Pregnant Moms Scared of COVID-19 in Hospitals Need More Home Birth Options

It's time to free midwives from excessive regulation and make room for more home births.


Even in the best of times, the U.S. faces a shortage of obstetricians and other medical professionals capable of delivering babies and providing prenatal and postnatal care. As America deals with the coronavirus pandemic, this shortage only stands to worsen. Meanwhile, pregnant women face a huge new incentive to consider giving birth outside of hospitals. Will U.S. authorities make it easier to embrace home births and midwives? 

"I've had more interviews [with prospective clients] in the last week than I've had in maybe January and February combined," Ray Rachlin, founder of Philadelphia's Refuge Midwifery, tells me when we talk on March 20. "The demand for home birth has increased dramatically." 

People have been wanting to avoid hospitals both out of fear of catching COVID-19 there and because they want to avoid new hospital restrictions, says Rachlin, who is a licenced midwife in New Jersey & President of Pennsylvania Association of Professional Midwives. Some hospital systems have been limiting or even banning visitors, including spouses, during deliveries. 

"Over the past week, the Kentucky Birth Coalition has been flooded with contacts from people looking for midwives who attend home births," Mary Kathryn DeLodder, a Louisville-based regional liaison for the group, tells me in a March 23 email. "Kentucky has pockets that do not have any access to home birth providers, and many of the midwives are reaching capacity. We desperately need more midwives to meet the current demand." 

"We've been contacted by people who are due anywhere from a few weeks from now to those due in the fall," DeLodder adds. "Folks are planning ahead in case the current restrictions persist."

Giving birth obviously can't be put on hold for the coronavirus. But as the outbreak intensifies, overstretched medical staff, limited doctor's office and clinic hours, and limited modes of transportation could prove logistical challenges for expecting families, even independent of any health risks.

In the face of the outbreak, the authorities have already been relaxing some protectionist rules around health care licensing and operations, such as those preventing doctors and nurses from working across state lines and those limiting the number of businesses allowed to make masks, ventilators, and hand sanitizer. Will we see similar momentum on home- and community-based health care for expecting moms and new babies?

For Years, The U.S. Has Needed More Birth Professionals 

"There has been no growth in the number of obstetricians nationwide since 1980 despite increases in the number of women of childbearing age and the number of births," noted an October 2019 report from the California Health Care Foundation.

In a March 20 letter to the White House, American College of Nurse-Midwives CEO Sheri Sesay-Tuffour said her group is "gravely concerned that the COVID-19 pandemic will place further untenable stress on the current maternity care system and workforce." So it's asking the White House "for emergency measures to temporarily lift the restrictive licensure requirements that limit access to the midwifery workforce."

Midwives are not doulas, to be clear. The latter are more like birth counselors, providing information, emotional support, and physical assistance during pregnancy and childbirth but not direct medical care. Midwives are trained to care for women during labor and delivery, as well as provide prenatal and postpartum health care for women and newborns. Some are also permitted—depending on their license—to write prescriptions and provide general gynecological and "well woman" care. 

Recent decades have seen a modest but measurable uptick in midwife-attended births, after they all but disappeared over the course of the 20th century.

"In 1900, almost all U.S. births occurred outside a hospital," according to analysis from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This proportion dropped to 44 percent by 1940 and to just 1 percent by 1969, where it hovered throughout the 1970s and '80s. By 2004, out-of-hospital births accounted for just 0.87% of all recorded U.S. births. 

But since then, non-hospital births have been making a small but steady comeback. According to a June 2019 paper published in the journal Birth, the number of home births increased 77 percent from 2004 to 2017 and the number of birth center deliveries went up by more than 50 percent. "In 2017, 1 of every 62 births in the US was an out-of-hospital birth," authors Marian F. MacDorman and Eugene Declercq found. 

States Put Up Artificial Barriers

The increase in non-hospital births comes as some states have loosened midwifery rules. Back in 2004, Missouri midwives could still be charged as felons; the state's Supreme Court put an end to that in 2008. At the same time, some states have made it more difficult for midwives to practice. 

Take Georgia. In 2015, the state said all midwives must have an advanced nursing degree and a Certified Nurse Midwife (CNM) license. Now, not only is it illegal to practice midwifery in Georgia without these credentials, it's also forbidden to even call oneself a midwife

"What the statute and regulations do, and the way the Board of Nursing is enforcing it, is to say that no one can even say they're a professional midwife, or a licensed midwife," unless they have this specific license, says Caleb Trotter of the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF). 

PLF is suing on behalf of  Deborah Ann Pulley, who works in midwifery advocacy and education. She "is not practicing as a midwife at the moment," notes the complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia against the president of the Georgia Board of Nursing. Pulley practiced midwifery for many years, however, and is still licensed in Tennessee as a Certified Professional Midwife (CPM).

Trotter says the situation is like Georgia saying he can't call himself an attorney while in the Peach State, since he's licensed by California to practice law.

Like lawyers, midwives are regulated and licensed at the state level. In around 35 states, having a CPM license means you can legally practice as an independent midwife (though scope of practice allowed varies). 

"You've got a vast majority of the states, the path to licensure is pretty straightforward," says Trotter. "It's only a minority of states, Georgia included—and they only did this about 5 years ago—that have taken the step to really limit who can get in and who can practice as a midwife."

Georgia is among a few states that refuse to recognize any midwifery as legal unless it's offered by a nurse-midwife. This also appears to be the case in Iowa, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, and North Dakota, according to the Institute for Justice's analysis of occupational licensing across America. 

Even in states with more flexible licensing policies, midwives are often artificially constrained by some state regulations. 

These include rules preventing midwives licensed in one state from working in another, disallowing midwives from offering the full range of services they have been trained for, and requiring that they enter into unnecessary collaborative practice agreements with physicians. In only 18 states can even nurse-midwives diagnose and treat patients without such an agreement. 

The American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) supports "policies that allow Certified Nurse-Midwives (CNMs) and Certified Midwives (CMs) to practice to the full extent of their education, training, certification and experience" as well as "legislative and regulatory reforms that seek to eliminate unnecessary and costly supervision and collaborative agreement requirements." 

In early March, an ACNM representative was among the health professionals who met with President Donald Trump and the COVID-19 task force for a briefing at the White House. In a statement about the meeting, ACNM Board Treasurer Cara Krulewitch urged officials "to the strain on our nation's health care workforce by allowing all health care providers to practice to the full scope of their training." 

"Community birth has multiple factors that make it desirable right now to folks who may not have considered it before," points out DeLodder. "Even in normal circumstances, there are things such as hospital acquired infections. For many people, the idea of being in their own environment feels safer than being in a hospital, particularly in the midst of a pandemic." 

What Makes a Midwife? 

There are two main types of midwife licensing schemes in the U.S.: nurse-midwives and direct-entry midwives. 

All 50 states allow certified nurse-midwives to practice. To get a Certified Nurse-Midwife (CNM) license, one must be a registered nurse with a master's degree or higher as well as complete a special midwifery educational program. 

A few states also recognize a Certified Midwife (CM) license, which requires a master's-level or higher degree in a health-care field outside nursing, plus specialized midwifery training. 

In February 2019, there were 102 CMs and 12,218 nurse-midwives in America, ACNM reports. Most midwife-attended births in the U.S. involve nurse-midwives, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2017, births attended by nurse-midwives and CMs accounted for 9.1 percent of all U.S. babies born. 

The vast majority of these still happened at a hospital. Only 3.2 percent of all the CM and nurse-midwife deliveries took place in stand-alone birth centers, and just 2.6 percent in people's homes. 

This is in part a function of red tape that can keep hospital-based nurse-midwives from attending home births. "Restrictions such as oversight requirements in some states can make this very difficult," DeLodder tells me. 

In any event, direct-entry midwives, who are trained and licensed independent of the nursing profession, are more likely to attend home births or birthing center deliveries. 

The gold standard license for direct-entry midwives is the CPM license. Getting one ultimately requires passing an exam administered by the North American Registry of Midwives. CPMs needn't have a nursing license or a college degree. But the registry "requires that the clinical component of the educational process must be at least two years in duration and include a minimum of 55 births in three distinct categories," according to The American Academy of Midwives

The CPM is the only midwifery license that requires training and experience in home-birth settings. 

State of Limbo 

"We passed a law in Kentucky in 2019 to license Certified Professional Midwives who attend home births," notes DeLodder. "While the license process isn't complete yet, it is very close. But there are still some states where CPMs are not licensed." 

"Those states that do not yet recognize CPMs need to do so immediately," she suggests, adding that groups in those states are petitioning "to have licenses issued by executive order."

These states fall into two groups: those that explicitly say only nurse-midwives are allowed to practice, and those that only officially license nurse-midwives but don't directly prohibit practicing midwifery outside this. 

Recognizing the CPM license could come with myriad advantages, including being able to draw from pools of CPMs in neighboring states. And for CPMs in these states, it could mean being able to actually accept private insurance payments, get reimbursed by Medicaid, and work more collaboratively with other health care providers.

"What we know from research is that better integration leads to better outcomes," says Rachlin of Refuge Midwifery, who also cites lack of insurance coverage for midwifery services as a major barrier for potential patients. (Just three percent of hospital births between 2004 and 2017 were self-paid, compared to a third of birth center deliveries and more than two-thirds of home births, researchers found.) Home birth "is a third of the cost of a hospital birth," says Rachlin. Yet it can cost patients much more in terms of out-of-pocket costs.

There are trade-offs to consider in states going from no regulations around home midwifery to offering the CPM license. If the CPM becomes the only non-criminalized path for non-nurse midwives, that could shut out a lot of experienced midwives, as well as stymie new entrants without the resources to be trained and licensed in this particular way. 

Getting the state to grant you a direct-entry midwife license can be costly, ranging from $822 (in New York) to $2,600 in Wyoming, according to the Institue for Justice

But there are ways around this. In Hawaii, which passed a licensing requirement for non-nurse midwives last year, the new rule exempts until 2023 any birth midwife who does not administer medicine and discloses their lack of licensing. A non-temporary exemption of that sort could help mitigate the negative impact on communities where informal midwifery is common, while giving pregnant patients across the board more care options and preventing non-licensed midwives who are honest about this fact from facing arrest. 

Free the Midwives 

So where can the government go from here? 

First, states that say only nurse-midwives can legally practice should reconsider. Otherwise, they block out skilled midwives trained before these requirements were enacted; discourage new midwives who can't afford a master's degree; and put their pregnant residents at a disadvantage in terms of choice and—especially now—safety. 

Second, states that neither forbid nor recognize non-nurse midwives should consider ways to bring these professionals into more alignment with the rest of the health care system (be it by offering a CPM licensure path themselves, permitting practice by people with CPM licenses from other states, or some novel way). But they should be careful that, in so doing, they don't ban merely calling oneself a midwife without a license (as in Georgia) or criminalize experienced midwives with alternative experience or certification. 

Third, all states should have health regulators look at ways to stop artificially restraining midwives during this time of crisis. (Ideally, any rolled back regulations would be permanent, but there's no need to decide that now.) An easy place to start is with rules requiring telemedical appointments be treated differently than in-person visits. 

"A lot of providers I've been talking to have been talking about [the need for] reimbursement for telemedicine," Rachlin tells me. With COVID-19 raging, "as much care as we can do outside the hospital and clinics is going to lead to better care." 

Medicaid coverage is another area ripe for tweaks. "There are very few states where CPMs are covered by Medicaid," says DeLodder. Not only could changing that "increase access, but it also presents a savings to Medicaid as both home and birth center births are much less expensive than even the most straightforward hospital birth. Even better would be if CPMs were listed as Medicaid providers on the federal level." 

Private insurers, which vary on coverage at present, could also "make a big impact and realize savings" by choosing to cover services from home birth providers, she says. 

In longer-term moves, they could abolish "certificate of need" requirements for standalone birthing centers, which arbitrarily limit medical facilities to those that politicians and their cronies deem necessary for the community. This has left states like Kentucky without any freestanding birth centers. 

"States could also provide emergency provisional licenses for birth centers and suspend certain requirements to allow facilities to open quickly," DeLodder points out. 

The benefits of more midwifery could extend beyond the current crisis. Research suggests more midwife-assisted births could bring cost savings and better birthing outcomes, too. 

Getting up to 20 percent of U.S. births to use midwife-led care by 2028 could save around $4 billion, according to a 2018 policy brief from the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. This would also reduce preterm births and episiotomies, the brief claims. 

"Evidence shows that low-risk pregnant women who are cared for by midwives have similar outcomes to those cared for by physicians, but are less likely to experience unnecessary obstetric procedures," it goes on. "Additionally, physician shortages in obstetrics contribute to problems of limited access to care during pregnancy," which is something that more midwifery could mitigate. 

"In Philadelphia, there are about six or seven practices, and we are all almost at capacity," Rachlin told me last week. "We're doing the best to work together so we can increase our capacity, and it's still not going to be enough." 

One major barrier to expanding midwife care is hospital systems that don't want competition. "Hospitals in Kentucky have been vehemently opposed to increasing access to freestanding birth centers," says DeLodder. "However, as we are especially seeing now, we need access to all safe birthing options to free up hospital resources."

"There are risks and benefits to any [birth] setting," says Rachlin. "The risks of giving birth at home for one person may outweigh" the benefits, and vice versa. "It's important to help people be able to have the choice to give birth where they feel safe right now, and that may have changed recently because of the current pandemic."

NEXT: The Senate's COVID-19 Relief Bill Is a Crony Capitalist Dream

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. What’s up with the phrenology picture, ENB.

    1. I just bought a brand new BMW after having made $6375 this past one month and just over 12k last 4 week. This is the best and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had. I actually started this few Weeks ago and almost immediately started to bring home minimum 74BUCKS p/h… Read More

  2. Will U.S. authorities make it easier to embrace home births and midwives?

    Well, *tele-*midwives, anyway.

  3. “There has been no growth in the number of obstetricians nationwide since 1980 despite increases in the number of women of childbearing age and the number of births,” noted an October 2019 report from the California Health Care Foundation.

    Three decades of shitting on gender roles and motherhood had some unintended consequences you say? No shit Sherlock.

    1. “In 2017, 1 of every 62 births in the US was an out-of-hospital birth,” authors Marian F. MacDorman and Eugene Declercq found.

      I’m having some trouble reading between the numbers here. Given all the complexities, are there enough midwives now to meet a/the shortfall? Said another way, is the message that more freedom would ease the shortfall or alleviate it? I’m not opposed either way, but we shouldn’t market a treatment as a cure.

      1. whenever you want to have some fun check nutten tirolladies

      2. There’s plenty of historical documentation of the concerted marketing campaign waged by the profession of obstetrics using nurses as their assistants who systematically destroyed community midwifery. And, they continue to do everything they can to restrict these competitors. So, no, there’s not enough midwives.

  4. Every month I am earning online more than $8650 by doing a very simply online job from my home. By doing this in my part time I was able to save enough to buy me a new car in just a few months. This is so freaking easy that everyone should try it… Start making some dollars online today by following instructions on this website… ——HERE…….. w­­­w­­­w.n­­­­­e­­­­­w­­­­­b­­­­­o­­­­­x­­­3­­­.­­­c­­­o­­­m

  5. There is a BIG difference between a CNM and a CPM. CNMs are actual nurses with Master’s level education and training in addition to their nursing training and experience. CPMs are basically “old school midwives”: folks who have attended some births with other “old school midwives” and taken a test (a different test, by the way, than CNMs take). I’m all for loosening restrictions on home births attended by CNMs. But the public needs to be made very aware of the differences between the training and experience of a CNM and a CPM, and they are not aware.

    1. As a physician, who has been trained in both medical and midwifery protocols, you are correct. CNMs are trained to follow obstetric protocols which, statistically, we know are the basis of the poor outcomes in the USA that have contributed to the reality that we are the only developed country in the world whose maternal mortality rates are increasing and have a first day neonatal death rate that is 4 times that of other developed countries. When you look at statistics, there are at least 55 other countries where it is safer to give birth than in American hospitals. The CPM credential is rigorous, based on time-tested optimal approaches, and is the only credential specifically geared towards the physiologic approach required to keep home birth safe. As a physician you attends home birth, I specifically choose CPMs to work with. I am and have been the collaborative physician for several CNMs as they transition from hospital to home birth practice and have stopped being surprised at how steep their learning curve is in that first year.

  6. Hospitals make a shit ton of money off births. Granted, there are complicated births that require emergency C-sections like both my sons’, but still-the Bill was $100k which fortunately was entirely covered my insurance. Also we chose not to have them circumcised but we’re still billed $1500 for the procedure which wasn’t performed, but insurance also covered that.

  7. No, the US doesn’t “need more birth professionals”. We need many fewer births, period. The fewer humans, the better.

    1. Gotta ‘save the planet’?

  8. With Democrats like Clay Jenkins waging a war on women (midwives and doulas are not allowed to see the pregnant women they’ve been working with by his decree).

    1. A democrat’s solution to pregnancy is abortion.

      1. The trade association of obstetricians (ACOG) has a solution to the rising maternal mortality rate as they were quoted at their annual conference last year: use condoms and don’t get pregnant so then you won’t have to worry about hospital obstetrics killing you. As to abortion – the answer is to implement the family supportive policies (always blocked by the GOP) that reduce the harm of unintended pregnancies. If we follow the example of the countries that have the lowest abortion rates (that is the goal, right, because otherwise, it is obvious that the goal is to control women’s choices) we will implement those policies immediately and, like them, we will guarantee that those who still find no other option for their families will have access to safe care. It is our responsibility to fix this and making abortion unsafe by making it illegal has always resulted in more death not less.

  9. This blog made me so sad. I felt so much grief. Many of the people died and affected especially for those pregnant women. This is very risky for them By this pandemic. Their voice must be heard. Since we are now facing a serious problem that is fighting the pandemic Corona Virus 2019. Everyone in this world is affected by it and we should protect ourselves first. “SAFETY FIRST”. The only thing that we could do is to isolate ourselves to get away with it. Well, while we are isolating ourselves, why not go to this website and get their help? They can help with cleaning the carpet. They have perfect care and cleaning your carpet. Grab it now!

  10. ★Makes $140 to $180 reliably online work and I got $16894 in one month electronic acting from home.I am a bit by bit understudy and work basically one to a few hours in my extra time.Everybody will finish that commitment and monline akes additional money by just open this link….. Click Here  

  11. As the COVID-19 pandemic progresses, home birth midwives across the country are being inundated. Families are desperate for our care, to avoid giving birth in unsafe hospitals. According to 2015 global statistics, the USA is the only developed nation with rising maternal mortality rates, and first-day neo-natal mortality rates up to 4 times higher than other industrialized countries. Existing childbirth protocols and practices in hospitals produce poor results. Our maternity care system was already failing us, and amidst the current crisis outcomes may plummet further, unnecessarily. A shift from prioritizing the needs and choices of the medical system, to prioritizing those of mothers will immediately improve outcomes for mothers and babies. To do this, we need new laws, attitudes and practices. This includes creating smaller facilities dedicated to childbirth; recognizing and asserting birthing women’s right to safety and choice; and valuing, supporting and remunerating all certified midwives.

    I am a community midwife of 40 years, the president of the Midwives Alliance of North America (MANA), and a practicing physician. I am watching the COVID-19 crisis dismantle the illusions that our health care system can cope with an overwhelming spontaneous event, or that the consumer has appropriate choices. This is the exact problem we see in our hospital-based maternity care system every day. To handle a high-volume of people using hospitals for a spontaneous event – like a pandemic or childbirth – the system must plan for enough beds, staff, and machines. Take the example of childbirth. To control the flow of birthing mothers through the hospital-as-business setting, we have turned this spontaneous event into one that can be scheduled and controlled. How did we get here? It is partly the result of a simple business concept employed in medical settings: plan, dictate flow, control clients in and clients out. Induction allows births to be scheduled. Without induction, birthing mothers may arrive at local hospitals randomly over any given 48-hour period. Unable to cope with this unpredictable volume, birthing mothers would be sent elsewhere. It would be devastating to business.
    This model is devastating consumers as medical professionals systematically coerce birthing mothers to make choices that they don’t want. The result is the rampant spread of non-medically necessary inductions, increased interventions, surgeries, traumatized families, and poor outcomes. To limit Corona virus exposure, pregnant women across the country who may otherwise have wished for an un-medicated birth are choosing induction. They will have to accept the cascade of interventions and poor outcomes that frequently accompany it. The consumer continues to suffer to accommodate the limitations of large-scale medical systems. We are forced to see that our health care system is ill equipped and not designed to support and promote consumer choice. We urgently need to keep birthing mothers and their babies safe and together, able to make choices for their own wellbeing.

    In response to the current national emergency, Certified Professional Midwives (CPM), including those formerly retired, are stepping up to help. They are also being arrested. Many people will be unaware that there are two types of midwives. Certified Nurse Midwives (CNM) and Certified Midwives (CM) work mostly in hospitals, and Certified Professional Midwives (CPM), work in community settings (birth centers or homes). Despite the high level of knowledge, skill and experience required to become a CPM, home birth midwifery is criminalized in many states. This criminalization is a well-documented, concerted campaign to eliminate consumer options and normalize hospital birth. While this earns well for hospitals, there is no evidence that it is in the best interest of birthing mothers or their babies.

    The MANA Statistics Project is one of the largest collections on community birth data existing today. Research based on that data has produced multiple peer reviewed studies that demonstrate the safety of planned community births under the care of a midwife. Low risk women experienced high rates of normal physiologic birth and successful lactation and low rates of operative birth and interventions, with no increase in adverse events.

    There are clear steps we can take to prioritize good outcomes for families.

    First, we need smaller facilities dedicated to childbirth, staffed by midwives. This would allow hospitals to focus on those who are ill, and would stop pregnant women exposing themselves to microbes just to get care. With sufficient numbers of community based maternity centers we can keep volume down, with less need to induce and control the birth process. Thus, producing better outcomes. To increase the workforce adequately, all hospital-based Certified Nurse Midwives (CNM) need full autonomy. In addition, hospital based direct-entry Certified Midwives (CM) need legal recognition expanded from the current six states that license them to all 50.
    Next, we need immediate, across the board legalization of home birth midwives with nationally recognized Certified Professional Midwife (CPM) credentials. This includes allowing access to necessary medications and equipment. Many practicing CPMs currently fear prosecution, yet they are the only maternity care provider specifically trained for out of hospital childbirth. Keeping their practices restricted and/or illegal is a flagrant disservice to families who need their care. We need these midwives, now.
    Third, all certified midwives need payment for their professional services. At the current time, insurance companies rarely recognize CPMs as in-network providers. This renders them ineligible for third party reimbursement, often including Medicaid. This financial control has two key effects. It further restricts midwives from providing their skills, and it limits consumers’ options, keeping them in mainstream hospital environments whether they want to be or not.
    Finally, we need to change the conversation about the physiological needs of the mother-baby unit, and recognize the value and importance of all midwives every day. Home birth and CPMs are not just band-aids to help get us through this crisis. As outlined in the Home Birth Summit Consensus statements created in 2011 by a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders: “All childbearing women, in all maternity care settings, should receive respectful, woman-centered care. This care should include opportunities for a shared decision-making process to help each woman make the choices that are right for her.”

  12. First, we need effective legalization across the board of domestic birth midwives with nationally recognized Accredited Professional Midwife (CPM) qualifications. It involves providing access to the requisite medications and equipment.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.