Feel-Good Story of the Day Until Someone Puts an Eye Out
Nine-year-old Colorado boy leads successful challenge to 100-year-old ban on snowball fights.

Here's the feel-good story of the day, at least until somebody put an eye out.
Nine-year-old Dane Best lives in Severance, Colorado, where a ban on snowball fights has been in place for 100 years. Even though the rule wasn't enforced, the kid was pissed about that, explains Newsweek.
"I think it's an outdated law," Best said. "I want to be able to throw a snowball without getting in trouble."
The young boy asked his mom's permission before taking his first steps in the political sphere. "She called the town hall and then she told me I had to make a speech," he explained to CBS Denver.
Best also gathered more than 20 signatures toward a petition on the issue, the outlet stated.
On Monday, the young politician gave his presentation to the Severance Town Board. "The children of Severance want the opportunity to have a snowball fight like the rest of the world," Best said during the speech, according to The Greeley Tribune. "The law was created many years ago. Today's kids need a reason to play outside."
Although he faced difficult questions from the board—including: "Can we amend this ordinance to say that if you're over 60, no one can throw a snowball at you?"—officials were impressed with the boy's performance and agreed to repeal the ban.
Mayor Don MCleod then presented ceremonial snowballs to Best and his little brother Dax. The pair went on to became the first legal snowball-throwers in Severance's history.
Chalk one up for the little guy and the forces of free-range parenting everywhere.
I'm sure I'm not the only who is a little disappointed that the Best brothers didn't immediately take those snowballs and whip them directly into the collective mushes of the Severance Town Board. Which might explain why some of us can't have nice things.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Our culture can't tell the difference between touching a woman's shoulder and raping her, so we best be careful not to let kids throw snowballs or else they might think it's OK to stab you in the face with an icicle.
Don't blame my tribe for that bullshit. #MeToo is from your end of town.
You know what other legislative feats a nine-year-old was able to accomplish?
Straw bans. Or was that kid only 8?
The Enabling Act of 1933?
Next thing you know they'll be parking perpendicular to traffic.
Meanwhile, Slate ran a hit piece on a dog.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/12.....rvice-dog/
I love it. Slate is finally uniting the country with that piece. Across the spectrum people on Twitter are calling the author a jackass. It's beautiful.
That article is beyond vile. Sometimes they just slip over the line in their enthusiasm to bash anyone not of their tribe.
It's such a shitheel gotcha. That tries to call a dead man on a facet that no one actually cares about. He'd only had the dog during the last six months of his life, so why should we give a shit about the dog? It's so amazingly tone deaf. And pets are definitely a cross-cutting concern. It is apolitical.
Why would you try to tell anyone who is mourning that their sadness doesn't matter? Let alone a fucking service dog, a creature just about everyone loves.
You have the Twitter link?
Never mind. Stumbled on it.
Stupid bitch. Of course that's what qualifies her to write for Slate, so I guess it works for her.
"Can we amend this ordinance to say that if you're over 60, no one can throw a snowball at you?"
WTF? is "over 60" now code for dotage?
Get over it, Grandpa.
*as I remove myself from your lawn*
And make it snappy and don't take a shit while you're at it, punk!
Hailing from the northern part of North America I can say getting hit with a snowball in the face hurts less than getting hit with a puck.
Fucken pussies.
We just don't have these sort of laws up here thankfully.
So what's your take on using a hockey puck to defeat a mass shooter [since your brought it up...]?
It'll totally work. Totally.
This was featured on the local news last night as a feel good story. The kid was decked out in a polo shirt buttoned up to the neck and sporting a bow tie to large for his little body. He was evidently acting at the direction of his overly proud parents. The whole thing was thoroughly annoying. I was left with the impression the kid is going to grow up to be either a social justice activist or a prosecuting attorney. In either case, he looks to be a future menace to society.