Occupational Licensing

Bipartisan Bill Would Stop States From Denying Occupational Licenses Due to Student Loan Debt

New proposal from Sen. Marco Rubio and Sen. Elizabeth Warren would stop states from using the dumbest of all reasons to keep someone out of work.

|

Ingram Publishing/Newscom

In at least 18 states, unpaid students loans can be grounds for denying someone an occupational license—even if the applicant is otherwise fully qualified.

Under these laws, state licensing boards can prevent applicants from earning the money they need to repay the loans that disqualify them from licensure. It's a nonsensical cycle that can lock qualified workers out of good-paying jobs. There's no benefit to the public—consumers' health and safety is not threatened by workers who owe student loan payments—though the policy does, like much else in the world of licensing, serve the interests of existing license-holders by limiting competition.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R–Fla.) calls it a "Catch-22" that resembles a "modern-day debtors' prison." This week, he teamed up with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) to introduce a bill that would prohibit states from denying occupational, teachers, or drivers licenses due to unpaid student loan debt.

"We shouldn't punish people struggling to pay back their student loans by taking away their drivers' or professional licenses, preventing them from going to work and making a living," Warren said in a statement. "Our bipartisan bill removes these senseless roadblocks so that borrowers can build better financial futures."

If it becomes law, the Protecting Job Opportunities for Borrowers (Protecting JOBs) Act would prevent states from suspending, revoking or denying state professional licenses solely because borrowers are behind on their federal student loan payments. The federal government has the authority to order states to do that, Rubio says, because of the Higher Education Act, a federal law that, among other things, require states to offer in-state tuition rates to members of the military. The bill also gives borrowers a legal recourse if states refuse to comply.

This is the second time Rubio and Warren have introduced this bill. Last year's version never received a vote.

A 2017 analysis by The New York Times found that at least 20 states had rules on the books allowing licensing agencies to deny or revoke professional and occupational licenses from individuals who defaulted on student loan debt. The Times found more than 8,700 cases in which individuals had lost their licenses, though the actual number is likely much higher due to the decentralized and often opaque nature of licensing boards.

The Times' feature included the story of Shannon Otto, a nurse from Tennessee who took on thousands of dollars in student loans to pay for nursing school. When an unexpected medical issue left her unable to work for more than a year after graduating, she defaulted on her loans. When she was finally ready to go back to work, she found that her nursing license had been suspended by the state because of the unpaid loans, leaving her unable to work legally in the field she'd spent years mastering.

The real kicker? Getting her license restored would require an additional payment of $1,500 to the state.

"It's an attention-getter," Peter Abernathy, chief aid and compliance officer for the Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation, told the Times. "They made a promise to the federal government that they would repay these funds. This is the last resort to get them back into payment."

But that's insane. Losing your ability to earn a living because the state government revokes a mandatory license might be an "attention-getter," but it's certainly not going to help anyone—neither the borrower nor the lender, who is less likely to get repaid if the borrower can't work.

Though licensing is largely a state issue, the federal government is partially to blame for these state-level policies. In 1990, the Department of Education recommended that states "deny professional licenses to defaulters until they take steps to repayment." That year, defaulted student loans totaled about $7.8 billion. Last year the figure topped $32 billion.

"Revoking or suspending professional licenses on account of defaulting on a student loan is a self-defeating policy that leaves borrowers worse off than before," concluded a trio of researchers at the R Street Institute, a right-of-center, free-market think tank, in a wide-ranging 2018 report on how states tie licensing to student loans. "By using occupational licenses in the service of debt collection, lawmakers make licensure an even more harmful labor market constraint."

When he introduced the same bill last year, Rubio admitted to having previously been on the other side of the issue. As a member of the Florida legislature, he once voted for a law allowing Florida occupational licensing boards to suspend licenses for individuals who defaulted on student loans.

Now, he's changed his mind about that policy—and for good reason. Rubio graduated from law school in 1996, and revealed in a 2012 speech that it took him more than 15 years to pay off more than $150,000 in student loan debt that he'd accumulated while pursuing his degrees. Those student loans didn't stop him from working his way into the U.S. Senate, but they might have stopped someone else from pursuing a career in nursing, teaching, or cosmetology. That's just not right.

"It is wrong to threaten a borrower's livelihood by rescinding a professional license from those who are struggling to repay student loans," says Rubio, "and it deprives hardworking Americans of dignified work."

Advertisement

NEXT: Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Or we could get rid of occupational licensing altogether. How about that?

    1. Or get the feds out of the loan business. How about that?

      1. Or as long as we’re fantasizing, get the feds out of business altogether. How about that?

      2. Or get the feds out of the loan business.

        Now you’re just being silly.

        1. I realize that now; sometimes the meds they give me at the clinic do not take effect on schedule. I think they get them at a discount in Canada or something – – – –

    2. I am making easily persistently $15k to $20k simply by doing direct work at home. Multi month again i have made $45890 from this movement. amazing and smooth to do work and standard pay from this is bewildering. i have propose each final one of you to join this progress right directly as low protection and get than full time salary through take after this association.

      Just Visit Now…… http://www.SalaryHD.Com

  2. the Department of Education recommended that states “deny professional licenses to defaulters until they take steps to repayment.”

    So, *that’s* the ticket to abolishing the Dept of Ed!

    1. Dept of Ed also separates children from their parents for long periods of time, locks them in small rooms with brutal fascist who damage the children’s spirit.

      #AbolishED

      1. Unfortunate abbreviation.

  3. According to the NYT article:

    In Louisiana, the nursing board notified 87 nurses last year that their student loans were in default and that their licenses would not be renewed until they became current on their payments.

    Eighty-four paid their debts. The three who did not are now unable to work in the field, according to a report published by the nursing board.

    So, if 84 out of 87 nurses who were in default on their student loans repaid them after being told they would lose their licenses that’s almost a 97 percent success rate. It seems that if this is being used as a last resort to get people to repay their bills, it’s working pretty well and if as taxpayers we’re on the hook for their unpaid loans, we’d have to be complete morons to give up this kind of leverage.

    1. Now do licenses in a lower income field.

    2. You can’t claim that as a 97% success rate until you correct for the number of defaulters who would have brought their debts current without this threat. In other words, if 80 of the ones in default were only behind by a payment or three and would have brought their accounts back into line anyway, then the threat only changed the behavior of half of the small remainder.

      Obviously, that’s not an analysis you can do within a single state but you can get a sense for it by comparing the repayment rates across those states which do and do not use licensure as a threat for repayment. Looking at the default rates by state, there does not seem to be an obvious pattern of better repayment rates among the 18 states that follow Louisiana’s practice.

      1. That is not always possible. The moment you default the debt is sent to a collector who demands ridiculous payments. I was told I had to mske payments equal to 98% of my monthly GROSS income. They would not negotiate

  4. Truth in headlines:
    The headline should read ‘student default’ not ‘student debt’

    No one is denied a license because they have student debt. They are denied a license if they are in default; which reasonably indicates they may be good at any business venture.

    Of course that would defeat the purpose of generating clicks.

  5. It always amazed me that everyone has to go after debtors by going to court, suing, and then collecting.

    The federal government gives out student loans and then does not have to get court ordered garnishments. etc.

    Instead the debtors cant earn money to pay, drivers licenses are suspended, and a judge even had a guy arrested for his student loan debt.

    People need to pay up but the federal government should not get special privileges in collection of civil debt.

    Obviously, the quickest end is to end student loans and pell grants.

  6. I earned $8000 last month by working online just for 6 to 9 hours on my laptop and this was so easy that i myself could not believe before working on this site. If You too want to earn such a big money then come.
    Try it, you won’t regret it!…..

    SEE HERE >>=====>>>> http://www.Geosalary.com

  7. The other issue they need to address is the loan consolidation scams. Like many others I consilodated my loans when I graduated and started paying. Suddenly my bill jumped from $320 a month to over $1800 a month which there was no way I could pay making $2300 a month in my first job. So of course I defaulted. A couple of years later, I entered a “loan rehabilitation program and signed an agreement to pay $300 a month which I did like clockwork for over 2 years. At the end of the 2 years, I was told the lender had rejected the agreement and I was dropped from program 2 months after I began making payments but was never notified. I was told only way to get out of default was to pay $2300 a month for 1 year. Of course ,I could not. So now my original debt of just over $18k is more than $130k due to alm the interest and penalities that have been added. My wages are ganrnished, but I can never pay off this debt. The entire system is a complete scam.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.