Charter Schools

A Charter School Moratorium Will Not Fix What Ails L.A.'s Education System

The district's budget is broken, and the latest deal with the unions will make it worse.


Charter school protestor

In 2017, Los Angeles voters put supporters of school choice in the majority overseeing the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). It was a big deal at the time. Charter schools are very popular in L.A.—there's more than 200 of them serving more than 100,000 students.

But this week that same school board, apparently as part of the negotiations to end the teachers' strike, voted 5–1 to support a resolution calling for a temporary moratorium on new charter schools. Even though thousands of charter school supporters showed up for the meeting, even board members who have expressed public support for choice voted in favor of a moratorium while a "study" of charters' impact is completed.

The sole "no" vote came from Nick Melvoin, one of the school choice advocates who swept into office in 2017, defeating then-president Steve Zimmer, who supported efforts to restrict charter school growth.

The good news is that the resolution is, on paper, meaningless. The State of California sets the rules for creating charter schools, and the LAUSD board lacks the power to actually enforce a moratorium. So what the resolution actually authorizes is for LAUSD staff to research a plan to change the laws so that a moratorium could be put into place. (Read the resolution here.)

The unions have an ally of sorts in Gavin Newsom, the state's new governor. Newsom insists that he supports charter schools, but he also says he wants some sort of "transparency" legislation and more regulation of charter-school operations. Regulatory tools have sometimes been used to shut down charter schools even when they're performing well and have support from parents, but there are also charter schools that have turned out to be scams.

But there's a certain level of blatant disingenuous concern-trolling here. This isn't about transparency, and it's not about whether charter schools have been appropriately studied. There are lots of studies about charter school out there that show that they're good for student performance. (Reason's Nick Gillespie took note of them here.)

This is about the financial impact on the public school system when parents can decide where to send their kids. When a child is sent to a charter school, the funding follows the child. The more parents send their kids to charter schools, the more money gets taken away from the public schools (though charter schools are themselves technically public schools operated by private non-profits). And Los Angeles has seen significant growth in charter attendance over the past decade.

This is a feature, not a bug: It's a way to introduce competition to a public-school setting and give educators an incentive to do better. The LAUSD's resolution is equivalent to McDonald's trying to force a moratorium on building new Burger Kings. Note that absolutely nothing in the resolution indicates an iota of concern about the interests of the district's ostensible customers. There's literally no reference to either students or parents in it. It does, however, mention the district's "financial strain."

And while the LAUSD may want to blame charter schools for their financial problems, the reality is that the biggest reason for the school district's severe financial debts is its pension and health care obligations. As Reason's Eric Boehm noted as the strike was ending, the deal the district made to get teachers back into classes will make its financial problems even worse. The pay raises included in the deal consume any surplus and will force the district into annual deficit spending. And even as the district loses students, the new agreement calls for more hiring. That will lead to even more pension and health care obligations, making the district's debt problems even worse.

A moratorium on new charter schools is not going to fix this problem. Instead it sends the message that the purpose of the school system is to serve the staff, not the students.

NEXT: Lyft, Juno Sue New York Regulators Over Rules That Could Make Them Pay Drivers More Than Uber

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Since a lot of the advantage in charter schools is freedom from regulations, what we need is more regulation.
    Got it.

    1. For the right definitions of “we”, yes it is.

  2. “This is about the financial impact on the public school system when parents can decide where to send their kids. When a child is sent to a charter school, the funding follows the child”

    Which shouldn’t be a problem for the public school system, if the funding they’re currently receiving is going towards the education of the child, right? Less children to educate = less funds required, right? Unless the public school system’s purpose is something other than the education of children, right?

  3. It’s only a question of which will file for Bankruptcy first: The School District, or The City.

  4. Unions hacks want to prevent competition by using government force, news at 11

  5. What is never mentioned is the growth of adminstration in schools. Why does the NEA not call for less non-teaching administration to help pay for raises? Oh I know, because these non-teaching administrators were the idea of the NEA.

  6. on Saturday I got a gorgeous Ariel Atom after earning $6292 this ? four weeks past, after lot of struggels Google, Yahoo, Facebook proffessionals have been revealed the way and cope with gape for increase home income in suffcient free time.You can make $9o an hour working from home easily……. VIST THIS SITE RIGHT HERE…………>>

  7. Who is moronic enough to lend this district money to fund their deficits? I guess they figure Uncle Sugar will be there when they arrive hat in hand.

  8. Well, this state have a lot of economical problems. Government should spend money on cheap argumentative essay for kids but not on school administration. When people see this here they become asking themselfs about current educational system. I agree that moratorium on new charter schools is not going to fix this problem but we should do something with this system.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.