Movies

Review: Color Out of Space

Nic Cage not totally nuts, but close enough.

|

Although Color Out of Space is based on a 1927 short story by the shovel-faced horror writer H.P. Lovecraft, you might question that provenance when a group of woolly alpacas trots through an early scene. There are no alpacas in the Lovecraft story, nor is there any character on hand there to inform us that they are "the animal of the future." There is, however, just such a character in this movie: an urban refugee named Nathan Gardner, who is rusticating with his wife and three kids on an inherited farm outside of Arkham, Massachusetts—the fictional capital of Lovecraft country. It seems right somehow (or at least why not?) that Nathan should be played by Nicolas Cage. And while this is not Cage in his classic mode of feverish delirium, he nevertheless gives a performance of several passing batshit pleasures.

The picture marks a return to the b-movie scene by South African director Richard Stanley, who has adapted the Lovecraft story with his fellow supernaturalist Scarlett Amaris. Heretofore most favorably known for his 1990 sci-fi film Hardware (which featured Iggy Pop and Lemmy Kilmister), Stanley suffered a legendary implosion of his directorial career after the calamitous, end-over-end disaster of his 1996 H.G. Wells adaptation, The Island of Dr. Moreau. That movie starred Marlon Brando and Val Kilmer, both at their most difficult (Brando insisted on wearing an ice bucket on his head for one scene), and the astonishing story of its making is vividly related in a 2014 documentary called Lost Soul, which I commend to one and all.

Color Out of Space quickly situates us in its world with the introduction of a young man wearing a Miskatonic University sweatshirt (Miskatonic being the Harvard of Lovecraft country). The man's name is Ward (Elliot Knight) and he's doing some surveying for a big dam-building project. When he comes upon a cloaked young woman named Lavinia (Madeleine Arthur) conducting a Wicca ritual on the bank of a woodland river, she finds him cute. Lavinia is Nathan's daughter, and soon Ward is making the acquaintance of her mother, Theresa (Joely Richardson), her pothead brother Benny (Brendan Meyer), and her littlest sibling, Jack (Julian Hilliard). They seem like a normal bunch—or as normal as any bunch might be with Nic Cage at its helm. With a familiar pre-wacko gleam in his eyes, Nathan says, "We're livin' the dream."

Then some sort of meteorite comes screaming down from the heavens and buries itself in Nathan's front yard, right near the stone water well. Nathan has trouble describing the flaming arrival of this thing: "I don't even know what color it was," he tells the inquiring sheriff. (This is a small problem: Lovecraft could get away with pronouncing the color of his meteorite indescribable, but here we can see it, and it's not indescribable at all—it's a sort of psychedelic cranberry-pink.)

Nothing is the same after this. Strangely hued flowers start blossoming near the well, the garden fills up with giant produce (foul-tasting tomatoes the size of softballs), little Jack begins conversing with an unseen "man in the well," and an epidemic of very gnarly body horror breaks out. ("Something's happening to the alpacas!") The effects techniques in these latter scenes are clearly descended from John Carpenter's 1982 The Thing, but it's good to see them being put to use once more, and Stanley finds his own imaginative purposes for them. (Asked what's become of his cat, a local hermit named Ezra, played by Tommy Chong, says, "You might see her, but I don't think you'll recognize her." So true!)

Cage's trademark derangement is minimal for most of the movie. He has a strange smirky scene in which he milks an alpaca, and a queasy moment in which he's grabbed by a ball of alien goop. Mostly, though he's an onlooker, watching the rest of his family drifting away to their awful fates. Finally, though, he snaps into action, and as we watch his blood-slicked fingers dropping 12-gauge shells into the breech of his shotgun and a tide of obsession lapping at his face, it finally feels like old times.

Advertisement

NEXT: Open Borders

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Noting the similarities to The Thing. John Carpenter was trying to make a Lovecraft movie

    1. The Thing was based on the John Campbell story.

      1. John W. Campbell wrote “Who Goes There?” (Astounding Stories, Aug 1938) filmed 1951 as “The Thing From Another World” and as John Carpenter’s 1982 “The Thing”. Antarctic expedition finds a spaceship buried in the ice that has a shape-changing monster.

        This followed the appearance of HP Lovecraft’s novel “At the Mountains of Madness” (Astounding Stories, Feb-Mar-Apr 1936) — Antarctic expedition uncovers survivals of ancient non-human races of extraterrestrial origin.

        Not only possible cross pollination going on between Lovecraft’s novel and Campbell’s story, but writing on Carpenter’s “The Thing” Kyle Anderson and Orrin Grey found several Lovecraft influences.

  2. This Lovecraft story was adapted just a few years ago in the Alex Garland film Annihilation, but this sounds like it’s a lot more faithful to the story. I’m going to go see this.

    1. The movie Annihilation was based on the story of the same name by Jeff Vandermeer — who explicitly disclaimed inspiration from Lovecraft in his interview by USA Today. Having read both stories, I would tend to agree with you — the ideas in both are far too similar for there not to have been some sort of inspiration, at least.

      https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/books/2014/02/28/jeff-vandermeer-annihilation/5902023/

      1. On the other hand, critics have pointed out that the movie Annihilation is more like “The Colour Out of Space” and less like the novel Annihilation.

  3. “Something’s happening to the alpacas!”

    Eerily reminiscent of “Where the hell did you get those chickens?!”

    1. Oh, we have people buying properties in the mountains here (Tennessee) and bringing in exotic (nonnative) animals like llamas, peacocks and texas long horn cattle.

      So someone moved alpacas into rural Massachsetts? No surprise.

  4. “the shovel-faced horror writer H.P. Lovecraft,”

    Ouch.

    1. was that dig really necessary?

    2. Jay Leno
      Sara Jessica Parker
      Bruce Campbell
      H.P. Lovecraft

      1. Aw, Bruce Campbell?

        1. “Why the long face?”

  5. And H.P has survived the S.J.W’s cancelled attempts. It look like all the S.J.W’s souls will be feed to Cthulhu now.

  6. Cage’s trademark derangement is minimal for most of the movie.

    Then what’s the point?

  7. So was this a recommendation? Hard to decipher if the movie was any good.

  8. OK. How does it compare to the 1965 version starring Nick Adams and Boris Karloff, directed by Roger Corman’s art director Daniel Haller and inexplicably renamed Die, Monster, Die!?

  9. honest online career from home Earns upto $550 to $750 doller by way of work is simple on web. i have made $28K only month via chipping away on internet. Its right way and easy home work maybe a piece adolescent can complete this movement on web and benefits….. Read more  

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.