Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Big Government

How Big Business Uses Big Government To Kill Competition

Corporations can afford robots. Their competitors often cannot.

John Stossel | 7.7.2021 12:39 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Screen Shot 2021-07-07 at 9.25.31 AM | Stossel TV
(Stossel TV)

Politicians say they pass laws to "protect Americans from big business."

People like hearing that. Many don't like big business.

Unfortunately, most people don't realize that those laws often help big business while hurting consumers.

"Big business and big government are not enemies like a lot of people think they are," says American Enterprise Institute fellow Tim Carney in my new video. "When government gets bigger, whether it's through spending or taxes or regulation, the big guys, big business benefits."

Consider the $15 minimum wage. People think of that law as pro-worker. But big companies like Walmart, Costco, and Amazon lobby in favor of it. Why?

Because big business can afford robots. Their competitors often cannot.

"Capitalism is a cutthroat thing," says Carney. "But this isn't capitalism. When you turn to government to regulate your competitors out of business, that's where we need to say this is wrong."

"Maybe you're too cynical," I suggest. "Maybe [Amazon founder Jeff] Bezos really just does want people to be paid more."

"If Jeff Bezos wants people to be paid more," Carney responds, "he can pay people more! But what Bezos is trying to do is outlaw competing business practices."

He's not alone.

When the big toymaker Mattel was caught selling toys that contained lead, its lobbyists got Congress to force all toymakers to do expensive lead testing.

That sounds like they just want to protect children, I tell Carney.

"If you're trying to test 1,000 Barbie dolls," he replies, "that might be fairly efficient. But if you are a grandpa making little wooden handmade toys, you'd have to hire some third-party tester. That could cost you $1,000, and you're not going to sell your wooden toy for $1,000. It effectively outlawed handmade toys."

After small toymakers screamed about that, Congress exempted toymakers that make fewer than 7,500 toys per year. So small toymakers must stay small.

"Maybe what [Mattel] did," says Carney, "is say, 'This is our opportunity through regulation to kill some of our competitors!'"

Facebook tries to do that, too.

At an international conference, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said, "We don't want private companies making so many decisions about how to balance social equities without a more democratic process."

In other words: "Government, please regulate all of us."

That sounds noble.

Carney points out the catch.

"He's calling for a mandate that platforms impose some sort of artificial intelligence to weed out misinformation or hate speech. Facebook can afford that, but Zuckerberg's smaller competitors [like Odysee, Rumble, Parler]…would struggle to pay the thousands of content moderators and the expensive artificial intelligence that Congress may require. New social media sites may never even start."

That last sentence is a key point that we often miss.

"Regulation doesn't just kill existing businesses," says Carney. "It keeps new businesses from ever entering."

Big business has always pushed for regulation.

More than 100 years ago, Henry Heinz, founder of Heinz Ketchup, started using refrigerated rail cars because, says Carney, "he could get fresher tomatoes, and therefore he could make a ketchup that didn't rely on sodium benzoate as an artificial preservative."

"Everybody loved Heinz ketchup, and it rose up to be about half of the market," Carney continues. "But sometimes people who are half of the market want to be all the market. So Heinz himself started lobbying to outlaw sodium benzoate."

Sodium benzoate is a preservative that Heinz's competitors used. Heinz claimed it wasn't safe, but it is safe. It's still used in Sprite, Jell-O Kool-Aid Gels, and other foods.

Henry Heinz almost got those products banned, says Carney. "He almost got Teddy Roosevelt on board, which would have outlawed all of his competition. Sometimes businessmen hate nothing more than competition."

Not "sometimes." Usually. Almost all businesses hate competition.

But competition is what helps us consumers most.

When big government colludes with big business to kill competition, we all pay the price.

COPYRIGHT 2021 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Trump Judicial Appointees Clash Over Qualified Immunity and ‘the Woke Constitution’

John Stossel is the host and creator of Stossel TV.

Big GovernmentCorporationsRegulationBusiness and IndustrySmall BusinessAmazonFacebookJeff BezosMark Zuckerberg
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

    Speaking of which, this is the ad Facebook is currently running, demanding more internet regulation.

    Those tech companies, just libertarian cowboys trying to sell you widgets without interference from government in a free, open market.

    1. Unicorn Abattoir   5 years ago

      Did you see his Hydrofoil video, with John Denver playing in the background?

      Denver was a critic of censorship, especially when government and private industry were acting in concert. His testimony at the PMRC hearings in the '80s make that clear. Pretty sure he wouldn't have been a big fan of Faceplant's censorship. I wonder if Zuck knows that.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   5 years ago

        Zuck gave a hundred million + to Newark. I don't think he knows anything outside of Facebook.

        1. Carla Feagin   5 years ago

          Making money online more than 15OOO$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its DS earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
          on this page.....VISIT HERE

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

        Comments turned off.

  2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

    Twitter now liable for users' posts in India.

    NEW DELHI, July 6 (Reuters) - Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) no more enjoys liability protection against user-generated content in India as the U.S. microblogging giant has failed to comply with new IT rules, the Indian government said in a court filing.

    The statement is the first time Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration has officially said Twitter has lost its immunity after repeatedly criticising the company for non-compliance.

    1. Don't look at me!   5 years ago

      Words are so dangerous.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

        Jack Dorsey agrees.

      2. Stuck in California   5 years ago

        Well, if we've learned anything since the safe space thing on colleges a couple of years ago, it's that words are "violence."

        Sounds dangerous to me.

      3. Unicorn Abattoir   5 years ago

        As far as India is concerned, words are as dangerous as methyl isocyanate.

    2. perlhaqr   5 years ago

      I'm going to guess what you can't get to Twitter from India right now.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

        I don't think that's the case. I believe that as of this moment, Twitter is wide open for prosecution in India's courts for anything currently being posted. But you could be right.

    3. Cthulunotmyfriend   5 years ago

      India is run by crazy autocrats and has been that way for years. Heck they are lionizing the guy who shot Ghandi. Nothing they do makes a lot of sense. Thank god they are so poor and incompetent that they are no threat to anyone else but themselves.

      1. Mark Thrust, Sexus Ranger   5 years ago

        India still has the plague……..

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sUMtHcUMWo

  3. buckleup   5 years ago

    Trillion dollar multi national corporations run by amoral billionaires acting as quasi governmental spy rings who aren't beholden to any laws if they wish to avoid them. Why do so many of their CEOs have citizenship in other countries is a good question.

    Private companies, move along, nothing to see there.

  4. Jefferson's Ghost   5 years ago

    Yet another good article, Mr. Stossel.

  5. raspberrydinners   5 years ago

    I find it amusing that this article hits on a good point (regulation can stifle competitors) yet are the same ones arguing that facebook and others shouldn't be broken up.

    So you want competition or not Reason?

    1. Don't look at me!   5 years ago

      Breaking up companies doesn’t create new competition.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   5 years ago

      Facebook has plenty of competition. They all compete for your time and eyeballs whether it is video games, Netflix, or Facebook.

    3. criticaljeff racial theorist   5 years ago

      "a good point, uetvare thebsame ones"
      WTF are you babbling about, mushbrain?

  6. BigGiveNotBigGov   5 years ago

    Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said, "We don't want private companies making so many decisions about how to balance social equities without a more democratic process."

    Zuckerburg translated:

    "Please, big government don't let anyone do to me what I did to MySpace."

  7. TJJ2000   5 years ago

    We won't even talk about corporate tax deductions, green-energy subsidies, foreign shipping subsidies and hundreds of other Gov-Gun Theft of citizens going directly to "Big Business" in this ever-growing National Socialist (acronym: Nazism) nation..

  8. Moderation4ever   5 years ago

    I am always amused by politicians who talk about helping small mom and pop businesses and then pass legislation that actually helps the big businesses. This in-turn allows those big businesses to force out the mom and pop outlets. Just a twist on bait and switch.

  9. Cthulunotmyfriend   5 years ago

    Stossel really hits a home run on this one. I agree that laws and subsequent regulations often accomplishes the opposite of what they say they intend.
    But, watch me take this idea and go in a completely different direction.
    Since we know that big businesses often engage in unfair competitive processes, and sponsor regulations that screw their smaller competitors, why don’t we tax them at a higher rate? Or, give a tax reduction to smaller businesses to help them survive in this world that is dominated by 800 pound gorillas.
    Of course, that will never happen.

    1. TJJ2000   5 years ago

      "why don’t we tax them at a higher rate?"
      As-if that hasn't already been done - ENTER more tax-deductions.

      Nazism (def; National Socialism) is the 'root' of the problem; always has been, always will be, and is the very 'regulation' favoritism mechanism. The very 'idea' that *stealing* more is exactly what disconnected the idea that wealth had to be *earned* and taking wealth out of envy wasn't *theft*.

      The problem isn't going to be fixed by adding MORE problem to it.

      Hint, hint; Where in the U.S. Constitution was the Union of States (United States gov) even given the authority to regulate "Big Business". They only have authority to regulate state-to-state trade deals. It's not a "Union" of Businesses or People it's a Union of States created to regulate State to State affairs and a strong Union of States defense.

  10. AmandaGreen   5 years ago

    Before talking about the opportunities offered by the automation of business processes, you need to understand what difficulties you are facing now. Only after thinking through all the weak points, you will be able to find the right tools to solve them. You can discover a lot of useful information here https://www.airslate.com/academy/invoice-processing

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Responses to Kimmel and Comey Highlight His Contempt for Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.6.2026 12:01 AM

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

The People vs. CEQA

Christian Britschgi | 5.5.2026 3:25 PM

How the Slaveholding Founders Really Felt About Slavery

Timothy Sandefur | 5.5.2026 1:20 PM

Can We Ever Trust the Government To Be Honest About War?

Alexander Langlois | 5.5.2026 12:27 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks