Review: Licorice Pizza
Squalls of flak suddenly surround one of the year’s most loveable movies.

Paul Thomas Anderson's Licorice Pizza may not be a full-on coming-of-age classic—it's a little disjointed and maybe a little too long. But whenever the beaming Alana Haim is onscreen, or Bradley Cooper roars in to do some wild-card comedy damage, it's a great movie.
So it's a special kind of drag to see this amiable film being suddenly peppered with hostile fire from the direction of the sex-and-racism lobby. And it's especially dismaying to have to admit that, at least in one aspect, the detractors' ire is understandable.
Naysayers can't cancel the movie's buoyant spirit, though. Bright-eyed Alana Haim, making her big-screen debut here, is already well-known as a member of the Los Angeles family band Haim, for which Anderson has directed a number of videos. The picture is thick with these sorts of connections. Alana's costar is affable Cooper Hoffman, son of the late Philip Seymour Hoffman, who featured memorably in such earlier Anderson films as Boogie Nights and Magnolia. Leonardo DiCaprio's father and a couple of Spielberg daughters are also in evidence, along with the rest of the Haim family (including Alana's bandmate sisters Este and Danielle), and composer Jonny Greenwood, too, back again to provide Anderson with a distinctive score.
The story is set in the suburban environs of LA's San Fernando Valley in 1973 (the golden age of the Licorice Pizza record-store chain, which gets no actual mention in the film). Haim is Alana Kane, a 25-year-old photographer's assistant who can't get her life together. Hoffman is Gary, a 15-year-old child actor who's aging out of the business but is blossoming into a real-world entrepreneur. Gary is determined to win Alana over; she's initially, strongly resistant. But the two actors have a sweet rapport; and despite the 10-year age difference between their characters, it's hard to see how a non-addled viewer could classify Kane's uncertain acceptance of Gary's romantic moves as predatory, or Kane herself as a "pedophile" (will somebody please take the trouble to look up that word?).
A bit more odd is a restaurant scene in which Kane shares a martini moment with a much older movie star named Jack Holden (played with craggy charm by Sean Penn). Kane wants Holden to give her a role in a picture, so…okay, maybe. (Anderson hasn't written Penn's character as a predator either.)
Two scenes in the movie are much cringier. They're centered on a character named Jerry Frick (John Michael Higgins). Jerry has a thing for Japanese women, but has never learned to speak their language; instead, he grunts at them in English, using a vaudeville-level Japanese accent of a sort not heard since Mickey Rooney donned fake buckteeth to play a yammering Japanese neighbor in the 1961 Breakfast at Tiffany's. It's not hard to grasp why an activist group called the Media Action Network for Asian Americans was appalled by these scenes (little surprise: They are appalling). In an interview with The New York Times last month, Anderson discussed his decision to write and include them in the movie.
"I think it would be a mistake to tell a period film through the eyes of 2021," the director said. "You have to be honest to that time. Not that it wouldn't happen right now, by the way. My mother-in-law's Japanese and my father-in-law is white, so seeing people speak English to her with a Japanese accent is something that happens all the time. I don't think they even know they're doing it."
Okay…maybe?
Objections like these don't seem to have had a lot of effect yet: Licorice Pizza opened nationwide on December 25, and now has a 92-percent score on the Rotten Tomatoes review-aggregation site. Word is getting out about Alana Haim's star-making performance, as well as Bradley Cooper's wonderfully daffy turn as Jon Peters—a real person, once renowned as a celebrity hairdresser, film producer, and boyfriend of Barbra Streisand. Peters reportedly okayed his portrayal as a period whack-job in this movie, and Cooper memorably makes it so. "It's good to meet you," Jon tells Gary. "I want you to be horrified."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I've added it to my list; if the woke brigades hate it, there must be something good in it, in spite of having Sean Penn. His love for Hugo Chavez only deepened my disrespect for him as an actor. I can't think of a single movie where his presence improved it.
I can't stand Penn either but his Spicoli was a goddamed classic.
Aloha Mr Hand!
A Divorced Mom With 4 Kids Lost Her Job in Pandemic, But Was Able To Stay On Top By Banking Continuously 15000 Dollars Per Week With An Online Work She Found Over The Internet .TRUMP TO WIN AND GIFT TO THE JOBS Before Elections But Unfortunately Election Fraud. It’s easy, just follow instructions on home page, read it carefully from start to finish Check The Details….. Visit Here
His role in The Professor and the Madman was quite good.
I bopped over to Rotten Tomatoes. The critics loved it. They skew overwhelmingly left, particularly the top critics.
The audience liked it. Under 80%, but not much under. Still, a pretty distinct disparity.
I perused some negative reviews. They all mentioned that the story was a disjointed mess and hard to follow and the movie was about 30 minutes too long. I sampled about 8 or 10.... Mostly the same theme.
I'm gonna say the woke brigade is not coming for this movie. If they were, there would be a bunch of reviews to that effect.
I really liked The Game, but it’s Michael Douglas who Carrie’s that movie. Penn is only in it for maybe 15 minutes total.
I could easily see myself slipping into a fake accent. When I read The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress my thoughts kept coming in a phony Russian accent.
Slipping into accents is pretty damn common to a lesser or greater extent depending on the person assuming you are regularly exposed to other accents, have normally functioning mirror neurons, and aren't a sociopath.
Yeah, some more than others, but those mirror neurons kick in and you just slip into the accent.
I am really susceptible to this.... So I usually just lean into it if it is a regional accent. If it is a foreign accent, I'm just screwed.
A new comedy romance that rewinded to the old time when lives were freer. Definitely one of the weirder romcom and slice-of-life. Characters said and did things that would instantly get them canceled in the modern time. However, these moments were damn awkwardly hilarious.
The two leads were interesting to say at least. It's amazing how I immediately shipped them after 5 minutes of the 15 year-old actor-trying-to-be flirted with the 25 year-old actress-trying-to-be. Their romance, however, became random, and honestly I'm not sure if the movie was still a romance. This is because the tumultuous lives they had with their seemingly random and naive decisions they made made this movie partly a coming-of-age tale as well.
Overall, it's a lot of weirdness, but I still loved the journey. I wished that i could relate more to the time.
Sounds worse than Hawaiian pizza; wasn’t sure that was possible.
I have not seen the movie, but a can confidently assert that this is the most heavily advertised movie in a long, long time.
And the advertising is a very effective, if dishonest method. The ads have been ubiquitous online, and they cheerily talk about "the movie everyone is talking about" and "everyone loves this new feature from...".
The whole thing is built around momentum.... For a movie that had not been released and nobody had seen.
My kids said they wanted to see it... And when asked why?.... Because everyone is talking about it!
So, Ida know about the movie, but the marketing has been superb, if annoying.
Weird. This movie opened in 4 theaters for over a month. Then went to wide release in 768 theaters.
Yet they were every other ad on YouTube for the last 2 months?
Why the big spend on advertising if they were not going to a wide release??
For comparison, Spiderman is on more than 4,300 screens domestically this week.
Scarcity creates value.
With two or three people per screen Spielberg can cobble together about 12,000 viewers per day for his woke movie
I wouldn't sit through another Spiderman movie if you paid me.
Sooooo.... That's $1.3 billion... Minus your twelve bucks.
I might be convinced to see it for $1200.
Always missing from movie reviews - is it entertaining?
I don't go to movies to be entertained, I go to movies to know what the filmmaker is saying about the current social condition.
If you're concerned with entertainment, watch something good.
So it's a special kind of drag to see this amiable film being suddenly peppered with hostile fire from the direction of the sex-and-racism lobby.
The sex-and-racism lobby is a bit of a drag. But just a bit. Even though the mean well.
And it's especially dismaying to have to admit that, at least in one aspect, the detractors' ire is understandable.
Ahh, keep bein' you baby.
between their characters, it's hard to see how a non-addled viewer could classify Kane's uncertain acceptance of Gary's romantic moves as predatory, or Kane herself as a "pedophile" (will somebody please take the trouble to look up that word?).
Uhh, if this is what we're upset about, then we're going to have to cancel... well, European art, film and literature.
It's not hard to grasp why an activist group called the Media Action Network for Asian Americans was appalled by these scenes (little surprise: They are appalling). In an interview with The New York Times last month, Anderson discussed his decision to write and include them in the movie.
So wait, are we authors and auteurs not allowed to include boorish, racist characters... as characters in our art?
I was going to say exactly the same thing.
I suppose "slice of life" is no longer a thing. If you are going to have a playboy type, you have to signal that he is bedeviled and then show his just comeuppance so that there is no ambiguity as to where we should all stand.
I guess even Archie Bunker would be disallowed.
I wonder if any of the woke would get it if someone made a woke Archie Bunker to demonstrate the wrongness of the ideology by subjecting him to comical situations that reveal his biases. And would it help at all if he were also trans on the show, but played by a trans man playing a trans woman?
I remember watching re-runs of All In The Family when I was about 14 (I’d been too young to understand the plots when they originally aired). I distinctly remember wondering what the reaction would be if someone did a leftist version of Archie and had fun putting asinine remarks in his caricature mouth. Let alone juxtapose him with a conservative or libertarian version of “Meat Head” who always explains the free market, limited government perspective ever-so cogently and reasonably.
The leftist Archie Bunker would be interesting. Bunker would be freeloading in his conservative son-in-law's house, schooling the breadwinner on all of his biases, whiteness and personal moral failures. It might actually work as a show, especially with the right subversive writer.
“The right subversive writer.” I see what you did there.
I agree in principle, but probably would need to see the scenes themselves. Loder found them cringeworthy and appalling, and I don't view him as particularly woke.
I have not seen the movie
Me either, but I’m curious to see it.
I also want to see Nightmare Alley.