Tennessee Woman Sues State Officials for Revoking Her '69' Vanity Plate
Nashville’s Leah Gilliam says her vanity plate is protected by the First Amendment.

Ten years ago, Leah Gilliam of Nashville purchased a vanity license plate which reads 69PWNDU. She claims it's quite innocent—merely a mashup of her passions for space travel and gaming: "69" for the 1969 moon landing, plus "pwnd" (meaning to be "completely annihilated or dominated"), with reference to a devastating video game defeat.
It was all fun and games until Gilliam received a threatening letter from Tennessee state officials in May, requiring that she return her plates lest she be rendered unable to renew her vehicle registration. After a decade of driving with them affixed to her car, the state had deemed her novelty plates offensive.
But Gilliam will not give up 69PWNDU without a fight. Last Monday, she sued the commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Revenue and the state's attorney general for allegedly violating her First Amendment rights.
According to her lawsuit, "The summary revocation of Ms. Gilliam's vanity plate—Ms. Gilliam's free speech—carries surpassing importance, because loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, constitutes irreparable injury."
In a statement, her attorney, Daniel A. Horowitz,* upheld that "The First Amendment forbids the government from discriminating against citizens based on the viewpoints they express. Ms. Gilliam's harmless vanity plate is transparently protected by the First Amendment."
But while Tennessee is cracking down on a decade-old indecency, Colorado is taking quite the different approach to risqué vanity plates. In April, the state's Department of Motor Vehicles auctioned off 14 marijuana-related vanity plates, with BONG, GREEN, and HERB all up for grabs.
The auction ended on April 20. Some received upward of 150 bids, with ISIT420 being sold for $6,630, the highest amount. Proceeds were donated to the Colorado Disability Funding Committee. A second 4/20 auction is reportedly in the works for 2022, proving some states have a better sense of humor—and sense of the First Amendment—than others.
*CORRECTION: A previous version of this article incorrectly referred to Gilliam's attorney as David A. Horowitz. The text has been updated.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just don't post that license plate # on Facebook.
[ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15OOO$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy DSD and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
on this page.....FAST CASH1 COM
I don't get the indecency angle. What am I missing here?
'69'
Look, it doesn't take much to set off a Censor.
Wow. Wait til they start looking into elementary math textbooks.
√
>>69PWNDU
challenge accepted?
I wonder what is going to happen when someone from a permissive state drives through a prudish state with the license plate 'IMAGOATFUCKR'?
You might beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride.
Saw this plate the other day: DIEPEDO
Took me a sec to figure it out.
Was it driven by Sideshow Bob?
the Bart. the.
If you see one that says ‘IMAPEDO’, it is probably Buttplug.
In April, the state's Department of Motor Vehicles auctioned off 14 marijuana-related vanity plates, with BONG, GREEN, and HERB all up for grabs.
In CA, they’re having lottery prizes for people getting vaccinated.
Maybe this will lead other great out of the box ideas. Pie eating contests for state elections? Cow shit bingo for districting?
I propose a lottery where entrants vie for the opportunity to be Gavin Newsome’s executioner after he is forced from office. In a state the size of CA, such an event should raise an easy billion dollars.
In all honesty, I doubt she has much of a case. License plate numbers are issued by the state, and the plates themselves actually remain state property. So the state can make rules about what speech IT is willing to put on its license plates.
Not really. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wooley_v._Maynard
Certainly an interesting case:
Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 (1977), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that New Hampshire could not constitutionally require citizens to display the state motto upon their license plates when the state motto was offensive to their moral convictions.[1]
ince 1969 New Hampshire had required that noncommercial vehicles bear license plates embossed with the state motto, "Live Free or Die".[2]
Live Free or Die is antithetical to my moral convictions, and I will be free to disagree with that, or die trying.
I think they were Jehovah's Witnesses who thought only God was worth dying for, not some perishable human government.
Even more on point from last November:
"A federal judge has concluded that California’s ban on vanity license plates considered “offensive to good taste and decency” violated the First Amendment’s freedom of speech."
https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/11/federal-judge-rules-that-california-ban-on-offensive-vanity-license-plates-violates-freedom-of-speech/
Hmm. Since I live in Calipornia, I might change my plates to "Trump 1"
Nope. That rule works until the state starts allowing vanity plates. Once you allow any vanity plates, you are permitting the vehicle owner to express him/herself. The First Amendment prohibits you from infringing on the owner's choice of expression.
Now, if the state got rid of all vanity plates, it would be a very different story. In that hypothetical, you're correct that the plate and number would be speech by the state which the state could restrict at will. But they'd have to give up all that easy money from the vanity plate programs.
Apparently NY state allows vanity plates and also restricts what you can put on it. They can disallow anything. Here are their rules.
https://dmv.ny.gov/plates/restrictions-personalized-plates
I also know they want the plates back if you leave the state for good.
Yeah, well, the plates were stolen and fell off my boat in deep water. Sorry, cannot return.
"Assman" has been Ok since the late 90s
Nope. That rule works until the state starts allowing vanity plates. Once you allow any vanity plates, you are permitting the vehicle owner to express him/herself. The First Amendment prohibits you from infringing on the owner’s choice of expression.
I'm not sure I agree with that. I don't have a problem with what you say on any moral grounds, but merely on the technical, legal grounds. If the state allows you to 'personalize' a message that will be publicly seen on something... like a displayed license, I don't know if there's a first amendment right to allow anything on that plate. We're not talking about a bumper sticker, we're talking about a state-granted license. To give a specific example, if your license plate is GXD-938, I cannot make a vanity plate that reads: GXD-938. I don't think there's any court in the land that would declare your right to duplicate my license tag is protected by the first amendment.
To take it another step further, the state requires a license be displayed. The state compelling ANY message to be displayed on my personal property could be construed as a first amendment violation. It's essentially compelled speech. Merely allowing someone to make a narrow set of modifications to that compelled speech does not suddenly grant a total freedom in what could already be described as an "exception" to the first amendment. Which I would argue a license tag already is.
License plates aren’t compelled speech, because you make an affirmative choice to drive on government streets.
No plate required on a private lot.
No true in illinois. If you dont have a license plate with a current tag on a car parked on your property, they will tow it.
No plate, no license required to move your personal property on a public thoroughfare. Just mark it with an orange triangle if it can't do the speed limit.
" The First Amendment prohibits you from infringing on the owner’s choice of expression."
Yeah, good luck with that. Last vanity plate I got was in MT and I had to explain to the clerk exactly what it meant.
You had to explain "DMVSUX"?
Nope. The state is severely constrained in how it can constrain speech.
They can not allow vanity plates at all or they basically open the door to whatever people want.
The state has no rights when it comes to association or freedom of speech.
I love it when "the state" (aka Karen the bureaucrat) pretends to know what's what in the minds of the citizens.
10SANY1 - OK
IM1RU12 - bad
Kind of like when politicians decide what is a drug reference of not.
Puff the magic dragon - bad
Tea for two - OK
Like how it isn’t obvious that WLLHUNG is showing admiration for William Hung?
She needs to fight for the right to have the sense of humor of a 12 year-old boy.
And yeah, I'm totally sure that the "69" refers to the year of the moon landing.
Good luck, Mr. Gorsky.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/good-luck-mr-gorsky/
The year they cancel the original Star Trek.
The last year for the 427 powered Corvette (1970 went to the 454)
The year Nixon was inaugurated
1st year of Sesame Street
Pele scored his 1000th goal.
The year Ulysses S. Grant was sworn in as President (1869).
The birth of Napoleon (1769).
James Cook observes the transit of Venus from Tahiti.
Two big steps in starting the industrial revolution: Watt's patent for a steam engine with a condenser, and Arkwright's patent for a spinning frame.
Or maybe 1469:
Machiavelli born.
Ferdinand II marries Isabel to unite Spain, paving the way to fund Columbus to find a westward route to India, allowing him to bump into a few Carribean islands instead and discover the New World.
Well, as a dear friend I played guitar with used to say: "The man who plans ahead may get some" -Wm. Moses "Billy" Roberts who penned "Hey Joe".
I'm gonna need to see a pic before I pass judgement on her.
And as a fellow Nashvegan, her address
You would think she could have come to some kind of mutually beneficial arrangement with the state where she scratches their back and they scratch hers.....
So, you can't allude on your license plate to a sacred constitutional right embodied in the Fourteenth Amendment as one of the hard-fought fruits (ha!) of the Civil War.
So I guess UB6IB9 is a no go?
I had friend who had guitar picks with that on it.
Maybe only in Fayette County.
Virginia has a "Kids First" plate. I saw a car a few years ago with the vanity letters "EAT THE" on such a plate.
Lightly grilled children! Part of the cannibal Mediterranean diet, I think.
LOL! A "Modest Proposal", to be sure.
Let's just hope that all 50 states become embroiled in a years-long, multi-million dollar battle dragging all vanity plate owners into court because, as we know, there are no other important matters of governance to attend to.
California actually puts the prohibition almost at the very top of their web page on "Special Interest License Plate": "The number "69" is reserved only for 1969 year model vehicles that the license plates will be placed upon." https://www.dmv.ca.gov/wasapp/ipp2/initPers.do
QQQQ
LOL! "QNOMOUS"?
Isnt pwned essentially a reference to slavery? Wokeness says this wont stand.
Its akin to rhyming slang. Pretty sure it originates as an alternative to "whipped you like a slave". (See Friday)