Income tax

Biden Won't Close the 'Tax Gap,' but He Will Snoop on Your Bank Records

Another new Democratic administration, another hollow promise to discover hundreds of billions of unreported tax obligations under the national mattress.

|

When the Group of Seven (G-7) wealthy democracies agreed in principle June 5 to establish a global minimum corporate tax of 15 percent and an "excess profit" surcharge on large corporations with annual margins above 10 percent, you could almost hear the sound of the world's political elites rubbing their hands together at visions of pillowy new billions.

"Huge sums of money are at stake," gushed The New York Times. "A report this month from the E.U. Tax Observatory estimated that a 15 percent minimum tax would yield an additional 48 billion euros, or $58 billion, a year. The Biden administration projected in its budget last month that the new global minimum tax system could help bring in $500 billion in tax revenue over a decade to the United States."

Those numbers, however plausible (or not), are all in the future, contingent on tricky G-20 negotiations, pesky tax competition abroad, and congressional skepticism back home. Surely there's some other massive pot of free money hiding just out of view?

Yes, claims President Joe Biden's Treasury Department, in a bluntly titled May 20 document called The American Families Plan Tax Compliance Agenda. A staggering $700 billion in currently undetected taxpayer IOUs is grabbable over the next decade, and $1.6 trillion the decade after, if only we give the IRS an extra $80 billion worth of rope with which to close the "tax gap."

"Even partly closing that gulf," noted The Washington Post, "could go a long way toward paying for President Biden's spending proposals, which include trillions of dollars for infrastructure, child care, manufacturing and other domestic spending priorities."

If such promises look naggingly familiar, that's because we were hearing similar vows, and reading equally credulous headlines, the last time a Democratic administration was enjoying its media honeymoon. "Obama cracks down on overseas tax loopholes," asserted NBC News in May 2009. Echoed NPR, "Obama: Tax Haven Curbs To Generate $210 Billion."

Back then, there was a common, vaguely sourced claim that, in the words of then–Sen. Carl Levin (D–Mich.), "Offshore tax evasion produces an estimated $100 billion in unpaid taxes each year." President Barack Obama name-checked the influential Levin while announcing his 2009 plan to end "indefensible tax breaks and loopholes" and "crack down on the abuse of tax havens by individuals," promising a resulting bounty of "savings we can use to reduce the deficit, cut taxes…and provide meaningful relief for hard-working families."

So before we assess Biden's new enforcement proposals, it's worth asking: What happened to that $210 billion?

The vast majority of Obama's projected haul, the multinational corporations portion, was scuttled before it got started, after successful pressure on centrist Democrats by Silicon Valley companies and Chamber of Commerce types. What remained, getting passed into law in 2010, was the individual taxpayer component, known as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or—because Washington is filled with grown-ups—FATCA.

FATCA, which unilaterally foisted upon foreign financial institutions (FFIs) the customer-unfriendly duty to rat out their U.S.-citizen clients to the IRS or face 30 percent account-garnishes, while also imposing proctology-level annual reporting requirements on Americans (I am one of them) who have at least five figures parked overseas, was projected by supporters to bring in a more modest but still measurable $8.7 billion in total new tax collections by 2020, or $870 million per year.

So how'd that work out?

"The actual amount of tax collected by FATCA is statistically insignificant," concluded Texas A&M University School of Law's William Byrnes and Robert Munro in an extensive March 2017 paper. "FATCA has probably generated $300 million extra tax revenue a year that otherwise would go unreported [though] this figure will continue to decrease."

An Inspector General report from July 2018 was titled, "Despite Spending Nearly $380 Million, the Internal Revenue Service Is Still Not Prepared to Enforce Compliance With the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act." An April 2019 Government Accountability Office (GAO) assessment found that, "Data quality and management issues have limited the effectiveness" of FATCA, and that "overlapping requirements increase the compliance burden on U.S. persons," leading to expatriates increasingly being denied financial services and seeking to revoke their citizenship.

Yet this is the template that Biden, despite his late-campaign promise to the estimated nine million Americans living outside the country to "work in partnership with you on all the issues that impact your lives and well-being as Americans resident abroad, including reviewing the barriers to accessing banking and financial services," is seeking not just to maintain but expand into the lives and ledgers of every U.S. citizen.

Biden's American Families Plan Tax Compliance Agenda seeks to build on the model of FATCA's intrusive third-party reporting requirements, constructing a "comprehensive financial account reporting regime" that would force a wider grouping of financial institutions and platforms (PayPal, settlement companies, "crypto asset exchanges," etc.) to "report gross inflows and outflows on all business and personal accounts…including bank, loan, and investment accounts."

But there's no need to worry if you've got nothing to hide.

"For already compliant taxpayers, the only effect of this regime is to provide easy access to summary information on financial accounts and to decrease the likelihood of costly 'no fault' examinations once the IRS is able to better target its enforcement efforts," Treasury reassures us. "For noncompliant taxpayers, this regime would encourage voluntary compliance as evaders realize that the risk of evasion being detected has risen noticeably."

For successive Democratic administrations (Donald Trump was rhetorically against FATCA, though neither he nor the GOP-led Congress did much of anything about it), increased financial surveillance is critical to ratcheting up "voluntary" tax compliance. Indeed, the bulk of revenue generated from FATCA has come not from the IRS discovering new taxable income, but from spooked expatriates voluntarily paying fines as part of various limited amnesties on filing post-dated IRS reports, many of which contain zero new tax liability in and of themselves. Turns out when you threaten law-abiding middle-class U.S. citizens with massive fines and even prison time while conscripting their banks into tax collectors, they will hastily throw smaller amounts of money at making Leviathan go away.

That is if they don't turn in their passports. As was repeatedly predicted in this space in 2011, 2012, and beyond, the burdens placed on non–fat cat expatriates are so life-rattlingly onerous that record numbers continue to de-Americanize themselves. This could change, if the United States joined literally every other country on earth besides Eritrea in taxing people based on residence and not citizenship, but it has long since become clear that Washington enjoys the ability not just to bully its own diaspora, but to impose financial reporting rules on the rest of the world while brazenly refusing to reciprocate when it comes to the international tax havens of Florida, Delaware, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Now that Biden is turning his attention inward to the financial nethers of non-expatriate Americans, it's worth pondering the possible consequences on those of us not rich enough to afford the finest in creative, penalty-free tax compliance. For that, check out this June 2 letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen from some canaries in the bank-surveillance coal mine, the group Democrats Abroad.

"We are deeply concerned that the need for additional investment in FATCA compliance frameworks will motivate even more [FFIs] to close the accounts of, or deny new accounts to, of customers deemed U.S. Persons," Democrats Abroad International Chair Candice Kerestan wrote. "[Since FATCA], the number of Americans locked out of banking services in the country where they live has grown from one in approximately fourteen to one in three." More:

Ordinary law-abiding Americans living abroad – the unintended objects of FATCA – have suffered an extraordinary amount of personal and financial disruption, anxiety, and distress, and yet, after ten years, the IRS has not been able to use FATCA reports to identify and apprehend genuine lawbreakers….There have been at least three Congressional hearings this year discussing the need to capture the tax that is lost due to "offshoring," and at no time have lawmakers noted the predicament of Americans abroad caught in the unintended adverse consequences of well-intentioned tax-enforcement measures.

At some point, the reality of Washington governance, and the coverage thereof, requires a reassessment of the idea that invasive new financial-snooping schemes sold with facially unattainable revenue promises are in fact "well-intentioned." The Biden administration, like the Obama administration under which he served, wants to scare Americans into "voluntary" compliance and penalty payments using a massive surveillance apparatus that turns all third-party financial players into narcs. To adapt a popular phrase about the previous administration, the obedience is the point.

NEXT: ProPublica's Bombshell Tax Report That Wasn’t

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. You’ll own nothing, have no privacy, and be happy. #GreatReset

    https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1402434266970140676

    Blackrock is buying every single family house they can find, paying 20-50% above asking price and outbidding normal home buyers. Why are corporations, pension funds and property investment groups buying…

    …So who is Blackrock? Only the worlds largest asset manager and the leading proponent of The Great Reset. They’re looking to redistribute -Get this- $120Trillion dollars. The entire wealth of the worlds middle class and poor combined several times over.

    1. Uhh, didn’t Blackrock get kicked off the land they were trying to appropriate, and went home quietly?

    2. Wait, never mind. I’m thinking of something else entirely.

    3. Hmm. So evidently, Blackrock and other investment firms are buying houses above market price and then renting them out. The author of your tweet seems to think that these investment firms are going to buy up significant amounts of property so as to turn would-be homeowners into permanent renters.

      What precisely do you think is the problem here, and what do you think should be done about it?

      1. Permanent renters do not own a portion of wealth of the country and will be prone to vote for leftist policies to survive paycheck to paycheck. Upward mobility will come from government, government unions, labor unions and the hedge funds that run the pensions.

        1. So what do you think ought to be done about this problem?

          1. It’s not a problem, on closer inspection the WSJ was a clickbait piece. Although some localities in the E.U. along with HOAs are banning investors. HOAs that ban investors are usually 20-30 percent lower. Makes me think another RE bubble?

            1. The WSJ article is a clickbait piece, and the tweet that Ra quoted turned that WSJ clickbait piece into a raging dumpster fire of paranoia. And this is where people like Ra get their ‘news’. Because, you know, CBS can’t be trusted.

              1. Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
                on this page…..VISIT HERE

      2. Except the market price is way too high now to get a good return from renters. Especially if the CDC keeps letting them not pay the rent.

        So any asset management firm doing this is about 9 years too late.

        1. There a lot of seniors who’d want to take a huge gain on selling a McMansion then rent in last ten / 15 years or so.

    4. I don’t call it Climate Jihad or Obamacare for every industry just for fun and giggles.

    5. BTW, that WSJ piece is on a community built as “a rental community” and sold as a rental community. Perhaps boomers ready to die. It’s a click bait article.

    6. But you’ll also have nice tweeting!!! And THAT is the most important thing.

  2. I don’t think the well heeled class has any intention of reevaluating how DC works. They profit from it, even if they have to tithe occasionally.

  3. 100% enforcement of the tax code would have the same result as 100% enforcement of traffic laws: a pissed-off public screaming bloody murder, and a chastised enforcement agency humiliated by Congressional hearings seeking to put the blame elsewhere.

    1. Yeah, like when they ran Lois Lerner out on a rail, right you stupid cunt?

      1. Yeah, like when Lois Lerner single-handedly 100% enforced the tax codes. Exactly like that. You are spot-on.

        1. When she enforced 150% of the tax codes on a few politically-selected organizations…

    2. Yeah, as a campaign strategy “I’ll hire 87,000 new IRS agents and use them against other people, trust me” is a non-starter.

      1. Unless you’re going for the votes for the 87,000 people who get the new high-paying jobs with great benefits.

  4. They are who we thought they were!

  5. Lol. Weep for the poor billionaires who supported this senile old cunt’s presidency. Weep deep and hard.

    1. Where the hell is OBL on this?

      1. I’m always curious about OBL’s very nuanced take on issues such as this.

    2. Billionaires have the best accountants.
      Do you think they sit at the kitchen table and do their own taxes like you do?

    3. Billionaires won’t be paying these taxes. Those who own Congressmen never do, they only hire lawyers and accountants to steer them through the loopholes they bought.

  6. No mean tweets WORTH IT

  7. Funny, my copy of the Fourth Amendment doesn’t have the “Large Fund Transfers” exception, or the “Small Funds Transfers Structured to Avoid Looking Like Large Transfers” exception.

    1. You need to read between the lines to find the penumbras.

  8. I’d like to see us spend less money on other countries. We have enough of our own debt. Also, we spend way too much on military.

  9. If everyone simply paid a reasonable percentage of their income, INCLUDING corporations, instead of finding every possible loophole and lie to keep from paying their fair share, the United States of America wouldn’t have debt. We wouldn’t OWE the Chinese and Russian governments unfathomable money. Bonus: we would have enough to pay for university educations and health care. BUT NO. The greedy at the top are having none of that.

    1. Nor are the idiots under the people at the top who scream about “fairness” and “freedumb”. These people would rather give every cent they have than somehow admit the wealthy people at the top are underpaying. No idea why. Temporarily embarrassed millionaires and all that.

      1. Bigoted, slack jawed, resentful useful idiots who whine that the government doesn’t take enough from other people to provide all the free shit they feel entitled to are among my favorite culture war casualties.

        Carry on clingers. So far as your betters, who don’t need to be on the dole, will permit.

    2. We wouldn’t have a problem if there wasn’t so much spending.

    3. Let’s see them try and collect.

    4. Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair! ™

      Yeah, they owe you university educations and healthcare. Haha.

      What a doosh.

  10. Reads like another reason writer stepped right out of Koch’s ass to serve his needs. Big surprise.

  11. Reason supported Biden over the President who cut regulations at an unprecedented rate. You guys made your bed, now kick back and relax in it.

  12. Worse even if they found 200 billion it would only recover a portion of the current year 2.1 trillion budget deficit much less make a dent in the 28 trillion national debt or the real big one the 90 trillion dollars of unfunded liabilities of SS and Medicare.

    You could wipe out the entire net worth of all the billionaires and leave them homeless and penniless and you can dent these numbers.

    “Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.”
    ― Frederic Bastiat

Please to post comments