Kurt Loder Movie Reviews

Movie Review: The House That Jack Built

Lars von Trier's latest film is heavy on maiming, short on message.

|

IFC Films

Lars von Trier's blithely vile new serial-killer movie, The House That Jack Built, made its one-day-only U.S. debut in a few lucky cities on Wednesday. It was an unrated "director's cut" of the film—the same one that triggered walkouts at the Cannes Film Festival last May—and it will be succeeded on December 14th by an R-rated version that will linger in theatres for as long as anyone sees a point in screening it.

One wonders how much had to be chopped out of this movie to qualify it for that R rating. Presumably, it lost the shot in which a bound woman's breast is sliced halfway off with a knife (a shot that Trier finds it necessary to show us twice). And probably it will be missing at least parts of a sequence in which the titular killer (Matt Dillon), armed with a rifle, uses a pair of little boys for target practice, bringing one of them down with a head shot and then tracking their wounded mother as she crawls away and finishing her off in a ditch. Then there's the flashback where another little kid—Jack as a larval psycho—cuts a leg off a squirming duckling and throws the frantic creature into the water to flounder and drown. (This spasm of depravity looks alarmingly real, although PETA, which was moved to make "numerous phone calls" about it, says it "confirmed" that the severed leg "was created using movie magic and silicone parts." Both those things.)

Trier is a talented attention hog. His 2009 Antichrist was beautifully filmed (by Anthony Dod Mantle), but also offered us the spectacle of a woman self-administering her own clitoridectomy with a pair of scissors. His coy ramblings about Nazis at a 2011 Cannes press conference ("What can I say, I understand Hitler…Albert Speer I liked") got him banned from the festival until this year – when he returned with this movie, in which we hear a little more about Hitler's favorite architect, and see more concentration camp corpse footage than anyone might want in a film devoted to nothing of more substance than feral sensation. In announcing the movie last year, Trier said it "celebrates the idea that life is evil and soulless." Not much of a message, but it's all he's got.

If you took away all the gaudy excruciation in this two-and-a-half-hour movie—the scenes in which we watch Dillon's Jack as he smacks women in the face with car jacks, strangles and stabs women in their homes, mocks and menaces and terrifies women before removing their body parts—all you'd be left with left with would be Trier's deep thoughts about art. Jack is an artist, for example—he feels the breast-slicing assault to be among his "greatest works." Trier tells us that art is destroyed by the imposition of any moral order, and that "religion has ruined human beings" because it has made them "deny the tiger" in themselves. Jack, of course, is a man who fully embraces his inner tiger.

Does Trier really believe this dorm-room bushwa? He's clearly putting us on, to some extent, but not in any way that's usefully suggestive. Dillon's vulpine agitation is basically humorous, and he has some funny lines. (Addressing a woman lying on the floor after he's just barely failed to kill her, he says, "I'm so sorry. What can I do to make this good again?") But after the first half hour, the laughs start dying along with the characters (well, "characters"—none of the constructs passing through this picture resonate as human beings). And the picture is so awkwardly structured that before long even the bloodiest events grow boring.

It's no surprise, really, that Jack is accompanied on his infernal rounds by a wizened figure he calls Verge (Bruno Ganz)—as in Virgil, as in Dante. In the end, after Jack has finally built his house (with the corpses he's collected in a walk-in refrigerator), he and Verge descend into a fiery netherworld where Jack's unholy journey will finally reach its end. I guess this is a spoiler, of sorts. Sorry. At least it's free.

NEXT: Gonzaga University Won't Let Ben Shapiro Speak on Campus

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. A good review of something lacking quality

    1. A better review might have connected a gory, bloody mess and Matt Dillon’s career, but maybe that’s just me.

  2. Thanks for describing this enough for me to conclude that I won’t see it even if I could see it for free. (Unless I accidentally swallow poison.)

  3. Von Trier has an interesting filmography; sort of a grimy Terrance Malick.

    1. Terrance Malick at least had an eye for beautiful shots and an ear for music. “Badlands” is a minor masterpiece, with a young Sissy Spacek’s portrayal of a dumb ingenue and Karl Orff’s hypnotic musical theme.

      Trier is an overrated failure. His “Melancholia” was the most boring and senseless film I ever saw. I’d sooner sit through back to back reshowings of the same Michael Bay formulaic sequel than that visual soporific again.

  4. In the end, after Jack has finally built his house (with the corpses he’s collected in a walk-in refrigerator), he and Verge descend into a fiery netherworld where Jack’s unholy journey will finally reach its end.

    Where everyone whose home construction fails to live up to code.

  5. My what a vile sounding film. Why would anybody fund such a thing?

  6. I remember when Matt Dillon still did relevant movies with philosophical content, nuance and depth–containing real-life characters, no less! When will an imaginative director summon the nerve to stimulate audiences with another “Drugstore Cowboy”? https://preview.tinyurl.com/ya4py8jo

    1. I once saw a latenight TV interview with him (might have been Letterman) and the guy came off as, shall we say, not very bright. Even by Hollywood actor standards, he seemed like the male version of a stereotypical dumb blonde. I don’t mean his views, I mean any conversation at all. I felt bad for him.

  7. Is this thing so bad as to make the last jedi look good ?

    1. not sure any movie is THAT bad.

  8. The film equivalent of Soave’s posts.

  9. I saw this. I’m the kind of person who can go from loving a movie to thoroughly loathing it. I’m not sure how I felt about it yet.

    Not sure if Kurt will see this, but if he does: do you think the red hats worn by Dillon and the family he’s with during the hunting scene are a form of political commentary? I usually wouldn’t read too much into such costuming, but my screening included an introduction by von Trier where he says, “Never another Trump.” The sequence in question reminded me of the University of Texas shootings, and obviously, apple pie is an American symbol.

  10. LVT? No thanks! He sort of had something going way back with The Kingdom, but that wasn’t as good as Stephen King’s (another miserable old grump) rework Kingdom Hospital. If faced with the prospect of having to choose between watching an entire LVT film, or rubbing haba?eros in my eyes while butt-chugging a gallon of Clorox, I’d express a resounding NO THANKS to both options and choose to walk on the sunny side of the street instead of wallowing in the nihilism and relentlessly negative garbage that is the ouvre of Lars Von Miserable Trier.

  11. `yes you can essentially started three weeks past and that i makes $385 benefit $135 to $a hundred and fifty

    consistently simply by working at the internet from domestic. I made ina long term! “a great deal obliged to you

    for giving American explicit this remarkable opportunity to earn more money from domestic. This in addition coins

    has adjusted my lifestyles in such quite a few manners by which, supply you!”. go to this website online domestic

    media tech tab for extra element thank you…
    http://www.geosalary.com

  12. `yes you can essentially started three weeks past and that i makes $385 benefit $135 to $a hundred and fifty

    consistently simply by working at the internet from domestic. I made ina long term! “a great deal obliged to you

    for giving American explicit this remarkable opportunity to earn more money from domestic. This in addition coins

    has adjusted my lifestyles in such quite a few manners by which, supply you!”. go to this website online domestic

    media tech tab for extra element thank you…
    http://www.geosalary.com

  13. We are fucking doomed.

  14. I essentially started three weeks past and that i makes $385 benefit $135 to $a hundred and fifty consistently simply by working at the internet from domestic. I made ina long term! “a great deal obliged to you for giving American explicit this remarkable opportunity to earn more money from domestic. This in addition coins has adjusted my lifestyles in such quite a few manners by which, supply you!”. go to this website online domestic media tech tab for extra element thank you .

    http://www.Mesalary.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.