Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Police Abuse

Watch N.J. Cop Throw Motionless Man to the Ground Before Dragging and Hitting Him: 'Get the Fuck Up'

The man wasn't moving, and didn't appear to pose any threat.

Joe Setyon | 3.12.2019 12:45 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | NJ.com/YouTube screenshot
(NJ.com/YouTube screenshot)

A New Jersey Transit Police officer was caught on video Saturday night throwing a motionless man to the ground, dragging him, hitting him, and telling him to "get the fuck up."

The exact circumstances that led to the events caught on camera were not clear. But it doesn't appear that the man posed any threat to the unidentified officer. "The unresponsive man was accosted and had his face brutally slammed into the pavement for no other apparent reason that the power trip of the Transit police officer," read the caption of the video, which was originally posted to Facebook, according to NJ.com:

The roughly one-minute video starts with the officer pulling the man up from the ground outside of the Trenton Transit Center, then throwing him back down to the pavement. "Get up, get out," the cop says. "Get up and get out now."

The man stays on the ground, barely moving, for roughly 45 seconds while the officer stands over him. Then, the cop drags him by the sweatshirt across the pavement before dropping him to the ground again and hitting him. "Get the fuck up," the officer says.

New Jersey Transit Police wouldn't identify the officer or the man he dragged, but did say they were looking into the incident. "The matter is currently under investigation with the New Jersey Transit Police Department Internal Affairs," spokesperson Jim Smith told ABC News. The officer involved has been suspended, Smith said.

According to the woman who took the video (who wanted to stay anonymous): "There was no resisting" and the man "wasn't even speaking." The woman told WPVI she stopped filming due to a dead phone battery, though the officer didn't stop dragging. "After my phone died it continued to happen. The berating. Probably another five minutes. Dragging him on the cement and dragging his face on the ground."

It's important to note that this video only captured about a minute of what was clearly a longer encounter. We don't know what happened before the camera started rolling, as the anonymous woman admitted, and we don't know why the man was on the ground in the first place.

However, it seems all too clear that it wasn't necessary for the officer to use such excessive force. The man on the ground wasn't moving, let alone resisting. It's difficult to understand why dragging him across the pavement and hitting him was an appropriate response to a man who was mostly immobile.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Trump's Budget Shortchanges the Prison Reform Bill He Signed

Joe Setyon is currently an associate story editor for The Western Journal, a publication based in Arizona. He is a former assistant editor at Reason.

Police AbuseNew JerseyPoliceCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (25)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. loveconstitution1789   6 years ago

    Why was this guy laying on the ground?

    I guess that is not important to this police brutality story.

    Yup, Lets just lump this in with police shooting unarmed people in the back....check.

    1. Crusty Juggler - Lawbertarian   6 years ago

      Laying on the ground is CONSTITUTIONAL and this man was within HIS RIGHTS as an AMERICAN CITIZEN.

      1. loveconstitution1789   6 years ago

        Unfortunately, Reason will not investigate (why) this guy was laying on the ground.

        People like Crusty lays on the ground in front of doors, so this guy must have been doing the same thing.

        1. mad.casual   6 years ago

          Unfortunately, Reason will not investigate (why) this guy was laying on the ground.

          He was trying to keep two white guys from assaulting Jussie and two Russians from scuttling the 2020 election.

          1. loveconstitution1789   6 years ago

            He's gonna have to fight that cop for title of "Hero" then.

    2. MatthewSlyfield   6 years ago

      "I guess that is not important to this police brutality story."

      You are correct, it's not important to the police brutality issue. There is no possible reason for it that would come close to justifying the level of force used.

      1. mad.casual   6 years ago

        justifying the level of force used

        Level of force? Did the guy even bruise? Get a bloody nose?

        At least half of us have executed clean plays in non-contact sports that were more violent.

        1. Crusty Juggler - Lawbertarian   6 years ago

          You're trying too hard.

    3. NM Dave   6 years ago

      Why does it matter why he was laying on the ground? Perhaps he was drunk, or on drugs.Does that make it acceptable to beat him and throw in around? You have a sick sense of morality if you find this officer to be behaving properly. You don't have to abuse a person to arrest them for public intoxication, if indeed that was the problem

    4. ace_m82   6 years ago

      Yes, let's get into a "he said, she said" argument about something that no-one can prove. That'll solve this problem!

      What's wrong with you?

  2. Eddy   6 years ago

    Maybe the suspect was a policeman accused of arresting women and forcing them to have sex?

    1. Freddy the Jerk   6 years ago

      Oh, I see where you're going with that. So you think the guy in uniform was just trying to wake the "suspect" up out of his drunken stupor to give him some kind of super-secret "top cop" award for his scoring abilities? And to tell him to clock out because his shift's over?

    2. mad.casual   6 years ago

      Maybe the suspect was a policeman accused of arresting women and forcing them to have sex?

      Maybe he was wearing a MAGA hat and sitting in front of the door that lets immigrants into the country legally.

  3. Crusty Juggler - Lawbertarian   6 years ago

    It's difficult to understand why dragging him across the pavement and hitting him was an appropriate response to a man who was mostly immobile.

    someone didn't go to cop school.

    1. NM Dave   6 years ago

      Or perhaps he went to cop school and learned the lessons well.

  4. Ragnarredbeard   6 years ago

    Its possible the guy was a serial drunk or stoner and the officer was tired of his ass and having to roust him every day.

    Doesn't change that what the officer was doing was wrong, though.

  5. majil   6 years ago

    Respect his Authoritah! and cheer when cops are shot in their fucking faces

    1. mad.casual   6 years ago

      Respect his Authoritah! and cheer when cops are shot in their fucking faces

      So, in turn, is 'shooting in the face' the standard punishment we would dole out to civilians for similar behavior?

      Is mutual deescalation the goal or one-sided escalation?

  6. Longtobefree   6 years ago

    "The matter is currently under investigation with the New Jersey Transit Police Department Internal Affairs,"

    Because we have no idea what officers are assigned to that location at that time?
    Or because we are coordinating the cover up?

    Of course, this type of enforcement will become more important as we all have to use trains in five years - - - - -

  7. mad.casual   6 years ago

    However, it seems all too clear that it wasn't necessary for the officer to use such excessive force.

    The only part that seemed excessive was the closed-fisted 'love tap' towards the end. Everything else was dragging and gravity. Nothing anyone who's had an unruly toddler hasn't had happen or had to do.

    Compared to the beatings, smotherings, accidental shootings, intentional shootings, multiple homicide raids... this is not the abuse of authority you're looking for.

    1. NM Dave   6 years ago

      Wow...what a wonderful parent you must be. I sincerely hope you haven't reproduced, if you think this is acceptable.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   6 years ago

    The officer is then seen dragging the man a few feet further by his sweatshirt before apparently throwing him face-first onto the pavement and allegedly hitting him in the head, according to the video.

    Allegedly, according to the video.

    Anyway, that will teach that guy to slip into a diabetic coma in New Jerksey.

  9. Sonny Bono's Ghost   6 years ago

    Yeah, Imma have to say this is a bit shy of police brutality, if our usual fair is the baseline.

  10. Martiandawn   6 years ago

    This is policy brutality to the same degree that catcalling is sexual harassment.

  11. marcopolo   6 years ago

    ?Google pay 95$ consistently my last pay check was $8200 working 10 hours out of every week on the web. My more young kin buddy has been averaging 15k all through ongoing months and he works around 24 hours consistently. I can't confide in how straightforward it was once I endeavored it out.This is my primary concern...GOOD LUCK .

    click here =====?? http://www.Geosalary.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Destroy Thousands of Acres of Tomato Crops in Florida

Autumn Billings | 5.12.2025 5:14 PM

Defenders of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order Offer an Implausible Take on a 127-Year-Old Precedent

Jacob Sullum | 5.12.2025 4:52 PM

Why DOGE Failed

Eric Boehm | 5.12.2025 3:20 PM

The Indian-Pakistani Ceasefire Is What U.S. Diplomacy Should Look Like

Matthew Petti | 5.12.2025 12:11 PM

Republicans Want To Redefine Obscenity

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.12.2025 11:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!