make or not make. And I don't need your approval whatever I decide.
Next year will be the “great bankruptcies “ from failed startups.
Even as the media is wholly online now, they still can't get it into their head that the brick-n-mortar economy is a thing of the past. One no longer works for a firm for fifty years then retires with a gold watch. One doesn't need an employer.
I'm too old school myself to get into that, but for years I wondered how young adults coped with the shitty ass economy and then I understood that they haven't dropped out or just living with mommy and daddy, but making their own money doing their own thing. Just not in brick and mortar employer land. That I don't understand it doesn't mean it's not legit.
I'm thinking of going in the resell business since I've now retired. I understand you can walk into a brick and mortar store, fill bags or carts with hundreds of dollars worth of goods and walk out without paying anything, then resell them on ebay for a 100% mark-up. It sounds like such a good deal, I'm afraid there may be a catch. I'm going to do a bit more research before I invest in a box of garbage bags or a shopping cart.
Making their own money and doing their own thing in a shitty economy.
Yeah.
Take this job and shove it was a celebration of freedom and autonomy. Now it's an occasion for handwringing over 'the economy.'
Ideas like "Be self-supporting" and "Earn a living" and "Show up for work on time every day" are all expressions of white privilege, right?
"are all expressions of white privilege, right?"
White servitude, more likely. Thomas Jefferson and Adam Smith would be rolling in their graves.
I see two kinds of people "dropping out". The first are the whiny white affluent kids demanding that everything be free. They never had to work before, and mommy and daddy will still pay their way, so why work? This usually ends by the time they get kids of their own and actually have to work for a living.
I don't think that's a huge share of the "resignation". They may be the noisiest, and the media may pay them all the attention, but outside of trendy white affluent enclaves on the coasts, somewhat rare.
The other kind are much more common. People who have money saved up that they can't spend and want more time with their children. This includes people quitting brick and mortar jobs to work from home. Or people waiting out the pandemic. Or those genuinely burnt out, like nurses.
Remember, we had six months to a year of the government declaring most of the working class to be "non-essential" and forbidden to work.
I've been working as a contractor most of this year for a telecom giant, and I can tell you the reason why I'm going to quit is because my job could literally be done from home and in fact is already set up to do so but the CEO doesn't think that's 'real work' and refuses to allow any remote options at all even during COVID.
And this is in Colorado, where a commute of an hour can easily turn into two or even three hours during heavy snow.
And, in fairness, it's the company's right to dictate how employees work but it is the employees right to quit if they feel it's unreasonable.
Of course, I have to ignore the irony of a telecommunications company not having remote work opportunities. If it wasn't so shitty driving in the snow, it would be hilarious.
the idea of (especially white-collar) labor needs to continue to evolve until the office is dead as a daily-jail concept.
I think more self-employment will improve the political influence on the countries where it's occurred.
Congress passed roughly $6 trillion in pandemic aid and economic stimulus—much of it, like expanded unemployment benefits, designed to put cash into people's pocketbooks.
No mention of inflation in the entire article? This is not remotely over. This is entirely the fault of governments. Only the parasites and the connected will be spared.
LOL, they had some article on NPR where they talked about the results of a poll, where "people surveyed" thought inflation would be down to maybe 3.5% by the end of the year. Not economists. Not historians. Not anyone with a clue.
Right after a news report bemoaning that the price of traveling nurses has tripled, and hospitals were begging for some sort of price controls. It's like there is no one with a brain overseeing these articles.
The value of an asset is simply a claim on the resources and economic output of the world. Since that actually declined during the pandemic, the value of assets must have gone down, even if its nominal value in dollars has gone up.
Depends on the asset. My house is up a ton, but it’s in a desirable area, large enough to accommodate 2 dedicated home offices, and in an area where government regulations have made it really hard to add new housing stock. That increase is the real deal and will likely persist given that the government won’t relax their bldg regs, work from home is here to stay, and likely buyers would be white collar tech workers.
I'd caution anyone to call their house an asset. The thing is, you have to live somewhere, it's hardly liquid, and unless you move to either a cheaper & smaller place or somewhere with a much lower cost of living, it's largely going to be a wash. Stocks on the other hand you can buy and sell as you like and in general make you money but unless a house is actively earning money it's a liability even if it serves as shelter.
Lots of people make the mistake of taking the route of treating their house as a bank account and get second mortgages to buy more stuff but that's nearly always unsustainable. At best, over time many home owners can actually live nearly 'rent free' since it may appreciate enough to cover repairs, taxes, & interest but many others won't
Yes. Real estate is more an asset if it isn’t your primary residence because you have more control over buying and selling. Single home residence is not an investment as much as it is storage.
Most civilian jobs are hardly worth doing, except for the paycheck. If you don't need to work, without going in welfare, why work?
Ok..where is reason on the allegations that Clinton/Obama/Biden spied on Trump as a candidate and President using govt resources. If this is a lie, we better darn well expose it now. If not, time for Reason to stand with liberty and demand these folks be thrown in jail.
Where do you think this is? South Korea? The predecessor president, daughter of dictator Park Chung-hee, was impeached, removed from office and is in jail now. Her predecessor, Lee 'the Bulldozer' Myung-bak, managed to complete his term and is in jail now.
In fact the current president, widely admired as a capable socialist, pardoned Park in December last year and she was freed from prison on the 31st. Ill health and national unity were the reasons cited. No such luck for the bulldozer.
I retired early (last year) because I could afford to and because I think this country is advancing toward a cataclysm of one form or another. At that point, I think it will be a decade or more before recovery if any. During the rebuild, it won't surprise me if I have to go back to work and won't be able to ever retire at that point. But I'll be able to look back and be thankful I had some time retired as opposed to looking back and seeing how all my hard work went to waste.
Ironically; No one seems to notice that all that unearned $ and corresponding laziness resulted in supply shortages and inflation...
Naw; think that deep... There must not be enough fake $ just print more. Venezuela retardedness shows up in the USA.