Public schools

Report: CDC May Relax Its Disastrously Strict School Distancing Rules

Mounting research shows that the Biden administration's politicized continuation of the six-foot rule last month flouts science and threatens full-time K-12 education in the fall.

|

Two infectious disease specialists have told Fox News that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is considering changing its school distancing guidance of just one month ago from six feet between each person inside a classroom to three. That simple adjustment, which would bring the United States in line with most of the rest of the industrialized world, could mean the difference between remote learning and in-person instruction for millions of American K-12 students.

UC San Francisco professor and medical researcher Monica Gandhi, who co-wrote with three other researchers a damning USA Today op-ed Tuesday accusing the CDC of misinterpreting their own work to maintain a six-foot rule that "no science supports," told Fox Thursday that an unnamed CDCer on the school-reopening task force told her that a change in the agency's social distancing recommendation could come "soon." One of Gandhi's co-authors corroborated that story. CDC spokesman Jason McDonald responded to the cable channel by saying, "I have nothing at the moment."

The federal government does not dictate education policy; that's up to state and local governments and school districts. But the CDC's recommendations on school opening do influence key decision makers, particularly in large, Democratic-run cities and states, whose schools have been disproportionately closed regardless of COVID-19 prevalence. Reluctant districts and teachers unions in particular had stressed in the run-up to the February 12 guidance that they would base their policy preferences heavily on the new administration's science.

This turned out to be a mixed bag at best. Though billed as a "reopening" document, the guidance, which was directly influenced by teachers unions, ended up (in the words of The Washington Post) "doing more to keep schools at least partially closed." That's primarily because of two recommendations: the six-foot rule, which if followed effectively requires class sizes to be so small they cannot logistically be open five days a week; plus a two-factor community spread threshold (past-week cases per 100,000 residents, plus positive test rate) that more than two-thirds of public schools cannot meet.

Teachers unions were understandably exultant about the guidance, since it allowed them to remain both rhetorically for yet practically against school reopening, while continuing to plump for President Joe Biden's American Rescue Plan, which contains around $200 billion in no-strings-attached K-12 money, 80 percent of which is earmarked for personnel.

"Today, the CDC met fear of the pandemic with facts and evidence. For the first time since the start of this pandemic, we have a rigorous road map, based on science, that our members can use to fight for a safe reopening," American Federation of Teachers president and frequent White House guest Randi Weingarten enthused after the guidelines were released. "The stage is now set for Congress and the Education Department to make this guidance real—and that means securing the funding to get this done in the nation's school districts and meet the social, emotional and academic needs of kids."

Happily for Weingarten, the CDC not only gifted unions the six-foot rule and community-spread proviso, which effectively combine to create a teacher-hiring formula, but officials also tied the recommendations explicitly to shoveling all those Biden bucks to school districts (on top of the $69 billion in extra funding that K-12 received from the feds in COVID relief bills last year).

"The American Rescue Plan has resources…to facilitate and help schools get there," CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said during an excruciating February 14 interview with CNN's Jake Tapper. "And that's really why we wanted—we're pushing…the Rescue Plan, so that we can facilitate getting our schools, all of those mitigation measures, so that they can open safely."

Walensky indeed helped secure the money Weingarten sought when Biden signed his gargantuan relief bill into law Thursday. But she got something else as well: a whole hell of a lot of blowback.

Reopening advocates were quick to point out that Walensky herself, when she was chief of infectious diseases at Harvard University's Massachusetts General Hospital, recommended to an inquiring mayor of Newton, Massachusetts, as recently as last July that, "I do think if people are masked it is quite safe and much more practical to be at 3 feet." Heavily skeptical reporting about the guidelines appeared, not just in conservative and libertarian publications, but also places like NPR, New York magazine, and Stat. ("The two core pillars of the guidelines," the latter argued, "aren't supported by science….These two demands will keep schools closed much longer than necessary, harming kids.")

New studies kept popping up, including a large one this week from Clinical Infectious Diseases, concluding that, "Lower physical distancing policies can be adopted in school settings with masking mandates without negatively impacting student or staff safety." School districts in Democratic states like Massachusetts and Illinois have begun following the lead of open red states like Texas and Florida in officially disregarding the six-foot guidance.

Republican senators this week threatened to hold hearings on whether the CDC was unduly influenced by teachers unions. "Common sense tells you there are powerful teacher unions in parts of this country who are very important to the Democratic Party, key allies of Joe Biden, and they don't want to open," Sen. Marco Rubio (R–Fla.) told Fox News Wednesday. "And rather than have to line up against them, this is a scientific cover, a pseudo-scientific cover for them not to have to reopen."

(Cue the inevitable Republicans-pounce stories.)

The backlash has not just been political. Parents of K-12 kids stuck in remote or hybrid learning have experienced up close the measurable educational and emotional backsliding, plus the ongoing negative hit on their own earnings (particularly among women; single mothers most of all). Though unions and their supporters have tried to play up public-opinion ambivalence about reopening, the fact remains that when given the opportunity to send their kids five days a week, two-thirds of families take it. A Gallup survey released this week found that "79% of parents of K-12 students in the U.S. favor in-person learning in their communities right now."

The prospect of yet another academic year being subject to uncertainty is driving parents into the arms of homeschooling and (mostly open) private schools, the latter of which tend to secure their down payments for the fall in February and March. Having experienced an estimated 5 percent enrollment drop nationwide, public schools that adhere to the letter of CDC guidelines will find themselves increasingly abandoned by those who are able to leave.

So there are plenty of sensible reasons for the Biden administration to relax the strict distancing guidelines and come back into line with the World Health Organization and American Academy of Pediatrics, particularly if the president is serious about his (malleable) goal, reiterated last night, of "opening the majority of K-8 schools in my first 100 days in office."

There's a more cynical reason available as well: The most union-friendly president in generations got his $200 billion K-12 wish list. There's no reason left to hold school reopening hostage. Now that the money is coming and all teachers can get vaccines, unions have run out of excuses. If sports stadiums are packed and Fourth of July celebrations back to normal, yet big-city school districts in September remain on a part-time schedule due to teachers unions following guidelines that few scientists will defend, there will be parental revolt.

So here's hoping that for whatever motivation, the CDC soon corrects the mistake it made last month, and in fact goes further by scrapping the strict community spread rules as well. Schools are safe, they got the money, vaccines are spreading, hospitalizations and deaths are plummeting, spring is here. It's time not only to open the damn schools full time, but to punish politically anyone standing athwart the schoolhouse doors yelling "Stop!"

NEXT: 'Hero Pay' Requirement for Grocery Workers Results in Unemployed Heroes

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “[F]rom six feet between each person inside a classroom to three.”

    I’m not a mathematician or anything close to it, but it seems to me that halving arbitrary bullshit still leaves us with arbitrary bullshit.

      1. Diet Double Dew.

        1. I have received $17634 last month from home by working online in my part time. I am a full time student and doing this easy home based work for 3 to 4 hrs a day. vbv.This job is very simple to do and its regular earnings are much better than any other office type work.
          See detail here…………Money90

          1. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much MJNH better than regular office job and even FGRF a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
            on this page…..READ MORE

      2. No, four times as much: you’re halving both the North-South distances and the East-West distances.

    1. Change Your Life Right Now! Work From Comfort Of Your Home And Receive Your First Paycheck Within A Week. No Experience Needed, No Boss Over Your Shoulder… Say Goodbye To Your Old Job! Limited Number Of Spots Open… Find out how HERE……. Visit Here

    2. Of course its arbitrary bullshit. Random figure pulled out of someone’s ass a year ago, before we started masking up. Key thing is, its possible to run a regular class with 3 feet of spacing, and not with 6. Hanging on to the six foot number has been the scientific cover that our teacher’s union and its pet school board have relied on to keep the schools closed.
      I’d thought they’d loosen up a bit having bullied their way to the front of the vaccination line, but not much evidence of that yet.

      1. They will not loosen up as long as there is a single active case of COVID19 or a single unvaccinated person anywhere in the USA. Even that might not be enough.

        1. My mom is a special education teacher for Baltimore City MD. The only thing the Baltimore Teacher’s Union asked for was PPE in the school buildings and that teachers be vaccinated. Mom had her shots and returned to the classroom two weeks ago. Prior to that she taught her caseload via Zoom. Not all teachers are lazy and incompetent. Mom has thirty three years in and will likely retire soon. Her students are the ones who will lose big time when she finally calls it a day.

          1. The issue with vaccinations is that transmission from kids is exceptionally low. They are less likely to get COVID at school than virtually any other location they’d possible visit.

            1. I am making 70 to 60 dollar par hour at home on laptop ,, This is make happy But now i am Working 4 hour Dailly and make 400 dollar Easily .. This is enough for me to happy my family..how ?? i am making this so u can do it Easily….

              Click this link,…… Home Profit System

      2. And Real Science ® says that putting humidifiers in the schools (and other public buildings) will have a lot more effect than either the masks or the social distancing — and for flu as well as CoVID-19 (Note that the per-case fatality rate for school-age kids is about five times the per-case fatality rate for CoVID-19 ;-( )

        FWIW

    3. I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance TGF on something new… after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier.

      Here’s what I do…….. Visit……….. Visit Here

    4. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple works from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
      on this page…. Visit Here

    5. Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple works from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its NEWS earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
      on this page…. Visit Here

    6. [ PART TIME JOB FOR USA ] Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple works from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
      on this page…. Visit Here

  2. *Looks at picture*

    Orange man… good?

    1. evil reverend from Poltergeist II

  3. That Bidem money will only affect the virus if people use it to blow their nose.

    1. Oh I’m pretty sure that there will be lots of people spending their $1400 on their noses and blow.

  4. “Having experienced an estimated 5 percent enrollment drop nationwide, public schools that adhere to the letter of CDC guidelines will find themselves increasingly abandoned by those who are able to leave.”

    Don’t you get it, the unions don’t care about this. There will be neither funding cuts nor personnel reductions because of this. In fact, this will result in even marginally less work for teachers, so it’s actually a plus for them. They are well aware that the trajectory for public school funding only points upward.

    1. You mean that the unions will finally achieve their long-term goal of reduced class sizes? Interesting take on this.

  5. Mounting research shows that the Biden administration’s politicized continuation of the six-foot rule last month flouts science and threatens full-time K-12 education in the fall.

    Not enough research to demonstrate that it mentally and socially crippled enough children to influence the outcome of the election.

    Come back when you’ve got standing.

  6. everything about this has flouted science

  7. Biden is a slave to the teachers unions. We knew this last year. Billions given to schools and it isnt enough.

    This is why you have no principles. You traded shit that matters for the facade of civility instead. Actions have always mattered more than words.

    1. “You traded shit that matters for the facade of civility instead.”
      ☝️

      Suderman and Welch screach “but muh norms”. And do it unironically.

      1. If Trump were still in the White House Welch wouldn’t be writing this story because he’d have told the teacher’s union to fuck off. Of course Sullum would write an article assuring us that Trump is literally Hitler because he told the teacher’s union to fuck off.

  8. 79% of parents of K-12 students in the U.S. favor in-person learning in their communities right now.

    Not to be that guy, but what they favor is an in-person option, they aren’t necessarily going to avail themselves of it. When my wife’s district ran their surveys there was wide majority support for at least a hybrid model, yet when registration was complete a whopping 25% decided to go that route.

    Hopefully this “guidance change” comes to pass. I have a daughter starting school in the fall, and the local superintendent has already stated that they won’t do full-time in-person if the rule stays at six feet.

    1. Its hard to parse though. I’m offered a pathetic “hybrid” option, which involves about 2 hours/week in school, complicated pickup/drop offs, and ZERO instruction. Its pitched as emotional/social time. Not worth the hassle to the parents, and the kids aren’t eager for what sounds like group therapy.
      Offer a full return, you’ll get a much higher opt in rate.

  9. Just so the CDC can re-institute the “Disastrously Strict School Distancing Rules” during the next flu bug?
    The people at the CDC found out they have power from the pandemic, people seldom give up power voluntarily.

  10. As long as the Covid-19 pandemic is still out of control and not enough people are vaccinated against it, there’ll still be the need for people to maintain a 6-foot distance away from each other.

  11. Let me channel the teachers here–the vaccines were tested at 6-foot of space, so school should stay remote until the vaccines are tested at 3-feet of distance in case their efficacy decreases. Only then *might* it be safe to go back.

  12. I think that many of Biden’s promises in all areas are a market that over time will turn into a big illusion, whether in the field of education or otherwise.

  13. The CDC and feds should have nothing to do with it. These are local issues. If they want to make recommendations, fine

    Went to watch the 4 year old play soccer at the Y the other day. So the adults in the lawn chairs are keeping distance and wearing masks, mostly.

    But the kids obviously can’t do that. It was fun watching them. The boys kinda have the general idea but they are like puppies chasing the ball around. You have to let life go on. Open the schools already.

Please to post comments