Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Cuba

The Case for Beaming Internet Into Cuba

The technological hurdles might be too difficult to overcome, but it's worth trying.

Eric Boehm | 7.27.2021 10:40 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
upiphotostwo808681 | Ken Cedeno/UPI/Newscom
(Ken Cedeno/UPI/Newscom)

When thousands of Cubans took to the streets earlier this month to protest the failures of the island nation's communist government, pictures and videos captured on cell phones told the world what was happening.

At least, they did until the Cuban regime cracked down on mobile internet access in an attempt to quell the protests.

It's a familiar pattern for political upheaval in the iPhone age. Twitter, WhatsApp, and other social media messaging services have been used by dissidents to organize on a scale that their 20th century predecessors could never have dreamed—and in ways that even police states like Cuba have a difficult time combatting. Once the ball is rolling, the same tech can quickly turn a mass demonstration into a worldwide event. Almost inevitably, governments respond by trying to cut off internet service or block the use of certain apps, as the Cuban regime reportedly did on July 14.

When that happens, there's usually not much the United States can do about it. But Cuba happens to be just 90 miles from Florida.

"Internet access for the Cuban people is of critical importance as they stand up against the repressive Communist government," Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, wrote in a letter to the White House earlier this month, urging President Joe Biden to provide "all necessary authorizations, indemnifications, and funding to American businesses" to get Cubans back online. He noted that the crackdown on internet access in Cuba has left many Floridians without the ability to communicate with loved ones on the island.

DeSantis has become one of the leading advocates, along with Reps. Maria Salazar (R–Fla.) and Carlos Gimenez (R–Fla.), both of whom are Cuban-American, for a radical plan to beam mobile internet service into Cuba from balloons anchored offshore that would effectively serve as temporary cell towers. It's an idea that would rely on the technological know-how of Google and the diplomatic might of the United States—and even then it might be of limited value. But it might, as DeSantis put it in his letter to Biden, also be "the key to finally bringing democracy to the island" without the need for military intervention.

The diplomatic and political dynamics are actually more straightforward than they might appear. There are plenty of precedents for beaming signals across international borders against the wishes of a domestic government. Radio Free Europe is probably the most famous example, but the better comparison here is Radio Televisión Martí, run by the U.S. Agency for Global Media, which has broadcast news into Cuba since the 1980s. Clearly, the U.S. has no qualms about whatever international laws it might be violating by sending television signals into Cuba against the Cuban regime's wishes. Sending mobile internet signals is a difference of degree—a slightly different wavelength of light—but should not require a total overhaul of U.S. policy toward Cuba.

"It is time to build on [the Radio Televisión Martí] model and include the delivery of Internet service," argues Brandon Carr, one of the five commissioners in charge of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

Still, due to the diplomatic issues involved, any effort to beam internet into Cuba would have to be cleared by the White House. Earlier this month, press secretary Jen Psaki said the Biden administration was "actively pursuing measures" to "make the internet more accessible to the Cuban people."

On Friday, however, Psaki sounded a less optimistic note when asked for an update.

"I wish it was that easy," Psaki said in response to comments from Salazar suggesting that the White House could restore internet to Cuba "within minutes."

"We are exploring a range of options," she added. "And we feel if we can get it done, that would be a great step forward and beneficial to the people of Cuba."

As Psaki suggests, the technological hurdles are in some ways more complicated than the political ones, but they are not insurmountable.

When DeSantis first called on the White House to deliver internet service to Cuba earlier this month, he nodded towards satellite-linked connections like SpaceX's innovative Starlink program. Using low-level satellites in stationary orbit, Starlink promises to beam high-speed mobile internet to parts of the world that are inaccessible for traditional cell phone towers. Unfortunately, the service requires small satellite dishes on the ground to act as receivers—not a problem in rural Kansas, but not a viable option in Cuba at the moment.

So the discussion about beaming the internet into Cuba quickly turned to a more Earthbound option: Project Loon.

Originally developed by Google before being partially scrapped for not being economically viable, Project Loon was a pre-Starlink attempt to bring mobile internet to rural areas by attaching antennas to weather balloons that could function as de facto cell phone towers floating more than 10 miles up in the air. The idea has only been tested on a large scale once—in Puerto Rico during the aftermath of the two devastating hurricanes that hit the island in 2017—but showed some promise. A 2018 test showed that a fleet of Loon balloons could maintain a connection over 620 miles, according to the Associated Press.

Again, Cuba is just 90 miles from the United States.

It's not a slam dunk, of course. Signals could be jammed by the Cuban government, which already tries to block Radio Televisión Martí as much as possible. Many Cubans' cell phones might not be able to connect due to differences in network protocols. And whatever connectivity is possible will be slow and spotty, at least by American standards.

But it may be worth making the attempt anyway, particularly since the technology already exists and could be deployed for minimal cost. There's little to lose, and much that could be gained—not just in Cuba, but in other fights against tyrannical regimes.

"Internet shutdowns are increasingly becoming a tool of tyranny for authoritarian regimes across the globe," says Carr. "America must stand against this anti-democratic tactic and move with haste to provide internet freedom to the Cuban people."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Uber Has Reduced Drunk Driving Deaths by 6 Percent, Study Finds

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

CubaCommunismTechnologyInternetBiden AdministrationFCC
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (63)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Longtobefree   4 years ago

    Guantanamo General. Don't forget Guantanamo.

    (0 miles from Cuba)

    1. Entelechy   4 years ago

      Unfortunately, zero miles from Cuba translates into 1000 kilometers East of Havana in this case. Even with a big Gitmo balloon for the reds to shoot at, there'd be zero bars of pirate wifi in the capital.

      Credit for the workable offshore balloon relay should go to Astro Teller, for the " radical plan to beam mobile internet service into Cuba from balloons anchored offshore that would effectively serve as temporary cell towers." is indeed his Loon Project, which Google pulled the plug on last year.

  2. Don't look at me!   4 years ago

    A lucrative market for targeted ads , I’m sure.

  3. BestUsedCarSales   4 years ago

    Honestly, fuck yeah. Radio Free Europe for a modern era. It's probably cheaper and more effective than even more direct intervention.

    1. Mark Thrust, Sexus Ranger   4 years ago

      We need to avoid turning this into some invasion.

    2. Union of Concerned Socks   4 years ago

      Harder than RFE, as internet use requires two-way communication. Well worth brainstorming though.

  4. buckleup   4 years ago

    Why aren't sat dishes viable? They are used in Iran, North Korea and other places, usually at night.

  5. CLN44   4 years ago

    We need to stop meddling in others affairs and let them handle things themselves. Desantis is pandering for votes.

  6. JohannesDinkle   4 years ago

    I thought the White House only worked with internet companies to stop the spread of dangerous misinformation from US right-wing nutters.
    This proposal would do nothing to aid this noble effort.

  7. Mickey Rat   4 years ago

    ""Internet shutdowns are increasingly becoming a tool of tyranny for authoritarian regimes across the globe," says Carr. "America must stand against this anti-democratic tactic and move with haste to provide internet freedom to the Cuban people."

    "Klobuchar's Plan To Combat Vaccine 'Misinformation' Would Have HHS Decide What You Can Post Online"

    Hmmm.

  8. Dillinger   4 years ago

    >>would be a great step forward and beneficial to the people of Cuba

    Peppermint Paski for "ain't gonna happen."

    1. Dillinger   4 years ago

      psaki dammit. edit button.

      1. Fats of Fury   4 years ago

        FWIW Psaki is Polish for dogs.

        1. Dillinger   4 years ago

          makes my day.

  9. Jon Lester   4 years ago

    I wish someone cared that much about the substandard internet service I'm stuck with as a rural American.

    Why aren't you speaking out against the embargo? Milton Friedman would.

    And fuck DeSantis. He thinks he can sanction a Vermont company because they don't want to do business in the West Bank anymore.

    1. Moderation4ever   4 years ago

      Have to agree it would look silly to say we can get internet to Cuba but not to part of rural America.

    2. cgr2727   4 years ago

      I generally agree with any statement that includes "fuck DeSantis," but the rest of the sentence kind of misses the point. It's not like that asswipe Elliot Spitzer who thought he could sue anyone out of existence just because they drove through New York once. Instead he's using things over which he has some degree of control or influence, like state funding, to say "you can't do business with a bunch of libtards who think the Palestinians are helpless victims." Same thing CALPERS and a bunch of other libtards do when they divest from shares in Lockheed, Winchester, or whatever other companies make them wet their pants and clutch their pearls. Yes it's mostly empty virtue signaling and pandering, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it sanctioning.

  10. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   4 years ago

    At least, they did until the Cuban regime cracked down on mobile internet access in an attempt to quell the protests.

    Merely cracking down on misinformation.

    I mean, here's Facebook's public statement on protests:

    Incitement or encouragement of the events at the Capitol, including videos and photos from the protestors. At this point they represent promotion of criminal activity which violates our policies.

    So video from protesters that is deemed by Facebook to be a promotion of criminal activity-- which the protests in Cuba most certainly were, should be verboten on the American Tech platforms.

  11. Moderation4ever   4 years ago

    I think it is worth a try and if it works it could be a bargaining chip with the Cuban government. If successful use it to get some opening of communication with those outside of Cuba. Set the goal as allowing American Cubans to communicate with relatives on the island. Either the Cuban government lets that communication happen or we will facilitate the communication. State we have no goals to bring down the government just to let people talk to people. If it does bring down the government it will be organic and not at our feet.

    I think the US should also allow American Cubans to sent money to island relatives. Even though I accept some of that money will be shimmed off to the Cuban government. Finally let's vaccinate the Cuban people. Odds are they are smarter than some of the American people and will welcome the vaccines.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   4 years ago

      Why on earth would the US be vaccinating anyone in a country with universal healthcare?

      1. BestUsedCarSales   4 years ago

        And such high literacy.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   4 years ago

          That's like Somalia providing the US food aid.

      2. Sevo   4 years ago

        "Why on earth would the US be vaccinating anyone in a country with universal healthcare?"

        1) M4e is a fucking ignoramus.
        2) Cuba is a prime example of how 'free' medical care works; it's great! If there is any.

      3. Moderation4ever   4 years ago

        Because we have extra vaccines that many of our own people are too stupid to use.

        1. Fats of Fury   4 years ago

          You should don your Che tee, fly down to Havana and tell them how great socialism is.
          They'll welcome you as a hero.

          1. mtrueman   4 years ago

            I'd rather do that than fly down to Port au Prince (capital of Haiti) and extol the virtues of capitalism American style.

            1. Don't look at me!   4 years ago

              Yeah, the clintons gave it to them dry.

              1. mtrueman   4 years ago

                You can probably give it to them dry too. A servant in Haiti will only set you back a little more than a dollar a day.

  12. cgr2727   4 years ago

    Won't someone think of the children? Right now there are a bunch of Cuban 16-year-olds who have to scrounge for back issues of Playboy rather than having free unfettered access to all the glories of the internet.

  13. Its_Not_Inevitable   4 years ago

    Can we beam OCrazio into Cuba? One way?

  14. Roberta   4 years ago

    Or just, you know, go there and kill anybody who tries to stop you.

    1. Roberta   4 years ago

      What are they going to do, hide out in the mountains again?

      1. mtrueman   4 years ago

        With more than 60 years of hostility with an aggressive imperialistic power under their belt, I imagine that, like the Gazans or North Koreans, Cuban cities are honeycombed with tunnels and air raid shelters.

        1. Roberta   4 years ago

          Sure, but who's going to be in them? Just the commies, I'm sure. They won't even have room for hostages.

          1. mtrueman   4 years ago

            "Sure, but who’s going to be in them? "

            Anyone with a gun.

  15. brdfshml   4 years ago

    For your best chat experience with local girls in UK you must to visit shemales manchester

  16. mtrueman   4 years ago

    Because Facebook needs more viewers.

  17. Ornithorhynchus   4 years ago

    'Using low-level satellites in stationary orbit...'

    Wait.... WHAT?!?!

    1. DRM   4 years ago

      Yeah, well. you can't actually be reading a Boehm article expecting him to know what he's talking about, right?

  18. DRM   4 years ago

    I've got a better idea.

    Let's just drone/cruise missile all of 115 members of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba whose homes we can identify at 3 am Havana time, on the indisputable grounds that they're leaders of a terrorist organization victimizing the Cuban people.

    If that means our ruling political party is subject to similar attacks in retaliation, well . . . what's the downside, exactly?

    1. Agammamon   4 years ago

      Its not like we've never directly attacked heads of state before.

  19. Agammamon   4 years ago

    Here's a government subsidy I would support;

    Elon, stop rolling out Starlink in the US for a bit and air-drop some - no, better, use that submarine you wanted to build, to set loose tens of thousands of Dishys to float onto Cuban beaches.

    I'd be willing to let my taxpayer dollars go to that.

    1. mtrueman   4 years ago

      Because Facebook needs more viewers.

  20. Chumby   4 years ago

    And who would be paying for this?

  21. BYODB   4 years ago

    The private sector literally already did this, it's called 'Starlink'.

    So...that was easy.

  22. Agammamon   4 years ago

    Using low-level satellites in stationary orbit,

    Oh, FFS. I guess this is what I get for actually reading the article.

  23. Agammamon   4 years ago

    Starlink promises to beam high-speed mobile internet to parts of the world that are inaccessible for traditional cell phone towers.

    No it doesn't . . . JFC.

    Its satellite internet. Not 'mobile' internet. It goes to a fixed ground terminal at your home and then you plug in like normal. Its a satellite modem basically.

    And its 'high speed' only in relation to existing satellite and most rural service - which is 25mbps. Starlink will hit 4 times that.

    That's still a 10th what most people can get from their ISP in a city.

    1. Agammamon   4 years ago

      Oh, and it comes with much higher latency than terrestrial ISP's.

      1. DRM   4 years ago

        Define "much higher". Starlink latency tests during the beta period have averaged 42 ms (per a PCMag study). That's worse than, say, Spectrum's 24 ms (as measured by US News), but not all that much worse. The satellites being low-flying compared to those of HughesNet and Exede really helps.

        1. BYODB   4 years ago

          Double could be considered much higher, although functionally no one will really care except maybe gamers or remote workers running on an already shitty VPN. Exactly the kind of people who aren't living in Cuba. The difference is almost certainly a 'first world problem' since the alternative for Cuba is no internet at all.

        2. Agammamon   4 years ago

          Double is pretty high.

          Its fine if you're not doing latency sensitive things.

    2. Brandon Lyon   4 years ago

      In terms of "mobile internet" that is one of the uses of Starlink, currently there are many places in the world that are too remote to hook a cell tower into a broadband landline. With Starlink you could place a cell tower anywhere and all you would have to supply is electricity. The tower would provide mobile cell coverage and beam it up using a starlink station. Also, I live in a city and 100mbps is the highest bandwidth I'm able to get.

  24. Maqala   4 years ago

    The private sector literally already did this, it’s called ‘Starlink’.

    So…that was easy.

  25. Far North Sider   4 years ago

    A waste of time & money, as the Cubans will just interfere with it & cause it to be useless!

  26. Political McGuffin   4 years ago

    Starlink would solve those problems, and not just in Cuba.

  27. ragebot   4 years ago

    I am calling bullshit on this.

    I have actually visited Cuba and experienced internet there. Not to mention leaving from Boot Key Harbor via Sisters Creek where the VOA radio towers broadcast to Cuba. When I pass by the VOA towers the autopilot on my boat turns on and other electronics go crazy. Yet the Cuban govt is still able to blunt the messages by strong signals in Cuba.

    Any balloon with wifi would be subject to wind an currents, not to mention it is hurricane season. Ignoring these problems you would still have to deal with Cuban govt gobbling up band width and confiscation of smart phones from those using the wifi. Not to mention simply shooting the balloons down.

    Cuba's problem is it is a poor third world country with no resources, no money, and it is run by morons. So far this year Cuba has bought about $US170,000,000 worth of food and medicine from the US, goods exempt by the embargo. The reason they do not buy more from the US and the rest of the world is they do not have money to buy stuff. Cuba is just another country Trump would call a 'shithole country'.

  28. John French   4 years ago

    The answer is from the private sector. Its AST Space Mobile. Currently in development, they will deliver 5g via satellite directly to mobile phones world wide. Since mobile phones are how most people in Cuba access internet anyways this is obvious solution.

  29. dougwesterman   4 years ago

    I think we should drop food packets via parachute by the thousands at 2 a.m. along with Spanish language copies of "The Road to Serfdom." If people understand that capitalist economies are more likely to produce food surpluses, wheras socialist/communist ones lead to long lines and hunger pangs, there is more possibility for change.

  30. NOYB2   4 years ago

    The technological hurdles might be too difficult to overcome, but it's worth trying.

    If some private organization wants to do this with private funding, they should knock themselves out.

    The US government has no business doing this.

    1. Ezra MacVie   4 years ago

      Agreed. Another governmental overreach. And shut down Voice of America, TV Marti and all those other stupidities.

  31. dowen   4 years ago

    Find The Call Girls 16+ Satta King Online Site.

  32. Ezra MacVie   4 years ago

    What's a "low-level satellite in stationary orbit?" If a satellite isn't at 22,000 miles AND above the equator, it isn't stationary, can't be, and never will be.
    Or am I missing something?

  33. BigFish92672   4 years ago

    Okay ne0-con traitors, now do the Cuban government case for shooting your stupid balloons out of the sky

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!