Teachers Unions

L.A. Teachers, School District Reach Deal To Possibly End Strike

The LAUSD has seen a 16 percent jump in administrative staffers since 2004-and per pupil spending has been marching steadily upwards.

|

Ingram Publishing/Newscom

An agreement has been reached that could end a week-long strike by some 30,000 teachers in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), though details will not be released until after union members vote on the deal later Tuesday.

If approved, teachers could return to the classroom as soon as Wednesday, the Associated Press reports.

As you might expect, the strike is ultimately a disagreement over money. The union is demanding a 6.5 percent pay increase for all teachers, while the district has offered a 3 percent raise this year followed by another 3 percent raise in 2020. But the union is also asking for the LAUSD to spend larger sums of money on non-teaching staff and to hire more teachers in order to reduce class sizes. District administrators say that giving into those demands would hasten the LAUSD's descent into insolvency.

On its current trajectory, the school district will face a $422 million shortfall by 2020, driven in large part by its $15 billion in unfunded health care benefit liabilities for current workers and retirees. A task force that studied the district's fiscal condition in 2018 concluded that the structural deficit "threatens its long-term viability and its ability to deliver basic education programs."

Even if the district was not facing those massive bills for pension costs and retiree healthcare, the call for more hiring should be greeted with skepticism at a time when LAUSD is seeing enrollment decline. The total student enrollment in LAUSD schools has dropped from around 700,000 in 2005 to just over 500,000 last year, according to the district's own comprehensive annual financial reports.

Meanwhile, hiring has been on the rise—the LAUSD has seen a 16 percent jump in administrative staffers since 2004—and per pupil spending has been marching steadily upwards.

Source: Chart and calculations by Eric Boehm; Data from Reason Foundation and LAUSD comprehensive annual financial reports

These numbers include only students enrolled in district schools and the district's spending on those schools. In other words, charter school students and the costs of running charter schools are excluded.

"The district is spending close to $17,000 per student—about 50% more than it was at the beginning of the decade," says Marc Joffe, an education policy analyst for the Reason Foundation, which publishes this blog. "If this money was more fully directed to the classroom, it should be enough to provide adequate teacher compensation and reasonable class sizes."

Spending more money to cut class sizes when student enrollment is already falling seems like a mistake. The decline is driven by a combination of factors, including the explosive growth of charter schools in Los Angeles and a growing number of families that are leaving the district to seek education in other public schools. Those are trends that are unlikely to be reversed by the LAUSD digging a larger hole for itself by hiring additional employees—all of whom will be owed pension and health care benefits, the two costs that are already dragging the district down.

Spending more money is not a surefire way to improve schools. As Stan Liebowitz and Matthew Kelly, a pair of researchers at the University of Texas, explained in a recent Reason cover story, student performance is not correlated with per-student expenditures.

Indeed, holding down pay in a district where the average teacher already earns more than $84,000 may have kept the LAUSD out of this fiscal hole in the first place. If raises for LAUSD teachers had been held to only 1.5 percent since 2014 (when the most recent contract between union and district was signed), Los Angeles public schools would now have an extra $352 million dollars a year to spend on education, according to an analysis by the California Policy Center, a center-right think tank.

The district could save $300 million per year by shifting retirees onto Medicare—an imperfect solution that would move those costs from district taxpayers to federal taxpayers, but one that would save the LAUSD money nonetheless.

Any of those options should be on the table as the LAUSD tries to get back on track. About the only thing that the district should not consider, given the current trajectories for student enrollment, long-term costs, and per-pupil spending, is hiring more workers on the public's dime.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

15 responses to “L.A. Teachers, School District Reach Deal To Possibly End Strike

  1. District administrators say that giving into those demands would hasten the LAUSD’s descent into insolvency.

    On its current trajectory, the school district will face a $422 million shortfall by 2020, driven in large part by its $15 billion in unfunded health care benefit liabilities for current workers and retirees

    Something something Jerry Brown something budget surpluses something fiscally responsible.

    1. $15 billion in unfunded health care benefit liabilities

      Who knew that promising overly extravagant benefits and letting people retire at 45 with 90% of their last years salary as a yearly pension would cause fiscal problems in the future?

      1. After all, California is the world’s 6th largest economy.

        1. Who knew your credit card debt defines the size of your economy?

      2. I don’t know how they do it in LA but where I live we also give teachers a big bump in salary their last 3 years (pension is averaged from the last 3 years before retirement here) so their pension is the same or more than what they made before the bump

  2. The author has fallen into the trap of assuming that education of the students has any bearing on these negotiations. The issue at hand is raising pay for union members, and increasing the number of union members paying dues. Those damn kids are just the rationale for the money, not anyone deserving of any actual consideration. Staff bloat is just fine, as long as that staff is dues paying union members.

  3. The kids in LA’s public schools are learning as much now their teachers are on strike as they were learning when their teachers were not on strike…which means the children are learning nothing.
    Isn’t public education wonderful?
    No accountability for the students’ achievement, and yet the educational system always sees getting more money as the answer.

  4. Let me guess. The teachers will make more and the students will learn less.

    1. Is that not how it’s supposed to work?

  5. Public schools are largely a jobs factory. And people who oppose vouchers are legit rent-seeking racists.

  6. Stand your ground, union!!! Do not compromise whatsoever!! All through Janus v AFSCME, every single Democrat in the Nation told us how great and wonderful and well-meaning public-sector unions are. If that is so, that evil, corrupt Democrat government in LA is just trying to rip you off. You guys are wonderful. Keep it up.

  7. Assume $84,000 base, 10 month work year.

    Offer is worth $175,560 total after two years.
    Demand is worth $178,920 after two years
    $3,360 difference.

    On strike for 7 out of 22 work days Cost: $2,422 at the offered rate, $2505 at the demanded rate.

    Assume they get the full 6.5% after the strike is over. The net is $3360-$2505= $855 gain after two years. One more day on strike and they be loss.

    But the union will not miss out on a single dues payment, at the agreed rate, of course.

    The take-away:
    1. LAUSD teachers can’t do math
    2. Unions suck.

  8. Start working at home with Google. It’s the most-financially rewarding I’ve ever done. On tuesday I got a gorgeous BMW after having earned $8699 this last month. I actually started five months/ago and practically straight away was bringin in at least $96, per-hour. visit this site right here……………… http://www.mesalary.com

  9. Start working at home with Google. It’s the most-financially rewarding I’ve ever done. On tuesday I got a gorgeous BMW after having earned $8699 this last month. I actually started five months/ago and practically straight away was bringin in at least $96, per-hour. visit this site right here….. http://www.payshd.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.