Biden Doubles Down on a Lethal Anti-Drug Strategy
Prohibition has driven opioid-related deaths to record levels.

For more than a century, the U.S. government has failed to prevent Americans from consuming politically disfavored intoxicants. Worse, it has systematically made drug use more dangerous by forcing consumers to rely on black-market products of unknown composition and by pushing traffickers toward increasingly potent substances that are easier to smuggle.
The ongoing "opioid crisis," which has driven drug-related deaths to record levels, illustrates both of those phenomena. But instead of recognizing the lethal effects of prohibition, President Joe Biden is doubling down on a strategy that has never worked as intended.
Last week, Biden signed two executive orders aimed at combating the "transnational criminal organizations" that "contribute directly to tens of thousands of drug-overdose deaths in the United States each year." One order replaces the federal government's Threat Mitigation Working Group with a brand-new U.S. Council on Transnational Organized Crime; the other authorizes sanctions against "foreign persons involved in the global illicit drug trade."
In the last two decades, a "senior administration official" told reporters during a conference call, "the nature of drug trafficking has changed dramatically." Illegal drugs nowadays, the official said, are "more potent, addictive and deadly and able to kill in mass numbers," as reflected in "the skyrocketing death rate from synthetic opioids."
During the year ending last May, according to estimates from the Centers or Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. saw more than 100,000 drug-related deaths, up 23 percent from the previous year and 46 percent from the year before that. Three-quarters of those cases involved opioids, and 85 percent of the 75,000 or so opioid-related deaths involved the category that includes fentanyl and its analogs.
These record-breaking numbers reflect the perverse impact of the government's efforts to reduce drug-related deaths. The surge in fatalities followed a successful campaign to reduce opioid prescriptions, which drove nonmedical users toward black-market substitutes that are much more dangerous because their purity and potency are unpredictable.
Between 2010 and 2017, the number of opioid prescriptions per 100 Americans fell by 28 percent; the rate of high-dose opioid prescriptions—defined as 90 morphine milligram equivalents or more per day—fell by 56 percent. Meanwhile, annual opioid-related deaths have more than tripled since 2010.
In a 2017 interview with the Carlisle Sentinel, Carrie DeLone, Pennsylvania's former physician general, confessed that "we knew that this was going to be an issue, that we were going to push addicts in a direction that was going to be more deadly." Her justification: "You have to start somewhere."
For a sense of where that attitude can lead, consider what happened after OxyContin, an extended-release version of oxycodone, was reformulated to deter abuse in 2010. A 2017 National Bureau of Economic Research paper concluded that "a substantial share of the dramatic increase in heroin deaths since 2010"—perhaps as much as 80 percent—"can be attributed to the reformulation of OxyContin."
The proliferation of fentanyl as a heroin booster and substitute has compounded this problem by making potency even more variable. "Today's drug trade no longer relies on crops or requires vast acreage," the "senior administration official" noted last week, "but instead on synthetic materials and precursor chemicals."
That trend also is driven by government policy. Fentanyl, which is roughly 50 times as potent as heroin, is a logical choice for suppliers dealing with government efforts to suppress the drug trade, since it makes production and distribution less conspicuous and more profitable.
At the import level, RAND Corporation researchers estimated in 2019, "heroin appears to be at least 100 times more expensive than fentanyl." And because fentanyl is much more potent than heroin, a package weighing less than an ounce can replace one that weighs a couple of pounds.
"Historically," The Hill noted in its report on Biden's executive orders, "drug trafficking organizations have been quick to adapt to new law enforcement strategies." Yet somehow the government never seems to anticipate that reaction, or its deadly consequences.
© Copyright 2021 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sloppy Joe, do alcohol next.
═══════════════════════════════════════★☆★●
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ... Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ... Mᴀᴋᴇ $90 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $12000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ... Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ..
░A░M░A░Z░I░N░G░ ░J░O░B░S░
¦¦¦¦F¦O¦L¦L¦O¦W¦¦M¦E¦¦¦¦¦ ...... www.maxpro9.com"
Fuck Joe Biden
Fuck Joe Biden!
"Today's drug trade no longer relies on crops or requires vast acreage," the "senior administration official" noted last week, "but instead on synthetic materials and precursor chemicals."
But enough about Pfizer and Moderna.
Christ, what an asshole.
If’n ye get caught up in this ancient old War on Drugs (with a new paint job?) for, for example, having prescription drugs on hand, that are NOT in their original, marked prescription bottles, marked as prescribed for YOU, then I have a suggestion which may be quite helpful: Buy some art from Hunter Biden!!! (It MIGHT even be a get-out-of-jail-nearly-free card.)
https://nypost.com/2021/12/06/wh-flags-art-market-as-money-laundering-haven-amid-hunter-biden-shows/
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/14/1015895944/the-latest-ethical-pitfalls-involving-joe-bidens-son-hunter
Hunter Biden's Paintings Are Going On Sale, Drawing Critics Of Art And Ethics
Funny how you weren't nearly as concerned about all the shady dealings of Trump's kids and Jared Kushner. Especially seeing as how they were part of the administration, and in the case of Kushner, in charge of vast swathes of policy. Meanwhile the only time Hunter Biden's name comes up is for bullshit that has zero connection to the administration other than the biological relationship except in right wing projection land where because the last administration was extraordinarily corrupt in regards to the President's family, the Democrats just have to be doing it to!
Wow, rarely see an idiot like this one in real life. Something about reason must attract them.
So whenever Trumps name came up, I'm sure it was all policy related and never had anything to do with subjective judgment or tribalism. Lol dipshit
Wait, Joe Biden is anti-drug? Every time I see him on TV, he's pushing drugs! He'd make it mandatory for everybody to take drugs if he could.
When I saw the title I wondered if the date was a typo. Is Sullum old enough to have covered the Biden-Reagan-Bush economy-wrecking prohibitionist, asset-forfeiture jihad of 1986?
he is anti HCQ and Ivermectin i thought so it checks out
Once a drug warrior, always a drug warrior. You just can’t let people safely enjoy intoxicants. It’s not moral. You must make it dangerous and illegal. It’s for their own good.
The Great Depression was morally uplifting, according to Elmer Gantry.
Treat the addicts; exterminate the pushers (death penalty - not the 20 year kind - the 1920's kind). Nothing else works.
Well, with new "tech" now being developed, and a stern, strong-minded, Manly disposition on the part of Our Government Almighty, we could embed electronic brain scanners under the skulls of weak-minded people, couple the scanners to shock collars, and administer strong shocks whenever citizens think sub-optimal thoughts, especially those having to do with illegal drugs or medical devices, like cheap plastic "lung flutes". NEW tech will lead to NEW and better solutions! Have ye FAITH in Government Almighty!
To find precise details on what NOT to do, to avoid the flute police, please see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/DONT_DO_THIS/ … This has been a pubic service, courtesy of the Church of SQRLS!
I thought the Clinton cheap shot was "skin flute." Is Sqrlsy trying to exaggerate the retiree's manhood?
Didn't work in the 1920's, why would it work now?
Korean communist brainwashing techniques developed in the early fifties may have given mystical conservatives hope they can finally extort agreement. Not one U.S. POW escaped. Many chose to forsake Jesus for Lenin and stayed in North Korea. Maybe Nixon decided "two can play!"
That's what the Phillippines is doing. Extra judicial death squads dispensing with due process, your fantasy. That's not working either.
How many times do you brain dead drug warriors need to learn the lesson that you can't arrest your way out of drug addiction, and that trying creates far more harm both to addicts and to everyone else than alternatives?
Despite a century of evidence you can't do it, you're creating more harm to forever chase an unachievable goal. Since it simply doesn't matter how harsh you are, you can't stop the supply. It's therefore a waste of resources and doesn't even remotely justify the damage you're inflicting.
Once you give up the impossible 'world without drugs', then you can focus on solutions to minimize the harm. But you're still hung up on maximizing it, too dumb to figure out it Will Not Work.
I hope the democracts intensify the drug war and continue to kill more of their own criminal ilk.
Ah! A mindless acolyte of the looter Kleptocracy advocates shoot-first prohibitionism. How original! God's Own Prohibitionists' policy of bullying girls and shooting druggies lost to a policy of respecting girls and shooting druggies, why? Because the Libertarian lady candidate stripped away enough votes to cost Trumpistas with green teeth Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin.
"How many times do you brain dead drug warriors need to learn..."
They are addicted to power. Addicts never learn anything that blocks their addiction until they've recognized that _they_ have a problem, etc. - but power addicts will never even take that first step.
Lately, the President himself is the biggest pusher. He and his ilk are constantly on TV and every news site on the net, pushing drugs...so you're threatening the President? That's one of those sort of legal 'grey' areas where due process tends to be overlooked, but threatening POTUS is very serious and so warrants pre-emptive extermination! Make an example of you and that'll stop any future threats!
In all seriousness, what if the addicts don't want 'treatment?' Many people are dependent upon drugs but manage to live rich, productive lives and more importantly, rigorously adhere to the NAP. I've known many functioning alcoholics and countless smokers! I mean, seriously: if 'extermination' worked China and the Phillipines would be drug-free by now. They're not.
He doubled down on lockdowns and masks as well. Seems like all the dems can do is double down on useless, anti science, money wasting bad govt policy.
Lets do what doesnt work, twice as hard!
The very definition of insanity. Doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.
Sounds like trickle down economics. Keep being told the wealth will trickle down, instead it's always just piss on our heads.
I can't imagine another president doing anything different. Until the people decide that violence is not the answer to the opioids, as they did with marijuana, this is going to continue.
You must be a parody.
How are people going to do reject violent laws? "BOTH" looter parties want men with guns to fan out from Toronto to Tierra del Fuego looting, shooting, kidnapping and murdering people for "the wrong kind" of production and free trade. Who in their right mind would pass up a chance to send thugs to rob, jail and shoot harmless sinners even if it means yet another Crash and Great Depression?
It's almost as though, from a libertarian perspective, the Biden Administration is as bad as the Trump Administration on some things, and a whole lot worse on the rest of them.
It's too bad no one could have seen this coming.
For definitions of 'libertarian' that are indistinguishable from 'authoritarian', as all the Republicans who like to feel edgy by complaining the auth-right isn't auth-right enough would have it.
President Joe Biden is doubling down on a strategy that has never worked as intended.
Hard-on drugs Biden doubles down on the same strategy that he's always pushed, knowing exactly what comes of it for the past several decades, and you really question his intent?
Biden's intent is the same as that of all Republicans--to legally kill people. When LSD was legal hardly anyone in America died of opiates or barbiturates. But Reagan, Nixon, Johnson, Ford and Bush-Bush sure as hell fixed that situation. What better proof is there that altruist collectivism requires death as human sacrifice?
Post-translational Modification
https://www.profacgen.com/post-translational-modification.htm Post-translational modification (PTM) refers to the covalent and generally enzymatic modification of proteins during or after protein biosynthesis in the cell.
Sullum has been in front of this issue for years. The "opioid crisis" was created by the federal government. Full stop.
True, but at whose bidding? Sullum noticed in 2015 that Indiana looter parties were starting to repeal prohibition. That's where three pals of Al Capone were killed and wired into a car next to a corn sugar plant and "closed" distillery in Hammond, next to East Chicago. Alcohol prohibition made drink a cottage industry fed by corn sugar, canned malt extract and Fleischmann's yeast by eliminating foreigners, brewers and distillers from trade and production. Who d'ya think paid to create this new cartel?
It's amazing how much drug prohibition looks like alcohol prohibition. Violent gangs fighting turf wars, criminals exploiting the system, people dying because their preferred option has been denatured/adulterated, government asshats looking to punish more people for doing what many of those asshats do in private, etc.
You left out the police corruption and tangential rights reductions (automatic weapons in the 1930s, privacy these days.)
"...by forcing consumers to rely on black-market products..."
Nobody is "forcing" anyone to actually BE a consumer. You don't wanna O.D. on heroine spiked with fentanyl? Maybe the correct answer is: don't do heroine. Or at the very least: take you chances.
Look, the drug war is moronic. It is moronic from a societal freedom perspective. It is moronic from a reduction in rights and the expansion of police state governance perspective. It is moronic from a taxpayer having to pay for combating the "drug war" and the prisoners of that war perspective. But the actual "consumers"? Why the hell should I care about them? Fuck those junkies.
Remember when the people gave the federal government permission to regulate their body intake?
Yeah; me neither...
F'en illegal Nazi's.
Yeah, if they really wanted to reduce deaths, they would legalize all of it, and let people sue manufacturers if they distribute tainted products. Let suppliers compete with TV ads instead of with criminal gangs.
Here is Nadra Card Uk. We provide Online Nadra Card Centreservices also provide Pakistani overseas card in Uk. If you can with expire nicop contact with us we'll provide you submission slip urgently
Don't see the problem. Illegal drug use is a problem of criminals (today they call themselves "liberals" or "progressives"). So if they die from what they voted for, that seems to work as intended. Looks good to me.
Mystical conservative nationalsocialists are The Anti-Life in Atlas Shrugged. Unbeknownst to national and international socialists, the book ends with an Amendment to strip Congress of power to legislate "abridging the freedom of production and trade"
Sullum didn't but the S&P 500 did notice these usurpations the 15DEC they were signed. But professional economists like Peter Temin also misinterpreted the same thing happening in Germany in 1931. Fresh from using the 18th Amendment and Increased Penalties Act to wreck the US economy, Bert Hoover got signatures on the 1931 Narcotics Limitation Convention that wrecked the largest banks in heroin-exporting Germany. "A Planned Economy on a World Scale" is what they called it. The Nazi Party vote share jumped from 18% to 37%.