The Crackdown on CBD in Food and Beverages Spreads To Oregon

Targeting CBD companies that make spurious health claims is one thing. Going after culinary experimentation is ridiculous.


Last week, Oregon's state liquor control board banned the addition of an increasingly popular ingredient to the alcohol beverages it regulates. The Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC), which regulates both alcohol and cannabis in Oregon, announced it would ban the sale of alcohol drinks containing cannabidiol—commonly known as CBD—a substance found in cannabis.

The ban, which takes effect next week, was unexpected.

"Up to now, Oregon has been relatively permissive in its approach to CBD consumption," the East Oregonian reports. "In 2015, the state Legislature said hemp and marijuana could legally be added to foods."

In a September column, I reported on Washington State's decision to ban CBD sales by any retailer that's not a licensed cannabis shop. I noted Washington's move was just the latest example of a growing crackdown on CBD sales. And I laid the blame for the increasing regulatory pressure on CBD sales squarely at the feet of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). States may be cracking down on CBD, but the FDA is providing directions. 

For example, last year, the FDA ordered Long Trail, the Vermont brewer, to stop adding CBD to its beer. And just last month, the FDA announced it had sent warning letters to more than a dozen companies that make health claims about the CBD products they produce. For example, the FDA alleges that Daddy Burt Hemp of Kentucky, which the agency says markets CBD oils and gummies through its website, claimed CBDs may be used to treat autism, a claim the agency questions.

Just as Washington State's crackdown on CBDs may have been spurred by the FDA, Oregon's move last week also appears to have been inspired by the FDA's aggressive stance. "To some degree, [the OLCC] is following in the footsteps of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration," the East Oregonian reported.

The OLCC isn't done yet, either. While the agency says it will begin penalizing anyone who continues to sell CBD-infused alcohol sellers in February, the agency is already looking to close a loophole that allows bars to add CBD oils to mixed drinks they serve.

"We're considering just outright saying that [CBD is] an adulterant for alcohol so you wouldn't just be able to mix the cocktails," OLCC chief Steve Marks told the East Oregonian.

Coalition Brewing, based in Portland, introduced its Two Flowers IPA, billed as the first CBD-infused beer produced and sold in Oregon, in 2016. If unscrupulous marketing lies at the heart of the growing pushback against CBD, then Coalition Brewing's marketing approach seemed to reside at the opposite end of that spectrum.

In an excellent piece in October, a site dedicated to beer journalism, Diana Hubble described Coalition Brewing as "careful not to overstate the effect [Two Flowers] might have on consumers" and unwilling to position its CBD-infused beer as "some sort of miracle panacea." (I reached out to Coalition but learned the brewery closed last month. Reports suggest Coalition may have been the only brewer of CDB-infused beers in the state.)

Despite Oregon's crackdown and the demise of Coalition Brewing, CBD-infused beer is having a moment. Last year, craft beer giant Lagunitas introduced Hi-Fi Hops, a sparkling water that contains CBD or THC—the latter of which is the thing in cannabis that gets you high.  Earlier this year, "Libertarian iconoclast" Mason Hembree sold his Colorado brewery to a cannabis company that also now owns Hembree's "patent-pending process for infusing… CBD into beer in a cost-effective way." Last month, Hop & Hemp Brewing, a London-based brewer, introduced a very low (0.5%) ABV, CBD-infused beer. Also last month, a cannabis website touted CBD-infused beer as "the next BIG thing."

As I wrote in September, I have no problem with the FDA moving to crack down on fishy claims made by a few CBD sellers. But while targeting of CBD foods should be the exception, it's increasingly becoming the rule.

NEXT: An Incomplete Map of Uberland

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Many states have become “laboratories of fascism”.

  2. the FDA announced it had sent warning letters to more than a dozen companies that make health claims about the CBD products they produce. For example, the FDA alleges that Daddy Burt Hemp … claimed CBDs may be used to treat autism, a claim the agency questions.

    Serious question: Does the FDA send “warning letters” to the (other) 10,000 companies that make health claims addressed by the standard FDA disclaimer?

  3. Anything not expressly allowed is prohibited. And don’t just take my word for it.

    1. “Right now, if there is not something expressly in this code that says that you can have one, you technically can’t,” Blakeman confirmed.

      Let the lawsuits begin.

      “The intention of it is to not to take away, it is to give,” he said.

      “Also, War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.”

      1. No, if they actually have a legal system in that town that makes everything illegal unless permitted, then passing laws to permit certain things definitely is intended to give rather than take away freedom, since one’s freedom is 0-based in their legal system.

        It’s just not credible that such a legal system exists, however. No code could possibly be voluminous enough to encompass just the actions one might undertake in any minute of one’s life, especially when you consider how finely actions can be broken down and described. Like you’d need specific permission to button this button, and then for whichever hole to button it into, and the order in which to button or unbutton a garment, and the time of day, and which hand to use, and which fingers….

        1. Not explicitly, but ‘Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime’ is just as effective.

  4. Meanwhile in all HyR’s coverage of vaping nicotine and THC, I see no mention of vaping CBD, which is also a thing. I have a friend who inhales separate THC and CBD vapes.

  5. Thisone is amazing article. You can check Brookdale Employee Login from here.

  6. This company help me get off my CBD oil business from ground up

  7. Google pay 350$ reliably my last pay check was $45000 working 9 hours out of consistently on the web. My increasingly youthful kinfolk mate has been averaging 19k all through continuous months and he works around 24 hours reliably. I can’t trust in howdirect it was once I attempted it out.This is my essential concern.for more info visit any tab this site Thanks a lot ……… Click Open The Site

  8. This is what happens when you are okay with drug deregulation rather than repealing the Controlled substances act and enforcing that states do not have the constitutional power to ban products or services.

  9. I became a teetotaler 30 years ago because my employees warned me that they feared I was becoming an alcoholic. My children agreed. But I have no objection to adding one non-addictive behavior altering substance to another — as long as it’s prominently stated on the label. My entire family imbibes small amounts socially and I worry. I also wonder about the rationale for these additives.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.