South Dakota Lawmakers, Activists Try To Work Around Gov. Kristi Noem's Opposition to Marijuana Legalization
Legislation advances and a ballot initiative circulates in response to a constitutional amendment that was struck down by the courts.

A bipartisan pack of South Dakota lawmakers this week voted to advance a marijuana legalization bill that they hope will satisfy citizens who already voted for it. But the lawmakers also have to deal with a veto threat from a resistant Republican Gov. Kristi Noem.
In November 2020, South Dakota voters passed two marijuana legalization initiatives—one for recreational use, known as Measure A, and one for medical use. Noem opposed marijuana legalization, and rather than accept the will of 54 percent of the voters, she challenged it in court (at the voters' expense). A South Dakota 6th Circuit Court judge ruled that the initiative was flawed because it tackled more than one issue (legalization apparently being separate from taxing and regulating) and didn't follow the proper methods for revising the state's constitution. The medical marijuana initiative remains intact and is slowly being implemented.
Supporters of Measure A are working to get the state's supreme court to weigh in. In the meantime, state lawmakers are hoping to use their own powers to give voters what they want.
Noem, however, continues to resist legalization efforts. Overruling her potential veto would require two-thirds support from both houses, so lawmakers are looking for a compromise that will either garner Noem's support or that of enough of their peers to survive a veto.
On Tuesday, lawmakers in the legislature's Adult-Use Marijuana Subcommittee voted 8-2 to advance a draft bill legalizing marijuana use. It will allow citizens over the age of 21 to possess up to one ounce of marijuana and up to eight grams of marijuana concentrate. The bill does not permit consuming marijuana in public, and deviating from the proposition passed by voters last year, it will not allow for growing at home or any outdoor grow operations. It would also replace the state's medical marijuana program and has sections to legalize medical marijuana use for those under 21.
KELOLAND News notes that Noem still might not be on board. Her spokesperson told the media outlet, "Governor Noem is not supportive of legalizing recreational marijuana." The bill has a lengthy path ahead, and would be sent to lawmakers to formally vote on next year.
In the meantime, activists who support legalization are mobilizing yet again for another ballot initiative. They've gotten clearance to begin circulating a petition for what they hope will be a 2022 vote. Pushed by South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Laws (SDBML), this new measure is a statutory change, not a constitutional amendment, in the hopes of avoiding a repeat of the legal problems with Measure A.
The new initiative would, similar to the bill lawmakers are pushing, legalize possession of up to one ounce of marijuana for those over 21. Unlike that bill, however, it would allow individuals to grow up to six plants at home, but only if they lived in an area with no marijuana retailers.
Supporters have until November to collect nearly 17,000 signatures. Marijuana Moment reports that SDBML wanted to wait until the South Dakota Supreme Court ruled on the validity of Measure A before they went through with this effort, but since a decision hasn't happened, organizers felt they had to take action. If the Court ultimately rules that Measure A is constitutional, SDBML has said they'll drop their new ballot initiative.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's high time the governor got off the pot and stopped interfering with this budding issue.
Chumby agrees.
I'm disappointed he didn't chime in with something about grass roots. I left that out just for him.
Waiting for a weed pun to bowl you over? Will have to leaf through my notes. Or maybe team up with another to have a joint reply. Either something blunt or something meandering that will zig-zag around the obvious. In ancient times, bad weed puns could result in you being stoned. In Quebec, potheads greet each other by saying Bongjour.
Man it's good to have a professional on the scene again!
SPECIAL REPORT: At Last...A Diet That Works. Here's How A Local 04 Mom Stumbled On To Secret Diet Used By Rachael Ray To Lose Up To 27 lbs. In 1 Month! Dr. Oz Is Calling It "#1 Miracle Fat Burner In A Bottle.... http://www.Fitapp1.com
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily.ZXv simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now……………… READ MORE
I'll pipe up here.
I am making a good salary online from home. I’ve made 97,999 dollar’s so for last 5 months working online and I’m a full time student.FGh I’m using an online business opportunity I’m just so happy that I found out about it.
Try it, you won't regret it!........ VISIT HERE
She has a hot box, but let's be blunt. This position isn't flattering.
Hi! Le'ts leave this talk and see Best Microwave Carts with Storage
Puns may be fun but they trivialize this crucial issue.
That’s a very blunt thing to say.
BTW, it would be nice if SD 'legalized' dope in such a way that it isn't a government monopoly, such as it is in CA and OR.
In both places, the regulatory costs are such that the black market is supposedly as strong as ever.
No. It's not the regulatory costs that support the black-market in the Legal States. - Consumers LOVE their legal stores. The majority of the black-market marijuana there is going to the states that still persecute their citizens for choosing near harmless marijuana over addictive, very harmful alcohol - like South Dakota.
The only thing that fosters some black-market buying in the legal states is the outrageous prices the legal stores charge, in every state. - After the fraudulently enacted federal prohibition collapses, average quality marijuana will sell for $25 TO $40 an ounce. It's just a plant. And it will be sold in grocery stores between more harmful beer and cigarettes.
easier to get a new governor.
Amen! - Let's do it quick!
Never knew SD had a dictator. Especially from the small govt party.
we knew full well that shitfordinner is a lying piece of lefty shit.
What are you raving about?
R-E-P-U-B-L-I-C. Say it out loud, maybe it will sink in.
Politicians are elected to vote their conscience. The problem throughout America is that so many confuse that with their interest.
I don't agree with her stand, but it shows integrity that she maintains it.
Raspberry dinners, being in Jr. High is just discovering the concept of an executive veto. Maybe by next year, xe will discover the executive order. Imagine how exciting that will be for xer.
No. They are not elected to "vote their conscience," especially if they are Republicans. -- Trump and his cult have shown they have no conscience. They actively work to destroy democracy in a corrupt, naked grab for power.
Politicians are elected to REPRESENT the people, of course. --- Noem has failed at this, since she is acting in direct opposition to the expressed will of the people. - She should be removed ASAP.
Adults are talking here. So run along now to your CPUSA meeting and stop interrupting.
When you can't respond to points, make lame insults. - Pathetic.
totally incorrect... elected officials are to uphold the views of their voters not their own biases…she’s not doing her job
Amen!
This is rather disappointing, but she has been about the least dictatorial governor around for the past year or two.
No. - She rates right up there with this trashing of the people's initiative power.
My wife and I moved from Oregon to South Dakota two years ago. I did not pay attention to who the governor of SD was until after we’d been here awhile. She is mostly limited government, but her religious upbringing does deeply color her thinking on drugs. In one hand she has libertarian views, such no mandates for masks, vaccination, or business closures, and if a private business wants to mandate employee vaccination that’s their right. But with marijuana she feels the state should control your choice. Aggravating, to be sure, but compared to the political dictates we saw in Oregon, much improved.
Jesus would definitely NOT support the persecution of people who prefer near harmless marijuana over the addictive, very harmful wine that he and most people drank.
No true follower of Christianity would think this horrific persecution is the 'Christian' thing to do. It's clearly evil.
Marijuana prohibition was fraudulently enacted in 1937 by soon-to-be-out-of-work alcohol prohibition bureaucrat, Harry Anslinger. He desperately wanted a new empire and no lie was too big to tell to get it.
President Nixon ramped up the huge fraud into a monstrous "Drug War" to attack his "enemies." His domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman explained:
“The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities,” Ehrlichman said.
“We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news."
Ehrlichman added.
"Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”
Because vastly more people consume marijuana than heroin, the fraudulent marijuana prohibition is the primary tool used to persecute Blacks, Hispanics and politically active youth and their protests.
The democrat party is the primary tool used to persecute Blacks, Hispanics, and anyone who values individual freedom.
lol - More ignoring of points to toss silly, unsupported claims.
Good for Kristi Noem for sticking to her guns. It's been many years since I smoked any weed and I really don't care for it, I'd hate to think that if weed were legalized I'd be forced to start smoking it against my will. My body, my choice!
Mandatory wake and bake.
lol -- What nonsense. --- You think that if marijuana were legalized, people would be forced to smoke it?
Republicans are all about lies and bogus conspiracy theories.
‘WHOOOOOSSHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!’
When you can't respond to comments, make silly noises.
I'm beginning to wonder if Noem is doing marijuana smokers a favor. Because after what we've seen with legalization in CA, OR and WA, there has been no discernable impact on prison populations, prices are higher than when it was illegal, and they're still raiding illegal grows which, according to the aforementioned states are exploding.
What forked tongues there are here. -- Science and widespread experience have shown marijuana is not addictive and has no significant harms. - Yet, more than 500,000 innocent Americans are arrested for simple marijuana possession each year and made second-class citizens - for life! They will forever face large obstacles to decent employment, education, travel, housing, government benefits, and will always go into court with one strike against them. They can even have their children taken away!
25 million Americans are now locked away in this very un-American sub-class because of this bogus "criminal" record. That has a horrible effect on the whole country, being a massive waste of human potential.
The fraudulent marijuana prohibition has never accomplished one positive thing. It has only caused vast amounts of crime, corruption, violence, death and the severe diminishing of everyone's freedom.
After the pandemic, there is no more important domestic issue than ending what is essentially the American Inquisition.
"(legalization apparently being separate from taxing and regulating)"
Don't let the democrats find out about this part!
Whooosh! - It went over your head. - That was sarcasm. OF COURSE, taxation and regulation are an integral part of marijuana legalization, as we have seen in all the states that have done so, and even in all the REPUBLICAN proposals to legalize.
Yeah, so why don’t you progs leave everyone alone? You morons even manage to fuck up legal weed.
When are you going to learn to respond to comments instead of tossing insults. -- You would be laughed off of every debate stage in the country.
In November 2020, South Dakota voters passed two marijuana legalization initiatives—one for recreational use, known as Measure A, and one for medical use. Noem opposed marijuana legalization, and rather than accept the will of 54 percent of the voters, she challenged it in court (at the voters' expense). A South Dakota 6th Circuit Court judge ruled that the initiative was flawed because it tackled more than one issue (legalization apparently being separate from taxing and regulating) and didn't follow the proper methods for revising the state's constitution.
A governor taking his (or her) own people to court at their expense for an initiative that they popularly passed is absolutely nothing new. I would say if that's the kind of thing that gets your blood up, then I would strongly recommend not moving to a blue state. I agree it can be infuriating, but that's the game.
As far as the violation of tackling two issues at once, it sounds like they are trying to go down the same route as CA, WA etc. No one seems to be satisfied with just legalizing it, they're genetically compelled to ask for byzantine regulations surrounding it, then they inevitably wonder where it all went wrong.
BS. -- You are apparently referring to the majority rule in Blue States that you don't like. That's totally different, of course.
The "Byzantine" regulations you are against are installed to pacify the gatekeepers, mostly Republican, who won't let simple justice take place unless they get their pound of flesh.
Democrats always thirst for money and control. As do many RINO’s.
More nonsense from the idiot who thinks insulting is debating. - You are clearly the biggest loser here. - This is no insult, just the clear statement of verifiable fact, confirmed by your atrocious, irrelevant behavior - aka troll.
Just another gov. who thinks they know best. Time for revolution
YES!
Chill out comrade.
You'd like that, wouldn't you? - No thanks. We will expose lies and corruption whenever and wherever they appear. -- Go crawl back under your ignorant, facist, white supremacist rock.
You want to smoke weed, go live somewhere it's already legal, stop trying to phuk up SD, you want to do drugs and alter your state of mind then drive and possibly kill someone, go somewhere else!! You people are phuking sick, you need to just OD already on something that makes you struggle to breathe and you die slowly and suffer! Allowing the shit will only degrade our society, we need to stop letting children make decisions. This is stupid!!
How foolish and bigoted. - - Science and widespread experience have shown marijuana has no significant harms. -- Every person who chooses near harmless marijuana over addictive, very harmful alcohol improves their health significantly - as well as the lives of their family and community.
The preponderance of the research shows marijuana is NOT a significant cause of auto accidents.
Marijuana was FRAUDULENTLY prohibited in 1937, and the bogus prohibition has never accomplished one positive thing. It has ONLY caused vast amounts of crime, violence, corruption, death and the severe diminishing of everyone's freedom.
Get educated.
STFU bitch
All the talk is about Noem's opposition to marijuana legalization. - That's not the biggest issue. It's Noem's opposition to the majority of SOUTH DAKOTA CITIZENS who voted to pass the legalization initiative. That is simply gross malfeasance of office.
She is supposed to represent the people of South Dakota -- as expressed through their voting. - Noem should be removed from office by any means necessary.
You want to weed out the politicians that oppose wee…marijuana?
I'm sorry for your reading disability. I just stated I am primarily against corrupt politicians who betray the voters that put them in office.
STFU bitch.
That's not the way forums work. If you don't like what's going on, contribute in a positive way or take a hike.
STFU bitch. Then take a hike.
Does swearing and barking at posters ever work for you? Hint: All it does is show you have no ideas or facts in your head.
Bitch. STFU.
Where do you think you are, in a saloon? -- Wake up.
STFU bitch.
I don't care if individual states ban it or legalize it. I just want the Feds out of the way.
“Great share!”
“Great share!”
vote her out of office. elected officials are to uphold the views of their voters not their own biases...she's not doing her job, don't vote for her
Right. And put a recall effort in action!
God's Own Prohibitionist harridan clearly wants an asset-forfeiture trap to rob Canadian tourists. That'll disabuse the Canucks of any foolish notions they might have had about living next door to a free country. Sending the hillbilly packing will help clear the decks for a standoff between Libertarian Party laissez-faire and the People's Party populism again swallowing the Dems like a python swallowing a burrito.
Canadians somehow interfere with U.S. political contests? -- It seems you get lost in your own words.
“Amazing write-up!”
“Useful post”