Oklahoma's Governor Commutes Julius Jones' Death Sentence, Halting Today's Scheduled Execution
In exchange, Jones shall “never again be eligible to apply for, be considered for, or receive any additional commutation, pardon, or parole.”

Just hours before the execution was scheduled to happen, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt announced that he was commuting the sentence of Julius Jones, 41, who was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1999 killing of a businessman during a carjacking.
Jones' pending execution became a national news story. Not only has Jones insisted he was innocent and not at the scene of the crime, but several Republican state legislators and members of Oklahoma's Pardon and Parole Board agreed that there was enough of a question of Jones' guilt to spare him death. The Board voted 3–1 earlier in November to recommend that the Republican governor commute his sentence.
Advocates of Jones' innocence note that co-defendant Christopher Jordan got a deal from prosecutors that let him point the finger at Jones in exchange for getting 15 years instead of a seat on death row. Several people have come forward to say that they've heard Jordan confess to the crime.
Stitt had kept quiet about the issue, waiting for the recommendation from the Pardon and Parole Board. He has overseen the return of executions to Oklahoma, which had been on pause for the past six years due to concerns about drug protocols that have caused some serious problems. In October the first execution after the hiatus, of John Marion Grant, made the man go into convulsions and vomit before his death.
"After prayerful consideration and reviewing materials presented by all sides of this case, I have determined to commute Julius Jones' sentence to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole," Stitt wrote in a statement announcing the commutation.
Stitt's executive order comes with some truly harsh conditions. Oklahoma's administrative code states that "After receiving a favorable commutation of a sentence from the Governor, an Inmate is ineligible to apply for an additional commutation on the same sentence." The Board recommended that Stitt consider commuting Jones' sentence to life with the possibility of parole. In his executive order, Stitt maintains that neither the Oklahoma Constitution nor state law grants the authority of the board to make such a recommendation. And according to the state's constitution, the governor doesn't have the authority to grant parole to somebody sentenced to life without parole.
Stitt includes the following command in his executive order: "Julius Darius Jones shall not be eligible to apply for or be considered for a commutation, pardon, or parole for the remainder of his life."
Despite this demand that Jones never attempt to be fully released even if he can prove his innocence, Jones' lawyer, Amanda Bass, put out a statement expressing relief that her client won't be put to death.
"Governor Stitt took an important step today towards restoring public faith in the criminal justice system by ensuring that Oklahoma does not execute an innocent man," wrote Bass. "While we had hoped the Governor would adopt the Board's recommendation in full by commuting Julius's sentence to life with the possibility of parole in light of the overwhelming evidence of Julius's innocence, we are grateful that the Governor has prevented an irreparable mistake."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sooner or later we thought this would happen.
Oklahoma would have to stoops to new levels to execute this guy.
This guy?, I'm a man!
Stitt will mullet over.
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FJIh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW
Why are you wasting your time depending on your monthly salary when you can work staying at home just with your PC and mobile phone you can earn up to $4000 within 3 days
Feel free to learn more... WorkJoin1
I am taking in substantial income 2000$ online from my PC. A month ago EI GOT check of almost $31k, this online work is basic and direct, don’t need to go Hah OFFICE, Its home online activity.
For More Information Visit This Site………… Visit Here
This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started with 25 persons company GDc now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.
For more info Open on this web Site............Pays24
Either way, he's going to die behind bars. This just changes the timing. There's no point in fighting for the death penalty.
Sure about that, Ben?
My guess, this guy gets paroled 20 years from now, whenever his medical issues become too expensive for the prison to treat, and his victims' memories have faded.
Killers of famous people die in the pen. Or famous killers. Not regular ones, usually.
I wonder what "prayerful consideration" looks like. What exactly is going on there?
Sitting quietly contemplating the issue and how to proceed on a moral path. You should try it sometime.
Hi) My name is Paula, I'm 24 years old) Looking for a naughty man to exchange private 18+ pics. If interested, my profile - http://xurl.es/id378955
"even if he can prove his innocence"
That wouldn't be a parole or a pardon. That would be overturning his sentence. I hope the State wouldn't have the power to deny that.
He had multiple appeals and his case even went to the U.S. Supreme Court! The reason the board recommended clemency is because it's full of activists!
And/or they thought they could get some face time with a Kardashian. The clemency/getting a finding of actual innocence process is a lot more political than an attempt to discover the truth should be. At least it's been that way in Houston and Texas. Doubt Oklahoma's any different.
I linked the OK A.G.'s statement on the evidence against Jones in the last article. It's pretty damning. Whatever though.
Government has plenty power to keep people in prison for a lifetime. They don’t need the power of execution when so often the execute innocent people and this has been proven over and over
That was my thought, too. If he can prove actual innocence, he could get his sentence overturned, and it wouldn't fall under this proscription.
Essentially, he was told, "This is all the mercy you're getting.", but being released if he could prove his innocence wouldn't be mercy, it would be justice.
Because there is reasonable doubt as to his guilt, he will not be executed.
Despite there being reasonable doubt as to his guilt, he will be imprisoned for life.
This is exceedingly confusing. Is the only evidence him his co-defendant's accusation? Is there any physical evidence?
Bah. I despise the death penalty. At least that's off the table.
https://innocenceproject.org/julius-jones-death-row-oklahoma-what-to-know/
The innocence project says (a) he was eating dinner at home with his family, (b) he had a shaved head and eye witnesses to the murder said the killer had 1-2 inches of hair, (c) several prisoners said the co-defendant admitted being the killer.
Family do not make the most reliable alibis. But mistaking bald for a couple of inches hair is more worrying, and trusting the testimony of his co-defendant, who may well have been the killer, and who had every incentive in the world to finger somebody else, is ludicrous. I don't see how any jury could have convicted Jones beyond a reasonable doubt.
never goto Oklahoma.
Because the Innocence Project and Jones supporters are a bunch of liars!
First of all, Jones' family is lying about his alibi; the night in question happened before Jones committed the murder. This is backed up by an independent witness who when asked to corroborate it, said that she had gone to a store that day and produced a receipt showing a different day. Also, Jones' two defense attorneys testified under oath that Jones himself had told them his family was mistaken.
Second, Jones matched the witness description of the victim's sister. She did not say he had inch long hair, but that he had a skull cap and she could see an inch of hair sticking out, aka sideburns!
Third, the murder weapon was found in Jones' home wrapped in a bandana. Said gun was identified by Jones' own girlfriend (who he tried to threaten to keep quiet by the way) as being his. Oh and that bandana was later tested for DNA evidence and despite him saying that he never wore it, not only did it show a strong probability of being his (as in the odds of it matching another African American youth were 1 in 100 million) but it also excluded his partner in crime.
If you are interested in learning more and going into even more evidence of Jones' guilt, look up Actual Justice Warrior on youtube. He's done multiple videos on the subject.
Thank you. I just created an account so I could write that but you saved me the trouble. This whole thing is a joke, it's like Mumia Abu-Jamal all over again.
I don't support the death penalty but Julius Jones is a murdering piece of shit that should never see the outside of a prison.
Interesting! And also useful. Thanks for posting that.
I'm a little tempted to find out how much was presented at trial, but not enough to find, download, and read a trial transcript.
If you want, just listen to the videos posted by Actual Justice Warrior. He's done several on this issue and I highly recommend his youtube channel.
Jesus Christ. I'll link to the OK A.G's statement again: https://oag.ok.gov/articles/attorney-general-hunter-reiterates-facts-julius-jones%E2%80%99-trial
Therein, we can read:
They got the right guy.
Thanks. I like Reason a lot and usually agree with them, but their writers are just incapable of telling the law enforcement side of a story or even the basic facts that support that side.
But can Stitt tie the hands of future governors this way?
That's what I was wondering. Seems like any future governor could just rescind that executive order, couldn't they?
Yep. The deal, is for public consumption. It doesn't bind anyone. There's no preclusive effect, other than OK can't reinstate the death penalty for Jones, for those crimes.
The next Governor is perfectly able to hear a subsequent petition for clemency or a pardon. Which, if Jones is as innocent as the Parole Board and Kardashians seem to think, ought to be forthcoming.
Not if the OK administrative code says he can't. The text quoted here makes it sound like Jones can't, by law, APPLY for any further clemency. Whether a future governor could grant it, in the absence of an application, despite the language in Stitt's order, is unclear.
Can the Parole Board move for it on Jones's behalf? I'm not an Oklahoma criminal appellate lawyer.
Though what will likely happen is Jones will be left to rot, now that he can't be used as a cudgel against Oklahoma's capital punishment system. Which I guess isn't terrible. Put some money on somebody's books, if you're that bent about him getting off Death Row.
Right. The article portrays this as the Governor ordering around his successors, when all he was doing was stating the legal consequences of getting this commutation.
bueno. shouldn't be killing in the name of anyway.
Understand Kim Kartrashian put "pressure" on the governor. Bet she put "pressure" on something, all right. The family of the victim opposed clemency. Now Jones can laugh, having gotten away with murder. He lives and the victim is still dead. Once again, criminals seem to have more rights than victims.
What part of "life in prison" screams "got away with murder" to you, exactly?
Getting money and business ventures sounds like getting away with murder to me. Kill a man in front of his daughters, get your own brand of shoes!
https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/2021/10/25/oklahoma-parole-board-told-julius-jones-making-business-deals-death-row/6140673001/