Telehealth Beams In the Sunshine State
According to a recent report published by the Reason Foundation, the Pioneer Insitute, and the Cicero Institute, Florida offers telehealth options that far exceed other states.
Millions of Americans used telehealth for the first time during COVID, but state regulations could soon strip that away. Emergency regulatory suspensions made it possible to expand telehealth services, but without permanent reform, patients will lose access to care as the clock on those temporary suspensions runs out.
A new report, Rating the States on Telehealth Best Practices: A Toolkit for a Pro-Patient and Provider Relationship, published by the Reason Foundation, the Cicero Institute, and the Pioneer Institute rates the telehealth policies of every state against the practices that would make those pandemic-era flexibilities permanent.
The greatest benefit of telehealth is its ability to connect patients to providers regardless of their physical location. Patients can access the best specialists around the country without the burden and expense of traveling. But an antiquated system of state-level licensing schemes prohibits health care providers from practicing telehealth across state lines.
It takes very little imagination to see the benefits of a flexible regulatory environment. For an example that began before COVID, look to Florida, which adopted a valuable permanent reform in 2018.
That year, Florida created a registration process that allows out-of-state providers to practice telehealth in the state without obtaining a full Florida-issued license. The process isn't perfect, but it helps propel the Sunshine State to the top of the telehealth rankings. The system applies to all health professions, and it does not require action from other states. There are nearly 11,200 actively registered out-of-state telehealth providers in Florida—only Arizona has a comparable program.
In 2020, Florida passed another valuable bill. This one allows advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to open independent practices. Many APRNs acted quickly to gain authorization. In 23 states, APRNs are required to work under a physician's supervision. These supervision requirements reduce access to care and arbitrarily limit the number of primary care professionals available, especially in rural areas. Over 5,300 APRNs have branched to independent practices since the Florida Board of Nursing began processing applications in October 2020.
Taylor Ann Drew is an APRN who runs a direct primary care (DPC) practice—that is, a subscription-based service for health care—in Tallahassee, Florida. Rather than relying on third-party payers and traditional reimbursement models, patients can get unlimited access to a DPC provider for a flat monthly rate. There are currently more than 1,600 DPC practices across the United States. Drew believes the success of her practice depends on its ability to work independently from a physician.
"Direct primary care is the perfect model for telehealth because you don't have to bill for it. Patients pay a monthly fee and ask me as many questions as they want—it's up to them and how they want to guide their health," says Drew. Her patients text her when they have questions, giving them virtually seamless access to expert advice. Under this system, patients are less likely to put off calling the doctor. And in many states Drew wouldn't be able to run or own this business.
Drew's practice is just one example of the innovations that regulatory flexibility makes possible. As emergency regulatory suspensions face expiration dates, millions of Americans could lose access to the telehealth they have appreciated throughout COVID. Lawmakers should make those changes permanent—and look to states like Florida for ideas for further reforms.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I think that telehealth will be one of the benefits coming out of this pandemic. Also wonder how telehealth could end the abortion debate.
Last month i managed to pull my first five figure paycheck ever!!! I’ve been working for this company online for 2 years now and i never been happier… They are paying me $95/per hour and the best thing is cause i am not that tech-savy, they only asked for basic understanding of internet and basic typing skill… UYr It’s been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply…
..
Visit following page for more information… http://moneystar33.blogspot.com
It would help a little in facilitating medical abortions, as would other measures that remove a requirement to see a doctor for a prescription for abortifacients, but there's not much to squeeze out by telehealth. Telehealth could help with surgical abortions and other surgeries by making possible remote control of tools; I don't know how far off we are from that.
By far the largest effect would be in facilitating medical abortions. That would allow providers to focus on cases that required surgical abortions. This could mean a free up of funds to assist women needing to travel for surgical abortions. Not a prefect system but one that will work.
Having used telehealth, I have mixed opinions. For routine visits, it may be ok, but if you're sick or injured, the capability is limited. Even basic vitals are unavailable in a telehealth exam.
Even basic vitals are unavailable in a telehealth exam.
Elizabeth Holmes has your solution! Send a check or money order today!
Still Would.
The astronauts proved telemetry to work for taking vitals. Also there's recording as via Holter monitors.
You have any of that stuff laying around your house?
No but it doesn't have to be at your house. Image this scenario. In a rural location without many doctors, the patient could be sent to local paramedics or a traveling nurse could collect vitals prior to a visit and send them to the doctor.
One area that telehealth could greatly assist is in mental health treatment. This doesn't really require vitals. It could really help spread services to underserved area.
Telelearning beams across America!
Telehealth is really only useful when you already know the solution and are just looking for a doctors check in the box to tell you the thing you already know. This it is extremely useful for people who are legally required to get stupid check in the boxes.
We could do telesupremecourtnominations at this point.
Telehealth is horrible and I'd like to see a little intellectual consistency from Reason dot com... why is remote learning bad but having to talk to your doctor over a fucking webcam good?
Because telehealth isn't mandatory?
Right. They may be opportunistic and sometimes even concern trolls, but the only context in which they've criticized remote learning is one in which taxpayers have paid for in-person teaching but are getting only remote classes, and where the students are required to attend them — in some cases even to dress for them!
It'll be mandatory if you're low-income.
Telehealth is also one more precedent that might be cited for future deregulations of medicine or of anything else. One permission tends to lead to another. Propaganda by deed.
The author thinks ARNP’s having completely independent practice is a good thing.
It’s one more step to the dumbing down of America.
Nurses are not doctors. Yes, routine things are routine and nurses can deal with routine things.
Then why have doctors at all? Just declare the nurses are now doctors.
The health care system is a complex web of people. Doctors are at the top with nurses, therapists, laboratory staff, pharmacist, and a host of others all being part of the process. What we know is that we don't need all those people in one spot at one time. Remote communication can allow for better use of people's skills to maximize patient care while holding cost to reasonable levels.