The Volokh Conspiracy

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

RBG, R.I.P.

A few personal reminiscences on the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

|The Volokh Conspiracy |

As many of you know, I was a Ginsburg law clerk on two separate occasions—when she was on the appeals court, and then again during her first term at SCOTUS. I know that RBG was perhaps not the favored Supreme Court Justice for many of the readers of this blog—which is fair enough—but I hope you will allow me some personal reminiscences as we all process the meaning of her death and, more importantly, her life and legacy.

I owe Ruth Ginsburg a great deal. My grades were pretty good when she hired me the first time, but, as she herself often admitted, two things got me over the hump in competition with all the other law students whose grades were pretty good: first, that I had an asterisk on my CV, to indicate that I had stayed home with my infant daughter Sarah for the first two years of her life while my wife continued working (RBG liked that arrangement a lot!), and, second, that instead of using one of my boring law school practice memos as a writing sample, I used a paper I had written on "Contract Law in Richard Wagner's Ring Cycle" (and she really liked that).

Most of what I know about writing I learned from her.  The rules are actually pretty simple:  Every word matters.  Don't make the simple complicated, make the complicated as simple as it can be (but not simpler!). You're not finished when you can't think of anything more to add to your document; you're finished when you can't think of anything more that you can remove from it. She enforced these principles with a combination of a ferocious—almost a terrifying—editorial pen, and enough judicious praise sprinkled about to let you know that she was appreciating your efforts, if not always your end-product. And one more rule: While you're at it, make it sing. At least a little; legal prose is not epic poetry or the stuff of operatic librettos, but a well-crafted paragraph can help carry the reader along, and is always a thing of real beauty.

She had the kind of fierce integrity that I think we all would want to see in a judge; she was always determined to get it right, to do right by the litigants and to do right by the law. She had her biases and her blind spots; we all do.  But I have often said that if my life were on the line, I'd be happy if she were on the bench, because she would be as fair-minded when weighing the evidence as one could ever ask for.

By an unfortunate coincidence, the two years I clerked for her ('86-7 and '93-4) were marred by some personal tragedies in my own life; my brother-in-law, Howard Eisen, died unexpectedly in the spring of '87, and my dad was diagnosed with cancer and died in the spring of '94. RBG could not have been more supportive and comforting during what were difficult periods for me.  When my dad was declining and it was clear he didn't have much longer to live, she wrote to him and my mother, sending them her best wishes and saying all sorts of nice things about what a great law clerk I was, how proud they should be, how she couldn't get along without my help, etc. etc.  She knew, and I knew, and even my parents knew, that she was exaggerating for effect—but I was there with them when the letter arrived, and they both wept with joy and pride when they read it.  It was a lovely thing for her to do, and I could never find the words to thank her enough for having done it.

During my time with her she—we—had some pretty rough encounters with some of her colleagues, notably Justices Starr, Bork, Scalia, and Williams on the DC Circuit and, of course, with Justice Scalia on the High Court.  She could fight with the best of them—but I never heard or saw or even intimated anything other than respect and even, often, affection for her adversaries in these battles. No snide remarks, no nasty innuendoes, none of that. She valued civility and collegiality very, very highly, and I think she helped to dignify the process of judging, and helped make those she was working with better as a result.

And my personal favorite RBG moment: In 1994, I arranged for my daughter's 6th grade class to come and take a tour of the Court.  After walking through the main courtroom and the courtyards and the portrait galleries and the rest, we all gathered in the East Conference Room and RBG came down to talk to them.  She took some questions from the kids—their teachers had made sure that the kids had thought of some questions beforehand, and they all came through; "How did you become a judge?" and "What's the hardest part about being a judge?" and "Do you like being a judge?" and the like.  Finally, she said she could take one more question before she had to go back to work, and it was "What case that you worked on that you enjoyed the most?"

So she told the story of Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld—the case from early on in her days at the ACLU Women's Rights Project. Mr. Wiesenfeld, the plaintiff, had just lost his wife, leaving him alone with their newborn son. He wanted to take time off from work so he could stay home with the baby, but he discovered that he was not entitled to spousal benefits under the Social Security regulations—although if he had died, his wife would have received the supplemental payments.  RBG took his case and won a famous victory in the Supreme Court. So she told the story, and then she added: "And just the other day that little boy wrote me a letter, to let me know that he had just been accepted to Columbia Law School …"  It was a very touching moment—the teachers and parent/chaperones who had come along on the tour all had tears in their eyes, and even the 6th graders knew, deep down, that they had heard something pretty special from a pretty special person.

Her legacy is prodigious.  She transformed American law through her work on equal rights for all, and, especially in her later years, she served as an inspirational symbol for millions of people—especially, though hardly exclusively, for millions of young girls who drew strength from her work and from her life.

One final recollection.  One thing that RBG and I shared, besides our love of opera, was that we were both Brooklyn-born and -bred (and proud of it!). Earlier this year, when I was doing some research putting together a compilation of her writings, I came across this essay that she wrote for the Bulletin of the East Midwood Jewish Center (the synagogue in my old neighborhood) in 1946 when she was 13 years old. It is, I think, a fitting epitaph for a life very well-lived.  R.I.P.

One People—An Essay by Ruth Bader, Age 13 (June, 1946)

Bulletin of the East Midwood Jewish Center, Brooklyn NY (June 1, 1946)

The war has left a bloody trail and many deep wounds not too easily healed. Many people have been left with scars that take a long time to pass away. We must never forget the horrors which our brethren were subjected to in Bergen-Belsen and other Nazi concentration camps. Then, too, we must try hard to understand that for righteous people hate and prejudice are neither good occupations nor fit companions. As Rabbi Alfred Bettleheim once said: "Prejudice saves us a painful trouble, the trouble of thinking."

In our beloved land families were not scattered, communities not erased nor our nation destroyed by the ravages of the World War. Yet, dare we be at ease? We are part of a world whose unity has been almost completely shattered. No one can feel free from danger and destruction until the many torn threads of civilization are bound together again. We cannot feel safe until every nation, regardless of weapons or power, will meet together in good faith, the people worthy of mutual association.  There can be a happy world and there will be once again, when men and women create a strong bond towards one another, a bond unbreakable by a studied prejudice or a passing circumstance.

Then and only then shall we have a world whose structure is the Brotherhood and Sisterhood of men and women.

Advertisement

NEXT: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, RIP

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

Please to post comments

46 responses to “RBG, R.I.P.

  1. Some nice stories, thanks for sharing.

    1. I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I’m working online! My work didn’t exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new…CMs after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn’t be happier.

      Here’s what I do…>> CashApp

  2. Thank you so much for sharing that. I really appreciated reading that.

  3. Thank you David. I will be the first to say that I disagreed with RGB’s judicial philosophy on many items, but I am deeply saddened by her passing. I am sad for the chaos that this will cause. And I am sad that this chaos will overshadow her loss of life.

    1. I’m sad that the left doesn’t have anyone with her integrity anymore.

      1. I am sad that the right has neither the integrity of Ronald Reagan nor the passion of Barry Goldwater. Or, visa versa, as Yogi is alleged to have said.

      2. The retort your comment begs is so obvious I won’t bother to make it.

  4. A lovely piece. Thank you.

  5. Thanks, David. And my condolences to you. That was a very nice piece.

  6. “to indicate that I had stayed home with my infant daughter Sarah for the first two years of her life while my wife continued working (RBG liked that arrangement a lot!),”

    I wonder how that would be seen today.

    1. “I wonder how that would be seen today.”

      Thanks to RBG, and others, what should be seen as just another day at the office.

      1. As a stay at home dad, I can tell you first hand that it is not.

        And what’s worse, is that the worst of it comes from little old ladies.

  7. That’s a nice sentiment for a change.

  8. What a great gift to have had the experience of greatness you had.

  9. This is a very fine essay, Mr. Post, worthy of one privileged to clerk for her on two benches. Thank you for writing it.

    1. Yeah, “privileged” being the operative word: someone who is a minor player in the ruling class expressing his admiration for someone who was a major player in the ruling class. It’s as if a wealthy minor nobleman had penned a ode to the memory of his beloved friend, benefactor, and king. Take it for all its worth.

      What matters to Americans about RBG is not what she was like as a person, or what her intentions were, but what she actually did. And her record is not good from the perspective of anybody who isn’t a left wing authoritarian themselves.

      1. She was a nice lady. Too bad that she was also an adherent to a doctrine of economic failure, tyranny, and death.

  10. “I know that RBG was perhaps not the favored Supreme Court Justice for many of the readers of this blog…”

    It seems that you don’t read the comments posted by the readers of this blog. They are overwhelmingly far to the left. If RGB was not favored by any of them, it is because they thought she was a right-winger.

    1. You’re delusional.

      1. Leo Marvin – Says you, the guy to the left of Stalin.

          1. Leo Marvin – Another thing common to the leftists who comment here is their piss-poor education. Not one of them ever studied rhetoric despite their “liberal” education. But then leftists have no need to study rhetoric or have any kind of education. The only thing they need is to control the government.

            1. D.E.L.U.S.I.O.N.A.L.

              1. He is correct.

                1. OK Shitlord of the Woodchippers. Lol.

  11. Thanks and condolences.

  12. I have made 96,760 Buck just last month by working online from my home. I am a full time college student and just doing this in my free time for few hours per week by using my laptop.Everyone can check this out and start making cash online in a very easy way by just following instructions…….  Read More   

  13. Well said, thanks.

  14. So noble and kind.

  15. David: That was wonderful. Very moving.

    Jim Lindgren

  16. Thanks for sharing. I’ve read, by now, dozens and dozens of similar articles. Yours was one of the most moving, and most personal.

    Thanks again.

  17. “In our beloved land families were not scattered, communities not erased nor our nation destroyed by the ravages of the World War.”

    OK, she didn’t have older brothers (or a father) who was drafted, but I’m struck by how nonchalantly she dismissed the impact of “the war” on this country. She was living in Brooklyn where ships were being sunk within sight of the shore, etc.

    1. RBG wasn’t so much a fighter for women’s rights, but for women’s privileges. She wanted women to be equally represented in all the desirable aspects of society, if necessary through authoritarian mechanisms, but she didn’t concern herself with equal representation in all the undesirable aspects of society. The massive discrepancy in life expectancy between men and women wasn’t a concern for her; neither the massive overrepresentation of men in prison or in mental institutions; neither the fact that women aren’t forced by the US government to become meat for the war machine.

  18. Mrs Justice Goldberg was, admittedly, a good lawyer. However, the damage that she and other Wilsonian progressives have done to Constitutional jurisprudence is almost unimaginable.

  19. Oh, please.

    How collegial was RBG when speaking of the President? A ‘faker’? Should resign?

    As reported by CNN….

    1. She was “collegial” insomuch that a handful of her colleagues shared her contempt for the Constitution, for the president, and for the rule of law.

  20. I never met the women so I cannot comment about what sort of personality she had. For all I know she was charming. But she did not belong within a million miles of the US Supreme Court. She scarcely pretended to care about the US Constitution or legal precedent, and instead concentrated on changing the Constitution into what she believe it should be.

    There is an established process for changing the Constitution, and justices making up new rights and deleting old ones on their basis of their own personal feelings is very emphatically not it.

  21. I am impressed by her advice to you on writing. Recently, I was surprised at the general high quality and readability of the DC Appeals Court decisions in the recent Flynn case, both at panel and en banc level. The DoJ and Defendant’s submissions were simiarly universally excellent. In contrast, the Gleeson amicus brief was the sort of turgid unreadable nonsense I expected from court paper.

    Perhaps a good prose helps makes a good case and a good case helps make good prose?

    1. Good writing and skilled rhetoric are key tools in the arsenals of authoritarians throughout world history.

    2. Agreed, her advise repeated for emphasis.

      Every word matters. Don’t make the simple complicated, make the complicated as simple as it can be (but not simpler!). You’re not finished when you can’t think of anything more to add to your document; you’re finished when you can’t think of anything more that you can remove from it.

      I’ve long tried to follow a similar rule which can be summarized as “words are expensive, invest them wisely”. Hemmingway was my main inspiration in that regard, but I can see RBG had a similar insight.

  22. I get it: she was a witty, intelligent, personal, hard-working person. All admirable qualities.

    But she used those qualities to impose her ideological preferences on the American people, against the Constitution and against her oath of office. She even expressed her contempt for the US Constitution in interviews.

    Putting her skills, charms, and gifts in the service of authoritarianism was not admirable.

    1. Dude, at least set it aside for a post, or for a day.

  23. Thanks for this. We all know this is going to make everything even more a disaster than it already was, and anything at all that contributes to more than remembering her as just a newfound political pawn now is more than worth publishing, and worth highlighting.

  24. Thank you for sharing this very personal piece of your shared history.

  25. Thanks for sharing.

    I don’t like many of her decisions, or her lock-step votes, but she was a great American and lived a good life.

Comments are closed.