Arizona Mom Threatened With Prison, Placed on Secret Blacklist For Letting Kids Play At the Park
"The market was asking that anyone who didn't need to go into the store to please stay outside," she says.

It was a little more than a year ago—right before Thanksgiving, as COVID-19 raged—that Jessica committed her crime: She let her 7-year-old son and his friend, age 5, play at the park while she went to buy a turkey.
For this, she faced criminal charges, as well as being listed for 25 years on Arizona's Central Registry, a secret blacklist that functions similarly to the sex offender registry but is less publicly accessible.
What, exactly, transpired that day?
Due to the pandemic, the kids weren't keen to go into the grocery store and Jessica wasn't that keen to let them. "The market was asking that anyone who didn't need to go into the store to please stay outside," she says. (To protect her identity, this article uses the pseudonym "Jessica." Reason reviewed documents, including police reports, that verified her story.)
Instead, she dropped the kids off at a park five blocks from the grocery—a park she had played in as a girl. At the time of the drop-off, a friend of hers was teaching a tai chi class at the park and another acquaintance was there walking her dog. Jessica told the boys not to leave the play area and dashed off to get the turkey.
While she was at the store, the tai chi teacher ran in to tell Jessica that the cops were talking to her kids. The two women raced back to the park, where the cops told her that she had broken the law.
In fact, the police made a startling assertion, Jessica later recounted: "One of the police officers told me that children of any age, up to 18, must be with a guardian at all times in a public place."
While that is clearly not the case, eventually she was criminally charged with two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a child. Each count carried a potential for six months' jail time. This means that as punishment for ostensibly not supervising her child closely enough for a short time, the state was threatening to stop Jessica from supervising her child at all, for a year.
Jessica hired a lawyer. He explained that the consequences of possibly losing at trial dwarfed the punishment for pleading guilty: In exchange for successfully completing a parenting class, the criminal case would be dismissed.
Jessica took the plea and enrolled in the class. The class had nothing to do with parenting, and people were there for very different reasons, including one who'd shaken her phone at a cop and another who had pulled someone's hair at a salon.
"Everyone is here today because you don't know how to deal with the police," she recalls the teacher saying. He then instructed them on how to keep calm and defuse situations.
Once she passed the class, the criminal charges against her were dismissed and vacated. But that was not the end of things, because Arizona's Department of Child Safety (DCS) was conducting a separate investigation.
In a letter they sent seven months after the incident, DCS declared that Jessica had placed her son "at unreasonable risk of harm for abduction, injury, harm from a stranger, exposure to drugs and death."
Jessica searched the archives for any story of an abduction or murder at the park and could find none. Nonetheless, her name was to be entered into the Central Registry for child abusers. There it will stay for 25 years unless the verdict is overturned at a hearing she requested. The hearing is set for early next year. In the meantime, being on that list means Jessica can't work directly with kids, and could possibly even be prevented from volunteering at her son's school.
According to Diane Redleaf, author of They Took the Kids Last Night: How the Child Protection System Puts Families at Risk, and legal consultant to Let Grow, not only are stories like Jessica's too common throughout America, 25-year registers are the norm in many states. Moreover, guilty findings are commonly issued by caseworkers—that is, without a trial—and hearings to contest those findings are often delayed.
Just last year, for example, New York cut its register length from 25 years down to eight years, which is still far too long for a parent who has done nothing more than buy a turkey while her child played happily in the park.
"Vague child neglect laws—open to the interpretation of any cop or caseworker—set up parents for no-win parenting choices," says Redleaf. "Without clearer laws that limit neglect to a serious likelihood of harm, registers will continue to sweep in thoughtful, loving, and protective parents."
Put another way: Real child neglect is when you actually neglect your kids, not when you let them play outside at a park during a pandemic while you run to the store.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Did that Texas law that made it explicitly legal for children to walk to school and play in parks unsupervised get passed? I remember reading about it on this website, but not the aftermath.
For obvious reasons this case reminded me of that law.
https://reason.com/2021/05/18/texas-becomes-third-state-to-pass-free-range-kids-law/
Texas Becomes Third State To Pass Free-Range Kids Law
"You had the most right-wing members of the legislature signed on with most left-wing members."
LENORE SKENAZY | 5.18.2021 4:15 PM
From there...
It does so because it "changes our definition of neglect," Rep. Gene Wu, a Democrat, told the assembly. From now on, kids will be removed only when "they're actually in danger, and not just the possibility of danger."
SQRLSY comment: OMG, a DEMON-CRAP blessed this new law!!! Man the barricades, all GOOD Republicans!!! We need to get BACK to having Government Almighty micro-managing the shit out of our parenting practices, 'cause the DEMON-CRAPS have blessed the new policy!!!!
My last pay test was $9500 operating 12 hours per week on line. my sisters buddy has been averaging 15k for months now and she works approximately 20 hours every week. i can not accept as true with how easy it become as soon as i tried it out. This is what to do,……….................…… Visit Here
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ... Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ... Mᴀᴋᴇ $90 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $12000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ... Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ..
░A░M░A░Z░I░N░G░ ░J░O░B░S░
¦¦¦¦F¦O¦L¦L¦O¦W¦¦M¦E¦¦¦¦¦ ...... www.maxpro9.com
.
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FGh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW
I've got my first check total of $15,550, pretty cool. I am so excited, this is the first time i Actually earned something. I am going to work even harder new and i can't wait for next week payment.jjs Go to home tab for more detail.......I highly recommend to everyone to apply...
Join this right now............Pays-/24
"Everyone is here today because you don't know how to deal with the police,"
Diddly squat to do with parenting... EVERYTHING to do with PROPERLY RESPECTING our Lords and Masters!
It is still ok to drone strike kids though, correct? Botcher Biden isn’t on a secret registry nor was he required to attend a training class. War crimes against children still ok but parenting in the real world not so much.
Military aged kids you mean.
Actually, he went to that class many times, but he doesn't remember any of it.
Their hair sure smelled good though.
As punishment for ostensibly not supervising her child closely enough for a short time, the state was threatening to stop Jessica from supervising her child at all, for a year.
This means that as punishment for ostensibly not supervising her child closely enough for a short time, the state was threatening to stop Jessica from supervising her child at all, for a year.
Nice editing.
It was so nice, they said it twice.
CPS is a stain on society trying to protect 10% of their charges while corrupting the 90%. They get paid for child in the system. Have an entire corrupt network of pay to play sychiatrists on hands who will do what CPS asks them to. And has a general employee base that makes Karen's look presidential.
And as in the case of my nephew's who actually were being abused by my ex sister in law and her husband (he chokehold one of my nephews until he passed out multiple times as punishment) and despite the school, their counselor (seeing him to deal with my brother's, their Dad's, death) and other adults in their neighborhood reporting the abuse to the state CPS did nothing. But when one of the boys ran away, in the middle of winter, and went to my parent's house, and my mom called the sheriff's department and notified them of where he was, CPS told my parents if it happened again, my parents would be charged with kidnapping for providing him a safe place to wait until the cops could show up.
This is also the CPS that made my brother pay back child support (when he wasn't working anymore because he was dieing of cancer) two weeks before he died of cancer. They said his illness and lack of income wasn't any reason not to pay his child support (which was based on his income when he was working and she wasn't and despite her making more money, and him actually having greater percentage of supervision of the kids).
*having greater income while he was fighting cancer. They said they didn't revisit child support unless he went back to court, which he couldn't afford on his disability from work.
They're not your damn kids, they belong to the state. The real crime here is being careless with government property.
Will Biden transfer the
kidsstate owned property to the Taliban? Was his MO earlier in 2021.Technically he didn't transfer it, he just abandoned it.
yeah but he felt better about it. wht hasn't bidet assigned the afghanies to the state of delaware?? and connectticut? or virginia??
or dc??
Parents are pushing back at school boards at least, and I'm sure that feeling will carry over into push back against government overreach in parenting, but it won't make changes soon enough, because you can guarantee the government wants the power over you and your kids.
It all happened thanks to Covid, remote learning, and parents finding out what goes on in government schools. It's gotten a lot worse then when todays' parents went to government school.
Heck, my dad's high school yearbook, shows photos of the Fish and Gun club, some with the students holding their rifles. That's not allowed today.
Sadly people like jeff just yesterday were asking why news like Fox is even covering the school board protests and arresting of parents, calling it conservative bias.
There is a simple three-step solution to this problem.
Tar. Feathers. Wood chipper.
The fiscally responsible solution is skipping the first 2.
Two step solution.
Tar. Lit Matches.
Save the woodchippers.
Woodchipper PTO Drives Matter
I wouldn't want to gum up a perfectly good woodchipper with tar and feathers.
I much prefer vote!vote!vote!.. It's not as sticky and messy and less noisy. tho not much.
Actually, her kids DID get snatched from the park.
(I wonder, does CPS ride in white vans?)
“As punishment for ostensibly not supervising her child closely enough for a short time, the state was threatening to stop Jessica from supervising her child at all, for a year.
This means that as punishment for ostensibly not supervising her child closely enough for a short time, the state was threatening to stop Jessica from supervising her child at all, for a year.”
Redundant.
Repetitively redundant, even! n00bdragon wrote the same thing already!!! Above!!!
See...
n00bdragon
December.14.2021 at 8:28 am
OK, I think we need to beat up "Reason" and LENORE SKENAZY some MORE about this!!!
Hey Lenore!!! You pissed off R Mac!!! You wasted its precious time, repeating a concept! You owe it an abject apology!!
So who was the Karen who called the Police in the first place?
Right after this COVID bullshit started, I was working from home. It was a nice day so I was on the back porch. My neighbor was going grocery shopping and asked if I would keep an eye on her kids while they played in the yard. I told her that it wouldn't be a problem. A bit later I hear a car come down the alley and slow down. I look to make sure that the kids weren't playing in the alley.
A few minutes later a Police car comes down the alley and stops at my neighbor's house. The Officer gets out and starts talking to the kids. I was just coming down the stairs when the kids pointed at me. I asked if there was a problem and the Officer said "No there's no problem. We had a report of children being unsupervised." About that time the car that went past earlier comes by and a woman gets out. She points at me and asks the Officer "Is that who you are going to arrest?". The Officer is as stunned as I am. She says "We're supposed to be "locked down" and these kids are outside."
I'm assuming you did the proper thing as any gentleman would? I mean - you got her license tag, tracked her down, and spiked all 4 tires, right?
The Officer gets out and starts talking to the kids.
Why do more people not find this behavior both creepy and really troubling. Kids do not understand that don't have to talk to police and will fully incriminate themselves and their parents despite their natural rights.
Kids do not understand that don't have to talk to police and will fully incriminate themselves and their parents despite their natural rights.
what natural rights are those...? 'rights' are, always have been, and always will be, whatever the powers that be say they are...
name one natural right that cannot be rescinded by the stroke of a power crazed pen wielder...
(To protect her identity, this article uses the pseudonym "Jessica." Reason reviewed documents, including police reports, that verified her story.)
I'd like to take a moment to thank Lenore, whether I agree with her or not, for a fine piece of journalism.
Above average for 2021. nyway.
In a letter they sent seven months after the incident, DCS declared that Jessica had placed her son "at unreasonable risk of harm for abduction, injury, harm from a stranger, exposure to drugs and death."
Since, apparently in this community, even the playgrounds are havens for abduction, injury, harm, drugs, and death the DCS recommended shitcanning the entire police force and finding someone who can do the job with even a modest level of competency, right?
The onus of performing this job (keeping parks and playgrounds safe) has now fallen onto parents. If you take your child to the public park, you MUST take your guns, pepper spray, handcuffs, and tasers with you, to defend your child from abductors, injurers, drug dealers, death-dealers, and other stranger-dangers!
First, never speak to the police. What you say will be used against you. Next, do not play footsie with the criminal courts. A bogus criminal proceeding about child endangerment that gets dismissed later has no impact on CPS or juvenile court and child custody. The problem in this case is that the mother admitted guilt willfully and knowingly to endangering her children. This admission is clear justification for the CPS action.
So... "How many fingers, Winston?"
Kids up to 18 have to be with a guardian at all times? That can't possibly be true.
The ironybis that the real threat to children and families are the mindless bots that make these laws.
Arizona voters had a choice between freedom and the initiation of force. They chose The Kleptocracy. Could this come of having so many Enemy Alien prisoner camps during WW2? Texas had such camps too. But New Mexico, now notoriously Libertarian, had so many enemy alien camps it is suspected of interplanetary sanctuary-ism. Maybe Arizona needs more physicists and fewer rednecks with green teeth...
NM is not libertarian... It's a blue state.
Not to mention bent teachers, coaches, clergy, scout leaders, etc (if only small percentages of same.) The institutions who hire such have shown strong tendencies to "pass the trash" and cover up real harm done to kids in order to avoid: cleaning house; recruiting replacements who don't neglect, molest or otherwise abuse their charges; minimize lawsuits from the families of victims; reporting those who commit crimes that give the institution a bad reputation. CYA and hide the checkbook, unless there's an NDA attached to a settlement.
Cops with nothing better to do than bully moms could move to Texas and hire out as vigilante girl-bulliers in service of Lebensborn legislation.
CPS, you mean?
Lenore, please connect me with the attorney representing "Jessica." Perhaps ParentsUSA can intervene as an amicus or otherwise support her. She may also want to consider a motion to withdraw her plea and take the case to a jury. Sure, parents can be rough on other parents, but it will take only one juror to get a not guilty verdict.
Until politicians that sponsor and vote for these laws are publicly called out, this type of thing will continue. Supporters of laws like this are anti-family and anti-children. And that is the nicest thing to say about them. I agree that 7 is a bit young, but that shouldn't be my decision. But anyone that thinks that kids shouldn't have independence before teen years should be put on a list. Just kidding, the list part sounds like it is out of a Ray Bradbury novel.
When I was 7, my Dad would send me to the store on my bike to get the Saturday newspapers. I got to spend the change on baseball cards. (1960s child hood.) It was a mile, round-trip, at most, on residential streets.
Is the playground of the school where I went to kindergarten a meth marketplace now? Things might have changed in a half century+. Our archaic drug laws aside, would we have our Professional Law Enforcement Officers to blame for the inability to guarantee that children will be able to play on playgrounds?
Time to write to your Arizona senators about a Free Range bill.
Children will rise to meet expectations.
I spent most of my childhood unsupervised, having a great time in a manner that would see my mom incarcerated these days. Even the tetanus shots were worth it.
Kids these days are just about crippled by the time nanny state and helicopter mom finally take off the swaddling.
Probably why they fall over like Kal-El exposed to rock from the Old Home Place when they encounter an allergen. Don't expect your immune system to be robust if you are raised like the Bubble Boy.
When th older generations complain about "helicopter parenting" I like to remind them that they created it with policies like this. It's not that I don't trust my kids--it's that I don't trust my government to tell Busybody Beatrice to mind her own business
There was no COVID-19 vaccine at the time. Surely that makes going into stores more risky than getting abducted?
The Stasi, Cheka and KGB did not go defunct when the Iron Curtain fell, but alive and well in America.
Next thing you know, the government will declare a right to decide how children are educated. Oops - too late…