Review: The Current War: Director's Cut
Lighting up with Benedict Cumberbatch and Michael Shannon.

The Current War is an elegantly made movie about the late-19th Century battle between Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse to be the first to light up America with electrical power. As you might remember—no dozing! —Edison was the champion of direct current (DC), while Westinghouse promoted the riskier but cheaper alternating current (AC). The movie—no yawning either! —stirs this dry subject to life with a lean script by Michael Mitnick, rich production design by Jan Roelfs, deftly organized cinematography by Chung Chung-hoon, and a strong cast that includes Benedict Cumberbatch as Edison and Michael Shannon as Westinghouse. It's not like homework, in other words. But it is a picture that was shot in 2016, so why is it just now reaching us?
The Current War actually premiered at the 2017 Toronto International Film Festival, in an unfinished form that the director, Alfonso Gomez-Rejon, openly disliked, as did most everybody else. In subsequent interviews, Gomez-Rejon blamed that bad cut of the movie on famously meddlesome producer Harvey Weinstein, who later reedited the whole film without the director's knowledge. This Weinstein problem eventually disappeared amid the uproar over revelations about his long history of sexual loutishness, but his toppling left Gomez-Rejon's movie homeless.
Eventually—be patient! —Martin Scorsese stepped in. Gomez-Rejon had worked for Scorsese as a personal assistant and second-unit director, and the older filmmaker's intercession at this point won his protégé time for further shooting and other useful tinkerings. So now the movie is finally getting a full release, this time with an emphatic subtitle: "Director's Cut."
The picture is somewhat old-fashioned, but not in a fuddy-duddy way. It offers a burnished depiction of life before electric light—a world of candles and oil lamps softly illuminating the heavy mahogany furniture and brocade curtains of the period. We see the contrast with the world that is soon to come in the opening scene, set on a snowy night in 1880. A train pulls up through the flurries and a group of wealthy men in top hats debarks. They make their way to a nearby field, which is ablaze with light from scores of incandescent bulbs affixed to poles. Thomas Edison, showman and inventor, always in search of financing, is waiting for them. "I hope you brought your checkbooks," he tells his guests.
The movie portrays Edison as an idealist (he refuses to work on any project intended to take human lives), but one who makes occasional visits to the dark side. Cumberbatch underplays this latter aspect of the man's nature, but it's clear enough in the occasional chilly set of his features, and in scenes like the one in which Edison tries to demonstrate the danger of Westinghouse's higher-voltage AC current by using it to publicly execute a horse. (Edison later staged the public execution of an elephant, and later still schemed to blacken AC's image by arranging to have it used to power the first electric chair.)
Shannon's George Westinghouse is—stop fidgeting! —Edison's opposite. Already wealthy from his invention of railway air brakes, Westinghouse believes that every man should endeavor to leave the world a better place than he found it, and he wants to partner with Edison to forge the country's electrical future. Edison, a stranger to charm, rudely rebuffs him.
Orbiting these two are a pair of wives (minimally utilized Tuppence Middleton and Katherine Waterston), the moneybags investor J.P. Morgan (Matthew Macfadyen), Edison's peppy aide-de-camp Samuel Insull (Tom Holland), and a brilliant young Serb immigrant named Nikola Tesla (Nicholas Hoult), who's already employed in Edison's European operation. Tesla has a track record in wireless and X-ray technology, and he is transfixed (briefly) by Edison's entrepreneurial brilliance. "We make a minor invention every 10 days," Edison tells him, "and a major one every six months or so." Bringing him aboard, the great man offers Tesla a derisory starting wage, but promises a $50,000 bonus if he proves worthy. Edison being a man of many surprises, this turns out to be a bald lie.
Normally, a movie about electrical science, if that's what it's called, might be a trudge, and The Current War isn't any kind of action movie. But Gomez-Rejon holds our interest in these two differently-gifted characters, who are standing on the brink of an enormous social change. In some scenes, he's even able to conjure a bit of the awe that people must have felt in that age of wizards and wonders. Addressing a crowd at the New York Stock Exchange in 1882, as he's about to flip a switch and light the place up, Edison says, "My boys and I caught in a jar what before now has only flashed across the night sky." Thanks, Tom.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Now I know what I’m going to go see this holiday season. Far from being homework, this sounds like fun. I read a book called “Empires of Light” a while back, and this movie sounds like it brings the same three characters- Edison, Westinghouse, and Tesla- to life.
Edison elephant electrocution probably isn’t true. See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topsy_(elephant)
Fascinating, thanks for the link. The idea of "hanging" an elephant is bizarre. It also seems strange to have the two electrocution points on two feet, rather than go through the head, but it seems to have worked; I've never thought much about how electrocution kills in any technical sense.
Make damned sure it doesn't go through your heart.
"I’ve never thought much about how electrocution kills in any technical sense."
Two ways:
1. stop the heart. If the current actually crosses the heart, it only takes a few milliamps to stop the heart. Dead.
2. Hit someone with enough current, for long enough, and (as long as it doesn't cross the heart) it will cook them alive.
"The movie portrays Edison as an idealist (he refuses to work on any project intended to take human lives)"
This would be an outright lie. Edison bankrolled the invention of the electric chair</a? as a means of human execution as part of his campaign to discredit AC current as too dangerous.
True. The support for the electrical chair and the reasons for it were despicable.
True, and fairly humane electrocution to stop the heart would only need two electrodes, one on either side of the chest, and not a lot of current or voltage.
The Electric Chair is more or less designed to cook the victim.
Tesla >> Edison.
The Oatmeal lays it out here:
https://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla
Edison also owes a lot of the early success of GE to Charles Steinmetz.
Animals are "destroyed", not executed. Only people can be executed...
Thomas Edison had no trouble endorsing Vin Mariani coca wine. But Edison converted to Prohibitionism, first of cigarettes (little white slavers) then everything banned under the 18th Amendment . Even in 1930--after reckless murders at the hands of government and volunteer "dry killers" tallied some 1500 deaths, Thomas Edison was quoted by Samuel Crowther as all in favor of men with guns as THE path away from beer and toward economic growth and prosperity.
AC isn't better because it's cheaper but because it travels farther.
Yup. You would need a generating plant every few blocks with DC.