Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Free Speech

Metal Musician Adam 'Nergal' Darski Fined by Polish Court for 'Offending Religious Feelings'

Behemoth frontman Adam 'Nergal' Darski was fined $5,000 for a 2019 social media post that showed him stepping on an image of the Virgin Mary.

Christian Britschgi | 2.17.2021 2:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
reason-nergal | Simone Re/Dreamstime.com
(Simone Re/Dreamstime.com)

Polish musician Adam 'Nergal' Darski, frontman for the extreme metal band Behemoth, has been sanctioned for violating his country's blasphemy law. This week, news broke that Darski had been found guilty by a Polish court of "offending religious feelings"—a crime punishable by fines and up to two years in prison—for a 2019 Facebook post that showed him stepping on an image of the Virgin Mary, a sacred figure in Roman Catholic Poland.

Darski received fines of 18,500 złoty ($5,000). English news website Notes From Poland reports that he has contested the fines and that his case will proceed to a full trial.

Poland's law criminalizing insults to religious feelings, Article 196, has long courted controversy for its restrictions on free expression. A Freedom House report describes the law as conflicting "with international standards on freedom of expression." Successful prosecutions under the law are rare, says Freedom House, but "the legal process involved is itself a deterrent that encourages individuals, notably artists, to engage in self-censorship."

Individuals can instigate Article 196 cases by filing complaints with prosecutors. It's a tactic that conservative pressure groups and right-wing politicians have used repeatedly against offending artists, musicians, and activists, and indeed against Darski himself.

In 2008, several members of the conservative Law and Justice party filed a complaint against Darski for his stage antics at a 2007 concert in which the frontman ripped up a bible on stage and called the Catholic Church "the most murderous cult on the planet."

Religious scholars consulted by prosecutors during the investigation determined that this was in fact an insult to religious feelings. Nevertheless, the case was eventually dismissed in May 2010.

Notes From Poland reports that Darski has two other offensive speech cases pending against him. One such case stems from a 2018 video he posted online of himself waving a fake penis attached to a crucifix. In another, Darski was accused of insulting Poland's national emblems for a Behemoth poster that featured an upside-down cross.

The legal harassment has yet to cow the metal musician. On Tuesday, he posted a defiant statement on Instagram about his most recent fines, saying, "Will I let superstition and fundamentalist dogmas capitalize on this and EVERY other case of the same nature? FUCK NO!"

Here in the U.S., the discourse over free expression has recently revolved around the issue of "cancel culture" and whether people—from a Star Wars actress to the host of The Bachelor—have been unjustly punished by their employers for their statements on social media and to the press.

No matter how frustrating or unfair individual instances of "canceling" might be, Darski's repeated prosecutions are a reminder that old-fashioned state censorship is still a live issue in much of the world. Given the occasionally punitive impulses of our culture and political discourse, we should be grateful the U.S. doesn't have laws that criminalize hurting people's feelings.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Civil Forfeiture Does Not Seem To Reduce Drug Use or Help Fight Crime

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

Free SpeechPolandMusicBlasphemy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (30)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Rimfar   4 years ago

    we should be grateful the U.S. doesn't have laws that criminalize hurting people's feelings.

    yet...

    1. Eeyore   4 years ago

      I give it about one more week.

  2. Cal Cetín   4 years ago

    "A Freedom House report describes the law as conflicting "with international standards on freedom of expression.""

    What standards are these? Western European standards? Go to Western Europe and publicize yourself stepping on a photo of Mohammed or Martin Luther King, see how much freedom of expression the "international community" allows.

  3. Ken Shultz   4 years ago

    This is hardly Poland's first kerfuffle with Black Metal. For instance, there was Gorgoroth's "Black Mass Krakow 2004".

    "The concert featured sheep heads on stakes, "crucified" nude models, Satanic symbols and eighty litres of sheep blood. The band came under fire for violating Polish anti-blasphemy laws as well as Polish animal rights laws. A police investigation took place with allegations of religious offence (which is prosecutable under Polish law) and cruelty to animals.[3] Though these charges were considered, the band was not charged as it was ruled that they were unaware of the fact that what they were doing was illegal, although the concert organiser was eventually fined 10,000zł in 2007, as he knew about it and neither informed the band that it was against the law nor intervened.[4] The whole controversy led to the band being dropped from the roster of the Nuclear Blast Tour and the footage of the concert being confiscated by the police.[5]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Mass_Krakow_2004

    Behemoth couldn't afford to buy this kind positive press, and for a Black Metal band, being accused of blasphemy by the government is like the greatest endorsement you can get.

    It also helps Black Metal as a genre, which has been getting kind of a bored response over the years. Being anti-Christianity these days is kind of beating a dead horse in most of the West. I've seen artists from eastern Europe defend the genre as still relevant as Christianity is still very much a part of the conversation both culturally and politically there, but for most Americans and western Europeans, watching Black Metal bands rage against Christianity is like watching punk bands rage against Reagan or Thatcher.

    That's kind of over now.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   4 years ago

      What, Sinead O'Connor ripping up a picture of the hope doesn't get the same reaction?

      Maybe she should try drawing a cartoon of Muhammed.

      1. Don't look at me!   4 years ago

        The only thing that everyone agrees needs to be torn up is state of the union speeches.

      2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   4 years ago

        Now if she'd ripped up pictures of the change .... woke would be all over her.

        1. m4019597   4 years ago

          Typo joke. Nicely done.

  4. Zeb   4 years ago

    So, what do you do if your religion requires that you insult other religions? Some kinds of Satanism are basically built around profaning things sacred to Catholics. Is this law itself not offensive to such a religious believer?
    Which leads to an even more interesting question: Can the existence of a law violate the same law?

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   4 years ago

      "No law shall prohibit other laws."

  5. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   4 years ago

    Interesting...

    The council, which operates the electric grid and manages the deregulated energy market for 75% of the state, issued emergency energy alert warnings in advance of the storm. But bitter-cold temperatures and a rare snowfall caused a surge in electricity demand and resulted in rolling blackouts as cold weather idled many of the state's wind turbines and reduced oil and gas production. Electricity generators that rely on fossil fuels were also impacted.

    Spot electricity prices in Texas’ West hub spiked above the grid’s $9,000 per megawatt-hour cap. Power typically costs $25 per megawatt-hour.

    The surge in prices was equivalent to the cost of charging a Tesla reaching $900. A full charge costs about $18 while a typical charge is less depending on how much power was used.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   4 years ago

      BTW, I'm still not 100% convinced of Bailey's 'fact check' on wind power NOT being the problem in Texas. Here's a warning from September:

      TX, which has virtually unlimited ultra-cheap natural gas, has significant blackout and price-spike risk because of its insistence on mandating unreliable wind electricity. The Public Utilities Commission of TX calls their grid's margin for error ("reserve margin") “very scary.”

      -- sept 14

      2019 TX incident: “As wind power slowed, [Texas] instituted its first level of emergency alerts, calling on small industrial and commercial generators to pour power onto the grid, and requesting power from Mexico from which an additional 60 MW were imported on Aug. 15." Power Mag

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   4 years ago

        Ouch $900.00 to fill up; that hurts.

        1. perlhaqr   4 years ago

          Shit, that's more than it takes to fill the truck in California, and I've got two 120 gallon tanks. Not that I ever let them get that empty, or that I'd ever attempt a full fill in California.

          1. perlhaqr   4 years ago

            Well, ok, it's not *much* more than 240 gallons of diesel at $3.70 a gallon.

      2. Zeb   4 years ago

        Certainly seems like some of the problem, at least. Of all the "green" energy sources, large scale wind seems like the dumbest. Enormously energy intensive to build and maintain and stops working when it's icy.

      3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   4 years ago

        Same here. All that power that was not generated by frozen wind turbines and sunless solar panels used to be generated by fossil fuels or nuclear power. All equipment needs some down time.

        Suppose you have xGW coming from fossil fuels, and design in that 10% will be offline at any normal time, reaching 20% once in a while.

        Now you convert 1/4 your 80% to solar, guaranteed to be offline for this storm, and 1/4 to wind, which was half offline due to frozen turbines. Your 100% energy budget is now at 70%, below your normal 80% allowance,

        I just made up those numbers, but the principle applies. Wind and solar are unreliable and must be 100% backed up by fossil fuels or nuclear power.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   4 years ago

          Right, that's pretty much exactly how I see it. Pointing to the fact that some traditional sources of power are offline (or diminished) from the storm, doesn't excuse the X% that's guaranteed to be offline due to the storm.

  6. Virgin Mary's creamy pussy   4 years ago

    I am not offended by someone stepping on a picture of the virgin Mary.

  7. Moonrocks   4 years ago

    Gee, that sucks. At least he's not facing 10 years in prison for it.

  8. Roberta   4 years ago

    Was the price worthwhile for getting rid of the communists?

    1. Hattori Hanzo   4 years ago

      A lesser evil than communism is still an evil worth fighting. I believe this guy trafficked in bootleg tape trading in the 80's as the commies banned western music including metal.

  9. Eeyore   4 years ago

    I think the Catholics that are offended are to blame for letting themselves be offended. Being this sensitive should be a crime.

    1. Cal Cetín   4 years ago

      It's one thing to defend the "right to be wrong" and oppose blasphemy laws. All very libertarian, like the defense of the right to use heroin.

      But when we come to actual defenses of blasphemy (or heroin use) we're going beyond libertarianism into actual libertinism.

  10. The New Number Two   4 years ago

    "Religious scholars consulted by prosecutors during the investigation determined that this was in fact an insult to religious feelings."

    I'm sure it was a grueling deliberation process.

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   4 years ago

      And then they disclosed just how many angels CAN dance on the head of a pin.

  11. Its_Not_Inevitable   4 years ago

    Well, it's the law. And if you're not doing anything wrong...derp derp.

  12. The Encogitationer   4 years ago

    "Born Again" Christianity = The Original "Woke" Culture

  13. JoeJoetheIdiotCircusBoy   4 years ago

    Because they hate you personally Geiger and organize their entire day around specifically pissing you off by not covering your cherished things in the cherished ways you want them to.

  14. m4019597   4 years ago

    Ha

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Militarized Response to California Riots Seeks To Expand Federal Power

Steven Greenhut | 6.20.2025 7:30 AM

War With Iran Should Be Determined by Congressional Debate, Not Presidential Whim

J.D. Tuccille | 6.20.2025 7:00 AM

Review: What the Hell Is a 'Libertarian Authoritarian'?

Brian Doherty | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Doctor Changes His Mind About Opioid Prescriptions

Jacob Sullum | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Hole in the Wall

Charles Oliver | 6.20.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!