Trump's Tariffs on Mexican Imports Would Be Biggest Tax Increase in Decades
If the tariffs ramp-up all the way to 25 percent, as Trump has threatened, they would be the biggest tax increase since 1968.

President Donald Trump is about to challenge Bill Clinton and Lyndon Johnson for a record few Republicans would want to achieve.
If Trump follows through with his plan to hit all Mexican imports with tariffs, the 5 percent import taxes scheduled to take effect on June 10 would push the cumulative cost of Trump's trade war ahead of the 1993 tax increase signed by then–President Bill Clinton.
According to an analysis from the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan think tank, existing tariffs imposed by the Trump administration would generate $69 billion in federal revenue over a full year—equivalent to about 0.32 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). As Axios notes, the hit from new 5 percent tariffs on all Mexican imports would be another $17 billion, or about 0.08 percent of GDP.
The 1993 tax increase, which triggered a Republican takeover of Congress and fueled a decades-long GOP aversion to raising taxes, increased federal revenue by about 0.36 percent of GDP, according to U.S. Treasury data. The only larger tax increase to pass since 1993 was the Affordable Care Act, which hiked taxes by 0.43 percent of GDP—though it did not hit that level until the fourth year after it had been passed (in part because the law was specifically structured to avoid looking like a large tax increase).
The White House has threatened to escalate those tariffs each month unless Mexico takes as-yet-unspecified actions to curb the flow of migrants toward the United States' southern border, with a maximum tariff of 25 percent to be implemented by early October. Trump is "absolutely, deadly serious" about following through with those threatened tariff hikes, White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney told Fox News on Sunday.
If Trump goes through his with threats to raise tariffs to 25 percent on all Chinese and Mexican imports, the Tax Foundation says, federal tax revenue would increase by $241 billion—about 1.24 percent of GDP. That would be the biggest tax increase since the Johnson administration, according to Treasury data.
It's not hard to see why tariffs on Mexican imports would be a drag on the American economy. Mexico is the United States' third biggest trading partner, behind only China and Canada. In 2018, the U.S. imported $346.5 billion worth of goods from Mexico. Mexico is the biggest source of agricultural goods into the United States, but it's also a major supplier for other industries.
The automotive sector would likely be hardest hit. Last year, American companies imported more than $115 billion worth of cars and car parts from Mexico. Thanks to decades of mostly tariff-free trade between the two countries, many automakers have supply chains sprawling freely from one side of the Rio Grande to the other. As Bloomberg demonstrated in a useful 2017 infographic, a single car seat might zig-zag across the border several times before being installed in a sedan built in South Carolina or a truck in Michigan.
"The auto sector—and the 10 million American jobs it supports—relies upon the North American supply chain and cross border commerce to remain globally competitive," says David Schwietert, interim president and CEO of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, in a statement about the proposed tariffs. "Any barrier to the flow of commerce across the U.S.-Mexico border will have a cascading effect—harming U.S. consumers, threatening American jobs and investment, curtailing the economic progress that the administration is working to reignite, and potentially stalling efforts to ratify the agreement in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. Congress."
Those cross-border supply chains have bolstered manufacturing jobs on both sides of the Rio Grande. There's been a 50 percent increase in American automaking jobs since 2011, according to the American Automotive Policy Council. And greater job prospects in Mexico have been credited with slowing illegal immigration, so disrupting U.S.–Mexican trade may well increase the illegal immigration it is supposed to stop.
"Intertwining difficult trade, tariff and immigration issues creates a Molotov cocktail of policy," tweets Jay Timmons, president and CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers.
And it means a huge tax increase for Americans—one that might even make Democratic presidents think twice.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I never thought I would live so long as to see the Republican Party become the party of higher taxes. And not just the Republicans, the most of the conservative ideological spectrum. Yet here we are.
When distant generations read about libertarians being "socially liberal yet fiscally conservative", they'll shake their head in wonder at what we ever meant by "liberal" and "conservative". Today's liberals are socially intolerant, and today's conservatives are fiscal spendthrifts.
Hello, Brandybuck!
That's because liberals are really illiberal and those conservatives-now-turned-Trumpistas were always Fascist and not real conservatives. There's nothing conservative about being for tariffs, for protectionism, for higher spending and against brown people.
I don't see how this is fascist. It's just stupid.
I also don't see how this is colorist, either. Trump merely has a fetish for tariffs.
I plan to wait for emergence of the videotape before reaching a conclusion about Trump's fetishes.
I plan to wait for emergence of the videotape before reaching a conclusion about Trump’s fetishes.
Reply
I bet you are you perv.
Always gotta play the race card!
Amen
I do not know what distant generations will say.
Please don’t talk about me when I’m gone.
Should not even post this.
https://tinyurl.com/Leon-dont-talkaboutme
"Today’s liberals are socially intolerant"
Some right-wingers just can't abide the progress that has placed bigots at our society's lesser fringe.
They long for the good old days when blacks knew their place (or were taught it), women weren't welcome in graduate schools, drunken drivers weren't persecuted, husbands could smack around wives and children without interference, gays were beaten in alleys, school prayer was common, and coathanger abortions were just part of the deal.
Stomping those losers in the culture war has been important and enjoyable.
Look - it's Rev Kookland with his daily rant against his 'lessers.'
To be fair it is difficult to discern old Mexican from Kirkland these days.
That says more about you than it says about either Kirkland or Old Mexican. Those two guys have very different styles of discourse.
Just proof of the the liberals intolerance right here!
Republicans have pretty much always supported higher taxes. They just said they didn't, but they were lying.
I bet Republicans would cut taxes more if Democrats helped them get to the 60 Senators that they need to pass.
Until then, we will let Democrats be the Party of slavery and gimmees, which siccing the propagandists on the GOP to constantly say how they are mean and push grandmothers in wheelchairs off cliffs.
The GOP has a platform of smaller government and lower taxes and they should stick to it.
LOL!! Have you been under a rock for the last 35 years?.....The GOP wasn't even that fiscally conservative under Reagan!
Adam Smith on tariffs to offset local taxes on production:
"It will generally be advantageous to lay some burden upon foreign industry for the encouragement of domestic industry, when some tax is imposed at home upon the produce of the latter. In this case, it seems reasonable that an equal tax should be imposed upon the like produce of the former. This would not give the monopoly of the borne market to domestic industry, nor turn towards a particular employment a greater share of the stock and labour of the country, than what would naturally go to it. It would only hinder any part of what would naturally go to it from being turned away by the tax into a less natural direction, and would leave the competition between foreign and domestic industry, after the tax, as nearly as possible upon the same footing as before it."
He may or may not be correct in his assertion here, but what does this have to do with Trump's tariffs on Mexican imports?
You tax the shit out of domestic producers by way of the regulatory state - OSHA and the EPA and minimum wage laws and the DoL Wage and Hour Division, the IRS and the class-action lawyers and all the product safety and testing and labeling mandates - and therefore you must level the playing field by taxing the shit out of foreign producers who do not enjoy the benefits of a wealthy country that can afford to give a crap about the environment and worker safety and a living wage and a 40-hour work week in an air-conditioned office free from sexual harassment and misgendering microaggressions with some fucking two-ply toilet paper in the bathroom and what the hell's with this store-brand coffee in the breakroom bullshit?
The very reason stuff isn't made here anymore?
Well I'll be dipped
This is why Rothbard hated Adam Smith. Smith was a terrible economist. Don't waste your time with Smith. Read some Bastiat instead.
---"Those cross-border supply chains have bolstered manufacturing jobs on both sides of the Rio Grande."---
Well, the president has said the solution to that problem (which he's causing) is to "bring back" those fragile supply chains that were so carefully created and laid throughout decades of (almost) tariff-free trade, back into the US. Because that's how the president's mind operates: in simplistic, childish images.
Our only option is to turn every California celebrity home into an orange Grove or a lettuce field.
+100
But where in the holy fuck can I get an avacado?
Oh noes!
What country can replace the counterfeit vanilla and poor-taxidermied frog mariachi band dioramas?
Treason is, once again, engaging in poor "journalism." Trump is the victim. He doesn't want to propose these destructive policies; make ill-advised threats; and otherwise make poor decisions. After all, a smart individual such as him wouldn't even dream of these actions.
It's quite clear there's another force at work. Another "person" must be pulling the strings. And this isn't the tinfoil hat talking! (I threw that out a while ago after it became associated with the sexy alien-government parties I held in the park. Fucking cops.)
Remember the tiny little alien homunculus inside the head of the dead human cadaver? In "Men in Black"? Trump's got one of those inside his head, and his homunculus has gone berserk! So it's not Trump's fault, and we MUST forgive Trump!
(WHERE can we get a new, better, replacement alien homunculus for Trump, anyway?!?!?)
A replacement for THIS guy, that is! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDObFetwDis
She had that hot cute nerdy thing going.
The rest of the movie was good also.
+1 Egar Suit
Fiorentino yum.
If we must have taxes, I'm glad we're getting one that helps keep illegal migrants out of the country. At least I feel I'm getting something for my money.
A whiter America may be your plan, Homple, but you are going to fail -- much as your betters have been crushing your preferences throughout our lifetimes.
Rev Kookland speaks !!!
“your betters”
Which race is that?
No race in particular but mostly white people with jobs in academia, media, Silicon Valley or fastened to a donation teat on some rich guy's foundation.
Not a tax increase if ya dont buy the product.
...just say'n.
Reason covered this already with washing machines. You will pay higher prices even if the product was made here.
Like the soda tax! Very sensible policy.
Supply and demand says otherwise. If an American manufacturer can now sell their product at a higher price and still remain competitive in the market, guess what those greedy capitalists will do. What Comrade Trump needs to do next is put price controls on domestic goods to save this country from the evil capitalists who hate our nation.
But Hillary.
Warmonger and wage thief. All the best internet beta males were saying so.
Hillary can shake her dick like all the best males can.
A tariff isn't a tax! It's an investment in a cleaner, brighter, fresher-smelling future! For our children! Yeah, that's the ticket. Wait'll you get a load of the investment we're going to make in the Green New Deal, Medicaid For All, Free College For All, Universal Daycare For All, Guaranteed Basic Income, Reparations, Preparations, and solar-powered, free-range, fair-trade, organic, gluten-free, flying unicorns - we'll all be billionaires when all these programs get done paying for themselves.
One of these days Eric will actually link to the prior in increased inflation ratea... one day.
Illegal immigration is already a tax that open border nuts refuse to admit to. The costs of enforcement and local and federal costs to services low wage unskilled laborers use is in fact a use of tax monies.
But to be an open border purist, one has to be ignorant and naive to these facts.
+10
Really. You either pay the tariffs or pay to house and feed 16 million Guatamalans and 9 million Hondurans not to mention the 40% of Mexicans who want to move here.
[…] Trump’s Tariffs on Mexican Imports Would Be Biggest Tax Increase in Decades – Reason.com […]
[…] View Article Here Taxes – Reason.com […]
[…] threats to hit all Mexican imports with a 5 percent tariff, the overall cost of the trade war will exceed the cost of the 1993 tax hikes signed by then-President Bill Clinton, when measured as a percentage […]
[…] threats to hit all Mexican imports with a 5 percent tariff, the overall cost of the trade war will exceed the cost of the 1993 tax hikes signed by then-President Bill Clinton, when measured as a percentage […]
Has anyone over there read "The Art Of The Deal"?
[…] cost thousands of jobs. At the highest level, they would be one of the largest tax increases in decades and would jeopardize more than $600 billion in cross-border trade, with agriculture and […]
[…] cost thousands of jobs. At the highest level, they would be one of the largest tax increases in decades and would jeopardize more than $600 billion in cross-border trade, with agriculture and […]
[…] wasn’t enough to announce over the weekend that Americans wouldn’t be subject to a new $87 billion tax increase come Monday morning. Instead, Trump mashed all-caps for a tweet that bizarrely claimed Mexico had […]
[…] wasn’t enough to announce over the weekend that Americans wouldn’t be subject to a new $87 billion tax increase come Monday morning. Instead, Trump mashed all-caps for a tweet that bizarrely claimed Mexico […]
[…] “Trump’s Tariffs on Mexican Imports Would Be Biggest Tax Increase in Decades,” by Eric Boehm […]
[…] “Trump’s Tariffs on Mexican Imports Would Be Biggest Tax Increase in Decades,” by Eric Boehm […]
[…] wasn’t enough to announce over the weekend that Americans wouldn’t be subject to a new $87 billion tax increase come Monday morning. Instead, Trump mashed all-caps for a tweet that bizarrely claimed Mexico […]