Democrats Still Want to Spend Trillions. But They Don't Want To Raise Taxes To Do It.
Plus: In-N-Out fights San Francisco's vaccine mandate, the Vienna Tourism Board gets an OnlyFans, apes protest the DEA, and more...

Democrats' plans to hike taxes to pay for their Build Back Better agenda are being derailed by the opposition of one moderate senator. On Wednesday afternoon, the Wall Street Journal reported that Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D–Ariz.) was opposed to plans to pay for the massive $3.5 trillion bill by raising taxes on high-income earners, businesses, and capital gains.
House Democrats had proposed raising the top income tax bracket from 37 percent to 39.5 percent. They would also raise corporate taxes from 21 percent to 25 percent. The top capital gains tax rate would go up to 28.8 percent, up from the current 23.8 percent.
President Joe Biden has repeatedly said these tax increases would make the super rich and large corporations pay their "fair share." Critics have argued that they'll actually hit the so-called "working rich" who already pay incredibly high marginal tax rates, the hardest.
The combined effect of all the new spending Democrats have proposed—plus the taxes and debt needed to pay for it—is projected to be a major drag on the economy as well.
This is all apparently now too much for Sinema and could end up leading to a smaller spending bill overall. The Journal reports that the income and corporate tax increases she is opposing would raise $840 billion. Without that revenue, the overall price tag of the Build Back Better bill will likely be closer to $2 trillion.
This "no rate increases" stance seems to be gaining momentum, and its existence is reiterated by the most credible reporters.
This is (a) welcome, (b) a sign that the bill is going to be smaller than $2 trillion. https://t.co/4o4Y2p648C
— Alan Cole (@AlanMCole) October 20, 2021
The shrinking size of Democrats' (still massive) spending bill has set off yet more political wrangling about what exactly to cut. Some more centrist liberal groups have proposed cutting the $300 billion in new spending on housing, among other things, from the legislation. The White House is reportedly considering forgoing a $150 billion clean energy program in an effort to appease Sen. Joe Manchin (D–W.Va.).
There's an endless number of budget gimmicks that lawmakers could include in the bill to reduce its costs on paper while still practically preserving much of the programs and new spending that they want. That could include setting the start date for programs years in advance or establishing expiration dates for them that will be politically difficult to stick to. This all helps lower the Congressional Budget Office's score of how much the bill will cost over a 10-year period.
Engaging in that budgetary trickery would be the most politically convenient thing for Democrats, but there are plenty of reasons to oppose it.
Writing over at Full Stack Economics, economist Alan Cole argues that frontloading the costs of the bill by setting up a bunch of temporary programs that go into effect immediately would end up pouring money on an economy that's already suffering from inflationary pressures.
Reason's Peter Suderman has also criticized these gimmicks as "simultaneously shameless and timid," writing yesterday that they represent "a refusal to acknowledge the necessity of tradeoffs, political or economic. And that, in some sense, is what legislating is—a matter of sifting through options and establishing what's important given the resources and political constraints."
The fact that Democrats' tax plans are in danger is obviously good news. But be wary of any supposed shrinking in the overall cost of the Build Back Better agenda as a result.
FREE MARKETS
A famed California burger chain had its San Francisco location shut down for refusing to play vaccine cop. News surfaced this week that fast-food company In-N-Out had its one restaurant in the city temporarily closed by the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH) because its employees were not checking customers' vaccination status as required by a local mandate.
"We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government," said Arnie Wensinger, chief legal and business officer for In-N-Out, according to CBS. "It is unreasonable, invasive, and unsafe to force our restaurant associates to segregate customers into those who may be served and those who may not, whether based on the documentation they carry, or any other reason."
The restaurant has since reopened but without indoor dining, prompting some churlish jokes from SFDPH.
In-N-Out(side) #VaccinateSF https://t.co/KnZNC9m0LU
— SFDPH (@SF_DPH) October 20, 2021
Just because you're enforcing an authoritarian and irrational vaccine passport system doesn't mean you can't have a sense of humor about it, right?
FREE MINDS
OnlyFans isn't just for sex workers anymore. The tourism board of Vienna, Austria, has joined the website to post pictures of racy artworks that have been excluded by other social media platforms. The New York Times reports:
The offending artworks include the Venus of Willendorf, a 25,000-year-old limestone figurine of a woman. Facebook removed a photo of it from the Vienna Museum of Natural History's page several years ago for being "pornographic."
There's also "Liebespaar," Koloman Moser's early 20th-century painting, which the Leopold Museum included in a video post celebrating its anniversary in September. The video, which was blocked by the algorithms of Instagram and Facebook, "is a combination of details of the work and written feelings that are evoked by the painting," said Christine Kociu, the museum's social media manager. "It shows a nude couple embracing. It's actually sweet."
QUICK HITS
- Two New York lawyers pleaded guilty to charges stemming from the torching of an empty police car during George Floyd protests last year.
- Some apes established a monolith outside the shuttered DEA museum in D.C. yesterday.
The apes explain their unusual demonstration style to me, and why they believe the DEA itself is the one that needs to "evolve."
Full @N2Sreports video, available to license: https://t.co/yrZWMx1YiN pic.twitter.com/CbGpVknbP3
— Ford Fischer (@FordFischer) October 20, 2021
- Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom declares a drought emergency in California.
- Los Angeles' clogged ports have left some sailors stranded on their ships for months.
- National Review has a pretty brutal review of former Gen. Stanley McChrystal's new book.
- Biden's handling of the economy is not popular with voters.
- India celebrates 1 billion vaccine doses administered.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good on in-n-out. I hope this works out for them.
I would love to see more businesses just close up shop and leave. Screw SF, NY, LA, Chicago, DC, etc...
Oh shit don't tell the poor guy California is the largest economy in America by far again this year and will be probably forever.
Also the most "inequitable", right?
Win-win!
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…Fx And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........VISIT HERE
Hey strudel, gonna lie about knowing Greenwald again? Or just shit up threads by constantly changing the subject? Are you just a dog chasing a squirrel, or are you deluded enough to think you are making a point as everyone laughs?
He takes pride on his lies. No shame.
I am making a good salary online from home. I’ve made 97,999 dollar’s so for last 5 months working online and I’m a full time student.HDv I’m using an online business opportunity I’m just so happy that I found out about it.
Try it, you won't regret it!........ VISIT HERE
Who is Glenn Greenwald? That's a damn good question. He's a regular guest of a notorious far right propagandist on a notorious far right fake news operation. He regularly retweets far right propaganda. Greenwald mostly only attacks Democrats. He seems to have vendettas against certain media figures and he's s a favorite of far right-wingers. Is he the reincarnation of Dick Morris?
Weird description of a self identified liberal who founded The Intercept. Is that the new OSF talking point?
Greenwald mostly only attacks Democrats.
What's the problem?
And if idiot knew anything about GG, he would know that GG attacks THOSE IN POWER. Who is that right now?
I am making a good salary online from home .I’ve made 97,999 dollar’s so for the last 5 months working online and I’m a full time student .DEc I’m using an online business opportunity. I’m just so happy that I found out about it.
For more detail … READ MORE
You haven't muted Los yet?
Know what's great about California from a Koch / Reason libertarian perspective? Not only does it have a huge, powerful economy, it also has a staggering level of economic inequality. You literally have movie stars and Silicon Valley titans living in the same state as people who are reduced to defecating on the street.
Indeed, California's poverty rate is among the highest in the US.
#LibertariansFor50Californias
California also has the highest poverty rate in the nation.
I just wish the democrats weren't all in agreement to spy on every poor person's financial transactions and pretending it's all about sticking it to the 1%.
Yep, bring on the government hamburgers, er, veggie burgers.
Green burgers. Soylent green burgers.
Eat the rich?
At least they are meat.
Hey, don't these Soylent Green burgers come in any other colors? It's not like I'm asking for 23 types of deodorants or something.
They are all pink in the middle.
Who is John Galt?
The best thing that could happen is infrastructure AND this build back better horseshit go down in flames. We don't need this shit. We need the government to just get out of the way.
Sadly unlikely. It would be effective though.
The whole build back better shows thier conceit. They think they can build a unicorn, but the only thing they are capable of building is a lump of shit.
^ yes
Biden admin is essentially done for. Manchin and Sinema have sank their notion of "just tax the rich", if they can even get anything passed, its going to be watered down or they will have to admit they always wanted to tax the middle class and nannies/gardners. Either way, Dems are showing themselves to be unpopular and inept at governing (not a huge surprise to those with a brain). Biden will get nothing done and just piss off everyone who wants the IRS out of their bank account.
And then 2022 will be a bloodbath for them. He wont pass anything major his whole presidency and if he even survives until 2024, he (or worse for them, Harris) will get owned in 2024.
That’s assuming those elections aren’t “fortified”.
Bad headline. The Ds do want to raise taxes, it is two “D” Senators that don’t.
Isn't it tragic? Democrats totally want to implement all these leftist economic ideas — "drink billionaire tears," "make the rich pay their fair share" — but darn it, they just cannot get it done even when they control the White House and Congress.
Here's what needs to happen. Poor and working class voters will need to turn out for Democrats in huge numbers in 2022 to give them much larger majorities. Then, I promise, we can finally build an economy that uplifts the less fortunate. 😉
#OBLsFirstLaw
Or you could put it this way:
Democrats want to pay for the things they're proposing by ever so slighty raising taxes on people who are loaded and can easily afford to pay the extra tax.
Strudel clearly didn't read the article. Based on how he is incapable of responding to what people actually say in a post, it is likely that he cannot even read.
Strumpet is shilling for the mega corporations. Going from 21% to 25% corporate tax is 'ever so slightly raising'? It's a 19% increase in the rate.
Better for the small guys that can't buy losses to offset profits to just sell out and turn their capital over to the big guys who can and pay 15% on any capital gains.
An article came out this week showing Amazon takes a 55 billion dollar hit on sales of Amazon branded merch offset by their other businesses, undercutting the market at an intentional loss. This is how markets crumble as industries without other revenue sources can't compete.
Who the fuck are you to say who can afford what?
Yup! Democrats definitely want to financially punish their base (billionaires) but ......... they just ......... cannot ..... quite ......... do that ........ yet.
They'll get it done in 2023 though. Vote Democrat in the midterms to make sure. 😉
LOL
Whatever. It looks like they're actually going pass both bills. It's an almost 4 trillion investment in America. If you think you're winning then that's great!
What sort of a warped personality does it take to continue to show up where you are universally despised?
What sort of satisfaction can shitlord possibly derive from being the butt of jokes and constantly insulted?
Whatever sort of assholish person that takes, it's good that he's there and I'm not.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
You being out of your mind would explain it too.
The new intern running this sock is just terrible. It makes me appreciate the original stroodle.
I honestly think it is a Turing device trained for trolling. Probably run by one of the Glibs for lols.
"You being out of your mind would explain it too."
Steaming pile of left shit attempts to explain his assholery this way? Again, no one pays for help that abysmally stupid.
I'm a Koch / Reason libertarian. I win when the richest people on the planet get even richer. And the Biden economy has surpassed my expectations in that department, concentrating $270,000,000,000 in the hands of the 10 wealthiest American in only 9 months.
#BillionairesForBiden
Haha. The wasteful politicians and bureaucrats are so thankful for useful idiots like you.
But if you think you’re winning, then that’s great!
Let's cut to the fucking bottom line. Answer these two questions:
1. What share of GDP should be surrendered to government, including federal, state, and local entities?
2. What share of taxes should be paid by each quintile of US households?
That is easy.... All of the economy belongs to the government. Duh
And all of the taxes should be paid by the quintiles above mine. Every good progressive knows this.
This is why we saw Whoopi Goldberg express shock and proclaim that $400k per year is not "the rich".
People who are not paying their fair share are always people who make more than you. Simple, really.
All your pay are belong to us!
1. 10% would be a lot better than what we pay now.
2. Everyone should pay the same dollar amount. So if the budget is 6 trillion and you have 300 million adults, you each get a bill for 20,000 dollars. If you want to raise spending by 3 trillion dollars, tack another 10,000 dollars onto your tax bill. Spending hikes might be a lot less popular with everyone actually paying their fair share.
Point #2 would certainly put an end to government bloat and waste.
Can’t have that.
2T isn't ever so little spending dummy.
You are free to pay more taxes. Why aren’t you?
"Democrats want to pay for 10 dollars in spending by generating 1 dollar in additional tax revenue"
Raising taxes to pay for unneeded spending is bad.
Raising spending to justify unneeded taxes might be worse.
The D's also want to spy on every bank account over $600 in order to "go after the 1%", which is complete bullshit, and it's a shame their followers play along.
That's much worse.
Funny- they wouldn't have to if Republicans didn't keep lowering them endlessly without also lowering spending.
Go ahead, give them all your money if you want.
Leave the rest of us out of this madness.
Be, fair. Assberry already blew all of his money and needs yours.
He is a taker who gets your tax dollars.
I believe that pretty well sums it up.
Or, from each according to what they have, to each according to what they don't.
Ah, blaming the GOP for the insaitable spending of the Demodcrats.
Just yesterday, I heard someone blame the GOP for the LA port problems. Los Angeles, California. I didn't think the GOP existed in LA, or weilded the power to hamper offloading container ships. Maybe you can enlighten me.
You have to understand that for progressives, the GOP's greatest crime, just like Trump's "tyranny", was not allowing the left to create an authoritarian socialist utopia.
Do you think our national spending problem is solely the fault of the Democratic Party?
When the Democrats think 3.5 trillion in new spending is cutting to the bone because they want 6 trillion, then yes, they are the primary drivers of the out of control spending.
That didn't answer my question. (Which I asked of Idaho Bob, by the way.)
I agree that Democrats are "primary" drivers of out-of-control spending, but I also see that Republicans are secondary drivers of out-of-control spending, doing nothing to control spending. They are just lesser offenders.
You're going to lose your 50 cents for saying both sides aren't equal.
Thanks for admitting Democrats are worse Dee.
Surely that was a miscawculation on mikes part.
Your framing is dishonest. There is no mechanism in the U.S. congress to "control" spending other than not doing it. Republicans do it less, ergo, they're your only shot at "controlling" it.
_My_ framing is dishonest?! Congress has wide, wide latitude to do whatever they want. If mechanisms to control spending are needed, they have the power to put them in place.
But who was talking about mechanisms in the first place? Even without mechanisms, Congress _could_ engage in more scrutiny of spending.
Solely? No.
Primarily? Yes.
You can willingly donate more to the government if you choose.
What sort of a warped personality does it take to continue to show up where you are universally despised?
What sort of satisfaction can shitfordinner possibly derive from being the butt of jokes and constantly insulted?
Whatever sort of assholish person that takes, it’s good that he’s there and I’m not.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
You're so weird and broken.
Have you been invited to a half million dollar air bnb weekend by sarcasmic yet?
"You’re so weird and broken."
Steaming pile of lefty shit attempts to explain his and shitfordinner's assholery this way?
Nobody, but nobody pays for this level of stupidity; you can get it by picking up a random handful of dirt.
Hmm, who does not like cutting spending on, well, anything?
Okay, what spending should be lowered?
What programs have Democrats ever shown a willingness to cut? Some will generically say "defense" but that is empty talk. A Democrat congresscritter whose military base or defense plant is gonna get closed will scream like a scalded cat and nothing ends up getting cut.
Tax revenues have increased every year, even with the tax cuts (look it up). Spending is the entire problem.
And the democrats would be much less creepy if they didn't want to spy on every account over $600 because "rich people."
I’m all for lowering spending ras, but please don’t pretend that you wouldn’t bitch about how draconian that would be to the leech class.
Democrats' plans to hike taxes to pay for their Build Back Better agenda are being derailed by the opposition of one moderate senator.
Thank God for Democrats who oppose humongous spending bills, because God knows the GOP is not opposed to increasing spending by an enormous amount.
All the no votes on spending increases don't count.
Shame they don't have any of that money to spend. Or any of the rest of the ridiculous boondoggles this 'pandemic' has spawned.
I still remember DoL losing his shit and crying about not getting PPP graft. Yet criminals easily found a way to that money.
There are several possibilities, of which I will enumerate two.
1) The PPP graft was intentionally designed to encourage criminals to get the money.
2) DoL is less intelligent than a group (criminals) with a mean IQ of 85.
Either seems likely.
Could always be both. Both is definitely an option.
You're going to eat crow when Manchin caves to his colleagues for a lesser amount of increased spending, right? Y'know, something like $4 trillion in new spending instead of the $7 trillion they propose now (when you correct for budget gimmicks).
Where in contrast, a Republican majority in either house would've blocked Biden's monstrosity entirely, saving the country trillions.
Remember, when progressives talk about taxes (and anything else related to money), they don't (can't?) think quantitatively. They comprehend things like "fair share" as simply not enough, and taxes--always--as more. Perhaps some of them might ponder (and admit) that their ultimate goals might aspire to "the rich" paying all taxes, with an effective rate of 100%.
Often their argument for raising a tax is simply "well, it hasn't been raised in X years!" as if there is some heavenly imperative that taxes MUST go up automatically.
"Fair share" will never have a defined number or percent. And "The Rich" will never be pinned down to a certain income. That's why they use terms like The One Percent. Once they eat up the wealth of people with $400k or more, they can slide that cap down to $300k, and then $200k, because they're now the top 1%.
Fair share will be 100% with government betters determine how much you get back.
Not taking is giving.
If 5% appears too small
be thankful I don't take it all
cuz I'm the Taxman....
And “The Rich” will never be pinned down to a certain income. That’s why they use terms like The One Percent.
They swap the terms "The Rich" and "The One Percent" because they are two distinct groups of people but they want you to believe they are going after the former when they are really going after the latter.
But remember the hoopla about how Warren Buffett pays the same tax rate as his secretary? That's because Warren Buffett is not in The One Percent, as Warren Buffett does not draw a significant paycheck. Zuckerberg, Musk, Bezos, and Gates are not in The One Percent.
Who is in The One Percent is your doctor and the lawyer who handled your divorce, and The One Percent already pays the lion's share of taxes.
“Fair share” is well defined by CE above.
Everyone pays the same amount. Any other definition just perverts the meaning of the word “fair”.
Wasn't there a you tube video where a guy showed new Yorkers the break down and they all started to think the rich were putting in way more?
The notion that those multi-trillion dollar monstrosities were going to be "paid for" is a ridiculous illusion anyway. They will end up costing far more than any Democrat--even Manchin or Sinema--would be willing to admit, and no tax scheme they can concoct will raise anywhere close to the revenue they expect.
But, but, SleepyJoe said it would cost zero.
To Biden, and most Democrats, "zero" is not a number, just a feeling. Quantitative math is a rightwing construct.
Sleepy Joe also said the Taliban would not take Afghanistan.
Fuck Joe Biden
The only reason to go to SF nowadays is if you want to take a shit on the sidewalk.
Sounds very libertarian.
Poodestrian. If you only urinate, that makes you a peedestrian.
Now that was funny Chumby.
An odious issue which will take a shitload of work to resolve.
Anyone attempting to correct this problem may face a smear campaign.
I still think it can be wiped out.
Virginia democrats are fortifying elections again. State law requires mail in voter applications to include last 4 of social to verify identity of the voter. This isn't even voter IS. But a heavy democratic County has waived this requirement in violation of state law.
https://publicinterestlegal.org/press/breaking-pilf-files-lawsuit-to-stop-the-unlawful-acceptance-of-absentee-ballot-applications-in-fairfax-county/
Oh, it's probably fine to waive the, uh, only tiny sliver of security mail voting provides
In another blow to JFree... 82% vaccinated Singapore now has its highest infection rate, hospitalization rate, and death rate of the covid era. Vaccines are perfect.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/covid-19-singapore-situation-stabilisation-phase-deaths-icu-cases-2253601
Watch jfree post total deaths not realizing population numbers between two countries.
Probably all the MAGA types in Singapore.
More and more artists are refusing to play in venues with vaccine passports mandates.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/travis-tritt-cancels-shows-over-covid-19-rules-vaxx-mandates-not-about-following-the-science-trying-to-divide-people
Brandon shows up to ALCS game to loud stadium chants.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/f-joe-biden-chant-drowns-out-mlb-playoff-postgame-show
Fuck Joe Biden
Fuck Joe Biden
I like winners. You guys are whiners.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
We all like Brandon.
Doesn't surprise me you guys locked down the obnoxious drunk vote. You're trash. Pure fucking trash.
You seem angry this morning. Food stamps run out?
the obnoxious drunk vote. You’re trash. Pure fucking trash.
I do so love it when the anti-racist posers lose their shit and reveal that they not only do they have no tolerance in their hearts, they are every bit as bad as the Klan in dehumanizing their enemies.
Feel the hate flow through you, Startlez!
Judging people by their character is completely legit. I'm describing people who scream political obscenities at sporting events as trash. They are trash and many if them probably are drinking.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Yeah, I bet you would have said the same if it was "Fuck Trump".
I fully accept your premise that protesting your government is seen as trash to you. You are an open authoritarian.
You're probably drinking.
Judging people by their character is completely legit. I’m describing people who scream political obscenities at sporting events as trash.
Yeah, you definitely should not be alluding to Dr. King's dream while referring to people as trash.
Trash is the things that humans discard for being useless, broken or rotten. Therefore, calling people trash is unquestionably dehumanizing. Furthermore, I suspect you are being completely disingenuous about judging character, using 'trash' to signal 'white trash', meaning that you are absolutely associating their behavior to the color of their skin.
But, by all means, keep digging.
Doesn’t surprise me you guys locked down the obnoxious drunk vote. You’re trash. Pure fucking trash.
You fuckers can't even figure out if you're a boy or a girl. Even Billy Dee Williams loved Colt 45.
There have been 125k unaccompanied children at the non crisis border this year.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/125-000-children-have-shown-up-alone-at-border-on-bidens-watch
They got him this time. Walls are closing in.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/new-york-county-district-attorney-subpoenas-trump-golf-course-records
He wrote down a 5 on the 7th hole when he really had a 6.
Did he fix his divot???
That is something they would like him to iron out. If only he wood have done this at the time. Should he run in 2024, this could be a wedge issue.
Political investigations are par for the course.
They foreshadow things to come.
The drive to find something continues.
There is a golf between allegations and findings.
I’m sure they will do it in a fair way.
Just stop puttering around
dammit too late to tee off
Shanks for all of the puns, everyone!
I'm really going to have to punch down, cut deep, draw from my pool of golf knowledge, and not fade under the competition.
Any way you slice it..
It’s the slew of constant accusations that really handicap him. They’ll just keep coming up with more of them even if you find a hole in one….
You missed the flatblade, putts.
If he doesn’t run, he would just end up puttering around the house.
He wouldn't have the balls to not be in public.
the suggestion in the report that the investigation appears to be focused, at least in part, on whether the Trump Organization inappropriately misled local officials about the property value to lower property tax bill
I don't give a fuck about Trump, but are we supposed to just ignore that this would not be a failure on the part of the business, who have every right to appeal property assessments, it would be a failure on the part of the agency that accepted the lower value for tax purposes.
Tax assessor is a specific job with a specific set of duties and if the property value was 'inappropriate' it is the assessor's fault 100% for not doing his fucking job.
The hilarious part is that ordinary homeowners try to figure out how to jawbone down their property value every single year when tax time comes around. It's only when they're selling that they pump up the supposed value.
This. Disputing ad valorem assessments is a sport in Texas. The system is set up, anticipating that the homeowner will fight the assessment.
The Con Man's new social media site hacked on first day with “a photo of a pig defecating on its own scrotum.” on the splash page. (pictured on Twitter link below)
Trump is setting up a con to bilk his stupid supporters with a "patriot" version of Twitter using a SPAC (Special Purpose Accounting Company) that avoids investor scrutiny.
https://twitter.com/clairenjax/status/1451021497703845892
This is really how he wants to spend his remaining time as a free man?
Like you predicted back in May, he'll be behind bars soon.
The bars are open in Florida so…
turd lies. It's what turd does. turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to recognize that he is, and to stupid to know everyone knows it. turd will get cites pointing out his lies and then repeat them an hour later; he's *THAT* stupid
turd lies; it's all he does.
"TRUTH Social"? Has Gettr been abandoned already?
There's a new con man in town now, buddy.
Hacked on the first day”. Not even launched yet.
“The social network, formed by the deal with the Trump Media and Technology Group, said on Wednesday it plans a beta launch next month and full roll-out in the first quarter of 2022. Shares of Miami-based Digital World were up 80% to $17.83 on Thursday morning.”
These folks on Twitter are claiming to have discovered Truth Social has ties to China. Wuhan to be specific:
https://twitter.com/meidastouch/status/1451002447422361601?s=21
Seems a little too good to be true.
Anyway, the launch of TRUTH Social puts the lie to the idea that the government needs to step in and make Facebook, Twitter, etc. carry any user's speech that they don't want to carry.
Trump was banned from those social media sites, and started his own -- the free market fixed the problem.
So, if I create a TRUTH Social account, am I allowed to post cat pictures and what I ate for dinner like I do on Facebook or Twitter? Is it only a place that's going to have political discussion?
Is it going to be international like the big social media companies, or English / US only?
Alan Cole
@AlanMCole
This "no rate increases" stance seems to be gaining momentum, and its existence is reiterated by the most credible reporters.
This is (a) welcome, (b) a sign that the bill is going to be smaller than $2 trillion.
Brandy hardest hit. Keeps advocating for more taxes
The spending is completely uneeded. Full stop. Over 7 trillion has been spent on covid now. 1 trillion remains unspent from last years funding. That's a full extra year of federal spending.
But the true goal is to get policies in place with sunsets so that the spending becomes part of baseline budgeting, the most insidious federal measure that grows at a faster rate than gdp growth.
"We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government," said Arnie Wensinger, chief legal and business officer for In-N-Out, according to CBS.
In n out is more libertarian than the left libertarians here.
The In-N-Outs I've been to in SoCal don't have indoor seating. They are set up like a Sonic. Most of their business is their drive thru.
Fisherman's Wharf is a tourist trap that probably doesn't have anything but indoor.
this is a one off iow
I already mentioned you weren't libertarian.
turd lies. It’s what turd does. turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to recognize that he is, and to stupid to know everyone knows it. turd will get cites pointing out his lies and then repeat them an hour later; he’s *THAT* stupid
turd lies; it’s all he does.
Most In-N-Outs in the Bay Area, which are out in the suburbs, have lots of indoor seating and a small outdoor patio with maybe four or five tables. And, of course, a long drive-thru line.
Looking at photos of the Fisherman's Wharf location, it has only indoor seating, and no drive thru. There are, of course, places to sit outdoors around Fisherman's Wharf, to eat take out.
It is a one-off, but I agree with In-N-Out that they shouldn't have to be the vaccination police. On the other hand, I'm never surprised by odd and impractical laws in San Francisco.
Every In-n-Out in California has indoor seating. They do a lot more drive-through business though.
It appears dildo was wrong again! Surprise surprise!
Biden's handling of the economy is not popular with voters.
You mean the plans publicly on his campaign website but still led to many reason writers to support him?
Who would have guessed that Weimar-level inflation would be unpopular?
Walter Mondale's ghost still can't believe that tax hikes are unpopular.
I don't think the infrastructure bill is going to pass. Manchin can't vote for any bill that has all of the Green New Deal crap in it and have any hope of winning another election in West Virginia. The far left is never going to accept a bill that is just an ordinary loot the treasury bill and doesn't have all the Green New Deal stuff.
The Democrats can't bribe Manchin because no job on KStreet no matter how much it pays is as good as being a Senator. No one is giving up being in the Senate for working on K-Street or being praised by CNN. There is nothing the Democrats can offer Manchin that would make giving up his seat worth it. So, I don't think he is going to cave.
Meanwhile, the Left doesn't need a deal that badly either. If nothing happens, the only person hurt by it is Joe Biden. The left can go back to their supporters and say they didn't sell out and let Manchin and the leadership pass a fake bill. That is a lot easier thing to sell that trying to explain why they folded and voted for what is in the left's view a fake bill.
So, there is no middle ground. Neither Manchin nor the left have any reason to make a deal and will both be better off with no deal than giving the other side what it wants. Schummer has zero leverage over either side. If the bill doesn't pass before the end of this session, it dies and has to be passed by the House all over again. And that isn't going to happen. It only passed the House because a good number of Democrats from swing districts voted for it on the assumption that voters would forget about it by the midterms. They won't be making that assumption after the first of the year. So, if the bill doesn't pass in this session, it won't be passed in the next.
I don't think it is going to pass. The other factor is the Virginia election in a couple of weeks. If McAuliffe loses, which is a distinct possibility, all hell is going to break lose and you will see a lot more Democrats than just Menchin breaking from Biden and being willing to kill his agenda. A McAuliffe loss will likely kill the bill even if Manchin or the left do give in.
Sweet Gridlock!
Too bad the massive $2.2 trillion Trump Welfare and Handout CARES Act of 2020 passed.
But it's okay to piss away trillions if you're a Republican.
Yeah, because Democrats making it illegal for most of the country to go to work in the name of stopping the Fauci Flu had nothing to do with that. Nope, Republicans just love to give away money.
And the only reason there is gridlock is we have a drooling moron as President who is the most unpopular and least effective President in modern history.
But hey, Biden is making up for it by alienating our allies and creating a humanitarian disaster in Afghanistan.
Nih just released a letter admitting they funded spike protein gain of function research in Wuhan. Still claiming it wasn't for covid.
When will Fauci answer for his crimes?
He should be treated like that other Italian dictator.
Republicans always have excuses on why they have to fuck up and massively increase spending and the size of Government.
Reagan, the Bush's, Trump - THEY WERE ALL TRICKED! WE WERE ATTACKED! FAGS ARE KISSING! DRUGS ARE EVIL!
Both parties suck. Our fake libertarians here need to admit the GOP sucks too.
Both parties suck, says the guy who literally spent 8 years sucking Obama's cock. I bet you were saying in 2020 how much Joe Biden sucked and how he was going to be a complete disaster as President, right? I am sure you can give some links to that.
LOL
I only noted that Obama was better than the Bushpigs and their useless $4 trillion War on Terror/Iraq War. And he cut the deficit in half.
On Biden I have said repeatedly that he is in over his head. I give him an F grade so far (matching Trump's F)
turd lies. It’s what turd does. turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to recognize that he is, and to stupid to know everyone knows it. turd will get cites pointing out his lies and then repeat them an hour later; he’s *THAT* stupid.
If anything he posts is not a lie, it’s purely accident.
turd lies; it’s all he does.
"Obama was better than the Bushpigs and their useless $4 trillion War on Terror/Iraq War."
Oh yeah, turning Libya into a slave-holding basket case, fighting Russia over who gets to attack the Daesh, droning the fuck out of everyone and sticking his fingers into Yemen was a huge improvement.
"And he cut the deficit in half."
No he didn't. In fact he fought against attempts. You could thank the Republican congress for forcing some cuts through.
Then, when the Democrats controlled congress he railed against Republican senators for holding back on their massive spending bills:
Obama Signs $1.1 Trillion Government Spending Bill
Of course Shrike knows this. He's been told so the last 100 times he posted this. Does anyone still doubt that he's paid to post this?
Liar
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2014/sep/05/barack-obama/obama-says-he-has-cut-national-deficit-half/
turd lies. It’s what turd does. turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to recognize that he is, and to stupid to know everyone knows it. turd will get cites pointing out his lies and then repeat them an hour later; he’s *THAT* stupid.
If anything he posts is not a lie, it’s there by accident.
turd lies; he does nothing else.
Lol, you didn't actually read that. They even admit that they fiddle with the definition to make the claim true, and the first two times they looked at it they had to admit he didn't:
"In 2012, PolitiFact twice rated True claims that President Barack Obama failed to keep a promise to cut federal deficits in half by the end of his first term...
...instead of using the actual 2009 deficit of $1.4 trillion, Obama lowers it by the $200 billion in increased deficit spending that he -- not Bush -- pushed through in the stimulus plan to address the crisis that became the Great Recession..."
They could only rate it as true if they counted not from the previous presidency, but from what Obama raised it himself. Polifact is pretty much admitting they're fiddling with facts here.
Using this insane metric you could claim that Trump cut the deficit in half in the last quarter of 2020.
Of course that would be retarded. Just like your dishonest claim about Obama.
Next time you post a link, maybe account for the fact that we might actually read it, shill.
It took him a year longer. big fucking deal.
It took him a year longer. big fucking deal.
::hicklib pederast posts link as refutation::
::says the link "isn't a big deal" when it doesn't say what he says it does::
Might as well make that your default programming language, shrieky-poo.
"It took him a year longer. big fucking deal"
Except it didn't, you fucking liar. You don't get to count deficit reduction from a benchmark you guys set. Who do you think you're fucking fooling?
Toddlers would see through this level of sophistry, Shrike.
Reminder, when they talk about cutting the deficit, most of it was simply getting the pay-ins from TARP while the pay-outs were in 2009/10. So due to TARP ending, they get to crow about deficits being cut. Lost in this is that Reid used the TARP payouts as the new baseline in their baseline budgeting increases.
Bullshit. TARP was not included in the 2009 deficit.
Yeah it was, you moron:
"Five Keys to Understanding New 2009 Deficit Estimates
AUGUST 21, 2009 | BY JAMES R. HORNEY"
3. Whether the new estimates exceed $1.84 trillion will likely depend on the amounts recorded for a particularly volatile category of spending: assistance to troubled financial institutions. CBO’s March estimate of a $1.84 trillion deficit included more than $330 billion in spending for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) enacted last fall,[2] plus $125 billion from legislation the President was seeking to provide additional authority for TARP activities.[3] However, Congress has not considered the legislation providing new authority for TARP, and through July the Treasury Department had recorded only $169 billion in TARP costs under existing authorities for 2009.
"I give [Biden] an F grade so far"
Ugh, it's Impostor Buttplug again. And he hasn't changed his routine — make Real Buttplug look like a pathetic hack who cannot maintain internal consistency to save his life.
RB spent Obama's entire Presidency crediting him with the strongest economy in US history. And his preferred metric to prove this? It wasn't GDP growth. It was the WBNWI (Warren Buffett Net Worth Index). If Buffett is rapidly getting richer, the economy is terrific, and the President deserves full credit.
So how do I know this is the Impostor? Because Buffett is up $17 billion already under Biden. Therefore by the same standards Real Buttplug used throughout the Obama years, Biden deserves an A+.
#StopSmearingButtplug
#LibertariansForBiden
Oops! Broken link.
Should go to https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires/
Sorry to hear about your pal being hacked OBL. Probably that awful Tulpa again. That's who's always steals sarcasmic's account every time sarc gets drunk.
Please don't mention cock around the resident pedophile. He will start posting links again.
turd lies. It’s what turd does. turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to recognize that he is, and to stupid to know everyone knows it. turd will get cites pointing out his lies and then repeat them an hour later; he’s *THAT* stupid.
If anything he posts is not a lie, it's there by accident.
turd lies; it’s all he does.
Buttplug - "Trump Welfare and Handout CARES Act"
Does anyone still doubt that Shrike is a paid shill? His ass has been handed to him hundreds of times by dozens of people on this issue, but every day he dutifully posts it.
"Nancy Pelosi indicated that the House would prepare its own bill, expected to exceed $2.5 trillion, as a counter-offer,[113] which was criticized by Republicans as "a progressive wishlist seemingly unrelated to the crisis".[114]
Representative Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, attempted to maneuver for a roll-call vote, but the quorum present did not support the idea. Massie's threat to demand a recorded vote nonetheless "compelled dozens, if not hundreds, of lawmakers to return to Capitol Hill from their home districts, navigating across interstates and through airports at a time when public health officials have urged Americans to avoid nonessential travel and gathering in large groups".[125] Massie's actions received bipartisan criticism. Former Secretary of State John Kerry, a Democrat, tweeted "Congressman Massie has tested positive for being an asshole. He must be quarantined to prevent the spread of his massive stupidity,
...After a late-August phone call with Mnuchin, Pelosi said: "Sadly, this phone call made clear that Democrats and the White House continue to have serious differences understanding the gravity of the situation that America's working families are facing." She indicated House Democrats were willing to negotiate reducing the House bill's cost to $3 trillion."[11]"
It is scary to think anyone would be dumb enough to think this guy would be worth paying to anything much less troll.
It isnt about intelligent debate with his ilk. Innis about flooding all commenting systems. Look at wapo, hill, etc. The same guys who ended up killing the federalist comments.
It's the shitposting that they want. Not insightful commentary.
If they can't create the impression of a Democrat-friendly consensus, then they want chaos.
"If they can’t create the impression of a Democrat-friendly consensus, then they want chaos."
Most insightful thing I've read today.
He admitted to being part of OSF. There is no doubt.
You're a liar.
Pelosi represented 1/3 of the needed power to pass that bill.
McConnell 1/3 and Trump 1/3 could have easily killed it.
but you have to lie because you are a shill for Trump.
turd lies. It’s what turd does. turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to recognize that he is, and to stupid to know everyone knows it. turd will get cites pointing out his lies and then repeat them an hour later; he’s *THAT* stupid.
If anything he posts is not a lie, it’s there by accident.
turd lies; it’s all he does.
That isn't how it works you fucking fraud.
And now should we talk about how Pelosi's CARES Act was vetoproof, and how Trump vetoed some of her subsequent spending bills?
It's like you imagine people can't remember last year.
You fucking congenital liar.
McConnell and Trump could have used Senate rules to not even schedule a vote.
The House status doesn't matter when the Senate won't debate it.
turd lies. It’s what turd does. turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to recognize that he is, and to stupid to know everyone knows it. turd will get cites pointing out his lies and then repeat them an hour later; he’s *THAT* stupid.
If anything he posts is not a lie, it’s there by accident.
turd lies; it’s all he does.
Why are you not addressing what I said? Explain to me how Trump could veto a vetoproof bill, you fucking congenital liar.
He doesn't need to veto a House bill when it is dead in the Senate, you moron.
Except it wasn't. The neocon RINOs you're always fellating as wise moderates whenever they do the DNC's wishes, made sure of that.
"...Does anyone still doubt that Shrike is a paid shill? His ass has been handed to him hundreds of times by dozens of people on this issue, but every day he dutifully posts it..."
I doubt it.
The steaming pile of lefty shit is simply too fucking stupid (or stoned) to remember what lies he told even an hour ago. Nobody pays for that level of ignorance or bad habits.
To be clear, turd lies.
Sure they do.
The point of fifty-centing is to disrupt and cause the impression of establishment solidarity.
Not to present cogent arguments, because that is impossible for them.
How dare Massie make the congress critters do their job
You may be underestimating the sleaze, corruption and stupidity that runs through Congress like a burst water main.
I am not saying it isn't corrupt. I am saying you have to understand how the corruption works. The corruption means that a Senate seat is about the same as being a billionaire. No ordinary millionaire job is worth giving up being a Senator.
On that we can agree.
I think the infrastructure bill not passing in an election year is probably too much for a libertarian capitalist to hope for, even if it doesn't pass until after the budget reconciliation bill.
The Democrats have until December 4th, now, to pass a bill (assuming McConnell doesn't grab his ankles again on the debt ceiling). By then, Congress will be fund raising mode during the holidays.
Once January rolls around, we're in an election year. Expecting a Democrat Congress to shut down spending on infrastructure pork in an election year . . . on principle?! That's not gonna happen.
The best we can hope for is that the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill fails completely, and even that's probably too much to hope for. The Congressional Progressive Caucus will scream bloody murder if they don't get what they want before December 4th, but by January 2022, they'll be eager to spend whatever they can again to get themselves reelected, I'm sure.
It is going to happen. They have incredibly small majorities. Even Democrats admit that nothing is getting passed next year because Democrats from swing districts have to go back to pretending to be moderates and won't make anymore difficult votes.
Since Biden has become so toxic, there is no public support for this bill. The only real constituency for the bill is the far left and they are not going to accept anything that doesn't include everything they want. So, if they can't make a deal before December, the bill will die because it won't get out of the House next year.
Lost in all of this is that their fallback is still 1.7 T passed as "infrastructure" so the best case is still nearly 2T in spending. Thanks to feckless gop.
The fall back is not getting passed. That is the problem. If they could pass the fallback, they would have already done so and declared victory and moved on. They haven't done that because the far left won't vote for that. Both Manchin and Sinema would vote for the fall back bill. The problem is Sanders and several others wouldn't. So neither bill can pass the Senate. And neither side has any reason to give in as I explain above. Nothing is getting passed. You watch.
"1.7 T passed as “infrastructure” so the best case is still nearly 2T in spending."
Last I heard it was around $1.2 trillion, and much of that was repurposed unspent money from previous pandemic bills--so a fat chunk of it wouldn't be additional spending. It's money they're taking back from other programs.
Meanwhile, blaming the GOP for what a handful of their members in the Senate did--when the Republicans don't even control Congress--may not be entirely fair. Didn't an overwhelming majority of Republicans Senators vote against it?
Didn't almost all of the the Republicans in the House vote against it? If the Republicans controlled the House, the infrastructure bill probably wouldn't have passed.
It only takes a minority of the gop to give the left wins. Nominally the ones who still think media praise is more important than ideals. I've blamed them all the way back to Paul Ryan. They are enablers.
Not true. The left will see the 1.7 trillion as a huge sell out and loss. For the left it is not about the money. It is about the societal and economic transformative things that are in the $3 trillion dollar bill. All Manchin is saying is that he wants that stuff stripped out and it just to be an ordinary spending bill. Without that stuff, the left sees nothing in it for them.
And any GOP Senator who breaks ranks and gives them a deciding vote when Manchin or Sinema won't would be committing career suicide. None of them are going to do that. If they were, the Democrats would have walked away from Manchin and gone to them and passed the bill. Or if they were willing to vote for what Manchin wants, would have told Sanders and company to pound sand and passed a bill. They haven't done that because they can't. The leadership and Biden would be totally happy with the $1.7 trillion bill. They just want to pass something so Biden can claim some kind of victory. They can't do that because the left doesn't care about Biden and is not giving in.
Spending is spending whether you think it is valid or not. The GOP has already agreed to the 1.7T infrastructure. Now they are simply hampering the 3.5T in new spending on "citizen infrastructure" as Pelosi openly admits their cuts are merely gimmicks. They are not on the morning shows yelling about these fake spending cuts, letting the lies of the left propagate forward. They refuse to openly attack the left (they being the 20% of GOP I mentioned above).
Yes, the GOP is better than the left. I have never said different. But there is a 20% of the GOP left that always caves to the lefts demand allowing for the ratchet effect. The same 20% also stop the GOP from reducing spending when they are actually in power, see McCain stopping the ACA vote. Defending that small minority as not causing the same harm is ineffective. They need to be called out just as much. But right now they are beholden to leftist media.
The biggest plus we would have as a country is to divide D.C. into regional areas like the appeals courts. Move BLM to the west, move DHS to the center, etc. Remove the centralized formation of the federal government and have it act in a more federalist manner where they are regional and beholden to regional passions instead of D.C. passions which is currently 90% leftist.
It is not about calling anyone out. It is about the reality that no Republican is going to break ranks to save the Democrats here and pass a bill. You can speculate all you want about their motives or if they are better or worse but all that matters for the moment is that they are not voting for either bill. And that likely means nothing is going to be passed because I don't think there is any bill that will get all 50 Democratic Senators to vote for it.
Heaven forbid that libertarians are unfairly harsh in their judgement of Republicans! Telling that you never show the same concern for unfair judgement of Democrats.
Caw caw!
The pot cawing the kettle black.
Frankly, I doubt either bill passes, Ken. And that is a good thing.
Senator McConnell needs to continue outmaneuvering Schumer and Pelosi. The real showdown happens in 40 days. I'd like to see sequestration come out of that debt ceiling process.
Winning those two Senate runoffs was the worst thing that could have happened to the Democrats. Winning those two races gave them the majority and the responsibility but a majority so small they can't do much with it. Had they lost those races, they could have passed all this stuff in the House and then blamed the evil Republicans for them not getting out of the Senate. Since they have the Senate, however, they can't blame the Republicans if these bills die in the Senate. Since they have such a small majority, they can't pass anything because no bill is going to please every single one of their caucus. Since they have the majority, they can't blame the failure on the Republicans.
While I hope you are correct, a far more plausible scenario is that the bill will be officially reduced from $3.5T down to about $2T (mostly via budgetary maneuvering that leaves most left wing policies in the bill) to secure Manchin's and Sinema's votes.
Then ten RINOs in the Senate (led by Mitch McConnell) will endorse and vote for the bill as a purported compromise (by claiming its significantly less spending than the $3.5T bill).
2T plus 1.7T infrastructure is still more than 3.5T. We have already lost. They are hoping people can't do math.
Senate RINOs will likely extend the debt ceiling again.
"After a series of meetings at the White House on Tuesday, Democratic lawmakers and aides said the plan under negotiation would likely wrap together a long list of their priorities—but for shorter durations—under a smaller price tag."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-cut-programs-durations-to-lower-cost-of-social-policy-and-climate-plan-11634747582
In other words.. 3 5T in spending. And more since cbo spending projections are always wrong by at least 50%
Were they RINOs when they suspended the debt ceiling under Trump?
Was Trump a RINO?
Congress who passed veto proof spending increases? Yes.
You are assuming there is no "offer he can't refuse." Photos, hinky stock dealings, racist e-mails? I doubt there is any senator who is "Mr. Clean."
Mancin is against blowing 2 trillion in a futile attempt to change the weather.
Sinema is against jacking up taxes even higher.
So that leaves the 46 Democrats and a couple of socialist independents mumbling something about a majority and impeding democracy.
Hopefully the infighting kills the infrastructure bill we don't need as well.
But don't worry, the news media will point out the pros and cons of opposing ginormous increases in federal spending:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/21/manchin-could-prevent-37-million-kids-from-getting-child-tax-credit.html
Yeah, they would lose the handout if their parents aren't poor.
Bill de Blasio is going to great lengths to help the GOP achieve more victories in November, and next year (as the NYC employee vaccine mandate will generate negative news stories every day for weeks and months to come).
https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-city-to-require-covid-19-vaccinations-for-all-public-employees-11634724001
If they would just realize what a privilege it is to be a city employee and your medical decisions are no longer yours to make.
Bill knows that electoral fortification will ensure that the correct outcome is reached.
"Democrats Still Want to Spend Trillions. But They Don't Want To Raise Taxes To Do It."
----Christian Britschgi
"Democrats' plans to hike taxes to pay for their Build Back Better agenda are being derailed by the opposition of one moderate senator."
----Christian Britschgi
These lines contradict. Why? You can't write something contradictory like that and expect people not to be confused about your intent (at the very least). Because one Senator (Sinema) is refusing to raise income, corporate, or capital gains taxes, does not mean, "the Democrats don't want to raise taxes". All the Democrats--except Sinema but including Manchin--want to raise taxes. My understanding is that Manchin is insisting on it.
My guess is that when people who lean progressive write for libertarian capitalists, they can't help but attribute superior motives to Democrats, subconsciously or otherwise. Otherwise, right leaning libertarians might get ideas! Just to be clear, no--the Democratic party is not opposed to raising taxes. In fact, they're almost unanimously in favor of raising taxes to pay for trillions of dollars in new spending. A more accurate headline might have read, "Democrats go Apeshit over Sinema Refusing to Raise Taxes".
Exhibit A:
"Report: Sinema Bent on Destroying Biden Presidency to Keep Taxes on the Wealthy Low"
----Jonathan Chait
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/10/sinema-taxes-wealthy-biden-build-back-better-rich-democrats-senate.html
It is never the left that is at fault. You could just as easily say that Sanders and the far left are bent on destroying the Biden Presidency by insisting on raising taxes. They could pass whatever they wanted if the left were willing to give into what Manchin and Sinema want. The logic works both ways. Yet, somehow it is Manchin and Sinema are the ones acting in bad faith while the left is as it always is wanting what is best.
"They could pass whatever they wanted if the left were willing to give into what Manchin and Sinema want."
They can't pass what they want and give in to what Manchin and Sinema want. Those are mutually exclusive things. Honestly, I don't think Sinema cared about taxes before she was humiliated using the bathroom on national television. I think she's sticking her middle finger in the progressives' faces. I think she's doing this specifically because it makes the budget reconciliation bill harder to pass.
Manchin isn't a principled anything either. His state went for Trump by a wider margin than almost any other state in the country, and he's afraid of what will happen to his political career if he capitulates to the Congressional Progressives Caucus on the Green New Deal. It doesn't matter what Manchin wants or his personal beliefs or character. He's reacting to the resolve of the people of West Virginia (God bless 'em).
The Congressional Progressive Caucus effectively wants to destroy the economy of West Virginia. They can't give Manchin what he wants without giving up what they want. And in the end, his infrastructure bill will probably make it through anyway. They'll give up fighting the infrastructure bill in the end. What's the point of electing Democrats that refuse to spend money on pork?
I don't think his bill gets through. The left has no reason to vote for it. If Biden were a normal President, I would agree with you because the left would cave out of loyalty to a Democratic President. Biden isn't a normal President, however. Biden is a toxic President. No one feels any loyalty to him or will pay any political price for defying him. So, Biden won't be able to bully the left into line for the good of the party the way Obama or Clinton could have done.
There's money in that infrastructure bill for a lot of big Democrat interests--especially the AFL-CIO. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. There's a lot of money in that bill for all kinds of government employee unions. Those unions are powerful in Democrat strongholds like New York and Chicago. If the progressives decide to screw over the unions in this country, they're really hurting themselves.
Please understand that I want these bills to fail. This isn't about looking at it from the perspective of what I want to happen. And we shouldn't get to wrapped up in how the media portrays progressives as this all pervasive and unstoppable force that everyone in the party must bow to or be cancelled. That's mostly just on social media, in the news media, and in Hollywood.
In reality, Democrat cities are run by the Democrats, and the people who run them answer to the police unions--and IF the police were ever in real danger of being defunded, they aren't being defunded for long. Money flowing from Congress to their union cronies at the local level is what keeps Democrats in their seats--even the ones in deep blue districts, who can be replaced in the primaries by the unions that control the local party in any election cycle.
IF the Democrats had 53 or even 52 votes, you would probably be right. But they have 50 votes. They have to get every single vote or it doesn't pass. There is no way to please everyone and with a toxic President and sinking administration, there is no way to bully holdouts into voting for a bill they don't want.
The money for the unions won't matter for progressives when they have to explain to their supporters why they folded and let Manchin dictate the bill. Their supporters won't buy it and the progressives have no reason to give in.
The leadership and Biden are desperate to pass anything. If the left were willing to fold, something would have been passed in September.
The resistance to the infrastructure bill is in the House, and if they don't pass it in 2021, they probably will in 2022.
The resistance is in the Senate. It already passed the House. They can't get it out of the Senate.
"The resistance is in the Senate. It already passed the House. They can’t get it out of the Senate."
The resistance to the infrastructure bill is in the House. This is all about how the progressives won't pass the infrastructure bill unless Manchin and Sinema in the Senate pass the $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation bill first. Nancy Pelosi promised to bring it up to a vote three times, and she reneged every time because she couldn't get progressives in her own party to vote for the infrastructure bill. The infrastructure bill has already passed the Senate, and the progressives are refusing to pass it in the House until Manchin and Sinema vote to pass the budget reconciliation bill.
If the budget reconciliation bill fails in early December, then it is highly unlikely that the progressives in the House will kill the infrastructure bill that the AFL-CIO and other unions have worked so hard to get. They're bluffing--especially in an election year--there's no way they'll screw the unions over just to spite Manchin and Sinema. It would be political suicide. Not just in West Virginia and Arizona. The AFL-CIO runs Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, Minneapolis, etc. etc., too. Count on the infrastructure bill passing.
The Senate already passed the infrastructure bill with 10 GOP votes.
And no one I have heard on either side thinks anything is coming out of the House in an election year. IT is now or never.
The Dems don't have 50 votes though. They have 48 nominal Democrats, and 2 of them oppose the 3.5 trillion dollar reconciliation bill. So they're down to 46 votes and a couple of socialist independents.
The Dems need to hand out a few hundred billion to government employee unions (and other unions), because a lot of union members are upset about losing their jobs to vaccine mandates. It's like the Dems are blowing up their own party on purpose.
The headlines on Reason blog posts often contradict the content. Have we ever established that writers make up their own headlines?
Tough to white knight on that one, huh.
She still gave it the old college try though.
Raise taxes, raise other fees, borrow money or cut spending. The US has done a lot of the first three and that isn’t working.
Like all socialists, when the 5 year plans keep failing, they just want to socialize harder.
Bilk Back Better 2: The Great Creep Forward
But They Don't Want To Raise Taxes To Do It.
Even raising the tax rate on citizens to 100% wouldn't cover the deficit, the interest and the spending plans. Only with massive, Weimar-style inflation can they stave off disaster. Time to be like Gates, Soros, Bezos, Koch and Buffett and start buying up land, folks.
Weimar-style inflation IS a disaster.
For us. For them it's a reset button.
Exactly. The system was coming down, this gives them the soft reset to stay in control.
One way to pay for the fascist takeover; eliminate the dept of education.
Another way, eliminate the HHS.
Another way, eliminate all legislation and regulation exemptions for congress and their staff, Obama care, vaccine mandates, using armed guards, all of them.
We're going to need some sort of Nuremberg-style trial for the Davos-crowd and their purchased politicos when all the dust settles.
Cool. Will there be hangings?
Depends if their death toll exceeds the Nazi's I suppose.
Can anyone name one problem the government has solved by spending money on?
Pelosis ice cream addiction?
War on drugs, war on homelessness, war on the Vietnamese people and public education.
They build a wall?
Instead you want them to spend billions not building a wall like brandon is doing. Paid labor and materials going to waste.
Hey, Brandyshit! We got what you deserve!
Well, Canada has not invaded yet.
In a few more years Trudeau will have turned us into North Venezuela, and then you'll find millions of us streaming south... If Biden hasn't turned you into North Venezuela too.
Hitler and Tojo?
Democrats' plans to hike taxes to pay for their Build Back Better agenda are being derailed by the opposition of one moderate senator.
And also 50 other senators.
Being derailed by a majority of the Senate. But I guess Republicans' votes don't count. That is the assumption behind that statement. If they could get a single Republican to vote for it, they wouldn't need Manchin. The bill is so bad that they can't even get Murkowski or Romney to vote for it. That is pretty remarkable when you think about it.
To Democrats, any member of the GOP is not really human, so they don't count. In their imagined utopia, wrong-thinking people would not be allowed to vote (and there would be only one party).
OK, now do how GOP members view Democrats. There is a lot of the same demonizing. It truly is both sides.
I'm not GOP (I couldn't be even if I wanted to be) and I demonize your party, Mike, because it has an almost 200 year history of acting demonic.
Anyone pretending that the Democratic Party is just like all the other Western parties, hasn't read history and isn't paying attention.
BoWfF sIdEs!
It's bipartisan opposition!
We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government...
OH BUT YOU'RE FINE BEING THE INCOME TAX COLLECTORS. In-N-Out? More like Hyp-O-Crit.
OnlyFans isn't just for sex workers anymore.
OnlyFans? More like OnlyFannies. Am I right, fellas?
I keep seeing pics of only fans women who charge 20 a month... many simply not good looking. Can we call the new generation generation incel yet?
OnlyTrans?
Thats playboy.
Is reason going to address the House criminalizing those who refuse to participate in sham political investigations? The same month an FBI manager was made whole and then some for lying to the IG?
Two New York lawyers pleaded guilty to charges stemming from the torching of an empty police car during George Floyd protests last year.
Fools for clients.
They really got burned.
Flaming liberals.
Their actions sparked interest by police.
It's about time some of these Antifa assholes caught heat.
What were they smoking?
Arson is just the language of the unheard. How are a couple of upper middle class lawyers supposed to make their case for how oppressed they are without firebombing a police car?
Most of the upper middle class lawyers in my town just use yard signs.
Do the yard signs ignite debate?
They've made the neighborhood a real tinder box, that's for sure.
Wonder if their employers fired them for this inflammatory behavior.
Probably not. But they should be for their part in this conflagration.
Maybe they are, son…
Some apes established a monolith outside the shuttered DEA museum in D.C. yesterday.
Wake me when it shows up on the moon.
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom declares a drought emergency in California.
Wear your masks to keep in the water vapor.
"He who controls the
spiceavocados controls theuniverseguacamole."Just odd that he picked a week when an "atmospheric river" is hitting California with rain to make this announcement. Tone deaf, but maybe after surviving a recall, he doesn't care about tone anymore.
Up next: Asking the fed for flood relief dollars.
Climate change is responsible for all of the extreme weather events -- drought, flooding, hurricanes, heat waves, and cold snaps. Even if we've had similar events going back forever.
Ah, I see. So a massive rainstorm is proof of drought. Nice.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/obtuse
Honestly, it combines stupidity and ignorance in a way that is almost a subspecies.
The rain watered down Newsom’s watershed drought announcement causing it to end up in a watery grave. Water. HO2.
I dunno, it’s flooding the airwaves here in California. I’d still like to see the original written drought emergency statement (I assume it’s written on parchment)
Los Angeles' clogged ports have left some sailors stranded on their ships for months.
Luckily the vaccines prevent scurvy.
What about HIV?
Has the FDA studied citrus fruits sufficiently? They might have long-term side effects!!!
People have been eating them since forever.
Orange you glad we don’t need the FDA to tell us this? Can imagine some Fauci-type there trying to steal the limelight with misinformation regarding citrus.
Contrary to the implications of your failed facetiousness, the FDA has indeed tested citrus fruits. Also, tens of thousands of studies have been done on them worldwide.
How many completed studies on the mRNA Covid "vaccine" process again, Mike?
left some sailors stranded on their ships for months
Dock whores hardest hit. 🙂
*Gives ENB an idea for her next article*
Pay docked because nothing was unloaded.
Biden's handling of the economy is not popular with voters.
If only they would let him spend more.
> Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom declares a drought emergency in California.
It rained here in California yesterday. And it looks to be a wet season coming up. We're not in a drought, at least not this year, we just have too much population for the available water. A drier year than normal, but not a drought. Lots of fires, but that's just poor forestry management.
Pretty much. Also, farming has easy access to massive amounts of water.
Farmers shouldn’t water crops?
Farmers should grow almond trees in a desert.
"shouldn't" -- auto correct just picks the antonym now
I live in wet Maine and often irrigate when I grow crops.
CA’s water situation is a clusterfuck.
we just have too much population for the available water.
this is completely wrong. The entire domestic water use in california represents less than 5% of the water use.
Democrats Still Want to Spend Trillions. But They Don't Want To Raise Taxes To Do It.
The fuck? That's cultural appropriation! They're stealing that from Republicans!
Oh come on. I thought that was a good joke. Must be too true to be funny.
India celebrates 1 billion vaccine doses administered.
India is a code name for Big Pharm?
Indiad.
Side effects?
We'll find out in five or ten years, which is now long the vaccine should have been withheld by the FDA. After all, it's experimental medicine with all kinds of long term effects that no one knows about, right? Prove there aren't side effects. You can't. That means it's poison.
Prove there aren’t side effects.
Prove there are long lasting effects.
Oops!
He's gotta be setting himself up on purpose sometimes.
Sorry Chucky, but you're with the attack trolls in Permamuteville. Have fun virtue signaling with the girls.
He actually thinks that he's punishing you, Chuck, for making him look dumb.
Sarcasmic's the ultimate attention-whore, and when Ken and soldiermedic blocked him for trolling it broke him. It was the worst thing that could happen to him.
That's why he makes a big deal about announcing who he's blocking and posting a daily list. He thinks he's hurting us.
Yup. Sarc is a Psych 101 case study in low self-esteem. Divorced, daughter won't listen to him, working for the government, bragging about guns and beer on the internet. Those are just the things he has confessed in the last 2 months. His TDS is as predictable as his need for validation. And if he can't get validation, he will settle for disrespect.
What he can't abide are those who ignore his tantrums. He muted me when I muted him. I unmuted him when he announced it because it is funny as hell to demonstrate that he in fact looks at every muted post. For those who don't use the feature, the identity on a muted post is hidden unless you click on 'Show Username'.
If Sarc has to come to the comment section of a libertarian webzine to get attention, there is still hope for the world. Plus, it probably keeps him from strangling prostitutes.
"it probably keeps him from strangling prostitutes"
For now anyway... hopefully.
Above he begs for someone to respond to his dumb joke.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10112443/At-NINE-bodies-discovered-manhunts-Gabby-Petito-Brian-Laundrie.html
Amazing what people find when a cute girl goes missing.
Nice
"Biden's handling of the economy is not popular with voters."
Well, supposedly about 1/4 of the country did vote for this.
Along with everyone at Reason right? I mean, Reason can't criticize Democrats because they're all Democrats, right? They like wanted this and stuff, right?
Look at how clever I am! I can dismiss anything Reason says by saying they voted for Biden!
Now I'm cool like the cool kids who say "Fuck Biden! You wanted this!"
So intelligent and clever!
Well, yes there are quite a few who said they planned to vote for Biden, and even those who didn't certainly preferred the Biden economy to mean tweets. Reason and everyone else who voted for Biden can talk all they want, but they all willfully/unwilfully ignored the blaring alarms signalling this would happen under the Democrats.
At the end of the day, anyone who pushed Biden deserves to experience the consequences of that, while everyone else can be left alone. It can be a learning experience for them.
"quite a few" = 3, and 2 maybes:
https://reason.com/2020/10/12/how-will-reason-staffers-vote-in-2020/
One of the three, doesn't work for Reason anymore, and the word on the street is the reason she doesn't work for Reason anymore is that management didn't see her personal politics as being libertarian enough. The other 4 all explained that they saw voting for Biden as a lesser of evils vote.
Any time someone brings up the right-wing "mean tweets" dismissive talking point it is (a) clear they are not a serious person, (b) they themselves have a blind spot about the role of civility and social cohesion in making this nation hold together.
Shhhhh! You're confusing the narrative with facts again! They all voted for Biden! It. Is. Known.
It's like you two clowns forget that they all wrote an entire article on it:
“I will cast my ballot for Joe Biden in Michigan, a swing state, because there is no bigger libertarian cause right now”
“Who do you plan to vote for this year? Joe Biden. The nationalists said the libertarian-conservative consensus is dead, and I take them at their word. Also, Stephen Miller is a white nationalist.”
“I will cast my first ever vote for president for Joe Biden in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.”
“I’ve been vacillating between sitting out this election, as I did in 2016, or voting for Joe Biden. The strongest argument for the latter choice is that it’s an opportunity to support the repudiation of both Trumpism and AOC” (lol)
“I’ll be voting for Joe Biden, primarily for three reasons: (1) A feeble president Biden seems like an opportunity to erode the power and glamour of the dangerous cult of the presidency and also push socialists, nationalists, and identitarians back to the margins, creating space for a more libertarian-friendly coalition to emerge.” (Oh wow! lol)
“If it was going to be close in my state, I might have considered holding my nose and voting for the person most likely to supplant the eminently fireable incumbent.
"(If) I believe there is a chance that Joe Biden will somehow fail to win Virginia... I will vote strategically and reluctantly for Biden.”
A lot more of the staffers saw Biden as the lesser of two evils, but didn't feel compelled to vote for him on account of it. Breaking out those where you can reasonably infer the runoff choice based on their response, Biden has the clear lion's share by my count:
Vote Count Pct T v B
Biden 4 17% 36%
Lean Biden 5 22% 45%
Trump 1 4% 9%
Lean Trump 1 4% 9%
Other/No Lean 12 52% N/A
Applying that 80% to the principled Libertarians and abstainers doesn't seem off base all things considered. That's the milieu of this magazine's talent and target audience, and politics now is like 90% wedge issues.
Very good job of pretending Jo wasn't an option, though that's what most of the staff chose.
Jesus tapdancing Christ, you're obtuse. I put them into the "Lean" and "Other / No Lean" categories and specifically called out "principled Libertarians / abstainers" in my comment. Of course the Libertarian is the first choice: this is a libertarian mag. Hence the word "runoff."
Most if not all may have wanted Jo to win (I certainly did, hence my vote for her), but they're not idiots and know that's not going to happen. Of those that expressed a preference for either major party candidate, the wide majority preferred Biden to Trump. So it shouldn't be surprising that the impression the staff prefers Team Blue when given only two options sticks.
Also, Nick Gillespie, on of the most influential people at Reason, said repeatedly during the 2020 campaign that he preferred a Trump win to a Biden win. He only flipped to being highly critical of Trump after January 6th, when he became disgusted with Trump's attempt to overturn the results of the election.
Such a good intern. Now go fetch coffee!
But... mean tweets! Reason wanted this because mean tweets!
Go read their article again you fucking gullible clown, and learn to be less trusting about the stuff White Mike says.
80/330 = 25%. Are you triggered by simple math or basic facts?
He is triggered by posts that don't garner enough attention to justify $.50.
I'm triggered by your mom.
Oh, and fuck Joe Biden, Reason wanted this. Mean tweets. Tweet tweet.
Did you accidentally take a red pill with your morning batch of Quaaludes?
Shouldn't the social justice warriors at Reason be touting the fact that Kyrsten Sinema may be the first openly bisexual Senator to kill a budget reconciliation bill--over her refusal to raise taxes?
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/kyrsten-sinema-makes-history-first-bisexual-member-u-s-senate-n935816
No kidding. If the media were willing to this as a story about public acceptance for LGBTQI+, there's probably an interesting article to write about how the LGBTQI+ community isn't a progressive monolith.
Ken, she is blocking a yuge tax bill. Reason has nothing to celebrate about that.
You are arguing with the Reason "social justice warriors" who only exist in your right-wing head.
Sure this comment didn't make sense, but remember that this idiot thinks it's his duty to troll and harass Ken, regardless of the subject.
"Mike Laursen
September.18.2021 at 11:38 am
SQRLSY, can you cover for me today? In a typical day, I usually post a comment or two pointing out logical flaws, contradictions and partisanship in Ken’s essays, which he regards as examples of flawless logical thinking"
Sinema is also the first openly bisexual Senator to be harassed by hateful progressives while using the restroom. If she was given a Jefferson bible, then she was the first openly bisexual Senator to be given a Jefferson bible, too. Every single thing Senator Sinema does is an openly bisexual first!
Isn't the Jefferson bible the one where he cut out all the bits that he didn't like? How openly bisexual of him.
Anyone watching what is going on in the Taiwan Strait, and China more generally?
China has beefed up their PLAN port that lies directly across the Strait from Taiwan. China has lowered oil consumption, and substituted coal for power generation. Air patrols continue apace. Sea patrols are up very substantially. Now a test of a hypersonic missile.
War is coming. Taiwan is running out of time to become a porcupine.
Has anyone thought of what happens the day after the communists take over Taiwan? The impact to Japan, South Korea, Australia, Vietnam, Philippines, and India?
China also can't keep it's power grid up without coal from Australia. If China goes to war with Taiwan, they could bomb Taiwan and do a lot of damage, but I don't think they could invade and conquer Taiwan. There hasn't been a successful amphibious assault since Inchon in 1950. An amphibious assault on Taiwan would require complete air and naval supremacy not just for the time it takes to launch the assault but for the entire campaign. Without air and naval supremacy, any Chinese Army could be left to die on the vine in a hostile territory. A single attack submarine in the South China Sea could send an entire invasion force to the bottom. A single squadron of attack aircraft could if not eliminated do the same. Naval warfare today favors the defense. Unless Taiwan just gives up, no way China wins such a war.
China has air and naval superiority in the Taiwan Strait; that is undeniable. It is only 110 miles from China to Taiwan.
Superiority isn’t good enough. You have to have supremacy.
China now has supremacy. That is the point Briggs. The correlation of forces is adverse to the US in the extreme. We cannot stop them.
You do realize that by firing up coal plants, China is conserving oil. Oil that will be used by PLAN. That is their only achilles heel I see; they would need to be cut off from oil.
They don't have supremacy. Naval supremacy is nearly impossible to obtain in today's environment. A single US attack submarine that goes undetected or a single Taiwanese diesel electric submarine, which are nearly impossible to detect could sink an entire Chinese invasion fleet. A single squadron of B2 bombers could do the same. There is simply no way to protect a large fleet in today's environment. A navy can deny use of a sea lane but it cannot control it sufficiently to launch an amphibious invasion.
If China tried to invade Taiwan they would either end up with an invasion fleet at the bottom of the Formosa straights or an Army stranded and starving to death in Taiwan if they somehow managed to land.
We disagree. But I hope you are right = If China tried to invade Taiwan they would either end up with an invasion fleet at the bottom of the Formosa straights or an Army stranded and starving to death in Taiwan if they somehow managed to land
I really believe there has been a revolution in military affairs in naval warfare. Because of satellite technology it is impossible for a fleet to hide at sea. It is also nearly impossible to detect an attack submarine. Combine that with the improvements in anti ship missiles and torpedoes and you get an almost total advantage to the defender.
Pulling back from the outside world and looking to become a self-sufficient economy certainly makes it easier for them if they decide to invade Taiwan.
https://apnews.com/article/technology-beijing-xi-jinping-china-economy-d046181a106413621761248660d47479
Unless they invent fusion or find a whole lot of oil that haven't found before now and figure out how to produce about half again as much food as they do now, they are not becoming self sufficient.
They have reduced their population in the past, it could be done again.
Because they're unlikely to be completely successful doesn't mean they won't try anyway or won't be successful enough.
They just may insulate their economy more by serving their domestic markets rather than exporting everything.
Propping up their economy with house-of-cards style debt bubbles doesn't help them become self-sufficient.
And the economic value of Taiwan is in the semiconductor manufacturing facilities and know-how. A war would destroy the reason for the war.
Not to mention the worldwide economic sanctions that would hit China if they launched an invasion.
Is there some way we could swap the populations of California and Taiwan? We could eliminate the need for any warfare when the new Taiwan government unites with the CCP. And the US west coast would be more productive and less annoying.
Fuck the Australians. They deserve them some totalitarianism good and hard.
I would feel bad for the Maori, but the Kiwi PM defending herself from the People's Army with the mace on her keychain would be pretty entertaining as well.
"The impact to Japan, South Korea, Australia, Vietnam, Philippines, and India?"
A "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere?"
They are going to invade. It's obvious.
Odd, given China's coal plants are being sidelined due to lack of coal. Guess they'll make do.
I don't see China making any overt foreign policy moves like an invasion, until after the Olympics they're hosting. Not that I think Biden has the character that Carter showed, and I think Carter was wrong to boycott Moscow 1980, but it'll be perceived as embarrassing for the CCP if they throw down before late Feb 2022. After that...?
They need something to both distract their rapidly impoverishing middle class, as well as provide an excuse for national austerity. A war does both of those, but I don't see it happening in Taiwan unless there's both a significant pro-CCP fifth column there, as well as a means of securing unharmed, things like TSMC. And if that happens, it really won't look like 'a war.'
Plus, Taiwan will show they've nukes, and will show them by removing the CCP NCA structures + at least the Three Gorges Dam, from the planet. If you're leading Taiwan if Xi decides he wants to push your shit in, you're dead anyway. May as well take the bastards to Hell with you. And China knows that.
The Philippines or Vietnam, OTOH...
Seems like Reason Roundups keep missing key news.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-tests-hypersonic-missile-in-military-expansion-11634744351?mod=politics_featst_pos3
I doubt if China would have tested their hypersonic missile if Trump was still president. But since the Chinese own the Big Guy (as they've got far more details of his and Hunter's massive corruption activities).
Comrade Chou Bai-den is covering their asses.
Zhou
Also....It would be great for ENB to give us a baby update!
Is it time to say Mazel Tov?!
The birth of a child is an awesome thing. Truly a miracle.
When Joe Biden's parents had a baby, it wasn't a miracle so much as a curse.
When Biden was born, not only did the doctor slap him but each of the nurses got a few smacks in as well.
Don't know if Sinema (or Oregon's Gov Kate Brown) continue to engage in bisexual activities, but publicly coming out as bisexual (by recalling previous activity(ies) almost certainly helped Sinema (and Brown) attain more men's votes in their elections (as many men fantasize about threesomes with two women).
Lots of people experiment sexually as teens or in their twenties (usually when drunk and/or other drugs), and then settle down as either heterosexual, homosexual or asexual.
Are those folks considered LGBTQ+?
It helped Sinema because she is not burn victim ugly and is just cute enough to be the subject of sick fantasies. So, coming out as bisexual is a pretty girl luxury. Some fat or homely or old broad isn't going go help herself by coming out as bi.
It's apparently 2SLGBTQ+? now, and as long as you're not straight and white you're in. Pedophiles might or might not yet count depending on if you favor girls or boys.
Even shortened it's still the worst acronym ever invented.
Apparently there is a new one, QTBIPOC, although that is for race (between apparently Queer and Trans are now races)
"(as many men fantasize about threesomes with two women)."
You're saying there are some who don't?
Some men fantasize about men. Or collectible action figurines.
Kate Brown has been married to a man for 24 years now. I think the fact that she married at 37 and never had kids of her own is the reason she can get away with claiming to be bisexual.
The "B" in LGBTQI+ is for "bisexual".
I think there needs to be some willful intent involved or some kind of general orientation. If Bernie Madoff was raped in prison, I don't think that makes him bisexual. I think it's possible to be a celibate bisexual, too. Virgins aren't nothing. If they're attracted to something, and they say that's what they're are, then that's what they are. Also, the "+" in LGBTQI+ stands for all kinds of other shades in the rainbow. All of these categories were created by psychologists originally.
In the Victorian world, before the advent of psychology, there was only "normal" and perverts in their view. And perverts included men who wanted to have sex with their wives for reasons other than procreation. Wanting to have sex with women for reasons other than procreation--even inside of marriage--was considered psychotic. Psychology invented the term "heterosexual" to describe such men and contrasted it to what psychologists at the time called another psychosis, "homosexual".
Before psychology stupidly tried to diagnose and treat these behaviors as psychoses, they were not identities, really. Gay and heterosexual activity are as old as humanity, but the categorization and construction of identities around them was psychology leaking into the wider culture at the end of the Victorian era/early part of the 20th century. Buggery was always something you did--not someone you were. If Sinema is creating a word for her own tendencies, then she's just like the rest of us--including heterosexuals.
"The 1901 Dorland’s Medical Dictionary defined heterosexuality as an “abnormal or perverted appetite toward the opposite sex.” More than two decades later, in 1923, Merriam Webster’s dictionary similarly defined it as “morbid sexual passion for one of the opposite sex.” It wasn’t until 1934 that heterosexuality was graced with the meaning we’re familiar with today: “manifestation of sexual passion for one of the opposite sex; normal sexuality.”
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20170315-the-invention-of-heterosexuality
That's entirely hilarious, and I'm stealing it for my Facebook feed.
P.S. I suspect the drop in the incidence of rape (and the evaporation of prostitution in much of society) had to do with the public acceptance of autoeroticism and the rise of pornography.
As recently as the Greatest Generation, I think those guys thought that activity was insane. They simply wouldn't do that to themselves. And people may have thought of prostitution as a necessary evil.
They used to have real arguments about whether it was possible to rape your wife. They used to blame women for getting raped because of the way they were dressed. They used to be more accepting of neighborhood brothels and dismissive of date rape. They got married right out of high school.
It's almost like they didn't think there was any viable alternative to those things.
“Me Too” used to refer to one of Ted Kennedy’s Democratic Party colleagues joining in during one of his…extra curricular activities.
https://www.courant.com/opinion/op-ed/hc-op-rennie-dodd-kennedy-waitress-sandwich-1119-20171115-column.html
I don't think that's particularly accurate. If you read Victorian pornography, they were pretty kinky
There was also a long running joke (and probably accurate) about homosexuality at Eton (basically England's private boys school)
Because the Victorians were wrong to see things that way doesn't mean they didn't see them that way, and Victorian pornography wasn't necessarily mainstream. In a lot of ways, I think the much ballyhooed sexual revolution of the 1960s was really a communication revolution. People started talking about what they did and what they liked when they wouldn't talk about that before. Before homosexuals started coming out of the closet in the 1970s and 1980s, heterosexuals came out of the closet in the 1960s.
India celebrates 1 billion vaccine doses administered.
Of course, you're probably more likely to get cholera there than covid.
That's where it came from [cholera].
This is what the Chron reported this morning:
"Big changes in White House ideas to pay for $2 trillion plan"
[...]
" In an abrupt change, the White House on Wednesday floated new plans to pay for parts of President Joe Biden’s $2 trillion social services and climate change package, shelving a proposed big increase in corporate tax rates though also adding a new billionaires’ tax on the investment gains of the very richest Americans..."
https://www.cleveland.com/nation/2021/10/big-changes-in-white-house-ideas-to-pay-for-2-trillion-plan.html
Regardless of the stupidity inherent in the assumption that taxing capital gains on some people will finance $2Tn, it's simply looking like droolin' Joe's "plan" is throwing stuff at the wall and hoping something sticks.
Nice to see Florida's SG and Governor refute the lies about masks by the US SG, Fauci, CDC, Biden, other Democrats and left wing media propagandists.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/10/21/florida-surgeon-general-data-does-not-support-masking-kids-n2597794
Florida now has the lowest rate of new covid cases of any state.
>>>Democrats ... Don't Want To Raise Taxes
lololololololololololol fucking lol c'mon I know you people get paid for this job. do better.
Many people need a house cleaning company ( house cleaning company ), because cleaning houses is a burden on housewives because of the large number of furniture in the house and the multiplicity of rooms. When looking for the best house cleaning company, it must have many features that make customers feel comfortable while dealing with it. Top Clean company ( Top Clean company )for various cleaning services. We offer many services that customers need at the most competitive prices.
But if they don't hike taxes, the 3.5 trillion dollars won't be free....
If only the Germans had been a funnier people...
Funny that the progressives running big tech are able to censor things that the "moral majority" conservatives types in the '80s could only dream of.
Progressives = Puritans.
Nudity is not pornography.
It is if you've got a limestone fetish.
I know it when I see it.
You have your finger on the pulse of this?
"if you are more outraged about the cost of a Big Mac rising by 17 cents over the last year than you are by the damage being done to our democracy and the undercutting of fundamental rights, well, you might reassess your perspective."
https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1451156873152016389?t=lx2Us_Ajp6LZFqrY-Oe3VQ&s=19
This dildo is running for LT Governor of TX.
Gas prices, food prices, heating and energy costs are all up. Christmas is coming and the shelves are empty. Hundreds of thousands of illegals are swarming the border of his own state. But abortions are what really matter.
17 cents?
I bought a quarter pounder with cheese and a large fries recently, and it cost $9.80 now.
A big mac meal now costs $10. Everything that USED to be on the dollar menu now costs $1.99 or more, except Coke.
I used to run thru McDonald's and buy a big bag of cheeseburgers for my kids for after their games and practices for a few bucks. It's substantially more expensive now.
Democrats still plan to go after poor people with the IRS:
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-admin-backs-tracking-bank-accounts-600-annual/story?id=80665505
So only people making $10k/year will get their ass analyzed by the IRS on behalf of democrats.
This is the party that wants to make everyone "pair their fair share."
You didn't care when they came for me. Will you care when they come for you, or just pretend it isn't happening, because you're a little bitch?
Actually making over 5k assuming they spend their money. It's 10k net (both in and out
Broken down that's roughly $800/month. Or, basically everybody. Still.
Joe Biden Boasts Plan to Take Millions of Vehicles off Highways by Putting People on Trains
He’s gonna put y’all back in trains.
Ken White is now "Antifa Lawyer Ken White". White is of course free to represent anyone he wants. It is a bit rich for self proclaimed "First Amendment and Free Speech Lawyer" Ken White to be representing the most illiberal of clients.
https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1449861334858756101
The upside of this is that if Antifa didn't hire White, they might hire a competent or honest attorney.
It's a living, I guess. What's Loder getting rung up for?
Man, was I wrong about that guy. Used to like reading Popehat, a decade ago.
TDS is a helluva drug.
Rageaholic throws icewater on the notion that Sinema is a moderate defying her own party.
"Democrats Still Want to Spend Trillions. But They Don't Want To Raise Taxes To Do It."
And that makes them different than Republicans how?!
Let's go Brandon!
Printing money is raising taxes, It is just a hidden way to to it.
(yes I know it is issuing electronic credits now days)
There's no need for the 98.6% of Americans who less than congress to pay federal income tax. We waste over 2/3rds of the IRS's resources to collect the measly 17% of our nation's revenue that is paid by these citizens & small business owners.
If we were smart, we charge a 1% transaction tax on the purchase & sale of stocks, corp. bonds, options, & secondary commodity trades. This would produce over 3.5 times the revenue that is collected by the IRS - enough to fund every social & infrastructure program our nation needs to thrive. Then there would be no reason to raise the tax rates on the richest among us.
You either raise taxes or print money. In reality both are taxes, one visible, one hidden, but to your pocket book, no difference, other than inflation hurts the poor and those on fixed incomes the most. You know the ones the Democrats say they care about the most. Also inflation taxes those billionaires that are almost all Democrats the least if you look at the "graduated income taxes" they support. No wonder billionaires are almost all Democrats!
Actually making over 5k assuming they spend their money. It’s 10k net (both in and out
Yowhatsapp
nice post...