Review: Aladdin
Will Smith makes Robin Williams’s old genie role his own.

How much could there possibly be to say about the new live-action Aladdin? It's another squeeze of the Disney property that's already yielded a phenomenally popular 1992 animated film, a pair of straight-to-video sequels (best left undiscussed), and a stage show that's been running on Broadway pretty much forever. (Well, since 2014.) I haven't seen the Disney on Ice version of Aladdin, and I'm pretty sure I never shall.
The story, frankly derived from the 1940 adventure fantasy The Thief of Baghdad, is by now a part of pop-culture DNA. Young street thief Aladdin works the bustling bazaar of the fictitious desert city of Agrabah with his wily pet monkey, Abu. He falls into the hands of the evil Grand Vizier Jafar, advisor to the sultan, who maneuvers Aladdin into entering the Cave of Wonders, a fabulous storehouse of gold and jewels, as well as a magic lamp—which is all that Jaffar is actually interested in. Aladdin does Jafar's bidding and emerges from the cave with the lamp and a magic carpet that he also found inside. Jafar tries to double-cross Aladdin, but Abu steals the lamp back from the sorcerer and soon he and Aladdin are making the acquaintance of an ancient genie who has been trapped inside the lamp for thousands of years. The genie tells Aladdin he will grant him three wishes (none of which can be a wish for more wishes). Soon he has transformed Aladdin into a wealthy prince named Ali, who before long has made his way into the royal palace and begun courting the sultan's beautiful daughter, Princess Jasmine. Jafar—who controls the sultan through a powerful spell—does everything he can to disrupt this romance. In the end, of course, he fails.
So what's new in this live-action version of the old tale? Practically nothing. It's still a musical, and the songs are largely the same (naturally including the Oscar- and Grammy-winning "A Whole New World," once again delivered with full Broadway gusto on a magic-carpet ride over city and starlit sea). The story is well-served by director Guy Ritchie (of the Sherlock Holmes movies), whose acrobatic action sensibility provides lots to look at (especially in a wall-running bazaar chase and a breakdancing production number inside the palace which is a couple of miles more entertaining than that description would suggest). The production design, by Gemma Jackson, is pure Disney, stuffed with charm and tchotchkes and ready to fill the skies with fireworks at the swell of a chorus or to bring in CGI elephants and giraffes and cantering ostriches for no particular reason at all. It's fun. Bring a kid.
The main players—Mena Massoud as Aladdin, Naomi Scott as Princess Jasmine, and Nasim Pedrad as her genie-fancying handmaiden Dalia—are fine, solid. However, Marwan Kenzari, who plays the scheming Jafar, lacks the resonant menace that Jonathan Freeman brought to the animated character in 1992, and he has none of the mad-eyed brio that Conrad Veidt provided in The Thief of Baghdad. An underplayed Jafar is practically no Jafar at all.
Fortunately, Will Smith, taking on the role of the genie, pretty much makes the movie. Unintimidated by Robin Williams's memorably hyperactive performance in this part in the 1992 film, Smith dials back the manic yammering and delivers his lines with a smoother spin. When lovestruck Aladdin tells the genie about Jasmine and says, "She's a princess," Smith flicks back a deadpan "Aren't they all?" that's gone almost before you register it. When the genie suggests a made-up place name for Aladdin to tell people that Prince Ali is from, the naive lad is hesitant. "Is that a real place?" he asks. "Yeah—it's got a brochure," the genie says, magically producing one.
From time to time, Smith clambers over the fourth wall to address us directly, at one point crowing, "This genie's on fire, folks!" He kinda is.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
BREAKING: Trump Approves Declassification of Documents Related to 2016 Election Spying
BAM!
The most important question on how we'll know if this is a decent remake.
Did they social injustice wanker it up?
Yes, Aladdin is now a blue transvestite.
How can you tell? He appears to be mostly naked.
How can you tell? He appears to be mostly naked.
Reply
My Crystal Ball sees all !!!
Billy Crystal's Blue Balls?
What it needed was a girl in the role of Aladdin and a girl in the role of princess and Tina Fey as the genie.
Yes. Alladin has to refer to the Genie as Master.
So what you're saying is that it stinks, right?
[…] Review: Aladdin Reason […]
[…] Review: Aladdin Reason […]
From what I've heard so far, Smith actually does a fine job of making the genie role his own, while giving a couple of little call-backs to the Williams version for fan-service, but the rest of the movie is pretty bad overall.
The biggest thing I'm noticing about these live-action remakes is how they end up reminding you how good the originals were, which makes them suffer in comparison. The Beauty and the Beast remake in particular suffered from this, and I'll give Disney credit for marketing it perfectly despite the end product being a disappointment. If some of these films weren't so iconic as pop-culture touchstones, they could probably get more credit, but all they serve to do is show how deficient in creativity The Mouse has become these days.
Wasn't that a shot for shot remake?
This does not sound the same... The cartoon versions are always going to be better with this kind of stuff (genies, beasts, the entire DC universe).
Pretty close. They changed up some of the details to meet Current Year sensibilities (like making LeFou gay instead of just a goofball sidekick), but overall it was exactly like the cartoon.
And here I always though that Jafar was voiced by Tim Curry, without actually reading the credits of course.
[…] Review: Aladdin Reason […]
[…] Review: Aladdin Reason […]
[…] Review: Aladdin Reason […]
[…] Review: Aladdin Reason […]
This film is really racist. Will Smith pretending to be blue, when he's actually white.
Oreo...
The story, frankly derived from the 1940 adventure fantasy The Thief of Baghdad...
I think the story goes back a lot farther than that....
Kurt probably thinks Snow White dates back to 1934
"Aladdin is a folk tale of Middle Eastern origin. It is one of the tales in The Book of One Thousand and One Nights (The Arabian Nights), and one of the best known—despite not being part of the original Arabic text. It was added to the collection in the 18th century by the Frenchman Antoine Galland, who acquired the tale from a Syrian storyteller, Youhenna Diab, also known as Hanna Diyab. Contemporary historians consider Diyab to have been the original author of "Aladdin" and believe the tale to have been partly inspired by Diyab's own life. Since it first appeared in the early 18th century, "Aladdin and the Magic Lamp" has been one of the best known and most retold of all fairy tales."