Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Hunter in Russia

Donate

Local Government

Missouri House Approves Task Force To Oversee Task Forces

It will be called the "Missouri Task Force Task Force."

Billy Binion | 5.16.2019 3:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
missouricap | davidwilson1949 / licensed under CC BY 2.0
(davidwilson1949 / licensed under CC BY 2.0)

Task forces on task forces on task forces! Can a state ever have too many?

Missouri Democratic House Rep. Jon Carpenter (District 15) wants to find out. He introduced a legislative amendment—which passed yesterday—to create a task force to oversee task forces.

Rep. Jon Carpenter's amendment to create a task force on task forces passes with a voice vote. pic.twitter.com/EMNPKySXRo

— Benjamin D. Peters (@BenjaminDPeters) May 15, 2019

The task force on task forces would be partially composed of members from other task forces, according to the amendment's text. Appropriately, the task force would be named the "Missouri Task Force Task Force."

While the role of the state's Task Force Task Force is still a tad ambiguous, the amendment says it would "investigate the current status of task forces in the state" to include "whether each task force is fulfilling its statutory obligations."

The Task Force Task Force would not have jurisdiction over every committee. Logically, the next step would be to assemble a Standing Committee Standing Committee to monitor Standing Committees, a Subcommittee Subcommittee to oversee Subcommittees, as well as a Special Committee Special Committee to watch over Special Committees.

But perhaps the biggest looming question is exactly who will monitor the Task Force Task Force without a Task Force Task Force Task Force. That's a conundrum—one Rep. Carpenter might more easily solve with a task force to evaluate the task of evaluating task forces that oversee task forces.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bill de Blasio Is the Worst 2020 Candidate on Property Rights

Billy Binion is a reporter at Reason.

Local GovernmentMissouri
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (23)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    They don't call it Mis-ery for nothing.

  2. Eddy   7 years ago

    Sounds like an old Yes Minister episode.

  3. Agammamon   7 years ago

    Weeeeel, at least now we know who watches the watchers.

  4. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

    I am chairman of the committee to select the members of the committee to select the members of the committee to select the members of the task force task force.

    1. soldiermedic76   7 years ago

      Monty Python?

      1. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

        Might have been, not sure. I know I saw the basic committe->committee thing somewhere , don't recall where though.

      2. Teddy Pump   7 years ago

        Does Missouri have a Ministry of Silly Walks?

      3. markm23   7 years ago

        Many places, and some of them came up with the idea independently. The comic strip Cathy had the Committee Committee, and I recall similar things in Dilbert and Monty Python. Even the ancient Romans got the basic idea: "Who watches the watchers."

    2. Teddy Pump   7 years ago

      Can I come to work for you?, I'm very qualified as I used to run the Dept. of Redundancy Dept

      1. Agammamon   7 years ago

        Until you were made redundant?

    3. Kevin Smith   7 years ago

      D-D-D-D-Don't quote me regulations. I co-chaired the committee that reviewed the recommendation to revise the color of the book that regulation's in... We kept it grey!

  5. Jerryskids   7 years ago

    While the role of the state's Task Force Task Force is still a tad ambiguous, the amendment says it would "investigate the current status of task forces in the state" to include "whether each task force is fulfilling its statutory obligations."

    I can give you that one for free: The state's task forces are doing the best they can to fulfill their statutory obligations given that they are chronically understaffed, critically underfunded, and woefully underappreciated by both the legislature and the general public.

    1. Eddy   7 years ago

      Holy crap, who leaked this confidential report to you?

    2. SQRLSY One   7 years ago

      Yes, indeedy! Yes, indeed, my General Pubic feels VASTLY pubically underfunded!!! So PLEASE better-fund my underly, fantastically under-funded pubic undies RIGHT NOW, before I have a hissy fit!!! Right out in WAAY-embarrassing-to-YOU pubic, no less!!!

  6. cheivous   7 years ago

    Wow! As a resident, this is embarrassing...

    1. Minadin   7 years ago

      Right?

      Oh well, at least we're still not Illinois.

  7. AD-RtR/OS!   7 years ago

    JIM GERAGHTY is kicking himself over missing this.

  8. Ann in L.A.   7 years ago

    Who will watch the watchmen's watchmen?

  9. Longtobefree   7 years ago

    Funded by the Department of Redundancy Department.

  10. merely_speculating   7 years ago

    But who's going to oversee the task force overseeing other task forces? I bet Democrats can waste even more taxpayer money funding a task force to study that question...

    Hold on....didn't we read a few weeks ago that 17 million people are in government work? Only 17 million? With this kind of redundancy, it's gotta be a whole lot higher.

  11. Rockabilly   7 years ago

    Comrades ! Excellent News, Central Committee applauds you !!!

  12. Echospinner   7 years ago

    I really want that job.

  13. Echospinner   7 years ago

    They gave it such a silly name that the other task forces will just make fun of them.

    I would have called it the Super Force because it is the force above all other forces.

    That might make the other task forces think twice when the hear Super Force is on the job.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 463 donors, we've reached $283,493 of our $400,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

Boat Attack Commander Says He Had To Kill 2 Survivors Because They Were Still Trying To Smuggle Cocaine

Jacob Sullum | 12.4.2025 3:15 PM

Hillary Clinton Is Still Blaming TikTok

Robby Soave | 12.4.2025 2:50 PM

The Cyberselfish Revival Shows Libertarianism Continues To Be Misunderstood

Brian Doherty | 12.4.2025 2:00 PM

A Deadly Attack Sparks Broad Punishment for Innocent Afghans

Beth Bailey | 12.4.2025 1:30 PM

Leaving AI Regulation to the States Could Strangle AI

Jack Nicastro | 12.4.2025 1:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks