Coronavirus

Prosecutors Fight Early Release for Whistleblower Reality Winner

Fears of contracting COVID-19 in prison are not enough, Justice Department says

|

Concerns that she might get infected with COVID-19 shouldn't be treated as a reason to release Reality Winner from federal prison early, say Department of Justice prosecutors.

Winner was arrested in 2017 for leaking top-secret documents from the National Security Agency showing that the government believed that Russian operatives attempted to hack into United States voting systems during the 2016 election. In 2018 she agreed to a harsh 63-month prison term (the longest for a media leak) for her crime.

As coronavirus spreads through prisons, attempts to try to get some inmates released in order to reduce density and risk of infection have led to some erratic behavior from the Bureau of Prisons, and families are frustrated that the feds aren't appropriately getting more prisoners out into home confinement.

Under the specter of coronavirus, Winner requested a compassionate release earlier in April, pointing out that she has been suffering from depression and bulimia while incarcerated and claiming to be at greater risk of a bad reaction to the coronavirus due to underlying medical conditions. She is currently being held at Carswell Federal Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas.

On Monday, U.S. Attorney Bobby Christine of the Southern District of Georgia (where Winner was arrested and convicted), filed a response opposing Winner's motion. Christine argues that Winner doesn't qualify for compassionate release for her underlying conditions and hasn't gone through the proper administrative procedures, which include having to wait up to 30 days for the Bureau of Prisons to respond to the request. Even in an environment where infections are spreading quickly, Christine is leaning on the slow speed of bureaucracy to justify keeping Winner imprisoned.

Furthermore, Christine argues that the prison Winner is in has taken appropriate measures to screen both staff and inmates and other recommended actions to reduce infection risk. He even uses the attorney general's directive to transfer more prisoners to home confinement as evidence that the prison system is handling things just fine, even though there's plenty of reporting out there which says otherwise.

Christine concludes:

Winner is not being treated any differently than any other inmate, and she has not shown that BOP cannot adequately address any potential medical issues she faces during this period. Because Winner has not demonstrated how COVID-19 specifically affects her, apart from pure speculation…her request for compassionate release based on COVID-19 fails.

If her request is rejected, her expected release date is Nov. 23, 2021.

There have been good reasons to oppose Winner's incarceration all along and it may seem opportunistic to use COVID-19 to echo these arguments, but there's really no criminal justice value in keeping Winner behind bars. She is never going to be in a position again to repeat her crime. She engaged in nothing violent or threatening. The information she leaked ultimately did become an important public story at a time were some were attempting to downplay Russia's attempts to manipulate the election. And even if Winner herself is not in any particular risk from COVID-19, removing her from the federal prison population will make it easier to manage inmates that the federal government simply shouldn't release because they are dangerous.

NEXT: Venezuelan Migrants Are Returning Home, Forced to Choose Between Ruinous Socialism and Colombia’s Pandemic Authoritarianism

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. >Reality Winner
    I think Krystal Ball has a worse name – sounds like a stripper.

  2. >>no criminal justice value in keeping Winner behind bars

    agreed. likely shouldn’t be there anyway.

  3. >there’s really no criminal justice value in keeping Winner behind bars
    making an example and a deterrent for future criminal acts counts as a criminal justice value

    1. Deterrent or not, there’s something to be said for having a policy of “Don’t leak these secrets or we’ll throw you in jail.” and then, when someone leaks those secrets, throwing them in jail. Expectations set, expectations met.

      I would agree that the material shouldn’t have been secret and that the government should be far more restrained in it’s use of what is considered to be secret, but Winner’s conviction and/or detention doesn’t drive at these issues.

      Between Manning, Winner, and Snowden it’s rather obvious who is a leaker and should face legal consequences for their actions and who is a whistleblower being unfairly prosecuted (or at least pursued).

      1. I’m guessing Snowden was the whistle blower and that’s why he’s in exile while Manning and Winner are just women looking for attention from Uncle Sam.

  4. This is another instance of a person being punished for seeking truth to power. This instance clearly shows that trump is a fascist dictator. Obama never punished whistle blowers during his terms, he only had to deal with dangerous terrorists that were causing disention.

    1. Did you mean “_speaking_ truth to power”?

  5. Of course, the real criminals in this are the dipshits who decided to name their daughter Reality Winner.

  6. Concerns that she might get infected with COVID-19 shouldn’t be treated as a reason to release Reality Winner from federal prison early, say Department of Justice prosecutors.

    “Such concerns are, however, a reason to shut down the economy.”

  7. (the longest for a media leak)

    What is the longest for treason? Oh, yeah. Life.

  8. She’s not a whistleblower. She stole classified information and broke federal law. Deserved a longer sentence for that dumbass name too.

  9. Fuck that….she stays in.

  10. I know nothing about this case.
    She should be in prison for not changing her name.
    Also, I agre with Ragnar, steaming secrets and releasing them is a federal crime and should be punished with federal time

  11. Nope she like Bradley Manning broke the law. Only way she gets out is if she pretends to be male with a vag.

  12. Maybe they could work out a deal where they swap her for the parents that gave her that name.

  13. The information she leaked ultimately did become an important public story at a time were some were attempting to downplay Russia’s attempts to manipulate the election.

    Yeah, because everybody knows that the real problem in 2017 was that people were insufficiently hysterical over intelligence agencies’ speculation about Russian influence in the 2016 election.

  14. Winner is one of a number of Leftist political operatives who hold jobs in the federal bureaucracy. She should not be released since to do so would only enable her infantile nihilism. Another instance of libertarians playing footsie with the Left either out of pure ignorance or ideological rigidity. If you want to get an idea about how people like Winner think, David Horowitz’s book “Radicals: Portraits of a Destructive Passion” is fascinating but also harrowing.

  15. [ For USA ]
    I am now making 70 k by doing a very simple and easy online work from home. I have received exactly $8471 last month from this online work. To start making extra income Just follow the instructions on SO COPY THIS WEB NOW………..read more

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.