More Bureaucracy Won't Cure Cancer
Biden's "supercharged" cancer moonshot is little more than a hollow promise.
The American Cancer Society (ACS) estimates that 1.9 million new cancer cases and 609,360 deaths from cancer are expected to occur in the United States in 2022. Cancer narrowly trails heart disease as the leading cause of death in the U.S.—making it an easy cause to rally behind. President Joe Biden plans to do just that amidst gridlock on his big ticket legislative plans.
Nearly every president since Nixon has promised to cure cancer in one way or another. On the 2020 campaign trail, both Biden and Donald Trump vowed to find a solution for the myriad classes and types of cancer. But with over 200 types, cancer is the very definition of a problem that doesn't have a one-size-fits-all solution.
As vice president, Biden led the original cancer moonshot program that President Barack Obama claimed would make "America the country that cures cancer once and for all." But as Ronald Bailey wrote for Reason is 2017, this plan was full of "the usual federal bureaucratic efforts of 'catalyzing', 'leveraging', and 'targeting'." As part of the initiative, Congress in 2016 passed the 21st Century Cures Act, which allocated $1.8 billion to cancer research—$400 million of which has yet to be spent.
The fight against cancer has progressed, but it's not nearly over. The ACS reports that the risk of dying from cancer in the U.S. has decreased over the past 28 years, with the cancer death rate for adults falling 32 percent between 1992 and 2019.
Today, President Biden announced that he would "supercharge" the previous moonshot plan. Biden wants to "reduce the death rate from cancer by at least 50 percent over the next 25 years, and improve the experience of people and their families living with and surviving cancer— and, by doing this and more, end cancer as we know it today." This initiative includes a dedicated "Cancer Cabinet" that includes personnel from nearly every health organization that currently receives significant funding from the federal government.
First Lady Jill Biden was exactly right when she proclaimed we are in a "golden age of research and discovery." Among cancer researchers, the most exciting developments in the last year have been magnetically responsive bacteria, advancements in personalized medicine, and chronotherapy. The same mRNA technology used in COVID vaccinations may be a key player in the fight against cancer too. The U.S. should focus on reducing the barriers that encumber access to these treatment technologies—and other promising remedies—for patients who don't have time to spare.
It felt like the world collapsed in on my large family when, out of the blue, my father was diagnosed with cancer late last year. Full of unanswered questions, we still worry about what he may miss. But, we quickly discovered that our story is all too familiar. The majority of U.S. families, including Biden's, have been affected by this deadly disease. There are countless reasons to believe that the government has slowed cancer prevention with the intent of racing towards a cure. Like many problems, there is too much at stake with cancer to let politicians dictate the solution.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Cancer is not one disease but many. It’s like saying they’re going to cure virus. I thought the ‘party of science’ would know this.
Everyone knows they’re talking about breast cancer. Prostate or testicular cancer is punishment for the sins of the patriarchy.
A better analogy would be that they are trying to cure “fever”. Cancer isn’t a disease. It’s a symptom. Yes, it’s actually the part that does damage, but the causes are myriad and trying to find a cure is, optimistically, stomping ants, and more likely like kicking back the tide.
The same mRNA technology used in COVID vaccinations may be a key player in the fight against cancer too.
At what point does plotting assassination graduate to overthrowing tyrants?
Just asking for a friend.
When Legos and a fire extinguisher are brought into the mix.
fire extinguisher
The thing that killed all those officers at the Capitol?
When you successfully overthrow the tyrants and get to write your own narrative
Damn. Nailed it.
Want it fucked up? Give it to droolin’ Joe.
I’m gonna just guess that all the ‘scientists’ wearing masks will be unable to cure cancer. Just a hunch.
More Nazism isn’t a cure for ANYTHING people need short of their self-serving power desires to poke guns at others and make them do as they’re told and steal from them.
First, and foremost, we shouldn’t spend a dime on any disease until the Communist Chinese Virus has been milked for every possible bit of fascism.
Secondly, this program should be called the lobbyist and crony full employment act of 2022 & 2023.
It’s a gigantic handout to important supporters: academics, universities, government employees, hospitals, and drug companies. That’s the primary purpose.
Whether they cure cancer is really not important.
I suspect a good deal of the drop in cancer death rates is due to declining smoking rates.
Also no mention of CRISPR and cancer?
Let’s start winding down the covid talk, because… god help us people we need a way out!
Trudeau claims truckers only hate him because he’s black.
Today i am going to show you that how to earns more than $500 every day simply working and staying at home. Last month my earning from this are $16205 and i gave this job only 2 hours from my whole day. Easiest way to earn more income online and it doesn’t needs any kind of special experience. Go to this website right now and follow details to get started right now.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>https://www.easywork2.com
Reason needs to fill its quota of libertarian platitudes and tautologies to keep up appearances. They think they can fool people into not noticing their progressive agenda that way.
That’s the thing most laymen don’t get: that there is no single disease called “cancer”, there’s a collection of diseases of different organs that are called cancers. They have more in common with other diseases of those organs than they do with each other.
Cancer is many diseases, but they are closely related in mechanisms and treatment.
Oh yeah, I want to reduce the death rate from cancer by at least 75 percent over the next 10 years!