Stephen Miller

Critics Want Immigration Advisor Stephen Miller Fired Over His Alleged White Nationalism

A new dump of emails shed light on Miller's agenda and motivations

|

In November, a hundred U.S. lawmakers called for the termination of senior White House adviser Stephen Miller after a former Breitbart News reporter, who previously identified as a white nationalist and an alt-righter, leaked emails to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) in which Miller gave her leads and ideas to depict immigrants in a negative light. At the time the emails were written, Miller was an aide to then–Sen. Jeff Sessions (R–Ala.). He then went on to become one of President Donald Trump's closest advisers and the architect of his immigration policies.

Now, 25 Jewish members of Congress are joining the call to fire Miller after Rolling Stone published another email exposé. These emails, which are from Miller's time in the White House, show that Miller has not only stacked immigration enforcement agencies with hardline restrictionists but also routinely bypasses normal channels to push his agenda. Those congresspeople are particularly incensed that Miller is using his part-Jewish background as a cover for his hardline anti-immigration policies. "If there was ever a group that should be most sympathetic to the plight of immigrants, to the plight of the downtrodden and to minorities, it should be Jewish people," Rep. Kim Schrier (D–Wash.), one of the lawmakers, told NPR. "His behavior is contrary to everything in our ethos."

Although the White House is hanging tough for now, even accusing the SPLC of engaging "in a vile smear campaign against a Jewish staffer," the calls for Miller's firing will possibly escalate after another story broke showing that Miller tried to embed ICE agents in the Office of Refugee Resettlement for interior enforcement purposes, a move that was almost certainly illegal.

The leaked emails from Katie McHugh, the Breitbart reporter, are from 2015 to 2016. They show Miller sharing stories with her from InfoWars, Alex Jones' far-right site that often peddles conspiracy theories, and VDare, a white nationalist website. The VDare story he sent her argued, for example, that there would be disastrous repercussions for the U.S. should Mexicans impacted by Hurricane Patricia be permitted to take shelter in America. In other email exchanges, Miller depicted immigrants of color as criminals and terrorists, and wrote, "it has never been easier in American history for illegal aliens to commit crimes of violence against Americans." McHugh dutifully published many stories linking immigrants with crime, even though the undocumented are, in fact, less crime-prone than natives.

According to McHugh, even though Miller was working for Sessions, he was effectively "the editorial director of the political section of Breitbart News." It was tantamount to Sen. Kamala Harris (D–Calif.) writing op-eds that CNN passed off as its own, McHugh told NPR. "It was wildly unethical—incredible violation of journalistic ethics."

McHugh, who has now repudiated her white nationalist ideology, was finally terminated from Breitbart in June of 2017 after outrage following this tweet: "There would be no deadly terror attacks in the U.K. if Muslims didn't live there."

But two years before that, in September 2015, Miller got upset with Pope Francis, who he felt was "in effect" saying "get rid of borders." He wrote to McHugh telling her that "someone should point out [to the Pope] the parallels to The Camp of the Saints," referring to the racist novel that has long been a cult classic in white supremacist circles. Written by French author Jean Raspail, the novel portrays the apocalyptic effects of migration. Its plot centers around a flotilla of hundreds of thousands of Indians—who eat their own poop and are described as murderous, sex-crazed, "kinky-haired," "swarthy-skinned," and "long-despised"—as they sail across the ocean to France in search of the "white man's comfort."

Brietbart obliged Miller. "Raspail's thesis, quite simply, is that liberalism is inadequate to defend liberalism," wrote Julia Hahn, then a Breitbart staffer, who is one of the people Miller has brought in as a Special Assistant to Trump. "All around the world, events seem to be lining up with the predictions of the book."

All of this barely scratches the surface of the stories Miller fed to Breitbart.

But the most recent tranche of emails obtained by Rolling Stone's Andy Kroll shows how Miller has used his White House perch to put like-minded individuals in key positions to push some of this administration's most notorious policies. "Miller, with his white-nationalist mindset and fervor to enact xenophobic policies, is far from an isolated actor," Kroll writes. "He's the leader of a broad operation spread across the federal government."

One of Miller's regular correspondents, the Rolling Stone emails show, is Jon Feere, a senior adviser at ICE and former policy analyst at the ultra-restrictionist Center for Immigration Studies (CIS). CIS is the respectable spin-off of the Michigan-based Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), founded by the late John Tanton. An ophthalmologist, Tanton lamented that Hitler gave eugenics a bad name and accepted funding from The Pioneer Fund, which advocated eugenics. FAIR is the organization responsible for republishing The Camp of the Saints in America. Despite FAIR's notorious background, Miller helped place its former staffer, Julie Kirchner, as an adviser to the acting commissioner of Customs and Border Protection and later as the top ombudsman at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service.

Feere is on record arguing for the elimination both of birthright citizenship and also the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program that gives temporary legal status to Dreamers (those who were brought to this country as minors without proper authorization).

The emails between Feere and Miller show the two working together, sometimes bypassing Feere's bosses and senior staffers, including former ICE Acting Director Tom Homan, no slouch himself when it comes to harsh enforcement.

Writes Rolling Stone's Kroll:

"In the emails, Feere strategizes with Miller about how to use the federal government to amplify their anti-immigration message; tees up potential attacks on prominent Democratic politicians; directly briefs Miller in great detail about upcoming enforcement actions and policy changes in the works; and recommends to Miller people the administration should hire to expedite its immigration agenda."

In one email, Feere tells Miller about a meeting he led about crafting a new agreement between ICE and the Department of Labor on worksite immigration enforcement actions that would be "more favorable to ICE's mission" of tracking down and deporting undocumented residents. Feere also describes helping plan an upcoming ICE raid in the Bay Area. All of this constituted a major escalation of ICE's enforcement mission. But what's also notable about the email, Kroll points out, is that Feere apparently sent it straight to Miller and other White House officials without running it by his bosses at ICE, including Homan, who learned about the communication only after the fact.

Kroll also found evidence of Feere saying he stopped the administration from responding to an Amnesty International inquiry about its immigration enforcement practices and helped a Fox News contributor and "friendly NGO" publicly defend a leaked draft proposal for separating migrant families.

Feere and Miller collaborated on defending some of this administration's most draconian policies, such as separating children from their migrant parents. But they also brainstormed to advance their enforcement agenda in more creative ways. For example, they discussed the possibility of transferring a like-minded employee from the Treasury Department to the Social Security administration as a "senior advisor" so that the individual would have "clout" in setting up information-sharing efforts to track down and deport undocumented immigrants.

All of this had already deeply upset many lawmakers. But then just before Christmas, The Washington Post reported that Miller attempted to embed ICE agents in the government agency charged with resettling refugees to intensify deportation efforts against the adult sponsors who come forward to claim unaccompanied minors. This flies in the face of language that Congress included in the 2018 funding bill prohibiting DHS from using any federal funds to "place in detention, remove, refer for a decision whether to initiate removal proceedings, or initiate removal proceedings against a sponsor, potential sponsor, or member of a household of a sponsor or potential sponsor of an unaccompanied alien child."

While the DHS rejected Miller's plan to let ICE agents infiltrate the refugee outfit, it nevertheless allowed them to collect biometric data on adults who come to claim the unaccompanied minors in its custody. The DHS says it is doing so to ensure that the kids aren't handed to traffickers. But the worry is that ICE will classify them as ineligible to take custody of the kids for all kinds of reasons, including minor immigration violations, and set them up for deportation.

This would likely violate the law. Worse, it will scare away relatives or parents of these children from coming forward. The last time the administration implemented zero tolerance, the amount of time unaccompanied kids ended up spending at government shelters almost doubled, from 50 to 93 days. That policy also resulted in a growing number of what are called "category four" cases, where the government cannot find an eligible adult to take custody of the kids. After several months, the kids are placed in foster homes, The Post notes.

Given all these revelations about Miller, the chorus of calls demanding that President Trump fire him are only likely to grow louder in the coming months.

Advertisement

NEXT: Although Cannabis Consumers Who Own Firearms Are Federal Felons, Illinois Says They Can Keep Their Guns

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Can this article be reprinted with the emails, instead of links to other news sources (and the SPLC which isn’t within 10,000 miles of a news source) that talk about the emails?

    Unfortunately, since everyone in the country is a Nazi now, it’s become harder to judge who really is and isn’t a Nazi. I skimmed the SPLC links to the email ‘segments’ from Miller, and it feels like a lot of push pins and yarn being used to tie him to white nationalists.

    1. I’m curious why a piece of how Miller is a white nationalist went on and on about a group that was associated with a different group that was founded by somebody racist and why it’s so bad for two people in agreement on policy in government attempted to have their goals pursued.

      You weren’t half as upset over the FISA abuses. Billy and Dalmia weren’t concerned AT ALL about them, based on their moronic output.

    2. I have to agree. I simply don’t trust Dalmia or Binnion who have distorted reports in the past. Link to the source documents. Show us the emails.

      1. Saves you from reading “the Nation” or “in these times”.
        Reasons standards for truth and accuracy seem to be dissolving in a solution of staff fame and clueless arrogance. Being popular with their hollywood and big government friends has blinded them to how far from Liberty they are straying.

        1. They just wish they were popular.

          1. After all, it’s not as if he did anything wrong in his emails. No one is claiming, for example, that he sent out any illegal “parodies.” If he had done that, there would have been ample grounds not only for his dismissal, but for his arrest–but again, his conduct in that regard has been entirely appropriate, as far as one can tell from media reports on this matter. Here at NYU, we put the emphasis where it belongs–on straightforward speech, regardless of the views expressed, as long as they don’t impinge on faculty reputations. If you cross the line and indulge in harmful degrees of irony, we will call in law enforcement; otherwise, we welcome all opinions. Why should it be different in government? See the documentation of our nation’s leading criminal “satire” case at:

            https://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/

      2. Yeah, fuck those two. Completely discredited and idiotic. I believe nothing they say.

    3. Absolutely not. Neither Reason nor the SPLC can trust you to make your own judgement.

      I can’t find the emails either. Somehow we’re supposed to trust the interpretation provided by a publication that couldn’t even interpret simple changes in the way craft whiskey is taxed in Minnesota.

    4. Thos is reason. They dont loom at primary sources. How dare you sir

      1. Holy phone keyboard batman. Meh.

    5. Is your question whether Trump came up with all his on-air racist statements and policies all by himself or whether Miller was feeding them to him?

      It was time to abandon the Republican party for this evil crap like 40 years ago. They’re just being more buttfuckingly honest about it now than they ever have.

      1. Wait, you, Tony, are calling other people racist? Lololololol

        1. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug claims to have ANY morals at ALL!

          Ha!

          1. I do? Jokes on you shit eater

            AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

            HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

            HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

            WIKIPEDIA

            AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

      2. Well Tony, you do know your buttfucking.

    6. Well said.

      I looked over the article as well and found nothing to support the claim that Miller is a “white nationalist.” Apparently, opposition to open borders and concern about ILLEGAL immigrant crime makes you bigoted towards all “immigrants of color” and a “white nationalist.”

      This is very low quality journalism and something I’d expect on an extreme Leftist site – not a good look for Reason.

      1. Corporate influence ($) is everywhere.

    7. SPLC is a hate group

      1. I would go further and say they are probably criminally subversive.

      2. The SPLC are race baiting vermin.

    8. Unfortunately, since everyone in the country is a Nazi now, it’s become harder to judge who really is and isn’t a Nazi.

      Hilariously, Jakiw Palij immigrated in 1949 and had his citizenship revoked in 2003. He would’ve been deported, but no other country would take him and the US leadership lost interest. He was finally deported by the Trump administration in 2018 and died in Berlin in 2019. He is believed to be the last Nazi living Nazi in the United States.

      1. EnemyOfThePeople: There are tens of millions of Nazis in America!

    9. Off topic:

      US just killed Suleimani, Quds commander, with an airstrike.
      That is BIG

    10. This is a Shikha article. Just accept that it’s 100% wrong about everything it says and move on.

      1. I have learned this, over time. Sad.

    11. This article is embarrassing. It seems Miller’s crime is not having the same politics as the authors. It reads as something Rachel Maddie would rant on MSNBC.

  2. Wow, two of Reason’s brightest lights team up. This should be epic.

    “Miller has not only stacked immigration enforcement agencies with hardline restrictionists but also routinely bypasses normal channels to push his agenda.”

    Oh heaven forbid he doesn’t use the “normal channels” that have made an impressive mess of this for years.

    “Miller tried to embed ICE agents in the Office of Refugee Resettlement for interior enforcement purposes, a move that was almost certainly illegal.”

    Because refugees would never, literally never, lie about being refugees. We don’t need to check them ourselves.

    “White House perch to put like-minded individuals in key positions to push some of this administration’s most notorious policies.”

    Yes, criminal to hire qualified people who have views that two people on Reason disagree with.

    “CIS is the respectable spin-off of the Michigan-based Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), founded by the late John Tanton. An ophthalmologist, Tanton lamented that Hitler gave eugenics a bad name”

    Never noticed Reason blasting Planned Parenthood for the views of ITS founder. Weird. I bet she opposed eugenics and the like.

    “Feere is on record arguing for the elimination both of birthright citizenship and also the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program that gives temporary legal status to Dreamers (those who were brought to this country as minors without proper authorization).”

    …And?

    Man, Billy and Dalmia … you didn’t disappoint. Literally not one worthwhile word was typed here. Good job.

    1. “Man, Billy and Dalmia … you didn’t disappoint. Literally not one worthwhile word was typed here. Good job.”

      If they fucked would it produce Cthulu or just one of the Horsemen of the Apocolypse?

      1. No, just one more shitty SJW.
        Let’s not give these morons too much credit

      2. Nevermind.
        Just did a little research on Binion.
        He hasn’t hit puberty yet.

      3. How dare you presume their genders.

      4. You assume Billy would be pitching.

      5. No need to worry about what they would spawn yet. Have you seen Billy’s head shot? He hasn’t reached puberty yet.

    2. Perfect review. Thank you for doing the work I didn’t want to do.

      Billy and Dalmia: Together at last. The stupid overflows today.

    3. I personally am scandalized that my government is concerned about child trafficking. That’s racist!

      1. Since only white men rape children, it’s racist to investigate child abuse by Beings of Color.

    4. I love how your defense is “we need to do illegal stuff to curtail illegal stuff.”

      I’m sure you’ll love the same reasoning if someone from the govt were to do nefarious things against you trying to catch you doing something illegal.

      1. Apparently you missed the Snowden leaks, you useless lefty scrotum hair.

  3. So reason is still pushing the lie that illegals are less crime-prone than natives?

    1. Yeah. Using Reason logic, we’d have a crime rate approaching zero if we expelled citizens and only brought in illegals.

    2. Quit lying! Do you think that Cato is lying? Only Breitbart speaks truth?

      https://www.cato.org/publications/immigration-research-policy-brief/criminal-immigrants-texas-2017-illegal-immigrant
      Criminal Immigrants in Texas in 2017: Illegal Immigrant Conviction Rates and Arrest Rates for Homicide, Sex Crimes, Larceny, and Other Crimes

      Conclusion from there:

      Texas is the only state that keeps the records of the immigration statuses of those arrested and convicted of state-level crimes, thus giving the public its best opportunity to study the crime rates of illegal immigrants compared to other subpopulations. Illegal immigrants were 29 percent less likely to be convicted of homicide than native-born Americans in Texas in 2017. For all crimes in Texas in 2017, illegal immigrants had a criminal conviction rate 47 percent below that of native-born Americans. Legal immigrants had a criminal conviction rate 65 percent below that of native-born Americans.

      Me back now: Oh, yeah, I know… Immigrant-haters will say that ALL of those who cross lines illegally are just horrible criminals! Circular logic! Look up “three felonies a day”, liar!

      1. Illegal immigrants were 29 percent less likely to be convicted of homicide than native-born Americans in Texas in 2017. For all crimes in Texas in 2017, illegal immigrants had a criminal conviction rate 47 percent below that of native-born Americans. Legal immigrants had a criminal conviction rate 65 percent below that of native-born Americans.

        that means they are less likely to be convicted once they are arrested. That says nothing about how many of them are arrested or what the overall crime rate is versus the native population. It just says they are less likely to be convicted. So what?

        Are you really so stupid you can’t understand that or are you just that dishonest?

        And my God CATO never publishes anything honest about immigration. Everything is either a half truth like this or an outright lie.

        1. It is doubly stupid because deportation is an option before incarceration in many cases. Making incarceration the benchmark is dishonest but is the only way they can exclude the arrested and deported illegal who hasn’t committed a non-immigration crime.

          1. That is a great point. If the guy is arrested for a minor crime, the DA is just going to turn him over ICE and have him deported rather than bother with convicting him. That has to account for the discrepancy in the conviction rate.

            CATO is just appalling on immigration issues. They literally do nothing but lie.

            1. Wikipedia self-polices their ass off to be factual at all times, as best as they can. Else they put themselves out of business.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_the_United_States_and_crime

              Right off of the top from there…
              According to empirical evidence, immigrants (including illegal immigrants) are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens in the United States.[1][2][3][4][5]

              But they say that which some people do NOT want to hear! So therefor, Wikipedia can NOT be believed, about whatever it is, that the facts-ignorers want to believe or not believe!

              For right-wingers, only right-wing bullshit is true. For left-wingers, only left-wing bullshit is true. Real lovers of individual freedom (like me) are left wasting our facts and our breath, against rigid-minded enemies of facts and freedoms everywhere!

              1. “Wikipedia self-polices their ass off to be factual at all times, as best as they can. Else they put themselves out of business”

                AAHAHAHAHAHAHHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHHAAHHHAAAHAHAHAH

                FUCK OFF MARY

                AAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHA

                WIKIPEDIA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                1. HE GOT HIS HEAD KICKED IN LYING WITH STATISTICS SO…

                  WIKIPEDIA

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                  HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  1. “For right-wingers, only right-wing bullshit is true. For left-wingers, only left-wing bullshit is true.”

                    Keep on proving my point.

                    1. Ahahahahah AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      OLD MEX CITED WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    2. HE SAID

                      AHAHAHAH
                      AHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      THAT THEY TRY TO BE UNBIASED

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    3. Argument by maniacal, moronic laughing does NOT qualify as persuasive or fact-basic or logical thinking in any way. This is why readers despise your stupidity and thread-shitting.

                      AHAHAH * 99,267 to the 435th power! Do I now “win”, Tulpa-Satan style?

                      Please take your stupid and your shit to where it is appreciated! Which is nowhere!

                    4. WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    5. OLD MEX

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      UNBIASED

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    6. “Argument by maniacal, moronic laughing does NOT qualify as persuasive or fact-basic or logical thinking in any way.“

                      Neither does any of the nonsense you spout.

                    7. “Argument”

                      Ahahahahahahah
                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      DRAMA LLAMA

                      THINKS

                      ARGUING

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      TOO STUPID

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      MOCKING HIM

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    8. Tulpa-Satan-Mary-Mary’s Period-“.”-more-handles-than-you-can-shake-a-stick-at psychotic multiple personality asshole -identity-theft-idiotic thief narcissist…

                      HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      PLEASE shit on the threads posted from grade-school kids? Instead of here? PLEASE?!?!?

                    9. HE SAID

                      AHAHAHAH
                      AHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      THAT THEY TRY TO BE UNBIASED

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                  2. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug wants to educate and inform us with endless ahaha…

                    Sarah Palin’s Buttplug is utterly full of Sarah Palin’s Buttplug!

                    1. January.2.2020 at 10:32 pm
                      AAHAHAHAHAHHA

                      AHAHAH

                      AHAHA

                      LOOK HOW BUTTHURT YOU ARE

                      AHAAHHHHHHH@HH@HHHAAHHHHHHHH@

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                2. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug is NOT a worthless TROLL?

                  Ha!

                  1. AAHAHAHAHAHHA

                    AHAHAH

                    AHAHA

                    LOOK HOW BUTTHURT YOU ARE

                    AHAAHHHHHHH@HH@HHHAAHHHHHHHH@

                    WIKIPEDIA

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                    HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              2. None of those citations mean what the article claims. You are pathetic Mary. Really, you are just pathetic.

                1. Prove it, liar!

                  John is a fact-based genius, and Wikipedia is all liars, whenever they disagree with John? Need some proof here…

                  1. If you need proof Wikipedia has a slant you’re not paying attention.

                    1. Reality has a slant. Deal with it!

                      Are you implying that “John” and JesseAZ and Tulpa-Satan do NOT have a slant?

                    2. NO YOU FUCKING IDIOT HE’S SAYING YOU’RE A RETARD FOR SAYING WIKIPEDIA DOESN’T HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAHHA

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      UNBIASED

                      AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

                    3. lol @ reality is equal to anything on the Internet whether it is hosted on Wikipedia or youtube or any place else. You’re an idiot who equates agreement with your views with being trustworthy. Check confirmation bias as needed.

              3. You wrote this with a straight face? Or more insane ramblings? Wiki self sensors to the liberal point of view and has posted literal incorrect information, refusing to correct even with primary sources material. Even wapo admits it dummy.

                https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/commentary-the-problem-with-wikipedia/2013/03/17/0bef0c84-8a74-11e2-8d72-dc76641cb8d4_story.html

                1. Where is your JesseAZpedia web site, then? Seems to me there is a HUGE need for vetted, double-checked, sanity-checked-by-many-many-editors (Wikipedia style) JesseAZpedia “knowledge” based database for bigotted, lying haters everywhere! Get going!

                  Readers, beware! Do not be deceived by JesseAZ! JesseAZ does NOT believe that LIES are bad in ANY way! Only ACTIONS matter, ethically or morally! See https://reason.com/2020/01/01/trumps-inartful-dodges/#comment-8068480
                  “Words are words dumbfuck. Actions are where morals and ethics lie.”, says JesseAZ. When confronted with offers of hush money, illegal commands (from a commanding military officer), offers of murder for hire, libel, slander, lies in court, yelling “fire” in a crowded theater, inciting riots, fighting words, forged signatures, false representations concerning products or services for sale… these are all “merely” cases of just “using words”. Just like the Evil One (AKA “Father of Lies”), Jesse says lies are all A-OK and utterly harmless! So do NOT believe ANYTHING that you hear from JesseAZ!

                  1. AHAHAHAHAHA

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    WIKIPEDIA

                    HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    UNBIASED

                    HAHA

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    1. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug amounts to more than worthless shit?

                      Ha-Ha!

                    2. YOU WANT TO EAT ME?!?!?!

                      AHAHAHAHAHAAJ

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                2. Also according to the same source, JesseAZ is TOTALLY on board with dictatorship (presumably so long as it is an “R” dictator that we are talking of).

                  With reference to Trump, JesseAZ says…
                  “He is not constitutionally bound on any actions he performed.”

                  1. Too much shit sqrsly. Cut back some.

                    I cant help that you are wrong so often. And it is easily provable.

                    You are also still unclear on constitutional structure and the fact that the legislative can not blunder the constitutional powers of the executive or vice versa, Texas v Perry.

                    1. Too much lying and Trump-worshipping, JesseAZ. Cut back some.

                      “Words can’t be crimes.” = Honest and short paraphrase of Jesse the Liar-Liar, Pants on Fire!

                    2. ““He is not constitutionally bound on any actions he performed.”

                      We need a BRILLIANTLY persuasive new movie from JesseAZ to “Wake Up, America!”, to flesh out the concept that “The Triumph of The Will of The Trump, Trumps All”! Including the USA Constitution. In fact, USA military personnel should start swearing allegiance to Trump, NOT to some stupid, moldering old piece of paper!

                      Previous Powerful People have blazed a path for us to follow here, slackers!!!

                    3. More raging nonsense from the Reason comment section psychopath.

                    4. WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAAH

                    5. Tulpa-Satan’s butthole…

                      HA-HA times infinity aginity! Do I win the baby-babble contest now? What’s the prize, a binky?

                    6. DRAMA LLAMA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                3. You cite the Washington Post, with a straight face? THIS is a sample of what your esteemed “Washington Post” has to say:

                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russian-women-find-a-punchline-in-the-age-of-metoo/2019/08/07/de45293e-8f95-11e9-b6f4-033356502dce_story.html

                  Russian women find a punchline in the age of Me Too

                  “While Communism gave Soviet-era women key freedoms decades ahead of their Western sisters — from the right to vote to legal abortion…”

                  Wooo-Hooo! The “freedom” to vote for a one-party dictatorship! JesseAZ adores and admires and cites WaPo! JesseAZ looks forward to the “freedom”, it seems, of voting for the One-Party Trumptatorship! WaPo my ass! They LIE almost as much as JesseAZ!

                  1. AAHAHAHHAHAJA

                    AHAHAH

                    WIKIPEDIA

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                    HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    UNBIASED HE SAYS

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    1. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug is the center of the Universe!

                      But ONLY in the mind of Sarah Palin’s Buttplug!

                      According to the head voices of Sarah Palin’s Buttplug!

                    2. AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      CRY MORE!!

                      AHAHAHAHAHAAJ

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              4. “Wikipedia self-polices their ass off to be factual at all times”

                BWA HA HA!

                1. Needs more ha.

                  1. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug will ALWAYS give you MORE ha-ha-has! Because it is the ONLY thing that Sarah Palin’s Buttplug is capable of!
                    All admire and worship Sarah Palin’s Buttplug, now!
                    Sarah Palin’s Buttplug DEMANDS it!

                    1. NEVER GO FULL SCHIZO!!!

                      AHAHAHAHAHAAJ

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              5. No.

                Legal immigrants seem less likely to commit crimes. That’s partially true. Legal immigrants need a police background check (or the equivalent) before they are allowed to arrive, so we can expect they would be less likely to commit crimes.
                But it’s really more of a statistical trick because immigrants on average have spent far less time in the US than citizens have, so they appear to have committed fewer crimes (the valid way to compare that would be to compare criminal records over a lifetime, not just while in the United States).

                On top of that, the data about illegal immigrants in that Cato study applied to Texas only. Illegal immigration is completely intertwined with human trafficking, drug trafficking, and identity theft (not to mention crossing the border illegally). There is no way on Earth they can be more law-abiding than US citizens, even if you think the laws they are breaking are unjust.

            2. Another factor distorting the stats is that crimes committed by recent immigrants against other recent immigrants are very unlikely to even be reported. Victims are unwilling to risk contact with the police.

        2. Lol.
          John: “I love immigrants. Trump support has nothing to do with hating immigrants.”

          Anyone: “Ok. Here’s the actual stats for immigrants that shows, definitively, that they committ fewer crimes per capita than natives.”

          Also John: “FUCK U U FUCK DIRTY PIG. HOW DAER U INFFER THAT ILLEEEGALS COMMIT LESS CRIME!”

          1. ” “Ok. Here’s the actual stats for immigrants that shows, definitively, that they committ fewer crimes per capita than natives.””

            Shorter DOL – “I like lying”

            1. Shorter Sarah Palin’s Buttplug…

              Sarah Palin’s Buttplug will thread-shit ever day, all day…

              And Sarah Palin’s Buttplug does not give ONE shit about who is sick and tired of Sarah Palin’s Buttplug!

              1. AAHAHAHHAHAJA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                WIKIPEDIA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                UNBIASED

                AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                1. Tragedy of the commons.

                  The fish are free! Soon, all that is left, is jellyfish.

                  The comments are free! We now have very little left except for Tulpa-Satan jellyfish. Sad!

          2. You were caught lying Mary. Why don’t you go lie somewhere where the people are dumb enough to believe you.

            1. Lying? Like the permanently debunked and to be safely ignored John Lott Jr? The same John who faked survey data and faked an online persona which called him the “best professor ever”? Or the John Lott who got caught getting paid by NRA for his gun studies?

              You guys are such willfully ignorant dupes.
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lott#Mary_Rosh_persona

              1. lol that one politician getting paid by a special interest groups somehow proves other special interest groups and the media to be truth telling vehicles.

                Do you even know how ignorant that is?

              2. De Oppresso Liber
                January.2.2020 at 6:16 pm
                Lying? Like the permanently debunked and to be safely ignored John Lott Jr? The same John who faked survey data and faked an online persona which called him the “best professor ever”? Or the John Lott who got caught getting paid by NRA for his gun studies?

                Facts do NOT matter to ideological idiots! If Jesus returned and healed the sick and the blind, walked on the water, turned the water into wine… Rose the dead… Right smack dab in front of ideological idiots, they would microscopically question Jesus’s data points! You can NOT win, with mere “facts”, in the eyes of ideological idiots!

                1. WIKIPEDIA

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                  HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  1. Satanic-Tulpa’s Butthole…

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                    HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    WHEN are ya gonna write that email to ReasonNeedsBrilliantlyPersuasiveWriters@Reason.com ?!?!?

                    1. AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                2. “Facts do NOT matter to ideological idiots!”

                  SQRLSY One
                  January.2.2020 at 5:51 pm
                  John Lott says…

                  “Study finds high rates of prison, jail for illegals”

                  Next… “Study finds high rates of being burned at the stake, in Dark Ages Europe, for witches”

                  Ahahahahahahah

                  HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  1. Hahahhaha

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                  2. Sanity and consideration of others do not matter to Sarah Palin’s Buttplug!

                    Only Sarah Palin’s Buttplug’s self-admiration matters to Sarah Palin’s Buttplug!

                    1. AAHAHAHAHAHHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      WIKIPEDIA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                      HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              3. Alan Dershowitz ended up having to admit his claim that NRA paid for Lott’s studies was not true.

                Charles Schumer claimed in an op-ed that Lott’s grant to study at Chicago U Law School was paid for by Winchester. The Chicago U Law School pointed out Chicago U chose who got the grant money from John M. Olin Foundation and while the Olin family once owned DuPont and DuPont once owned Winchester, Winchester had no influence over to whom Chicago U awarded Olin Foundation grants.

                Lying about the sources of Lott’s funding makes you guys look like liars.

                1. It was not John Lott’s study but one by FAIR.

                  Doing his own analysis Lott found some interestong things. Quoting the Washingon Times on the FAIR study: “Mr. Lott’s research, using data from Arizona that differentiates between immigrants, found that legal immigrants had the lowest rates of incarceration, with citizens in the middle and illegal immigrants with the highest rates of crime.”

          3. You need a dictionary. You dont know what definitively means. In fact the only studies on actual prison populations, the only true way to count percentages, shows illegals commit crimes at a much higher rate. For example the John Lott study:

            https://apnews.com/b78a2a3c7b9d28c765ca3542e4581382

            1. John Lott says…

              “Study finds high rates of prison, jail for illegals”

              Next… “Study finds high rates of being burned at the stake, in Dark Ages Europe, for witches”

              More news at 11:00!

              1. It is amazing watching you break so easily when actual real information is presented. Your intellectual bubble is so weak. At least pod will stand by his ignorance proudly, you just grow more manic.

              2. So, illegal criminals are just like witches? Fictional?

                Not a good argument, dude.

                1. Crossing invisible lines is criminal witchcraft. Good argument! I see your point! If we want to burn some witches, this will work!

          4. Pedo Jeffy, kill yourself. No one wants you here.

            1. Hey Shitsy,
              I see you’re pimping for the Evil One yet AGAIN! So… HOW MANY people, so far, have you persuaded to commit suicide? Have ANY of these suicides brought you ANY long-lasting happiness, yet? If not, then WHY don’t you give UP your evil ways?
              I really don’t care one way or the other, if you or anyone else believes that the Evil One is “real”, or metaphorical. “Machs nix” to me. What I WOULD like for you, and others, to understand, is that by obeying the “spirit of the Evil One” (whether “real”, or not), you make the Evil One real… Just like obeying (or praying to) the Spirit of Peace and Love, makes it real! Whether it is “real”, or not! Because it is VERY difficult (actually impossible) for me to go off and stab my neighbor in the back, needlessly, immediately after having SINCERELY prayed for peace!
              On the flip side… By lusting for others (who think “wrong” thoughts, in Your Exalted View) to commit suicide, your spread hatred, destruction, and self-destruction. You’re PROUD of that?
              Next time you’re “channeling” the Evil One in Your Self-Esteemed Mind, and dreaming up new-and-improved ways to encourage people to kill themselves, I would like for you to ask the Evil One the same simple question that I just asked you: Have ANY of the suicides that you have solicited and enabled, brought you ANY long-lasting happiness? We already KNOW that the answer is NO! An excellent working definition of evil is “the unquenchable thirst”! So why not give UP on your FAR-worse-than-useless, EVIL quests?

              Evil Shitsy! Is THAT how you want to be remembered, after the worms start crawling through your rotting flesh? Or your cremated ashes are thrown in the dump?

        3. It’s especially stupid because they looked at one year in one state. There have now been multiple studies on sampling state prison populations such as:

          https://dailycaller.com/2018/01/16/arizona-dreamers-8-percent-of-prisoners/

          It is showing illegal immigrants have a higher share of prison populations than their makeup.

          Reason also pointed to a study that combines legal and illegal immigrants. The former have been pre screened for criminal background checks. Often times the pro immigration groups get the “more charges” numbers by a single defendant with 25 charges, used more often on citizens in an attempt to plea down. Illegal immigrants or immigrants can be deported on a single charge.

        4. Come on John. Be honest here, that Cato report also looked at arrests as well (precisely for the reasons that you said it is problematic to focus on convictions).

        5. That says nothing about how many of them are arrested or what the overall crime rate is versus the native population. It just says they are less likely to be convicted. So what?

          They are, as an underlying premise, admitting that they’re a-OK with the numbers and underlying documentation being 100% fabricated. As absurdly factual as the ‘100% of illegal immigrants have broken the law’ is, the(ir) counter argument is that all documentation and statistics on the issue don’t matter at all. If the US Gov’t. were outright torturing 50% of citizens and impoverishing the other half, they’d be encouraging people to cross the border in pursuit of ideological purity, diversity, or freedom. They aren’t pushing for more Guatemalans to make Mexico great again. They’re specifically pushing for more people of any nationality to prevent people *like* Trump from doing so in America.

      2. https://cis.org/Report/Immigration-and-Crime

        The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) estimates that immigrants (legal and illegal) comprise 20 percent of inmates in prisons and jails. The foreign-born are 15.4 percent of the nation’s adult population. However, DHS has not provided a detailed explanation of how the estimates were generated.
        Under contract to DHS in 2004, Fentress, Inc., reviewed 8.1 million inmate records from state prison systems and 45 large county jails. They found that 22 percent of inmates were foreign-born. But the report did not cover all of the nation’s jails.
        The 287(g) program and related efforts have found high rates of illegal alien incarceration in some communities. But it is unclear if the communities are representative of the country:
        Maricopa County, Ariz.: 22 percent of felons are illegal aliens;
        Lake County, Ill.: 19 percent of jail inmates are illegal aliens;
        Collier County, Fla.: 20 to 22 percent of jail inmates and arrestees are illegal aliens;
        Weld County, Colo.: 12.8 to 15.2 percent of those jailed are illegal aliens.
        DHS states that it has identified 221,000 non-citizens in the nation’s jails. This equals 11 to 15 percent of the jail population. Non-citizens comprise only 8.6 percent of the nation’s total adult population.

      3. Now show me the arrest statistics by race.

      4. Those are conviction rates, not violent crime rates. There are many reasons why conviction rates may be lower even though violent crime rates are higher in a population.

        It is also utterly irrelevant. These people are committing a host of crimes simply by living in the US. In addition, they lower per capita GDP, cause wages to stagnate, are a net drain on government resources, lower average life expectancy, and lower average education levels. The US can’t make social progress as long as it admits third world populations.

    3. For those who care, the most recent meta-analysis examining immigration and crime: Ousey, G. C., & Kubrin, C. E. (2018). Immigration and Crime: Assessing a contentious issue. Annual Review of Criminology, volume 1, pages 63-84.

      Overall finding: small negative association between crime and immigration with variability across different moderators (e.g., how crime was measured, how immigration status was measured, type of crime, etc.).

      Note: can’t remember if they looked at legal vs. illegal immigration as a moderator.

      1. Association, not actual rates or causation.

  4. The anti-immigration agenda is motivated by racism? Surprised: no one.

    1. Can you point to Miller’s racism? I didn’t see it. Not “Well, he read books I have heard about and am pretty sure I won’t like”. ACTUAL racism.

      Note: Obama was not racist for attending a church for 20 years where two “pastors” were quite vehement racists. So, you will have to exceed that wall right there.

      1. You guys think someone is racist only if he explicitly comes out and says “I am a racist and hate minorities.”

        1. We would like some evidence beyond “Well, I don’t like his policy proposals”. I’m silly like that.

        2. That would be a start. Certainly better than “he disagrees with me” which seems to be your standard.

          Just how much glue did you sniff as a child?

        3. No we should believe he is because some dumbass in a comments section wants to believe he is.

        4. Is there a law that prohibits racists and white nationalists from holding public office?

          Yeah, didn’t think so.

          1. Of course there isn’t a prohibition. Democrats have been holding various office positions since 1828.

            Democrats are racist as all hell.

        5. Race baiting from Chip. Shocking.

        6. I don’t hate Mexicans, I simply don’t want to live in Mexico.

    2. So you continue to be a complete dumb ass who makes stupid, pointless, and baseless assertions in order to virtue signal.

      Surprised; no one.

    3. Chipper Morning Wood
      January.2.2020 at 2:34 pm
      “The anti-immigration agenda is motivated by racism? Surprised: no one.”

      The pro-immigration agenda is motivated by racism, and pedophilia?
      Surprised: no one.

    4. In addition: the free market capitalism agenda and math/stem agenda is motivated by racism, or so I’ve recently read.

    5. Chipper has no depth of inspection of any topic and merely resorts to namecalling?
      Surprised: no one.

      1. Have you cousinfucking morons ever considered not defending every single Republican politician at all costs no matter how stupid and vile? Did you draw the line at Roy Moore perhaps? I’m asking because I genuinely am not sure. In fact, if I had to guess, I bet you were cool with him too.

        1. Cwy more DOL!!!

        2. You’re an idiot. Disagreeing someone provided enough proof to condemn someone else does not equate to supporting the accused. You know, that whole innocent until proven guilty thing.

            1. Cwy more!!!

              1. Tulpa-Mary-Satan done with hissy fit? Goo Goo Gah Gah? Tulpa-Mary-Satan want baba npw?

            2. What’s sad is you can become smarter but refuse to do so. Meanwhile, everyone else has to negate your idiocy lest it becomes contagious.

              IE: you have a choice to not be stupid, yet you chose stupiditstupidity Hicham all too infective to useful idiots.

              Only a shame you chose to argue with people infinitelymarter than you are. If not, you’d have converts; as is, you have nothing but blind faith in your idiotic echo chamber.

              1. What’s sad is that I admit to being a partisan and don’t lie about it, but you idiots do. What’s sad is you think you’re intelligent because, why? You can change your own oil? Hitch an inner tube to a pickup truck?

                Stop doing butt work for Republicans. They lost that privilege so long ago from any perspective, especially a libertarian one.

        3. I’m not defending anybody Tony, I’m pointing out the lies you and chipper push dumbfuck.

          1. What lie? Is Trump not a racist? Is his entire campaign + presidency not largely based on anti-brown-people horseshit?

            1. Awww cwy more about big bad twumpy DOL ahahaahahah

            2. As stated earlier disagreeing with you or diagreeeing with the current given evidence doesn’t make one a racist. To deny that reality though does make you an idiot.

              1. I call for a complete and total ban on Muslims entering the country.

                Border wall on Mexico.

                Look at my black person! Did I deny him an apartment once?

                Racism happens sometimes.

        4. “Have you cousinfucking morons…”

          Yet another demonstration that when the Left calls the Right racist, it’s all pure projection of their own racist hatreds.

          1. If you spend time misinforming yourself and others on the actual real problems of the world in favor of being an absolutely butthurt titty baby over a 16 year old Swedish girl who gave a speech, you deserve ridicule at maximum volume and for your children and grandchildren to laugh at you.

            1. No one here demonstrates more butthurt than you, yet again demonstrating that Leftists Always Project.

  5. I notice you failed to actually state how Miller is a white nationalist. Color me stunned.

    You realize that there was a time where even I empathized with DACA…but largely thanks to this site, I APPLAUD their expulsion.

    1. From the SPLC site:

      He [Miller] refers to demographic changes brought about by immigration as “new America” multiple times in the emails. It’s a phrase VDARE sometimes uses. Here are some examples of Miller using similar language in emails to Breitbart over nearly a week in July 2015:

      Push pins and yarn. I don’t know anything about Miller. He might have sympathies with white nationalists… but unfortunately, I’m going to need a lot more than this to convince me. Fifteen years ago, I would have been satisfied with this level of ‘evidence’. But in this day and age, with the rampant media malfeasance we now know to be epidemic… I need a little more convincing. And please stop linking to the SPLC. You have a problem with some emails? Print the fucking emails.

      1. The left has spent most of the last 30 years bragging about how demographic changes are going to usher in a permanent Democratic majority. A couple of leftist professors even wrote a book about it.

        But anytime someone on the Right notices this fact, they are just a “white nationalist”.

        1. My spidey senses went off when I clicked on the ’emails’ link:

          The leaked emails from Katie McHugh, the Breitbart reporter, are from 2015 to 2016.

          And it took me to the SPLC website. I need something that’s a little less… how do I say, circular confirmation bias-ey.

      2. You know another phrase VDARE sometimes uses, “for sure”. Time to start investigating Robbie, for sure.

        1. Robbie is obviously not a white nationalist. ’cause his phrase is “to be sure”.

          1. Hitler also drank water and Robbie drinks water every single day!!

            1. Does he float?

              1. He did turn me into a newt.

                But I got better.

                1. Did your gills go away and did you develop lungs?

      3. Reminiscent of when Trump was claimed to have tweeted that The Squad should go back where they came from but when the actual tweets are read, said something quite different.

      4. “They show Miller sharing stories with her from InfoWars, Alex Jones’ far-right site that often peddles conspiracy theories, and VDare, a white nationalist website.”

        Is VDare really “a white nationalist website”? According to whom? Is all of their material problematic, or a portion of it? Which articles did Miller link to? Which were the worst? Or is it guilt by association?

        1. You’re either a Globalist or a White Nationalist.

          Those are the only two possibilities.

      5. Everyone has sympathies with white nationalists in the same way that we all have sympathies with Hitler because we both used math. Batshit insane people being correct about something factual doesn’t mean we’re all batshit insane too.

    2. Shikha is an Alt-Right mole, sent here to discredit Open Borders Inc.

  6. Other than being against open borders, why is Miller a “white nationalist”. This article doesn’t seem to explain that or give any evidence that he is. Miller appointed people who agreed with the President’s policies to key positions. The humanity.

    1. Well, the SPLC says he is and they have never been known to exaggerate before.

      Yeah, Reason needs to leave DC and NYC post haste. Jonestown had more independent thought than those two shit stains.

    2. Newspeak Dictionary
      white nationalist: anyone who contradicts The Narrative

  7. Wow, a Republican administration hires perfectly ordinary Republicans? I’m shocked, shocked I tell you.

    1. Know what’s even more shocking? A government official leaking stories to sympathetic members of the media! Who’s ever heard of such a thing happening? In Washington D.C., of all places!

  8. I actually read this article. The whole thing.
    Billy Binion and Shika Dalmia are hilarious pedophilic globalists

    1. “Billy Binion and Shika Dalmia are hilarious pedophilic globalists”

      Binion is not a pedophile, he is merely sticking with his own kind.

      1. Just using the same process that leads to the “Miller = white nationalist” conclusion

      2. No one should smear Binion as a pedophile until he’s at least reached puberty.

    1. McCabe should be prosecuted for sedition, pure and simple.

  9. Now, 25 Jewish members of Congress are joining the call to fire Miller after Rolling Stone published another email expose.

    Rolling Stone? I knew Haven Monahan was behind this.

  10. I keep looking for the actual emails themselves, but the closest thing I can find is the SPLC article which is heavily editorialized and even goes so far as to insinuate that Miller is a white nationalist because he references a Calvin Coolidge policy and, like, white supremacists love Coolidge too. Weird, isn’t it??

    I don’t have nearly enough information to make heads or tails of this, but given how difficult it is to find the raw emails themselves, I am inclined to believe the media does not want us seeing them and thinking for ourselves on this subject.

    Until this changes or someone links me to the raw emails, I’m going to have to file this under “they called him a white nationalist because he thinks we should have limits on immigration.”

  11. Is reason.com’s comment section the gathering place for bigoted right-wing malcontents who are banned at Stormfront?

    Which of you guys is Nicole Franklin, and which is James Harris Jackson?

    1. We are all full up on toothless, redneck progressive stupidity. Take it elsewhere Rev.

    2. Hi, gecko!

      1. Hi, Nicole!

        1. You can’t even get one guy fired!!!

    3. Do you realize the reason no one believes this article is because you and the media are in lock step equating any disagreement with racism and ignorance? You’re literally the poster child for why most should rightly question this article and many, many others.

      But whatever, keep crying wolf, I’m sure someday it’ll work instead of backfiring constantly.

    4. You really need to eat a bag of dicks followed by a shotgun. Even if you actually are parody, you suck at it. Get a fucking job and lose your virginity you useless hole.

      1. How about I, with others like me, just keep shoving liberal-libertarian progress down your whining, bigoted throat?

        Open wider, clinger. It will go easier for you. Until replacement, which will conclude your hideous defeat in the culture war.

        1. If that were true Miller would have been sacked already lololol

          You lost ahahahaahahaj

          1. You actually figure the slack-jawed bigots are going to win this time? The uneducated, backward losers are ready to change the course of American history and the arc of American progress?

            They lost with the Italians, Asians, and Hispanics.

            They lost with gays, women, and blacks.

            They lost with Catholics, Jews, and agnostics.

            They lost with eastern Europeans, other Asians, the Irish, and other Hispanics.

            But this time, it’s going to be different? This time, the voices of right-wing ignorance and clinger bigotry from can’t-keep-up America are finally to prevail against the elites and their fancy advanced degrees, their elitist standard English, and their modern, successful, educated communities?

            Clingers are gullible by nature and ignorant by choice, but I find it difficult to believe that even the most deplorable right-wing malcontent believes that one. You guys know you have been America’s losers for as long as you have been alive, and that you will continue to lose in America until the day of your replacement. That’s what makes you desperate enough to latch onto Trump That’s what makes you resentful enough to settle for the occasional brick through a mainstream window or a middle finger toward your betters.

            Carry on, clingers. Until replacement, that is.

            1. AHAAHAHAJAJA

              AHAHAHAHAHAHA

              CRY MORRR BECAUSE YOU CANT EFEN GET ONE GUY FIRED

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAH

              AHAHAHAHAHAHA
              AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

              HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              YOU CAN’T EVEN REPLACE ONE FUCKING GUY AHAHAHAHAHHAHA

              YOU TOTALLY LOST

              AHAHAHAHAHAHA
              AAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

              AND YOUR WALLOTEXT PROVED IT LOSSER

              AHAHAHAHAHAHA

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

              1. AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                YOU

                CANT

                EVEN

                REPLACE

                ONE

                GUY!!!

                AAHAHAHAHAHAHHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHHAAHHHAAAHAHAHAH

                ONE GUY

                AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            2. Who lost what, rev? The voices in your head lost to your self importance?

              Yup, you’re a winner, old man. Haha.

      2. Yes, he’s parody. Not to be taken seriously. Probably working for trump/2020.

    5. Holding non-criminal children in cages indefinitely is the libertarian dream.

      1. Poor Tony. His citations always fall off.

        1. reason does not print Libertarian articles.
        2. Its a crime for non-Americans to enter the USA without permission
        3. Obama was keeping children in cages forever too?

        1. Lots of people commit minor crimes and civil infractions. Should you go to a cell indefinitely and have your children put in another cell indefinitely because you ran a red light? My incredulity is simply baffling, I tell you, at why so many people are so fucking obsessed with this one paltry civil infraction that doesn’t even affect them. What could be the real motivation? What, I tell you, what?

          Also, I’ll presume from now on that your starting place for argument for a political position is “Obama did it, so that makes it OK.”

          1. “My incredulity is simply baffling”

            Oh and you tried so hard lololol

          2. All countries do it. And illegal immigration is a felony in countries such as….Mexico.

            Your argument for a political position appears to be: if Orange Man does it, it must be Bad.

            1. My argument is that if children are being thrown in cages for no good reason, libertarians should be against it.

              1. No actually your argument is “waaaaaahhhhhhh!!!!” DOL!!!

                1. Goo Goo Gah Gah! Mary ready for baba yet?

              2. Getting rid of nonAmerican invaders is one of the best reasons.

          3. “Lots of people commit minor crimes and civil infractions. Should you go to a cell indefinitely and have your children put in another cell indefinitely because you ran a red light?”

            What if you keep running the same one, over and over, never stopping?

            These illegals could, you know, leave and go back where they came from. They aren’t obligated to stay here.

            1. “These illegals could, you know, leave and go back where they came from. They aren’t obligated to stay here.”

              Isn’t that what they used to do … you know, BACK WHEN IT WASN’T A PROBLEM?

          4. Tony is too fucking to know we have a CPS service that often separates criminals from their children. Tony is a dumbfuck.

            1. Yes, but most of them are democrats, so totes cool.

          5. It’s not a question so much as “should we do this” but what would be the alternative to not doing it? And first we have to define “locked in a cell”. There’s a lot of strata of meaning and scope in regards to what’s happening at the border.

            If someone crosses the border illegally with children in tow, the standard procedure in any criminal arrest is to separate the children from the parent arrested. In this case, we don’t know if it’s the parent until that’s verified. But if you’re willing to admit that the whole ‘trafficking’ thing is a bullshit panic, then maybe we could streamline that process. If you refuse to admit that “trafficking” is a major international epidemic, then it’s easily argued that it’ll be in the best interest of the child for immigration officials to verify if these children are really the children of people being arrested, or just some kids they snatched along the way.

            That’s the problem with this whole immigration debate, it’s utterly infected with simplistic, one-dimensional thinking and arguing.

            1. He played the flase dichotomy card; if you don’t agree then you must be racist.

            2. it’s utterly infected with simplistic, one-dimensional thinking and arguing.

              You’re right. Conservatards pee their pants about brown immigrants on cue from Rush Limbaugh whether there’s even net immigration or not. They were just as jizzed up about it when there was a recession and no migration at all. They will always be there to tear their eyeballs out in fear of swarthy migrants. It’s what keeps them voting. There is no connection to reality. This is the definition of bigotry. Nobody gives a single slim shit about the porous Canadian border? And terrorists have actually come over that one. Most terrorists (those who aren’t domestic) come legally via airplanes, in fact.

              It’s all a big dog and pony shitshow. And libertarians could be on the front line of freedom on this issue if they so chose. But of course, they don’t actually believe in freedom.

              1. Ahahahah I guess YOU care DOL AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                WALLOTEXT

                HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                SAYS WHO CARES

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                HE OBVIOUSLY DOES

                HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAAH

              2. There are less people, total, in Canada than there are people who have snuck in from the southern border, or tried to, in just a couple decades. But, yeah, totally it’s racist to focus on the southern border.

                Haha.

          6. Tony, entering the country is not a civil infraction. It’s a misdemeanor. No one goes to a cell indefinitely (other than Gitmo). We don’t imprison people for running a red light because when their time for a hearing comes up they usually show up. Although some asylum seekers do sow up for their hearings over 80 percent do not get asylum. But only 1.6 percent ever leave the country. So yes, they should be locked up until their hearing is completed and if denied immediately deported. However, their children make that impossible because of an arbitrary ruling by Judge Dorthy Gee (I am an idiot) that only allows the children to be detained for 20 days. Change that, detain the entire family for 90 days and their hearings will be complete and they can either be welcomed into the country or deported.

            But the Dems don’t want that because the bodies count for congressional representation. They don’t care who comes in. They don’t care if the child is really with a parent. They don’t care if the adult has committed crimes in their country of origin. They also know that these people will go to states that are losing population (CA, NT, IL) and they don’t want to lose house seats.

            As to why “I’m so fucking obsessed with this one paltry civil infraction (I repeat it’s a misdemeanor the first time and a felony the second) its because my son is dead because of this one paltry “civil infraction”. I deal with this shit every day (and have now for over 8 years) speaking with people who have lost a loved one because of what you think is a “paltry civil infraction”. Does an illegal alien have to kill one of your loved ones to wake you up?
            http://www.aviac.us You can make a donation to my group to help educate imbeciles like you.

            1. He doesn’t have any money lololol

          7. How long is “indefinitely”, tony? Are these kids growing beards “in cages”? I’m sure hysterical hyperbole makes sense to you.

      2. An endless supply of trafficked children is Tony’s dream.

    6. Is reason.com’s comment section the gathering place for bigoted right-wing malcontents who are banned at Stormfront?

      You tell us, since that’s where you’re obviously from. After all, the Nazis were a progressive movement.

    7. Your tears of impotent rage are delicious.

    8. My god you stink like cat piss and public transportation.

  12. These members are particularly incensed that Miller is using his part-Jewish background as a cover for his hardline anti-immigration policies.

    Just wait until he uses it as a justification for his net worth!

    1. Wait until he unleashes the powers of his Russian background.

      1. We found the Russian Collusion!!!!!!

  13. Question: has anyone at Reason ever heard of a story called “The Boy Who Cried Wolf”?

    If you’re going to assert that every right-of-center policy in Washington is motivated solely by White Supremacy and nostalgia for the Confederacy, then don’t be surprised when 95% of the population stop listening to you.

    1. It never seems to occur to them that insulting people by calling them racist for holding legitimate differences of opinion doesn’t persuade anyone. They seem to think that because they are more worried about being called a racist than telling the truth, everyone is.

      1. Yep. Cowards are gonna cower.

        1. Not just cowards. They argue like children. Can’t win by persuasion? Just call the other person icky names!

          The sad thing is, the emails might actually be newsworthy! Unfortunately, they’ve done such a good job at thoroughly destroying their own reputation that no one will believe them unless they actually provide the source documents.

          1. Agreed; only saying that name calling instead of arguing against actual points is intellectual cowardice.

            Though when you have nothing else and enough usefull idiots (not you) exist, what else do they have left?

      2. There is no legitimate reason to use child separation as a tool to enforce policy. Especially since we have the memos showing that they knew (Miller included) that they could not keep track of the children and return them to parents. Also that they instituted the 0 tolerance policy for family separation not for safety, as was claimed, but as a deterrent. Aka, let’s punish children for the crimes of their parents.

        That is legitimately evil, and is revealing of your character much more so than some ordinary disagreement of policy. One side wants to knowingly harm children, the other side does not. There is no middle ground and there is no white washing for you.

        Based on this issue, we all know which side of the aisle you would have been on when the reichstag burned. You know the brownshirts became the enemy too, in the end? You’re not gonna get a special seat for being a good boy. Now go run along to your little gay occult orgy, I mean “rally”.

        1. There is no legitimate reason to use child separation as a tool to enforce policy.

          Yeah there is. Children get abused in adult facilities. To prevent that, you keep them separate. That is why Obama did it and why retards like you were never told to have a problem with it.

          You are legitimately evil. You lie about everything. It is demonic how much you lie. You are a disgusting and depraved human being and proof that yes some people are worthy of going to hell regardless of whether such a thing exists.

          1. There is also the whole child trafficking going on with cartels where they transport kids back and forth across the border to try and get family release waivers to unrelated families. Not shocked dumbfucks like de opresso ignore child trafficking.

          2. The pants shitting hysteria over “separated families” is the most moronic bit of hypocritical faux outrage currently in fashion.

            Thousands of US families are separated daily by the criminal justice system.

            We don’t put children in detention facilities with grownups. Duh.

        2. Not sure what you mean by the last paragraph, but otherwise I agree. One also wonders why such strong steps are not taken to simply combat Medicaid and other welfare fraud (as even legal immigrants are not allowed to claim it until a certain amount of residency); this would strike part of the problem (overspending) at its root, rather than trying to stop something that’s been going on for all of human history and will continue for the rest of history.

          The war on immigration works about as well as the war on drugs.

          1. Invasions have been going on for all of human history, and have never before been confronted so gently.

          2. Countries like Japan show that illegal aliens can be kept out if the political will is there.

        3. Widdle baby gonna cwy? You cwying widdle baby?

          1. Just because no woman would let you pay her to touch your dick doesn’t mean other humans don’t care about their children.

            1. You forgot which sock you were using again DOL lolo

              Cwy more widdle baby!!!

              1. If only it were merely your lack of self-awareness and irony that made women not want to even take the remotest chance of reproducing with you.

                1. Aww you can’t stop cwying DOL!!!

                  1. Tulpa, I’m frankly surprised you made it through the holidays alive. You seemed, and still seem, to be going on a downward spiral of insanity where a total lack of bodily control was imminent. Well done.

                    1. OMFG how are you still cwying DOL!!!

                  2. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug can’t stop from thread-shitting.

                    Sarah Palin’s Buttplug thinks that EVERYONE admires Sarah Palin’s Buttplug’s endless thread-shitting.

                    Sarah Palin’s Buttplug is the center of the universe of Sarah Palin’s Buttplug!

                    1. I DONT EVEN KNOW WHO YOU ARE

                      AHAAHHHHHHH@HH@HHHAAHHHHHHHH@

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      WIKIPEDIA!!!

                      AHAHAHAHAHAAJ

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

        4. You’re an idiot. We do this today with citizens who are single parents who run afoul with the law.

          Do you honestly think single fathers with daughters would rather have their children jailed with them versus the alternatives?

          1. I don’t understand why children are being jailed at all.

            1. I don’t understand why you can’t stop cwying DOL ahahahha!!!

            2. Son if we have to arrest single parents, we should just release children to be on their own? Good to know your profile child homelessness.

            3. Would you prefer they were returned to their country of origin immediately? You wouldn’t complain about that too?

        5. “There is no legitimate reason to use child separation as a tool to enforce policy.”

          There is no legitimate reason to enter the country illegally

      3. Stephen Miller is a white nationalist. So is Steve Bannon. If a New Black Panther had gotten within 100 miles of Obama’s White House, you would have crapped your fucking pants in hysteria.

        White nationalism is bad. We already proved it. Like several times.

        1. Widdle DOL gonna cwy? You can’t stop cwying DOL!!!

        2. Poor Tony. His citations always fall off.

          1. The SPLC has it all documented. They did the leg work. But you think you are entitled to reject reporting that you don’t like, so what’s the point of cites? You are an anti-intellectual. You only care about proving yourself right about the dumb shit you believe. And most people like that are racist fucktards anyway. Go to Google. You can find everything you need to find.

            What I want to know is why you aren’t simply defending his beliefs and statements.

            1. lol @ SPLC being a definitive source on anything other than what they believe will help them the most.

              1. Did he deny the veracity of the comments?

                Who cares about Stephen Miller anyway. Isn’t Trump racist enough every day on live TV?

                1. “Who cares about Stephen Miller anyway.”

                  From all the cwying you’ve done in this thread, you do DOL lolololo

                2. Citations still missing Tony. Please use original citations and not paraphrases by other dumbfucks like yourself.

                3. Yes I deny them as they refuse to post all emails fully within context. Until they do so, there is zero reason to believe them.

                  The better question is, if they have 20k emails provide their point, why not release them?

            2. “”. But you think you are entitled to reject reporting that you don’t like,””

              Says the guy that likes to discredit something because it’s on Fox news.

            3. “The SPLC has it all documented. They did the leg work.”

              You shit on Breitbart but will fucking cite the SPLC?

              Seriously?

              Neither are reputable. In the slightest. All you need to be “racist” to the SPLC is a need for them to hit a fund raising goal.

                1. Robby should fill his coworkers in on this.

                2. +1000

                  SPLC #MemoryHoled

            4. It’s weird you say they have it all documented yet they refuse to put the material on their actual servers for others to verify. But tony is so fucking dumb he never learned about primary sources in middle school.

              1. Not weird, but suspect. As cowards always hide themselves behind the veneer of respectability.

            5. SPLC is a hate group.

        3. “Stephen Miller is a white nationalist. So is Steve Bannon. If a New Black Panther had gotten within 100 miles of Obama’s White House”

          The group Obama refused to penalize after they lost a case in court?

          If Miller had anybody in his past in the same ballpark as Jeremiah Wright, you’d be demanding him to be hanged.

          1. Tony never learned of Eric Holder’s college friends apparently.

          2. Miller is himself worse than Wright you dumbfuck. And while Obama disowned Wright for one alarming sermon, Miller still works in the White House.

            1. Aww you can’t stop cwying DOL!!!

            2. Obama disowned Wright for one alarming sermon

              If by one sermon you mean a 35 year history of being a raving psychotic racist and anti-Semite, and if by “disowned” you mean he said:

              [Wright] strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. … I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community

              Then sure.

              Do you ever get tired of being a subhuman retarded piece of lying shit?

              1. He does not.

              2. Do you ever get tired of defending the Republican party decades after it proved itself to be a warmongering fiscally disastrous plutocratic theocratic shitshow?

                1. Misspelled Democratic Party there, son.

                  It’s not Republicans demanding people pretend that people can change their sex due to feelings. That is a belief that cannot be falsified to its adherents and is based on literally nothing.

            3. “Miller is himself worse than Wright you dumbfuck.”

              In what way?

              “And while Obama disowned Wright for one alarming sermon, Miller still works in the White House.”

              Obama CHOSE to attend his church for twenty fucking years. Yes, I’m sure Wright made ONE “problematic” sermon. Note: citing an article from VDare is enough to make one a white nationalist, but attending a church headed by racists for twenty fucking years and naming a book of yours after one of the racists’ sermons is not.

              There is markedly more proof of Obama being a bigot than Miller.

        4. If a New Black Panther had gotten within 100 miles of Obama’s White House, you would have crapped your fucking pants in hysteria.

          You mean like when Malik Shabazz visited the white house in July 2009 and then when Obama got busted on it he literally blamed it on a case of mistaken identity?

          1. Well that’s different because Tony is lying trash.

    2. “Don’t be surprised when 95% of the population stop listening to you.”

      They do the same thing when they rail against the white, blue collar, middle class for being racist, homophobic, xenophobic, etc.

      They won’t believe this is a losing strategy until they lose at one more election. They certainly didn’t learn from losing the last one.

      Try to remember four years ago, when they were running articles here comparing Trump speeches to Nuremberg rallies, complete with the brown-shirt thugs who supposedly roughed up Michelle Fields.

      Try to remember four years ago, when they were reporting on one of Gloria Allred’s clients, a porn star who appears to have done gang-bang and bukakke movies, etc.–and was suing Trump because he kissed on the cheek when they met.

      They’ve been crying “wolf’ for four years, and at this point, Trump could rape a string of interns, use the Ukraine to collect dirt on his opponents, and use racial slurs like a Klansman, and nobody would bother listening anymore.

      The credibility of the MSM is already shot.

      P.S. Isn’t Rolling Stone the one that always gets it wrong? Going back to the UVA rape story in 2014, they’ve been so very, very wrong. I’m not saying they can’t be right about anything, but if there’s someone who’s cried wolf the loudest and the most often, surely Rolling Stone is up near the top of the list.

      1. Oh, and in keeping with the discussion we had earlier today, Rolling Stone has a circulation of about 700,000.

        Fewer than 1 in 330 Americans subscribes to Rolling Stone.

      2. I think they read The Boy Who Cried Wolf and instead of understanding it came away with “If at first you don’t succeed….”

        1. I keep telling Leftists to #CryMore, but apparently they misunderstood me.

      3. Rolling Stone should sit out pretty much every news story except the ones about Bob Dylan… and even then…

  14. Walls closing in on Miller in 2020 (lets see the emails?). When is the next written SCOTUS threats from Democrats- – its been awhile since the NYT and the Democrats tried to frame a justice while verbally threatening the court at the same time.

    1. Yep. No evidence whatsoever presented in this hit piece presented by two of the most progressive leftwing shills on this site. GTFO.

  15. Miller is using his part-Jewish background

    He’s a Jew. What’s with the “part Jewish” shit? This has to be Shikha. I guess her anti-religious bigotry is not confined to Hindus.

    1. It’s kind of gross. She clearly doesn’t understand how gross, because she’s an ignorant anti-semite, but it’s super gross.

    2. I certainly wouldn’t presume to state that all Jews need to agree on the rules of naturalization because of the holocaust.

      My two cents has it that, if anything, Jews should be free to think whatever they want to think for whatever reasons they want.

      1. People thinking for themselves?! Surely you jest!

        1. You know who else said we should all think alike because of our ethnicity?

          1. The white nationalists who think I’m a double-race-traitor for (A) being gay and not having white babies and (B) marrying a Hispanic?

            1. The answer is every tribal group ever. Apparently you included.

            2. Literally nobody cares which faggot you decided to go share your AIDS riddled ass with, and trust me when I tell you that less than nobody ever wanted you to reproduce. Mentally ill defective pieces of shit like you are a self-correcting problem. You don’t breed and you (thankfully) kill yourselves or die of the predictable consequences of your actions.

            3. Well, that certainly explains your preference for open borders.

              1. Principals over principles

            4. Nobody cares. You have delusional self importance.

    3. Progressivism is anti-semitic, hence Reason is anti-semitic

    4. Next week they’ll call him a White Jew.

  16. I read the whole article looking for evidence that Miller had done something illegal, but I didn’t see anything. All I saw was evidence that Miller pushes policies that Rolling Stone doesn’t like.

    “Miller, with his white-nationalist mindset and fervor to enact xenophobic policies, is far from an isolated actor,” Kroll writes. “He’s the leader of a broad operation spread across the federal government.”

    I suspect that Kroll thinks that wanting to deport illegal aliens is indicative of a “white-nationalist mindset” and that building a wall on our southern border is a “xenophobic” policy. Regardless, it’s clear that Kroll thinks that thought crime is an actionable offense.

    Being an adviser to the president doesn’t even require Senate confirmation.

  17. Can you imagine a three-letter agency using embedded people with like-minded ideas and nefarious tactics to reach their goals?!

    On top of that, those people aren’t even elected!

    Crazy!

    Well, enough about impeachment!

  18. “If there was ever a group that should be most sympathetic to the plight of immigrants, to the plight of the downtrodden and to minorities, it should be Jewish people,”

    Then there’s Israel.

    Miko Peled is an Israeli, an author, a public speaker and the son of a famous Israeli general.

    He is also opposed to Israeli apartheid and terrorism against Palestinians.

    Between 38:00 and 45:00 in the video he describes Israeli terrorism.

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TOaxAckFCuQ

    1. Says the asshole who says the holocaust was one big fat giant lie.

      Give credit where credit is due! But that doesn’t include MiseKKK… NO credit is due THERE!

      (Also, the world is FLAT, I’m a tellin’ ya!)

      1. AHAAHAHAJAJA

        HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        WIKIPEDIA AHAHAHH

        HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

        UNBIASED

        AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

        AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

        1. MiseKKK and Tulpa-Satan,
          Sitting in a tree,
          F-U-C-K-I-N-G!
          First cums fascism,
          Then cums genocide,
          Tulpa-Satan?
          He sides with genocide!

          1. AHAHAHAAHAHHA

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            UNBIASED

            AHAHAHAHA

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

          2. Pathetic and lazy, using genocide twice like that.

            The sooner you realize your attempts at humor aren’t funny, the sooner you can stop making an ass of yourself.

            1. You don’t like my shit?

              You’re authorized to NOT read it!

              WHY do you obsess on reading it, then commenting on it? Perhaps because TRUTH HURTS, maybe? MUST… FEND… OFF… TRUTH…

              1. No he means the shit you said you like to eat.

                1. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug claims to have a brain!

                  Ba-Ha!

                  1. I did?

                    AAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    YOU CANT EVEN INSULT ME

                    HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    BRAINLESS

                    AHAHAHAH

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    AND OWNING YOU

                    HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    1. Come on, stop that, please. It’s getting really annoying.

              2. Yes, it is true that you have a poor sense of humor, and I’m sorry it hurts you so.

  19. This article is a twofer of fail – nothing more than character assassination and innuendo – abysmal even be the standards of either author.

  20. When Edith Enron passed away, the average IQ at Reason dropped about 40 points! Please vet your sources as to their political ideology! Otherwise, your articles are only leftist drivel. Don’t waste our time!

    1. Sorry. Edith Efron.

  21. really more because he’s on T’s team.

  22. Thank God President Trump and Stephen Miller are trying to protect our borders from illegal invaders.

    1. Any god that would approve Trump and Miller would be a paltry, slutty being (and illusory, at least in the understanding of ostensible adults).

      1. Any God that would approve of you should not exist.

        1. Come on, some people exist simply to serve as bad examples to others.

          1. I stand corrected.

      2. A Reverend slut shaming God. How odd.

  23. Would it inappropriate to applaud these two for following the Journolist mantra for attacking critics they do not like? Just call em racist and move on.

  24. Another Reason article that should be printed by “in these times” or other hard lefty magazines.
    Very little to agree with and lots of pure BS!
    I am , for the first time in 30+ years wondering why I subscribe to Reason. If a decent Libertarian magazine ever comes along I will dump Reason and their Lefty loons asap.
    I assume Reason has no respect for reader feedback or we would not get so much of this type of crapola.

    1. They know full well how many people they’ve already run off in the last few years. They don’t care a bit. They wouldn’t care if every single article drew zero comments and had close to zero readers.

      The entire point of the enterprise has become pushing the agenda of a small handful of billionaires who now provide almost all their funding.

    2. If a decent Libertarian magazine ever comes along I will dump Reason and their Lefty loons asap.

      There isn’t and won’t be, since the entire ”””””libertarian””””” movement is nothing more or less than the political advocacy department of Koch Industries.

      I assume Reason has no respect for reader feedback

      Here again, you aren’t their customer. You don’t pay their bills. You don’t keep the lights on. Reason, just like Cato, Niskanen, AEI, Americans for Prosperity, et. al., is a single-donor organization.

      1. I’m guessing they get Soros money too these days, based on the team up with Koch

  25. “The Southern Poverty Law Center is one of America’s preeminent libertarian institutions.”

    -Welchie Boy and his minions

    1. Couldn’t a RICO case be made against the SPLC at this point?

      1. On what basis?

        All they do is collect publicly available information and package it to make their case that group A or group B are assholes.

        If that’s the basis for a RICO case, every two-bit blogger in this country is in trouble.

        1. All they do is collect publicly available information and package it to make their case that group A or group B are assholes.

          Make sure to let Floyd Lee Corkins know that.

      2. Libel perhaps. Racketeering, unlikely. Unless you can find an explicit request for a donation in exchange for not getting labeled a racist, and even then it would be simple extortion

    2. Need citation.

      I’ve got a little collection of quotes of Nick going off the deep end. I need some for Welch.

  26. So lefties can ignore any law or rule all over the US but someone in a high position in government cannot believe in the rule of law. Illegal immigrants are butting in line, period.

  27. Miller depicted immigrants of color as criminals and terrorists, and wrote, “it has never been easier in American history for illegal aliens to commit crimes of violence against Americans.” McHugh dutifully published many stories linking immigrants with crime, even though the undocumented are, in fact, less crime-prone than natives.

    Translation: Miller is concerned about illegal, unvetted aliens being potential terrorists; Reason deliberately misrepresents illegal aliens as immigrants; Reason repeats false analyses about criminality of illegal aliens

    Although the White House is hanging tough for now, even accusing the SPLC

    The SPLC is a leftist organization spreading hate and trying to push a political agenda through propaganda.

    “If there was ever a group that should be most sympathetic to the plight of immigrants, to the plight of the downtrodden and to minorities, it should be Jewish people,” Rep. Kim Schrier (D–Wash.), one of the lawmakers, told NPR.

    Well, then Israel should take in all those displaced Syrians, Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghans, Somalis, and other Muslim refugees!

    1. The SPLC, which was notably silent regarding the Hannukah machete attack

    2. “even though the undocumented are, in fact, less crime-prone than natives.”

      Anyone who uses the term “undocumented immigrant” for those that have crossed the border illegally is an agendized lying progtard. They are spewing propaganda and should rightfully be called out on it.

      The term should be reserved for those that have overstayed their visas and no longer have proper documentation , not those that blatantly broke laws to get here.

    3. “Israel should take in all those displaced Syrians, Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghans, Somalis, and other Muslim refugees”
      They’d have to be crazy/suicidal. So would we. Come to think of it, one would have to be crazy/suicidal to vote for Ms. Schrier (or any other Democrat).

      1. My point was that it’s obviously not the position of all Jews, just of privileged, ignorant American Democrats who happen to be Jewish.

  28. Another rousing meeting of Libertarians For ABC Immigration Policies And Practices — Authoritarian, Bigoted, And Cruel!

    1. As written earlier you invalid racist; disagreeing enough proof exists to condemn a man does not equal support for the supposedly codemned.

      Grow up.

      1. Since when do libertarians need proof to be skeptical of a government bureaucrat?

        Is it only when they’re racist cunts? It’s only when they’re racist cunts, isn’t it?

        1. Aaaw you can’t stop cwying DOL!!!

        2. Since when do libertarians need proof to be skeptical of a government bureaucrat?

          Is it only when they’re racist cunts? It’s only when they’re racist cunts, isn’t it?

          Must be, since the entire Reason staff was competing with you to see who could get more of Obama’s cock down their throat for 8 consecutive years.

        3. You have a reading comprehension problem.

          1. No, he’s just an angry old liar. Actually, you’re right, it’s both.

      2. You will be replaced, Michael Langston. By a better American. But not before your betters smack you around some more in the culture war.

        Open wider, clinger.

        1. YOU CAN’T EVEN GET ONE GUY FIRED

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAH

          SOME “REPLACEMENT” AHAHAHAHAJ

          MAYBE TEST YOUR POWER ON MILLER

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          OH WAIT YOU DID AND LOST

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAJAJAJAJAHAAHAHAHAHAH

          1. MILLER SAYS

            “FUCK YOU REV, REPLACE THIS”

            AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA

            AND THEN YOU LOST

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            1. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug going postal in 5-4-3-2…

              Sarah Palin’s Buttplug thinks that the whole galaxy will adore and worship Sarah Palin’s Buttplug for Sarah Palin’s Buttplug’s great services to humanity!

              1. CRY MORE

                AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                WIKIPEDIA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        2. lol – if, and eventually when, I’m replaced my only hope is it isn’t a bigoted racist like you. And scine my children don’t believe as you, I doubt that will happen.

          But good luck to you. Even racist bigots need hope. Afterall Hitler had children too.

    2. “I convict thee of MeanFeelz!”

  29. According to McHugh, even though Miller was working for Sessions, he was effectively “the editorial director of the political section of Breitbart News.”

    Bleech… what is with this cozy relationship between the media and politicians? Isn’t it time to drain the swamp? I mean since when did libertarians become apologists for state-run media channel #2 cavorting with members of Congress?

    1. You got banned for posting kiddie porn and then I took your name as payment for the bet you never paid off.

      1. Dude, I’m Tony. You’re picking on the wrong sock, handle-thief scum. Are you 14 years old, BTW?

        1. Cry more Shreek lolololol

          1. Mary like nice warm baba yet? Goo Goo Gah Gah!

  30. You know, when it comes to the commenters here who pride themselves on their ability to tell hard truths to the Leftist and socialist minority on here you all seem pretty guileless when it comes to what government officials tell you.

    1. You know, when it comes to pedophiles posting kiddie porn links and getting banned, that describes you.

      1. When it cums to a SUPREME thread-shitting asshole, who EVERYONE wishes would just GO AWAY, that describes YOU, right, Tulpa-Satan?

        1. Hey look, Mikey Hinn the demented senile useless piece of subhuman shit defends the admitted sockpuppeting Stalin-apologist radical left wing troll.

          1. Hey look, idiot spouts gibberish! We can NOT even see WHICH side of the fence, the idiot sits and shits on!

            1. AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

              AHAHAHHAAH

              WIKIPEDIA

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

              HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              1. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug’s (AKA Tulpa-Satan’s) brain…

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                AHAHAHHAAH

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                1. AHAAHAHAJAJA

                  HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  TOTALLY GETTING TO YOU

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                  HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  CRY MORE ABOUT BEING MOCKED

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                  HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  WIKIPEDIA

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                  HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

            2. Unlike you, who eats shit on both sides of any fence.

              1. He actually said he likes to eat shit.

              2. MUST… FEND… OFF… TRUTH…

                Ideas about truth, justice, facts, logic… Fend them OFF with childish obsessions about… POOP!!! Freud was full of shit, for most of us, but then again, maybe Freud had SOME insights into R Mac and Tulpa-Satan…

                1. USE WIKIPEDIA

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  UNBIASED

                  AHAHAHAH

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  HE ACTUALLY SAID THAT

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                  HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                  AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                2. You said you like to eat shit. Why are you crying when we talk about you saying you like to eat shit shit eater? You said it. Now you’re crying.

                3. Since you eat shit, I’m guessing you’re the one with the anal, and oral, fetish.

                  1. Cannot defend indefensible fascism… MUST divert to talking about poop…

  31. The Pioneer Fund also established Cold Spring Harbor Labs, who gave us our understanding of molecular genetics — DNA and all that — as well as developing hybrid crops.

  32. Reason:

    McHugh dutifully published many stories linking immigrants with crime, even though the undocumented are, in fact, less crime-prone [link] than natives.

    At the link, we find:

    Light and Purdue University sociology graduate student Ty Miller used state-level immigration data from the Center for Migration Studies and the Pew Research Center spanning 1990 to 2014, comparing undocumented immigration rates to an index of violent crimes — homicide, rape, robbery and aggravated assault — kept by the FBI. They also examined the impact of undocumented immigration on violent victimization rates from the National Crime Victimization Survey. […] More undocumented immigration meant less violent crime. According to the study, a 1 percent increase in the proportion of the population that is undocumented is associated with 49 fewer violent crimes per 100,000 people. […] That immigration waxed while crime waned didn’t necessarily mean undocumented immigrants helped the country reduce violent crime.

    Reason misrepresents a state level negative correlation as evidence that “the undocumented are, in fact, less crime-prone than natives”. This is not evidence that “the undocumented are, in fact, less crime-prone than natives”.

    Incompetence or deliberate propaganda?

    1. Deliberate propaganda.
      Reason magazine: progress uber alles

      1. Reason magazine: Source of propaganda that pollutes the purity of the essences of the (supposed but probably imaginary) brains of Nardless the Nadless!

        Please abandon ship, and go elsewhere, Nardless the Nadless, before the purity of your essences are polluted yet further!

        1. YOU MEAN LIKE TO WIKIPEDIA

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

          HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAAH

          UNBIASED

          AHAHA

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAH
          AHAAHHHHHHH@HH@HHHAAHHHHHHHH@

        2. “Nardless the Nadless”

          Not funny, but makes up for it by being stupid.

          1. He just reeks of desperation and feces.

        3. Please abandon ship, and go elsewhere,

          Oh, don’t worry: should socialists actually take over, people will certainly “abandon ship”.

        4. I’d wager that more people want you, sqrlsy, gone than I.

          1. For the smell alone.

          2. MUST… FEND… OFF… TRUTH…

            You’d rather read baby-babble from Tulpa-Satan… It suits your intellectual level better. Growing and learning is painful! Ignorance is bliss!

            1. AHAHAHAHAHAHA

              YOU SAID

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

              AHAH

              WIKIPEDIA

              AHAHAHAAHHA

              AHAHAH

              AHAHAHAHAHAHA

              UNBIASED

              AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

              EAT MORE SHIT

              AHAHAHAHAHAHA

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

            2. You babbling like a wild hyena has nothing to do with truth.

              1. I think he might actually have rabies

    2. Incompetence or deliberate propaganda?

      The latter. There is not a single person working for the Reason foundation who could comprehend even the executive summary of that study, let alone the actual data. There has never been a sadder conglomeration of pig ignorant dilettantes probably in the entire history of publishing. NYT and WaPo are psychopathic liars, but they’re intelligent enough to actually craft the lies. Reason is merely a disinformation aggregator.

    3. What, straight up lying isn’t a choice?

      1. It’s always a choice, as you show us all the time! You and JesseAZ and all the other Trump-balls-garglers!

        1. RIGHT!! LIKE WHEN I POINT IT OUT!!! LIKE YOU SAYING

          AHAHAHAHAHAHA

          WIKIPEDIA IS UNBIASED

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

          AHAHAH

          AHAHAHAHAHAHA

          OWNING YOU

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

          HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

          1. AHAAHHHHHHH@HH@HHHAAHHHHHHHH@

            HE WALKED

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

            INTO THAT

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

  33. Hey remember when comparing Jews to Nazis was universally considered a racist trope?

    1. It’s only bad when you do it with Nazi-collaborator George Soros (whose ideology is just as totalitarian)

      1. George Soros helped gas and burn jews in the NAZI ovens?

        Who knew?! Well, NOW we know!

        1. AHAHAHAHAHA

          AHAHAHAHAHAHA

          WIKIPEDIA

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

          HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          HAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

        2. “George Soros helped gas and burn jews in the NAZI ovens?

          Who knew”

          THE ENTIRE WORLD SHIT EQTER!!!

          AAHAHAAHAHJ

          AHAHAHAHAHAHA

          EVEN WIKIPEDIA

          AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA

          HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

          1. HE ACTUALLY TRIED

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            TO NAZI DENY

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            WELL KNOW NAZI COLLABORATOR SOROS

            AHAHAHAHAHAHA

            AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

            OMFG

            HHAHAHAJAJAJAJAJAJ

            1. No no Soros want a Nazi,

              GO WITH THAT

              AHAHAHAHAHAHA

              AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

              HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

              HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

              1. Sure sure Soros totally wasn’t a NAZI

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                RUN ON THAT ONE

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                1. Sarah Palin’s Buttplug…

                  A being with NO purpose in life, other than trolling and thread-shitting! You gonna get that inscribed on your tombstone?

                  Sarah Palin’s Buttplug… Who WASTED gravity!

                  1. AAHAHAHAHAHHA

                    HE TRIED

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    TO NAZI DENY

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    GEORGE SOROS

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                    HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    WIKIPEDIA!!!

                    AHAHAHAHAHAAJ AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                    1. AAHAHAHAHAHHA

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHA

                      AND THEN

                      HE DOUBLED DOWN!!!

                      AHAHAHAHAHAAJ

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH

                      WIKIPEDIA!!!

                      AHAHAHAHAHAAJ

                      AHAHAHAHAHAHAH
                      WIKI

          1. Soros is literally a Nazi collaborator.

            1. Is he also collaborating with Genghis Khan? Are dead people taking over the planet? Do we need to man battle stations NOW, to fend off the zombies?

              What shall we DO, Commander?!?!!?

              1. You’re a hysterical ignorant moron.

                George Soros admits Nazi collaboration with no regrets https://youtu.be/W8Id0-Lsyr0

  34. Shikha is providing a pro-liberty service by reporting on the nasty behavior of Miller. He does need to be deported from the White House and from all government offices. He may not be a white nationalist but he sure is a ruthless, heartless, and xenophobic human being. Look at the man’s photo – it makes me shudder to see that grim face. He looks like a man who could do a lot of damage.

    1. Have you seen Adam Schiff?

    2. “So scary and nasty! Now submit to Invasion USA or I will call you scary and nasty too!”

  35. I’m looking for any public or private statement of Miller advocating govt taking away natural rights from anyone who is not “white”? Or forcing private firms to discriminate based on race. This would be evidence of an attack on individuals and our constitutional rights. And he should be fired. Being against illegal immigration or even favoring immigration from countries which have higher skills is not white supremacy.

    It seems time and again Reason is after showing the far left establishment they are really good folks and should be invited to their parties in Georgetown or some high end place in NYC or LA. Seriously it is getting annoying….let’s be sure to mention Ron Paul and paleoconservative and Tom Woods and so on..hey throw in Dave Smith..

    You can be a libertarian and not want open borders..you can be a libertarian and be against foreign intervention (neocons seem to have found a warm place at Reason these days), you can be a libertarian and not be freaking out about “climate change.” and yes you can be a libertarian and be against group rights.

    Where are all the congressman, senators, and governors advocating for stripping the bill of rights from citizens who are not with European background? I have yet to hear one. We have a small minority of very unhappy “libertarians” who just want t be loved by the left…

    What’s next digging Cathy Young up or inviting Max Boot or Kristol on to say America must defend the world and Goldman Sachs? Smearing real libertarians who are not multiculturalist and don’t live in DC seems to be Reason’s MO these days….as Trump would say…Sad.

    1. It’s the cocktail parties.

  36. Dalmia schleps out “Camp of the Saints” once again. Her links supporting the claim that it’s a white supremacist favorite lead through two of her own past articles to a 2001 SPLC post that makes the claim with no supporting evidence.

    https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2001/racist-book-camp-saints-gains-popularity

    SPLC collapses on the nearest fainting couch over the WSJ opining that the book has moments “of appalling power and occasionally a terrible beauty” — after all, if it’s a book saying things the SPLC wants to ban, then the book must have warts and a hunchback, right?

    Dalmia’s bugaboos aren’t based on evidence and not reasoned. Very little at Reason is anymore…

  37. One wonders if Miller’s side ever truly wins will he jump in the oven himself or will they have to shove him in.

  38. IT’S OK TO BE WHITE.

  39. “His behavior is contrary to everything in our ethos.”

    Yeah, no it’s not. I hate when some Jews claim to speak on our behalf (or any group that tries to speak on behalf of all people). It’s not contrary to our ethos at all to want to keep out people who hate us and kill and persecute our people throughout the Middle East and Western Europe.

    1. “even though the undocumented are, in fact, less crime-prone than natives.”

      Also, go fuck yourselves for using this shitty logic. Illegal immigrants are not less crime-prone than natives. They’re less crime prone than blacks and hispanics. Stop being duplicitous with your groupings in order to attack white Americans.

    2. It’s not contrary to our ethos at all to want to keep out people who hate us and kill and persecute our people throughout the Middle East and Western Europe.

      Which, incidentally, is pretty much government policy in Israel, and for good reason.

  40. “If there was ever a group that should be most sympathetic to the plight of immigrants, to the plight of the downtrodden and to minorities, it should be Jewish people,” Rep. Kim Schrier (D–Wash.),

    It’s interesting Reason approves the assertion people of certain ethnic groups must have certain beliefs. Libertarians oppose this.

  41. Can someone just fucking put a muzzle and straightjacket on Tulpa already? I mean Jesus.

Please to post comments