Democratic Socialists Lost Big on Election Night With India Walton Defeat
In Buffalo, incumbent Byron Brown staged a successful write-in campaign against DSA-backed candidate India Walton. Elsewhere in the country, DSA candidates won their local races.

In June, India Walton, a proud democratic socialist, beat incumbent Byron Brown in the race to see who would become the Democratic nominee for mayor of Buffalo, New York. This past week, Walton got walloped by her opponent, who eked out a last-minute write-in win.
Brown's "campaign was crafty," reports The New York Times, "spending $100,000 to distribute tens of thousands of ink stamps bearing the mayor's name to allow voters to ink his name on ballots, something allowed by state law." This will be Brown's fifth term as Buffalo mayor, one he garnered by emphasizing coalition building with more moderate and conservative supporters. On Tuesday night, he oh-so-humbly declared his own write-in win "one of the greatest comeback stories in our history."
As for Walton, "she exceeded my expectations in the general in some ways," University of Buffalo political science professor Jacob Neiheisel tells Reason. "We thought her ceiling was 30-35% and she outperformed that," though he alludes to the fact that it's hard to tell what percentage of her support is comprised of true believers versus those who simply wanted a change.
Walton's campaign was hobbled, at least in part, by her campaign staff's inability to regain control of media coverage after news reports surfaced that her car had been impounded due to failure to pay parking tickets and an expired inspection. Though Walton initially smartly leveraged this by reminding voters that these are the struggles poor people go through all the time, she fumbled later on when blaming the impounding troubles on her opponent.
"Brown successfully turned the election debate to the petty personal mistakes of Walton, a woman who became a working mother as a teen, before becoming a nurse: she was charged with $295 worth of food stamp fraud in 2003; she owed $749 in back taxes in 2004; she was stopped for driving with a suspended license; she visited her cousin before he went to jail; she failed to show up for a court summons sent to the wrong address; she wrote a rude Facebook post; and her car was towed just last month over unpaid parking tickets," writes Branko Marcetic at Jacobin, noting that Walton did not come from a moneyed background.
Neiheisel says that Brown made a mistake when he underestimated Walton's team initially. "He should have seen this coming," he says, noting that Federal Election Commission filings showed that Walton had significant downstate support, broadcasting ad spots in the right markets, and a solid media team. Still, "I don't think I've seen someone [within Buffalo politics] who has been quite as willing to append the socialist label to themselves [as Walton]," says Neiheisel, noting that there's a "generational gap" at play where younger voters are more willing to outwardly profess their democratic socialist or socialist affiliations.
Walton's platform consisted of boilerplate socialist commitments, especially in the realm of housing policy. She wanted to "provide financial relief to small landlords in exchange for rent forgiveness for tenants" while implementing the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act (TOPA), which "means that when a property goes up for sale, existing tenants will have the first option to purchase the property." (TOPA provides funding for tenants to do so.) And, "if a tenant does not want the ability to purchase, they can assign their right to purchase the property to a local non-profit housing agency, which will then manage the property."
Walton's website says that "TOPA is a powerful anti-displacement and wealth generation tool." What her website doesn't say is that Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) proposals to intervene in the provenance of housing stock often creates problems. Tenants' rights protections, which DSA types (including Walton) almost always advocate for, raise landlords' costs of doing business, which results in them either raising rents or selling off their housing stock. Socialists tend to attempt to stymie developers building new housing stock, operating under the delusion that building new luxury apartments will raise rents for everyone, while also failing to recognize that higher vacancy rates correlate with less rent inflation.
Despite Walton's loss, several DSA-endorsed candidates performed concerningly well. Kendra Hicks won her bid for a seat on Boston's city council; incumbent Quinton Zondervan won his reelection bid for a seat on nearby Cambridge's city council. J.T. Scott was reelected to the city council in Somerville, Massachusetts.
Other DSA upstarts in the state were less successful: Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler failed in his bid for reelection to Cambridge's city council. Becca Miller, Eve Seitchik, and Tessa Bridge all failed to garner enough votes to be elected to the seats they were vying for on Somerville's city council. In all, the planned socialist takeover of Somerville, Massachusetts, didn't amount to much, and Boston DSA-backed incumbents had a much easier time getting the votes they needed than new entrants did.
"Our goal is … to take over Somerville and to start implementing a Green New Deal for Somerville, free transit, defunding the police, creating affordable housing, bringing back rent control," Boston DSA spokesperson Seth Gordon told Politico back in March, which noted that such "endorsements are a signal that the Boston Democratic Socialists of America is flexing some new political power, and eyeing a move toward the mainstream."
Elsewhere in the country, Rajesh Barnabas lost the race for a Rochester, New York, city council seat. Three DSA candidates won seats on Minneapolis' city council. And in Florida, Richie Floyd won a seat on St. Petersburg's city council.
2) DSA natl win rate is decent bc partly incumbents but also due to strategic campaigns across jurisdictions within & btw chapters such as in the greater Boston area. Staying local and combining resources across multiple races is key to expanding elected socialist representation.
— David S. Duhalde (@TheDuhalde) November 3, 2021
DSA endorsed 32 candidates in total; though many of the highest-profile contenders like India Walton were rejected by voters, the DSA's strategy of casting a wide net in local races appears to have somewhat come to fruition, with the organization reporting a 69 percent success rate.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Given that this is Buffalo, maybe she thought she could wing it and win.
Her campaign veered wide right allowing the Giant in New York politics, Byron Brown, to win.
If she ran a deficit in her campaign, who would foot all those Bills?
These are 2 pay checks $78367 and $87367. that i received in last 2 months. I am very happy that i can make thousands in my part time and now i am enjoying my life. Everybody can do this and earn lots of dollars from home in very short time period.XEs Your Success is one step away Click Below Webpage…..
Just visit this website now.......... Pays 24
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…Fh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…HFb And i get surly a check of $12600 what's awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won't regret it! ……...........VISIT HERE
Sarah getting Paid upto $18953 in the week, working on-line at home. I’m Student. I shocked when my sister’s told me about her check that was $97k. It’s very easy to do.CEs Everybody will get this job. Go to home media tab for additional details……
So I started.............. E-CASH
She's going to win the next three primaries, but choke in each of those general elections too.
I am taking in substantial income two Hundred$ dollar online from my PC. A month ago I GOT check of almost $31k, this online work is basic and DQs direct, don’t need to go OFFICE, Its home online activity.
For More Information Visit…………Pays24
She would not admit defeat, nor would she concede.
Get it? Nor would = Norwood? Yeah, had to work too hard for that one.
Well done!
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily.VGr simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing. Try now…
Click & Chang your Life ._________foxlineblog.Com
That’s a saucy take.
Side note; buffalo sauce is used in a traditional preperarion of chicken gizzards amongst the lower class irish peoples of the area. They fry the gizzards in butter and add generous amounts of hot sauce. Pretty tasty tbh, but not as good as deep fried, which is traditionally popular amongst the lower classes in the new orleans area.
Sounds delicious, thanks.
Sounds like a gutsy recipe.
That sounds offal. Pass.
Chicken livers I like with either ketchup or A-1, but gizzards are too bitter for my taste. Why every chicken breast in every chicken restaurant from KFC to Bojangles to grocery store delis always retains them is a mystery to me.
What this shows is that while Socialism is a minority view in America Socialists are becoming more open in their control of the Dem party.
A Great Software To Generate Passive Income And Get Results In A Short Time https://bonuses-review.com/post-n-earn-oto/
With the stimulus checks paying people to just exist, who needs passive income? We've got that already!
"Our goal is … to take over Somerville and to start implementing a Green New Deal for Somerville, free transit, defunding the police, creating affordable housing, bringing back rent control,"
When I was a kid, Somerville was a real shithole and was referred to as "Slumerville" before it got gentrified by white, liberal hipsters. Looks like the DSA is trying to bring back those good old days.
“Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.”
http://bastiat.org/en/government.html
Back in the old days when these comments were a place where you could learn stuff, a link to Bastiat would start a conversation.
Now I expect a few personal attacks from the usual suspects, and not a single person interested in a conversation about the role of government in our lives. Not a word about taxes for wealth redistribution as opposed to paying for legitimate uses of force, or anything like that.
I expect "sarc you voted for Biden" and "sarc you're a drunk who fucks his own child" and "sarc you hate Trump."
I will be flabbergasted if a single person engages in a conversation about ideas.
They will.
With people besides you. You're a caricature, Sarc. A farce. You don't even really rise to the level of 'troll'.
And to quote Bastiat alongside the things you've been espousing borders on sacrilege.
If you want intelligent conversation, try engaging that way, with reasoned ideas and arguments.
What have I been espousing?
You tend to expend your energy ranting about Trump. Even when Trump isn’t part of the conversation. You also frequently show up here looking for trouble.
And yeah, you did help push Biden. So you got what you wanted.
Victim hood
Oh, and I'm not flabbergasted.
Seriously. If you're gonna level a condemnation like that, back it up. Empty words are empty. What have I been espousing?
If you haven't learned by now from the thousands of comments telling you what, you never will.
Please a reply from someone I haven't muted for being a dishonest piece of garbage.
Please stuff it up your ass; you've muted those who call you on your bullshit, asshole.
Now I expect a few personal attacks from the usual suspects
Like you as you called people certified morons yesterday? It's revealing the very people who pretend they don't want "personal attacks" both personally attack others and derail their own comments to invoke them. Hmmm.
Did those I referred to as "certified morons" have anything of value to add to the conversation?
So personal attacks are fine as long as you don't like them. So why are you whining that others live by same standard you do?
Saying that someone adds nothing to a conversation is not a personal attack. They can prove me wrong by saying something that isn't derogatory. Well, actually they can't. I'm Charlie Brown and they're Lucy. And I'm not kicking.
Saying that someone adds nothing to a conversation is not a personal attack.
Calling them "certified morons" is. Why the lies? Never mind, it's you.
I'm Charlie Brown and they're Lucy.
You're a child only here to express hatred of other commenters to convince yourself of your superiority.
He is lying. He is Lucy. He loves to pull out the Motte and Bailey fallacy anytime his argument is critically challenged.
Here he is today begging to be taken seriously, but it would be difficult to tabulate the number of times he has used his handle as an excuse that he didn't mean what he just wrote. I have seen it at least a dozen times.
He represents himself as a foil to conservatives. But he is just a fool for the progtards.
Seriously? Down below I'm having a conversation about economists. Why are you telling my I'm expressing hatred instead of commenting on your favorite lecture?
Why are you telling my I'm expressing hatred instead of commenting on your favorite lecture?
You don't get children to stop throwing tantrums by giving in to them.
So talking about ideas is giving into a child but you getting together with your buddies to talk shit about people is being mature. I get it.
talk shit about people
I'm not talking shit about you, I'm explaining that we understand your behavior. This is how you teach children.
Mature would be for you to give up the "poor sarc" victim pandering.
This is like a conversation with the people I have on mute. The conversation is always about me as a person. Bastait? Who? I'm starting to wonder why you shouldn't join them.
The conversation is always about me as a person.
Yes. Whenever you start a conversation about others we make it about you instead. This is how you get people out of bad habits. If we allowed you to start shit with everyone and still treat you like an adult you would never learn. You should complain to your parents for not teaching you this.
Despite your pretense you wanted a conversation about Bastiat all you did was post a link. You provided nothing about how any particular element of his philosophy ties into the current issue.
Then you immediately commented - to yourself without anyone else having commented - changing the subject to other commenters you hate. So you gave yourself a fig leaf defense before starting your personal attacks. Now you want to pretend you were only interested in Bastiat.
Again, this is childish. You've been caught enough times you're now trying to hide your true goals. But your sophistication is so lacking you think you're getting away with it as the adults roll their eyes and wait for you to grow up.
But it's very big of you to threaten people with muting as if that's some kind of penalty. Bonus points for bragging about that and criticizing others for being closed minded in the same thread as you did the other day. You're the child who thinks they understand adulthood enough to mimic it but misses the core elements.
You could have just left the quote there on its lonesome and seen if anyone engaged.
But you replied to yourself about how this would be about you, thus making it about you.
"So talking about ideas..."
sarc knows people do this, but he just has trouble figuring out what it it.
Because he's a steaming pile of lefty shit.
I see lots of hatred here, but it ain't coming from me.
What have you added to this "conversation" that you claim you wanted?
He dropped names of some economists without promoting a single argument on their behalf.
"child fucker" is all the QAnon Trump trash has left.
Did you see the pictures of them waiting for JFK Jr or something? I wonder which one of them was Nardz.
Yes, these morons were hilarious.
Thousands gathered in Dallas to wait for a ticket of Trump/JFK Jr to descend from the clouds and take back the White House.
I can see Nardz and JesseAZ there waiting slack-jawed for their savior to come back.
You know turd lies; it's all he ever does.
So now you’re pals with the resident child molester? Goddamn, you’re fucking pathetic Sarc.
Bastiat can be proved right just by attending any municipal meeting. The "public comments" will be thoroughly dominated by people demanding that government take money from others and use it to support the speaker's projects and issues. Then there are the NIMBYs who think private property use is for them but not for others.
I've never attended such a meeting. Maybe I should. Though around here I'd be puking in the back of my throat. There isn't a "match" these voters around here will pass up. Never mind that taxes keep going up and up to maintain the freebie from the match. Idjits. My head would probably explode.
What kind of match is this about? The kind that starts fire? The kind that pairs people or things? That pairs people in a contest?
Federal funds for schools and other expensive things.
I encourage everyone to attend or watch a Olanning and Zoning commission meeting if you truly want to see the dark underbelly of NImbyism.
But, do they succeed? If they do, that's probably why they do it. If they don't, they're just letting off steam, and we should be glad they do.
"sarc you're a drunk who fucks his own child"
Sweet Jesus, dude. Your post was a pathetically desperate cry for attention without this.
How could you possibly write that about yourself? It it some kind of confession? Seriously, you need to get some help. There is something broken inside you.
Bastiat was just an old drunk that hated Trump and voted for Biden.
Kidding aside. I feel like we typically have some good exchanges. I don't post too much due to limited time. Plus I tend to take forever to craft a post since I try to be very specific with my wording and message. My posts don't always end up exactly where I want them, but I have to cut it off at some point.
If you are interested in a discussion on the role of government, I view the role of government to be VERY limited. With a couple of notable exceptions, I feel like laws could have stopped being written about 200 years ago. Even though technology and society have changed, I still see our basic natural rights as consistent over that time. From my perspective, almost every law that has been written over the past 200 years is just layering on top of existing laws that actually protected individual rights. This additional layering of laws takes away what I consider to be natural rights without actually adding to the protection of other natural rights, if that makes sense.
I believe in the invisible hand and allowing individuals the freedom to come to any agreements that they want. For me, the government is there to arbitrate disputes between individuals.
I'm a big fan of Don Boudreaux, Milton Friedman, and Thomas Sowell. Sometimes I will YouTube lectures and let them drone in the background while I work.
I am not too familiar with Don Boudreaux. I will need to check him out.
I love listening to Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell. Especially Friedman when he is addressing questions or is in a debate. Makes me wish he were still alive and a prominent voice in America.
Here is one of my favorites. It articulates something that always made sense but I could never put my finger on.
I am about 20 minutes in, and I like it so far.
https://www.fff.org/freedom-in-motion/video/liberty-legislation-and-law-bourdreaux/
The gist of what you are saying is great. Pro tip, though: Adam Smith stated that self-interested traders achieved more good when trading than not "as if by an invisible hand. Adam Smith didn't believe in an actual invisible hand.
Why does there need to be a conversation about most of those things? We pretty much agree on them all.
It’s a little sexist to just assume that women would be the only ones who think that Government should undertake remedying all the evils of the world. Plenty of true men like Tony think the same way. Otherwise we wouldn’t be seeing the DSA making any kind of progress, or have people like Bernie Sanders in office.
the Pegulas must not have liked her.
Going forward, it's important to understand that the Democrats--as a party--will become more authoritarian and more socialist as they lose power.
When the Democrats are routed in the 2022 midterms, it won't be the progressives in the deepest blue districts that lose their seats. The Democrats that lose their seats will be the ones from red districts, purple districts, and light blue districts. The Democrats will almost certainly lose control of the House in 2022, but the surviving House minority will be representing the deepest blue districts--with very few moderates left to pull the Democrats towards the center.
The average Democrat in the House will probably be more like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez after 2022, and the leader of the minority Democrats in the House will not be Nancy Pelosi. It will almost certainly be Pramila Jayapal, the leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. It will be interesting to see how the Republicans respond on the issues. For instance, I don't think the Republican party has ever been more committed to free speech than it is now.
That isn't because of some fundamental aspect of Republicanism. It's mostly a reaction to progressive assaults on free speech. We might expect to see more of that kind of thing going forward. Unfortunate, the Republican response to he progressives' authoritarianism and socialism isn't always perfectly libertarian, with their attempts to force social media to tolerate speech against their will being one example. However, the Republican responses to progressive assaults of individual rights and capitalism can be libertarian.
Maybe we need to try to figure out how to help them get there.
Ken wrote: "It will be interesting to see how the Republicans respond on the issues."
Unfortunately, I strongly suspect Conservatives in the GOP will make banning abortion their top priority, which will prompt many women, moderates, libertarians and atheists to switch back to voting for pro choice Democrats.
It's a big problem.
Unfortunately, I strongly suspect Conservatives in the GOP will make banning abortion their top priority, which will prompt many women, moderates, libertarians and atheists to switch back to voting for pro choice Democrats.
^
Disagree on abortion being the catalyst, I think the single issue abortion voters will stay firmly in place. The issue will be big government conservativism in other areas. George W Bush created a negative reaction against the GOP with TARP and his blunders in the Middle East giving Obama the election over McCain (at least that's how I read the tea leaves).
Pretty easy to read those tea leaves.
After Dubya the number of voters who self identify as "Republican" dropped about five per cent skewing polls is favor of Democrats.
They still vote for Republicans though. Bush damaged the brand that much.
turd is a pathological liar.
McCain had the crazy eyes. There was no way I was going to chance that ticking timebomb. He managed to get me to vote for Obama.
Was in the same boat. Boy was I duped, knew somethings I wouldn't like but Libya, Snowden and droning were all things I didn't see coming.
Seriously, ffs, let's try 18 weeks and leave it the fuck alone.
No one can claim to be libertarian or a Libertarian if voting for Democrats. When I don't have a candidate to vote for I always write-in.
Good points; as of today the progressive caucus holds 95 seats in the House and 1 in the Senate [Sanders]; Agree that many of these from districts with the "true believers" will likely remain, and as Leander Perez described AOC, will be "the new face of the Democratic Party."
So they will be an increasingly radicalized and marginalized party, with who no one will work other than leftist members of the Black Congressional Caucus, which currently consists of 55 members. Even if they could all agree on something, it wouldn't be enough to form any meaningful coalition.
And they're unwilling to compromise.
They're like religious fanatics that way.
You don't compromise with racism like you don't compromise with the devil.
If the Republicans then become the new moderate party, will that be a good or bad development at the national level? In the states? Locally?
At that point, I probably become more libertarian and less Republican.
When Teedy Rosenfeld used the name for his party in 1912, "Progressive" meant the same thing as "Christian National Socialism" meant in 1920--all the way down to forcing women to reproduce or else "race suicide." One of the big election smears of 1920 was a pamphlet saying Warren Harding was "part negro." By law at the time that was sth like 1/19th. Similar laws restricted "Indians" from buying a beer. DNA tests nowadays prove everyone is part black! See Slick Willie's "Blue dress" DNA test.
As the Atheist bumper sticker says: "We Are All Africans!"
Maybe we need to try to figure out how to help them get there.
The problem for the libertarian movement is how do you make up with the girl you ditched at the prom? Libertarianism had it's "moment". And that moment mostly happened in Republican and conservative circles. And the spokespeople for the libertarian movement (not most grass roots libertarians) mostly decided to respond with contempt and attempts to ally with progressives. Even when doing so meant cheering on mask on vaccine mandates. Or playing fast and loose with commitment to due process and the presumption of innocence.
I can't say I'd be shocked at Republican skepticism at libertarians' demands for scrupulous adherence to libertarian principle.
It isn't about the leadership. I think it's about influencing the voters rather than their leaders.
I still strongly believe that the means to change is persuading the American people, and their leaders will change once the people change.
Jesus didn't need to convert the emperor for Christianity to dominate the Roman Empire. He persuaded the people, and eventually, you couldn't lead the people effectively unless you were a Christian. Constantine converting to Christianity was a bit like George Wallace turning his back on segregation. They both claimed to have had a change of heart, but it's hard to ignore that changing change of heart was in the same direction as their political ambitions would have led them.
Anyway, it's not about transforming the politicians. It's about changing the hearts and minds of the people. Once the American people decide that marijuana should be legal, taxes should be lower, and foreign wars of adventure are a bad idea, there are few politicians who will stand in their way. Barack Obama raided medical marijuana facilities in California hundreds of times during his first term. He stopped when the American people started changing their minds about marijuana, and Trump played the same issue the same way for the same reasons.
Joe Manchin isn't principled. He's just afraid of what would happen to him if he ignored what the people of West Virginia want.
Change the people's minds first. It starts with friends and family. It's a hard, long, drawn out, and difficult process, but it also has the advantage of being the only thing that works over the long haul. And we have an advantage over the elitist progressives, too, in that we aren't contemptuous of the people we're trying to persuade. Progressives are disgusted by the thought of trying to persuade people who disagree with them, and it's practically impossible to persuade people of anything if they think you're contemptuous of them. Before you convince people to eat in your restaurant, you have to persuade them that they're welcome to come in.
Anyway, once we get a critical mass of the American people to feel like we do--about school choice, meritocracy, fiscal conservatism, low taxation, free speech, etc.--the politicians we already have will be falling all over themselves trying to be more libertarian than each other. And when that happens, it won't really matter if those politicians describe themselves as Libertarians or Republicans when they win. I don't care if Rand Paul calls himself a libertarian, a Libertarian, or a Republican. I just care about where he is on the issues, and how he votes.
It's not the Republican/conservative leadership I'm talking about. It's the leadership of the libertarian movement and what lessons Joe Blow Republican/conservative sees when he hears from them.
Let's say Joe Blow Republican/conservative is just the kind of guy you're talking about persuading the kind of Republican/conservative that is persuadable. During the Tea Parties he was almost half way there. And how did the libertarian leadership react? They trashed him as a hypocrite because he thought he should be able to pull at least something out of his "Social Security Account" (Yes, I know that that's not in any way the way it works. But, it's exactly how it has been sold to Joe Blow all of his adult life). He was told by them that he was utterly unprincipled because he wasn't so sure having no restrictions on immigration was the best of ideas.
And when push came to shove, when the moment of truth arrived for these brave, principled, consistent truth-tellers, how did he see them react? Well, he saw them make excuses for lockdowns and mandates. He saw them handwave away the presumption of innocence and the basics of due process when there were accusations against Kavanaugh and later Trump. He heard them explain to him that the schools weren't really pushing CRT on his kids, even though what was being pushed on his kids shared all of CRT's assumptions and conclusions. And, besides, he shouldn't care anyway, since he might eventually be able to take his kids out of public school. Of course, he'd still be paying taxes on it in the meantime.
Joe Blow was the guy you're talking about trying to persuade. Heck, I'll say I was one of the Joe Blows that was persuaded. But, I spent probably more time reading the comments here, for example, than I did the stories. As I said, my criticism isn't toward most grassroots libertarians. It's to libertarian elites. Because the message he got from them is that they're fully committed to their principles, except when being fully committed to their principles might benefit him and undermine those he disagrees with. And those libertarian elites are who our Joe Blow sees and hears from as libertarians.
From what I've read, if not for those immediately around Constantine who actually decided for him, Christianity would've remained one of several popular cults that were going at the same time. It may have grown or it may have shrunk or died out.
I'd settle for scrupulous adherence to originalism or textualism constitutional law.
Oh come now. The Republicans abandoned their economic principles to chase after culture war nonsense. They left Libertarians, not the other way around.
Note to foreign readers: by "culture war," "ethnic strife" and similar equivocations Kleptocracy looters really mean "religious crusades" or "jihad."
Democrats play the long game. They know this shit is going to cost them the 2022 and the 2024 elections, they don't care. They know that even though the GOP is going to win a majority for the next 4 years, the GOP is not going to capitalize on it to advance their interests and in 2026 the Democrats are going to be back in charge and the ratchet effect is going to continue. Right now they're pushing their "democracy" agenda, the principle that 50%+1 makes a majority and the majority can do whatever they please, and the GOP is not going to refute that idea. As long as the GOP only plays defense and never goes on offense, it's only a matter of time until the Democrats win.
It's like with Obamacare - the whole thing was a disaster because the Democrats weren't interested in making a good system, they made whatever concessions to the insurance companies and the medical community were necessary just to get something passed, to establish the principle that the federal government was responsible for healthcare, to establish the principle of socialized medicine. And it worked - the GOP failed to repeal Obamacare for the simple reason that it was unimaginable that you could repeal a government program and replace it with nothing, if Republicans were going to do away with the Democrat's version of socialized medicine, it was incumbent upon them to come up with their own version of socialized medicine with which to replace it.
Right now, it doesn't matter what the Democrats manage to get passed as far as the spending bills are concerned, it only matters that they get something passed, to establish the principle that bipartisanship and compromise no longer matters, that it's strictly mob rule from here on out.
"Democratic Socialists Lost Big on Election Night With India Walton Defeat"
That's why the editors of the NYTimes, WaPo, LaTimes, CNN, MSNBC and other socialist news media decided NOT to report this news.
Hey, their doing everyone a favor calling themselves "democratic socialists" so voters can reject them.
On the right a similar "Republican Fascist" label might help some but is pretty much redundant.
Whatever you say, racist.
Anytime, snowflake.
Fuck off Kiddie Raper. We need to find out who you really are so you can go to prison, where you belong. Which is generous, since a child rapist like you should be slowly tortured to death.
You QAnon trash never stop, do you?
Do you lick the butt plug after her use? You ever consider changing your name to something like 'anal warts'?
turd never does anything but lie.
Is that a conservative progressive a la ted Roosevelt?
Notable fascist like FDR and Obama were Republicans? Oh wait…
This is true. When you go through the platforms for Germany, the Nazis knew better than to nationalize munitions industries (hence the Krupp law). Nazis also exploited the Lutheran hatred for Jyoos and communists. Those are the only important differences aside from emphasis laid on eugenics. Theodore Roosevelt was so much a role model for young fascists that Orwell uses a TR "within measurable distance of winning" meme for a dictator's speech.
Seems like lots of lefties have doubled down on their "all Republicans are racists" lies since Tuesday's election.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/11/05/pew-research-gets-pummeled-for-distribution-of-skin-color-graph-n2598641
This is just the hispanic version of "You Ain't Black," with a nice little chart.
But race has become the #1 issue as both sides have lost their fucking minds.
Progressives want preferential treatment for AAs and conservatives reject all their supposed small government principles to elect a Birther reality TV star who might as well said "ni**er ni**er" when he referred to Obama being a Kenyan and Mexicans as "rapists".
Kill yourself. You’re a child molester.
I suppose of you're a progressive and the rest of your platform sucks and is failing spectacularly, then yes. Race is the #1 issue.
Obama's literary agent listed him as Kenyan on their ad pamphlets.
This is funny (and true).
https://townhall.com/columnists/briandarling/2021/11/05/republicans-owe-a-debt-of-gratitude-to-progressive-democrats-and-the-woke-media-n2598619
It makes me really happy that AOCs endorsed candidates pretty much all lost, especially India Walton, who lost loudly and spectacularly to a write in campaign.
AOC is a loudmouth camera whore who will do and say anything to get her mug on TV, and apparently her endorsement is worthless at best.
But she says all the losses were because the Dems didn't prog hard enough. When I saw that statement, it filled my heart will glee knowing that this awful ideologue is being reject across the wider country while it's adherents are willing to go with the ship.
She was busted masking for a propaganda photo and then immediately taking the mask off while not social distancing. Even proggies will tire of her bullshit.
When you're a proglodyte, you can get away with anything.
Calling out those two as different is telling and I doubt intended. It rightfully calls out "socialists" as anti-remocratic, leaving "democratic socialists" as the oxymoron it is.
They already to: make a better offer. If you give tenants the right to match the best offer, you haven't changed anything as far as the landlord is concerned. If you force the landlord to accept any tenant offer in the face of better outside offers, that is theft, plain and simple. If you give taxes to the tenants to back up their offers, you are distorting the market and raising prices for everybody, including the tenants who make those inflated buyouts and owe more property tax.
Those familiar with American history will know that the there were a number of Socialist on city level politics. Including mayors. These were often urban industrial centers were the Socialist base were union members and other blue collar workers. The Socialist fell out of favor with the rise of Communism in Europe, Asia and elsewhere. I think that we are seeing a renewed interest in socialism and you will see more on the local level. This rise will be fueled by wealth inequities and by rising populism attacking minorities.
by rising populism attacking minorities
Jussie agrees.
I met Milwaukee 's Frank Zeidler and talked third party politics with him, back in the 1980s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Zeidler
Which party and group is attacking minorities in their ads and policies, education, and laws? They are populist, true, but populist doesn't mean the group you were told and so clearly believe it does.
I see populist as group looking for easy answers and so blaming others usually minorities and foreigners for problems. Socialist are often the people coming to support those attacked. Reading Reason, I think that Libertarians often reject the idea that some others are to blame. Where Libertarian fail is that they don't come across as willing to challenge this bigotry.
PA Gov Wolf violates his own mail in ballot law after insisting PA's 2020 election contained no fraud.
https://triblive.com/news/pennsylvania/gov-wolf-describes-having-wife-drop-off-ballot-as-honest-mistake/
The fringe is the fringe. They will always be relegated to the fringe.
Just by way of an update, the moderate Democrats are holding up the budget reconciliation bill.
"WASHINGTON—House Democrats’ goal of approving their version of a roughly $2 trillion education, healthcare and climate package this week again hit roadblocks as a group of centrist Democrats withheld their support for the bill until they received further analysis of its costs . . . .
But some centrist Democrats have so far declined to commit to supporting the bill, calling for additional analysis of its cost. Several of those Democrats met with Mrs. Pelosi on Friday morning and the chamber didn’t move to an initial procedural vote on the legislation . . . .
Rep. Jared Golden (D., Maine) said Friday that he wouldn’t vote for the bill without a cost analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which isn’t expected to come for at least a week.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-moves-toward-votes-on-infrastructure-budget-bills-11636120392?
Last week, the headlines were all about how the House progressives were holding up the infrastructure bill until the moderate Democrats in the Senate passed the budget reconciliation bill. Next week, the headlines will be all about how the House moderates won't vote for the budget reconciliation bill--no matter whether the progressives pass the infrastructure bill or not.
A mere precursor.
The DSA gets a 69% success rate in running for local offices, whereas the LP shoots its wad every four years on a hail mary pass for the White House.
Sorry libertarians, but that strategy is not working out for you. You can't make it to the majors without a farm team.
Agreed, the LP really needs to focus itself on small local and state elections for a while and build a base.
Something tells me that the public just isn’t that into liberty though..
LP candidates just ran unopposed for over 100 small local offices in Pennsylvania. ALL local LP candidates in Austin got more votes than the Spike Anarchy/Jo Antichoice ticket in 2020. Voters are smarter than looters give them credit for. All they need is an unmuzzled choice.
But if they wanted to follow a strategy like DSA's, they'd get the farm team nominations by a major party. The DSA is a caucus within the Democrats.
A politician of any party is able to caucus with any others they choose. Their are bipartisan caucuses in the Congress. So a Libertarian could caucus with any group they feel they share common ideas. Sometimes it is the major party that is the problem.
Great suggestion. I fail to understand the Libertarian parties reluctance to get into smaller races where they might be better able to win an election.
Ah, another GOP shill sweating over the choice between bullying girls and losing or copying Libertarian planks and winning. The Orange Don lost the 2016 popular vote by 2.1% while the Libertarians got 3.3% of the vote. The whole point of the LP running votes is to make the worst socialist LOSE. For us that's a win. The communist income tax amendment got into the Constitution after Greenback party spoiler votes covered the gap between the entrenched Kleptocracy factions by a factor of 300. Spoiler votes change laws.
the DSA's strategy of casting a wide net in local races appears to have somewhat come to fruition
I wonder if that approach might work for other third parties. Instead of focusing all your energy on running presidential candidates who don't have a prayer of making a dent, focus on recruiting and electing low-level local candidates who might be able to show the local voters that they're not political nutjobs. I guess we may never know.
DSA is not a party. They're a caucus of the Democrats.
skids here knows that's a lie. Small party spoiler votes are what change bad laws. Nobody with any sense is fooled by the Trump or Biden looter puppets. But we do listen carefully to everything the religious faction says about the communist faction and vice-versa. Those are the only true things The Kleptocracy ever utters! Without anarchist bootheads and antichoice harridans the LP grows its vote--up a thousandfold in 50 years and--barring hostile infiltrators & saboteurs--still growing.
DSA is not a party. They're a caucus of the Democrats.
True, and look how much clout their votes pack! Fools give money to lobbyists to whine on their behalf with whatever is left over after rent and groceries, hookers and dope. But each citizen can directly leverage a libertarian spoiler vote into at least 20 times its weight in changed laws. Before the LP 18-year-olds went to prison for plants and to 'Nam for crippling disabilities, thanks to The Looter Kleptocracy that wants your vote. Both Kleptocracy parties are LOSING members, and only gain voters via loathing and fear.
Democratic socialist is an oxymoron.
B.S.
Not so. Democtacy is unlimited mob tule versus Individual Rights, including Property Rights.
So his voters had to ink stamp Byron Brown's name. Tell you somethin' about the education system in this Democrat stronghold.
Avoids votes not getting counted due to mispellings {Brian Braun?}, smudged ink or lousy handwriting.
V'z fhecevfrq gur "fgn zc gur anzr" zrgubq unfa'e orra znqr vyyrtny.
Democratic Socialists don't belong in the USA at ALL!!!!
Your national utopia already exists elsewhere... Why are they here in the USA?
I'll tell you why; Their fundamental survival instinct is to CONQUER and CONSUME... They go where ever the wealth exists and CONQUERS and CONSUMES until nothing is left.
They've learned that STEALING gets them momentary gain.
Sadly; at the EXPENSE of someone else EVERY TIME.
Gov-Gun-Forces =/= Wealth. You cannot eat GUNS. You cannot make goods with GUNS. You can only STEAL by the threat of GUNS.
So it's nothing to do with Teedy Rosenfeld, Edward Bellamy, Jack London, William Dean Howells, William Jennings Bryan, the People's Party, the Socialist Party, Prohibition Party or Socialist Labor Party spoiler votes? All These States had before the Liberal Party were mercantile protectionist carels, lynch mob mystical fanatics, bomb-throwing anarchists and socialist orators. Libertarians only exist since 1971, and went from under 4000 to over 4 million votes in the meantime, thanks largely to the pro-choice plank of 1972-76.
Food stamp fraud; back taxes owed; suspended drivers license; unpaid parking tickets. Yeah, let's put the socialists in charge of industry.
Back taxes? THOUGHTCRIME!?
As far as the DSA engineering a democratic takeover of some small city and thereby instituting a local "Green New Deal", complete with free transit, TOPA run properties, etc., along with the more typical municipal responsibilities, I say, "Go for it!". As long as they institute the local taxes (or, more likely, vast borrowing) it would take to do so.
As it is, most of America's struggling small cities (probably excepting such atypical cities as Summerville that exist in the shadow of high-income centers like Boston and are home to mostly high-income residents who appreciate their close proximity to it) would see such actions as far beyond possible. In fact, I have to wonder if even those older suburbs lie Summerville can actually pay their own way as it is.
Han Solo would've said: Better her than me.
Kurt Russell could observe: I dunno, but it's weird and it's pissed off!
So... does anyone remember who was "upset" between election night 2016 (4M LP votes) and Inauguration day?
Socialism is when you steal from those who work and earn a living and give it to those who prefer to sit on their arses and do nothing.
As for the Green New Deal which in reality is the Green Raw Deal, those behind it will only make a mess of things. Guaranteed. They have the combined brain power of a hen house. Clueless individuals who fell under the spell of a New York City cocktail waitress with a bogus college degree and somehow got elected to congress. I feel sorry for those people who have to suffer from the actions of the socialistas.
Great work