Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Regulation

A Fresh New Year Means Fresh New Restrictions on Gas-Powered Leaf Blowers

From California to Washington, D.C., new restrictions on gas-powered landscaping equipment are blanketing the nation.

Christian Britschgi | 1.4.2022 9:45 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
reason-blow | Sornwut Tubtawee/Dreamstime.com
(Sornwut Tubtawee/Dreamstime.com)

Like so many freshly fallen leaves, new restrictions on gas-powered landscaping equipment are blanketing the nation.

Washington, D.C., rang in the new year by implementing a prohibition on gas-powered leaf blowers that the city had passed in 2018. Beginning January 1, landscaping companies and individual lawn care enthusiasts alike are now subject to $500 fines for using gas-powered blowers in the city.

Just a few weeks prior, the California Air Resources Board (CARB)—the state's primary air pollution regulator—voted to ban the sale of gas-powered leaf blowers and lawnmowers beginning in 2024.

CARB's decision doesn't prevent the use of gas-powered landscaping devices. But an increasing number of cities in the state, including places like Oakland and Hayward, are going that mile by passing municipal bans this past year.

Leaf blowers' critics argue their noise and noxious emissions far outweigh the convenience they add to tidying lawns and clearing sidewalks.

"I hear from residents all of the time about the nuisance and the noise that is created. It prevents them from working and it prevents them enjoying the peace in their own homes," said D.C. City Councilmember Mary Cheh during a 2018 hearing on the city's then-proposed leaf blower ban.

A D.C. city council report from that year said that 170 municipalities restrict or ban gas-powered leaf blowers, and that list is only growing. At least 60 California municipalities have passed restrictions on these machines as of 2020.

This crusade for quieter neighborhoods is producing some exceptionally broadly written policies.

Take Princeton, New Jersey. In October 2021, the city passed an ordinance banning the use of "noise-creating gas-powered equipment, blowers, power fans or internal combustion engines" during early mornings and evenings, Sundays, Christmas, Thanksgiving, New Year's, and Fourth of July (lest the leaf blowers compete with the sound of booming fireworks). During the summer and winter months, gas-powered leaf blowers can't be used at all in Princeton.

That inclusion of "internal combustion engines" had a few Twitter posters musing about whether Princeton has also accidentally banned traditional gas-powered cars as well.

I was just re-reading the town of Princeton's new leafblower ordinance, and I think it may have been written so broadly as to *actually ban cars* after 8 pm and on Sunday mornings… (1/3)

— Central NJ Yimby ???????????????? (@YIMBY_Princeton) December 30, 2021

https://twitter.com/davidlnoll/status/1476712153092661250

"I can see why some might read it that way, but the new Princeton leafblower ordinance doesn't ban internal combustion cars," writes Gregory Shill, a professor at University of Iowa College of Law, in an email.

Shill tells Reason that because the general subject of the city's ordinance concerns the regulation of landscaping equipment, the legal principle of "ejusdem generis" means that catchall phrase about "internal combustion engines" shouldn't be interpreted as limiting the use of literally all gas-powered engines in the city.

"In sum, this is good news for Princeton residents who were worried about their gas-powered cars," he says.

Nevertheless, these more limited restrictions are provoking complaints of overreach from the landscaping industry, who argue that emissionless electric-powered leaf blowers they're being shifted toward aren't adequate substitutes.

One industry representative cited by the Los Angeles Times said that a three-person landscaping crew would need to carry 30 to 40 fully charged batteries to power its equipment during a full day's work.

A D.C. city government report notes that most battery-powered leaf blowers can only operate for about 10–15 minutes at full power (or an hour at lower-power settings) and that corded leaf blowers often lacked the range needed for commercial-scale landscaping.

"While excellent for homeowner use, electric-powered blowers on the market today do not have sufficient power or duration to replace gasoline engines for professional use," Bob Mann, a representative of National Association of Landscape Professionals, told the D.C. city council when it was considering its ban.

In addition to the burdens placed on businesses, gas leaf blower bans also have a more visceral cost.

As I wrote in 2020, "a well-manicured lawn, maintained by loud, gas-guzzling machines, has long been a symbol of freedom, prosperity, and the American dream."

Clearly policy makers are increasingly willing to sacrifice that part of the American dream for a little more street-level domestic tranquility.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 'Should Police Arrest Sex Workers for Standing Around?' No, of Course Not.

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

RegulationNanny StateCaliforniaD.C.Pollution
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (78)

Latest

Even Trump's Supporters Are Slamming His Post About Rob Reiner's Murder

Robby Soave | 12.16.2025 7:40 PM

Localism and the Limits of Regulating What We Love

Christian Britschgi | 12.16.2025 3:55 PM

The Federal Government Has Shed 271,000 Jobs This Year. That's Great.

Eric Boehm | 12.16.2025 3:10 PM

17 Ways Politicians Can Make Things Cheaper, Starting With Food, Health Care, and Appliances

Ryan Bourne | 12.16.2025 1:00 PM

Funding College Sports With Private Equity Is Way Better Than Hitting Students With Higher Fees

Jason Russell | 12.16.2025 10:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks