The Government's Foolish War on Vaping

Misguided health police are cracking down on e-cigarettes.


E-cigarettes let people get a hit of nicotine without burning tobacco.

Avoiding burning tobacco is the single greatest preventative health measure human beings can take, given the diseases conventional cigarettes cause.

Unfortunately, our government and media now act as if vaping e-cigarettes is the health crisis.

"Your kids are not an experiment! Protect them from e-cigarettes," warns former Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy in a CDC PSA.

My former employer, ABC News, which never finds a risk it doesn't hype, has run more than a dozen scare stores on vaping. A Nightline reporter warned about kids "addicted to nicotine before they even graduate from middle school!"

Yet compared to regular cigarettes, e-cigarettes are "extraordinarily less harmful," says Michelle Minton of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. In my new newest video she says, "we should really be encouraging people to use vaping."

Calling vaping safer than smoking doesn't mean the risks are zero. Vapor contains harmful chemicals, too. But scientists say it's far less harmful than smoking. If smokers switched to e-cigarettes, that would save millions of lives.

Nicotine is what makes both e-cigarettes and regular cigarettes addictive. But nicotine itself isn't that bad. Like caffeine, it's a stimulant.

"On the spectrum of drugs that you can become addicted to," says Minton, "nicotine and caffeine are very similar."

The big health risks come from the 7,000 other chemicals generated by burning tobacco leaves.

By contrast, e-cigarette smoke is mostly just flavored vapor, which is less likely to harm anyone.

It doesn't even smell as bad as cigarettes. "Somebody who's vaping a huge cloud of Vanilla Cherry Blast, or whatever they're vaping, is way more pleasant than standing next to somebody exhaling smoke from a combustible cigarette," observed Minton.

Full disclosure, Minton's think tank received some money from companies that make e-cigarettes. Nevertheless, she's right. Vaping is a much safer alternative.

"While there are a few lunatics who say e-cigarettes are more harmful—based on zero evidence—every legitimate scientist who's investigated this issue has said, 'We don't know all the risks, but we can say they are less harmful than smoking.'"

Nonetheless, America's health police have gone to war against vaping.

Some cities want to ban vaping. The CDC funds ads that say, "young people should never use these kinds of products!"

But kids will. Kids experiment with all sorts of things. Far better that they vape than smoke.

Actually, CDC data show kids had been vaping a little less since 2014, but recently there was a spike.

"The only explanation I can come up with," said Minton, "is that the CDC and FDA have advertised these products by talking about them so much! The CDC telling children you shouldn't do this is not necessarily going to make many of them say no. Maybe it makes it more attractive to them."

Minton acknowledges that it's bad if kids become addicted to nicotine but says that's a risk worth taking.

"Do we want children to become addicted to anything? No. But keeping a small percent of teenagers from trying e-cigarettes is not worth sacrificing adults whose lives could be saved."

About half of teens who take up regular cigarettes will never quit. About a third of those users will die from smoking-related illnesses. Smoking is America's leading preventable cause of death.

So banning alternatives is not a wise move for public health. Minton points to the example of snus, a moist tobacco chew popular in Sweden. Snus is not completely harmless, so the rest of Europe banned it. But "Sweden currently has the lowest smoking and lung cancer rates of any EU country."

Banning snus in Europe was a public health tragedy. Now the U.S. is doing something similar with e-cigarettes.

Minton says that in "states that enacted (age restrictions) on e-cigarettes, teenage smoking rates go up because when teens who want to do something like smoking can't get ahold of e-cigarettes, they just go to smoking."

Thanks to government's paranoid warnings and media hype, Americans who might make the rational choice to pick e-cigarettes over burning tobacco are now more likely to be killed by conventional cigarettes.

NEXT: After Cracking Down on Airbnb, New York City Comes After Traditional Hotels

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Addiction is a disease, and yes it can start with vaping, and yes it can end in a heroin overdose. If these preventative measures keep one kid alive then it’s worth it.

    1. Addiction is chemical specific. A nicotine addiction is NOT going to end in a heroin overdose.

      Nicotine is no more of a “gateway” drug than alcohol or caffeine.

      1. Nicotine is a gateway drug. See the 2014 New England Journal article:

        We do not understand the gateway effect well but it almost undoubtedly is true.

    2. There’s a price for freedom. I don’t think the problems with herion are derived from vaporizers. Take away freedoms for an unproven correlation? I don’t think so. America is the land of the free, not the land of the safe.

  2. It’s only a foolish war if you believe in Hanlon’s Razor more than you believe in the Iron Law of Institutions. The Bureaucratic State isn’t stupid, it’s evil.

    1. There’s no reason it can’t be both stupid and evil. They are orthogonal traits.

  3. “On the spectrum of drugs that you can become addicted to,” says Minton, “nicotine and caffeine are very similar.”

    Um, it appears the nicotine habit is generally *much* harder to kick.

    1. No, it’s not that hard. I’ve done it many times.

      1. Ah, yes. 😎

    2. Both you and the article writer have oddly neglected the potential of vaping marijuana, which would not involve nicotine and would not be habit-forming at all.

      1. Not true. Marijuana for many is habit forming. Marijuana is now viewed as addictive by the medical community. It does not happen in most just as addiction does not happen to most that try alcohol. But it clearly is addictive for some users.

  4. Vaping just makes you look like a hipster douche but it’s much better than smoking. Just keep your vape to yourself hipsters. I don’t understand the war on it, other than government doesn’t like to see people doing things that they haven’t given the ok to.

    1. The concerns are not with people vaping in general but instead deal with the young.

  5. The latest hysteria over vaping is that breathing in the water-laden vapor can cause a pneumonia-like condition which is worse for your lungs than smoking. A smoker actually told me that recently.

    It would not be surprising to find a “Baptist-bootlegger” type connection between the public health establishment and the tobacco industry. Both hate vaping and want to see it eliminated.

  6. II tell people it’s like sniffing perfume, because it is. It’s got water, maybe glycerine or propylene glycol, both of which are components of common food additives, flavorings also used in foods. Some of it contains nicotine, whose properties are very well studied and which is also widespread as both naturally occurring and applied as insecticide. There’s no cause for this ridiculous specul’n on its dangers. It’s inhaled, but we inhale when we taste food too. The dosage is nowhere near toxic levels.

  7. Relax, the government knows what’s best for you.

    This message was paid for by the Democrat progressive socialist/communist party.

  8. The big tobacco companies all came out with their own brands of e-cigs. Then Juul came along and crushed them.

    So follow the money. The tobacco companies want to regulate vapes to keep people addicted to regular cigarettes.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.