Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Coronavirus

There Is Literally One Guy Overseeing Nearly $500 Billion of Emergency Coronavirus Spending

He has no colleagues or staff, but he's supposed to provide oversight on $454 billion in coronavirus spending—nearly equal to the annual budget for Medicare.

Eric Boehm | 4.15.2020 2:40 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
splrfphotos105577(1) | KTSDESIGN/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY/Newscom
(KTSDESIGN/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY/Newscom)

A five-member commission created to track nearly $500 billion of coronavirus relief spending is still missing four members.

And staff.

And an office.

And its first report is due to Congress in a few weeks.

Bloomberg reports that Bharat Ramamurti remains the sole appointee on the Congressional Oversight Commission that's charged with overseeing about half a trillion dollars worth of emergency spending authorized by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). The commission's mandate to provide oversight on $454 billion in spending to be disbursed from the Treasury Department to large and small businesses affected by the pandemic—an amount of money nearly equal to the annual budget for Medicare.

The commission is supposed to operate for five years and issue reports every 30 days. It is modeled after a similar temporary oversight commission that reviewed the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) during the previous economic crisis. Other aspects of the CARES Act's massive $2.3 trillion in spending are supposed to be overseen by the Government Accountability Office and a newly created Special Inspector General for Pandemic Response.

With few resources and no colleagues, Ramamurti has started using his Twitter account to raise questions about how the spending is being handled. Already, the Treasury Department has announced plans to use $195 billion of its CARES Act funding to support loan programs run by the Federal Reserve.

The CARES Act gave the Treasury Department at least $454B to use to support the economy. The Treasury and the Fed just announced how they will use $195B of it. The announcement raises several initial questions within the jurisdiction of the Congressional Oversight Commission: 1/

— Bharat Ramamurti (@BharatRamamurti) April 9, 2020

 

"I think it is concerning that a chunk of the money is going to support lending to big businesses, and that money comes with, as far as I can tell, zero strings attached in terms of restrictions on executive compensation, restrictions on stock buybacks and restrictions on dividends," Ramamurti tells The Washington Post.

The commission's ability to report on the Federal Reserve's coronavirus response "is a key check on the infamously accountability-resistant body," says the Project on Government Oversight, a nonpartisan government watchdog.

With recent news of President Donald Trump firing several inspectors general, about the only good thing to be said about the understaffed oversight commission is that at least Ramamurti isn't a Trump lackey. He's a former staffer for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.), as well as an advisor to her failed presidential campaign. While working for Warren, Ramamurti was involved in the investigation that uncovered unscrupulous behavior by Wells Fargo, which had opened thousands of empty bank accounts in customers' names to meet internal sales targets.

He was appointed to the commission by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.), who said in a statement that Ramamurti "is a ferocious advocate for consumers who will fight for transparency and hold bad actors accountable." Other congressional leaders are responsible for appointing the remaining slots on the commission and for choosing a chairman or chairwoman.

Given the speed with which the CARES Act cleared Congress and the unprecedented amount of money being thrown around, it would not be much of a surprise to find rampant waste. And while fully staffed oversight commissions would help identify wasteful spending, it's probably right to be skeptical about such a body's ability to prevent it.

"Oversight only works if the government is small enough to do proper oversight, and it only works if you can follow it up with proper action. That's something the government doesn't do very well," says Veronique de Rugy, a senior fellow at the Mercatus Center and a Reason contributor. "And $2 trillion is impossible to oversee. It's insane. Even if that person flags stuff, what is going to happen?"

Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW), a nonprofit that advocates for fiscal responsibility, has proposed 10 principles on its website for the money being spent for coronavirus and other emergencies. The recommendations include making everything temporary, targeted, transparent, and accountable. All of the expenditures should be made available in a searchable online database, the group says. 

"Taxpayer and watchdog groups need to be vigilant to make sure the oversight is not politicized," Tom Schatz, president of CAGW told Reason via email, "and that the money and power being given to the government at all levels is not abused or extended beyond this crisis."

Wasteful spending in government is inevitable. Malfeasance in a massive, rushed spending package is all but guaranteed. The only hope for limiting it is having Congress empower the watchdogs—immediately.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: From the Cholera Riots to the Coronavirus Revolts

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

CoronavirusStimulusGovernment WasteCongress
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (23)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. DH   5 years ago

    Did someone promise bonuses at Reason for articles today? You guys have been cranking this shit out like madmen.

    1. Ragnarredbeard   5 years ago

      They're all working from home. Probably got tired of jerking off all day and decided to write instead.

    2. RabbiHarveyWeinstein   5 years ago

      The remaining Koch Brother is reassessing his spending habits and probably realizing that a Mexican wetback and H1B visa pajeet probably write better articles than LeatherMan and Grape Juice Boy.

  2. Juice   5 years ago

    Step 3: Profit

  3. Rossami   5 years ago

    If the only good thing you can say about the commission is that Ramamurti is a Warren lackey instead of a Trump lackey, that is faint praise indeed.

  4. Juice   5 years ago

    Is this real or fake?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mKDv3_ac6c

  5. H. Farnham   5 years ago

    Interesting bit of space news to keep your mind off the Covid.

    https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/04/15/rocket-lab-reports-recovery-test-success/

    Always nice to see free(ish) market innovation finding success.

  6. JesseAz   5 years ago

    "With recent news of President Donald Trump firing several inspectors general, about the only good thing to be said about the understaffed oversight commission is that at least Ramamurti isn't a Trump lackey. He's a former staffer for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.), as well as an advisor to her failed presidential campaign. "

    LOL. It's good that it is a Warren acolyte? Boehm, you've just lost all credibility.

    This article could be better summarized is that Congress wrote a crappy bill that had unrealistic timelines on staffing and organization.

  7. Rich   5 years ago

    With few resources and no colleagues, Ramamurti has started using his Twitter account to raise questions about how the spending is being handled.

    Oh, FFS! Perhaps he can use it to fund Michigan's Operation Gridlock.

  8. BigGiveNotBigGov   5 years ago

    While this lack of oversight is an insane invitation to corruption, the root problem is that this stimulus was signed into law and exists at all. Yes, the economically fragile and ill suited to a pandemic and post pandemic economy would have lost to those economically resilient and well suited; but stimulus can only delay and stifle necessary adaptation and innovation to new real world conditions.

    C-19 pandemic stimulus is not life support for the old terminal economy as too many rationalize, but is a slow poison killing both the economy and liberty.

  9. Longtobefree   5 years ago

    He was appointed to the commission by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.)

    Wait, what?
    I thought the republicans controlled the Senate. How in hell does this even work?

  10. n00bdragon   5 years ago

    One Warren lackey is a feature, not a bug. The point is to have less accountability. Why act so surprised?

  11. Dillinger   5 years ago

    >>He's a former staffer for Sen. Elizabeth Warren

    lol. street cred.

  12. R Mac   5 years ago

    Libertarians for Liz Warren!

    Anyway, would it have been too hard to state who the other congressmen are that should be appointing people?

  13. Rufus The Monocled   5 years ago

    Can a Wes Anderson movie be made of this guy?

  14. JimCherry   5 years ago

    The government commission for oversight of multiple hundreds of billions of corona-virus relief dollars conducts business via social media?

  15. Longtobefree   5 years ago

    On the other hand, could we use this as justification to reduce all other federal departments to the same dollar to employees ratio?
    As a method of paying for the bailouts?
    It might save one child - - - - - - -

    1. Jima   5 years ago

      That's too smart to be implemented, but bonus points for the originality!

  16. Liberty Lover   5 years ago

    Is he overseeing any of the money in his personal account?

  17. Case of the Mondays   5 years ago

    So, vote libertarian because they will fire all these guys?

    Hahahahaha, yeah right.

    1. Longtobefree   5 years ago

      Well, libertarians do claim to be in favor of smaller government. It would be real hard to get less than one bureaucrat per program.

  18. James K. Polk   5 years ago

    "...least Ramamurti isn't a Trump lackey. He's a former staffer for Sen. Elizabeth Warren ..."

    So he's a Warren lackey? Actually this might be the only job where a Warren lackey might be good for the country.

    Four slots left? They should fill one of them with Tom Shatz (if that is his real name).

  19. markm23   5 years ago

    Wikipedia now lists 4 members:
    Chair: TBD
    Senate Majority: Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA)[2]
    Senate Minority: Bharat Ramamurti (D)[3]
    House Majority: Rep. Donna Shalala (D-FL)[2]
    House Minority: Rep. French Hill (R-LA)[4]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_Congressional_Oversight_Commission

    The Majority and Minority leaders in the Senate and House each picked one. The chairman is to be jointly selected by Pelosi and McConnell, so that position won't be filled until those two can come to an agreement.

    When they do agree, I expect their choice will fit Kim Dutoit's definition of "bipartisan": When the Stupid Party and the Evil Party agree to do something stupid and evil. And the news media will blame Trump somehow...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!