Police Oversight Board Demands Answers After Dallas Cops Seized Traveler's Cash
And some state politicians are talking about asset forfeiture reform.

Last week the Dallas Police Department seized more than $100,000 in cash from an airport traveler. As the department detailed in a statement, a drug-sniffing dog alerted to the passenger's luggage, which police found to contain "nothing but blankets and two large bubble envelopes" containing $106,829 in cash. The police did not arrest the traveler but did keep the money, "subject to the civil asset forfeiture process."
Now a member of the city's oversight board is demanding answers. "What I want to know are: What are the rules? And did this woman break them?" Brandon Friedman, a member of Dallas's Community Police Oversight Board, said to a local CBS affiliate. He added: "It's not my business why someone's carrying $100,000 at the airport unless it's illegal, and from everything we've seen it doesn't seem to be."
A Dallas Police Department spokesperson told the station last week that "travelers are not allowed to board a plane with more than $10,000 of cash without declaring it, even on domestic flights." But there is no law, either state or federal, that says that. It's just that police are allowed to seize cash or other property merely on the suspicion that it was involved in illegal activity, and the owners must go to court to prove it wasn't. And in Texas, the law requires only a "preponderance of the evidence" before the police can take private property.
Egregious though it may be, there could be an upside to this story: Some Texas legislators, including House Speaker Dade Phelan, have responded to the incident by expressing a desire to reform the state's civil asset forfeiture laws.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"What I want to know are: What are the rules? And did this woman break them?"
Haaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! So quaint.
Next time, kick some of the seized cash up to the oversight board. Oversight indeed.
Put these criminals in jail.
I'm referring to the cops of course
>>It's not my business why someone's carrying $100,000 at the airport unless it's illegal, and from everything we've seen it doesn't seem to be.
omygawd a seemingly honest DPD
Trump's Dealings in Scotland Were Typically Shady—and Now, Legally Perilous. Cash deals are common with money laundering especially from Deutsche Bank, which is packed with Russian Oligarchs who have co-signed $millions for trump.
You are boring, and an asshole.
Do you know Trump sued Deutsche Bank twice? They loaned him $300 million and he never paid. He sued them ! He claimed that they should have known he wouldn't pay them back. He sued them again to keep them from releasing his taxes. He lost that one, Congress has them, which is not good for him. Isn't that boring?
Show me on the doll where trump toutched you
@dbruce
Yes. Show me on the doll. I know he scarred you terribly. Tell me what you were thinking when he touched you there. Did you let him do it because he had money and power? Did it feel good when he touched you? Or were you having evil thoughts that your mother had told you would cause you to turn to stone, and were you frightened because you thought the process had started down there? Do you still touch yourself now and think about it? Who do you fantasize about touching you now? Is the fantasy so intense that you get a damp sticky feeling afterwards? Tell me all about it.
A newly released secret video from 2005 captures it. Here’s what Trump says about the norms of being a famous man: “They let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the pussy.”
As a Rev. you must be an expert on touching people you're not supposed to. Could Pope Francis’ record on sexual abuse threaten his legacy?
Ignore, or better yet, mute it. It's another stupid, ignorant troll. On RAK's level, but posting copy & pasted left/DNC in-group conventional 'wisdom' and talking points. It's painful how trite and how similar these dullards are.
AMERICA'S FIRST ILLITERATE PRESIDENT
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/01/americas-first-post-text-president/549794/ Donald Trump has told us he doesn't read because he is too busy, so we know he doesn't read, and it shows. Doesn't read PDBs, tears them up and throws them away, knowing they are supposed to be archived. Interns making $60,000 yr spent hours taping the pieces back together.
I've heard the high-end art market is rife with corruption as well.
It depends!!! Buy some art from Hunter Biden to play it safe!!!!
https://nypost.com/2021/12/06/wh-flags-art-market-as-money-laundering-haven-amid-hunter-biden-shows/
I love the nypost, it keeps me laughing for hours with its ignorance. Ted Cruz senator who once supported a ban on sex toys’ – Mostly False
Newly Discovered Planet Could Destroy Earth Any Day Now – False
PS 169 Pledge of Allegiance and Holiday Ban Controversy – Mostly False
‘NY Post’ op-ed rebuts starving children claim that was never made – Pants on Fire
Hours after signing an executive order on Jan. 20, 2021, U.S. President Joe Biden violated his own mask mandate. – False
Migrant children being sheltered in Long Beach, Cal were each given a copy of VP Kamala Harris’ children’s book by the Biden admin. – False
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-post/
"Overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks."
Well, now I know!
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/14/1015895944/the-latest-ethical-pitfalls-involving-joe-bidens-son-hunter
Hunter Biden's Paintings Are Going On Sale, Drawing Critics Of Art And Ethics
There are BOATLOADS of reports on this, all across the media, right, left, and middle! Are they ALL lying to us?
You are where you can answer that question. I use it every day. Claim by Viral Post: the World Economic Forum (WEF) reported about the omicron variant back in July.
Check Your Fact rating: False (They did not)
BLATANT LIE
Last time I checked the $10,000 declaration was only for international flights.
Now a member of the city's oversight board is demanding answers. "What I want to know are: What are the rules? And did this woman break them?"
This is... to me a strange set of questions to ask. If she wasn't arrested, and no one has been charged with a crime, then the city's oversight board has the answers to these questions.
Strange questions require strange answers.
Well, a lot of these oversight boards don't have all that much authority. "Demanding answers" might be all they can do.
Only-slightly OT post here... It still has to do with out-of-control cops, though, so it is slightly "on topic"...
https://news.yahoo.com/stand-ground-self-defense-claim-180600498.html
Will a Stand Your Ground Self-Defense Claim Save Black Oklahoma Man Who Killed White Intruder? Legal Expert Says It Depends: ‘I Just Leave It to God’
Black man running his pot shop (legal pot shop, except his pot license had expired) shots white guy who was breaking down black dude's pot-shop door, and wouldn't stop, when warned. Black dude shoots through door, kills white intruder-robber-who-knows-what.
"Stand your ground" might apply only when defending your LEGAL currently-licensed business!!! Depending on how many lawyers you can afford...
So I'm warning you!!!! If you are blowing upon an UN-PRESCRIBED cheap plastic flute, when some thug breaks down your door, you may NOT "stand your ground" when said thug breaks through your door, you HORRIBLE law-breaking flute-blower ye!!!!
To find precise details on what NOT to do, to avoid the flute police, please see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/DONT_DO_THIS/ … This has been a pubic service, courtesy of the Church of SQRLS!
>> shoots through door
interesting if it matters
That caught my attention too. Found below in ABS linked in the Yahoo article. Don't look good for the owner.
Bratcher told police at the time that the door was “locked and secured” when he started shooting.
https://atlantablackstar.com/2021/05/12/he-didnt-go-out-looking-for-trouble-oklahoma-community-rallies-for-black-father-charged-with-murder-for-shooting-white-burglar-breaking-into-his-business/
should have gone with the kettle of boiling oil from the rooftop
In Texas your porch is considered part of your home.
And pretty much everywhere else it's considered part of your home too.
wonder if your haberdashery can be your home too?
Now a member of the city's oversight board is demanding answers.
I hope nobody on the oversight board owns a dog.
Houston PD shoots the dogs. DPD shoots the neighbors and/or the residents.
Did the union get its cut? All good then.
" . . . expressing a desire to reform the state's civil asset forfeiture laws."
Well, just pass a law enshrining the obvious fact that inanimate objects cannot be subjected to civil or criminal legal actions.
(I know that this might allow a certain rogue red SUV to avoid prosecution, but that is price worth paying)
It wasn’t a rogue SUV. It was simply out of control.
...a drug-sniffing dog alerted to the passenger's luggage
as it was trained to do.
For any large sum of cash, some of it will no doubt have been involved in some unsavory circumstances in the not-too-distant past.
Cash is filthy. I'm sure someone once snorted coke through the dollar bill I gave my kid for snacks yesterday.
The police just cannot stop themselves from making BLM's case against them. Seriously they just act as if it is them versus America and are just daring people to stand up to them
If freedom MUST have enemies, better that they be incompetent.
We should ask why Democrats created a diversion with their Defund the Police movement, from how big city Democrat machines train, hire, and manage their police forces. Then the Democrats have the nerve to claim we're systematically racist, and the police are racist.
The Democrats are entirely responsible for the abuse they received from their elected D politicians. And essentially Democrats are telling us they're racists (and they are correct about that, not that the country is racist). And it's not really racism that's the problem (but they push for it), it's government power they seek, including the power to discriminate as to who's acceptable and who isn't, and who will be let off for their crimes while who will be prosecuted for a crime to promote a political narrative.
Ah! The Kleptocrat Pot calling the other looter... er... African-American. Republicans are the adversaries Libertarians write to Santa to send us.
Racism is learned.
a couple of blankets and $100K?
no they shouldn't have taken it for no reason
yes it's probably going to turn out to be drug money
anyone contacted the victim yet? are they asking for it back?
entirely possibly this was some poor woman's life savings the cops stole, but don't want libertarians to get too invested in this without knowing facts
if it comes back drug money, CAF proponents will ram this story up our asses