Bail

Virginia's Attorney General Wants To Stop Jailing People Just Because They Can't Afford Bail

The number of people being detained prior to trial has tripled over the course of three decades.

|

Bail reform cover
Reason Magazine

Virginia's attorney general is looking to join the movement to reform the cash bail system in order to cease stockpiling poor people behind bars before their cases go to court.

Democratic Attorney General Mark Herring announced this week that he's calling for reforms to Virginia's pretrial systems. Herring wants to keep people who are dangerous, or flight risks, behind bars; but he thinks courts should stop using money to determine who gets to go free before trial.

The Virginia State Crime Commission is studying the state's pretrial processes this year and will be presenting its report on Nov. 8. Herring sent the commission a letter encouraging it to take a closer look at how Virginia judges set bail for defendants. He notes that "[t]he widespread practice of detaining low-risk indigent defendants before trial has become very concerning, even raising potential constitutional concerns, and pretrial detention may have become the norm rather than the last resort in too many cases involving nonviolent, low-risk offenders."

The stats show Virginia's pretrial population has ballooned from 3,000 to 9,000 over the course of three decades, and nearly half the people in Virginia's jails are there awaiting trial, not serving criminal sentences. Not all of those people there because they pose a risk to the community; many folks are stuck entirely because they don't have the money to cover their bail. Using money as a criterion for freedom keeps people from working, and data shows they're likely to receive harsher sentences, or accept unpleasant plea agreements, because it's difficult to negotiate from behind bars.

Virginia was, interestingly enough, a state that pioneered pretrial assessment systems more than a decade ago. The state wanted to determine a defendant's risk level as objectively as possible. But Herring notes in his letter that the judges determining conditions of pretrial release received very little information from pretrial services, and made their decisions with neither prosecutors nor defense attorneys present. Without debate, discussion, or adequate information, magistrates often end up resorting to cash bail without considering alternatives.

Herring is not calling for a complete elimination of cash bail, as is the case in California; nor is he advocating for the severely curtailed versions cash bail we're seeing in places like New Jersey and Alaska. But he has made several recommendations and asked the commission to consider certain principles to guide any pretrial reforms in Virginia. Specifically, he is calling for the commission to consider establishing that judges should operate on the presumption that defendants should be released under the least-restrictive conditions necessary to make sure the defendant shows up for court and doesn't cause trouble while free.

That type of presumption can be necessary to keep bail reform from backfiring and causing the opposite of what's intended. In New Jersey, judges operate with a similar presumption: the defendant goes free unless prosecutors can make a compelling and individualized case that a defendant should be detained prior to trial. What's more, defendants have their lawyers there to represent them during pretiral release negotiations.

Without the presumption of release and additional guidance or information, eliminating bail can potentially result in judges simply detaining defendants with no possibility of pretrial release at all, regardless of income level. We have seen this problem playing out in Baltimore, which Herring specifically mentions in his letter. Judges in Maryland were told to consider the ability of defendants to actually afford bail before they offered it. But they weren't operating on the presumption of release and, as a result, they ended up ordering defendants detained without any bail at all. In Baltimore, this resulted in more people being detained than under cash bail.

The bail reform law California just passed requires pretrial assessments and evaluations and the complete elimination of cash bail. The goal is to get more people out of jail before their trial. Unlike New Jersey, however, California's new law doesn't establish a presumption of release. Civil rights and criminal justice reform advocates are very worried that Golden State's new system will result in more being people detained before trial.

That Herring recognizes this potential pitfall is good news for reform advocates in Virginia. They may want him to go all the way and call for abolishing cash bail, but it's important that, before blaming the problem on the bail industry, the state examines its own role in keeping people behind bars before they've been convicted.

For more on the bail reform movement and its challenges, check out Reason's cover story from August/September.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

14 responses to “Virginia's Attorney General Wants To Stop Jailing People Just Because They Can't Afford Bail

  1. What’s in this for Herring? There has to be something.

    1. (sorry) something red?

    2. Make more profit weekly… This is an awesome side job for anybody… Best part about it is that you can work from comfort of your house and earn 100-2000 dollars every week … Apply for the job now and have your first check at the end of the week.

      linked here…..=====??? http://www.Jobs73.com

  2. So if I am poor and I get arrested, I get to go home on my good looks and promises to do better. If I have a job and get arrested, I have to pay hundreds or maybe thousands of dollars to a bail bondsman if I want to go home.

    Perhaps that is not the best incentive structure?

    1. was going to say it must be across-board or nothing, but:

      >>>Herring is not calling for a complete elimination of cash bail

      Herring misunderstands equal protection.

  3. Specifically, he is calling for the commission to consider establishing that judges should operate on the presumption that defendants should be released under the least-restrictive conditions necessary to make sure the defendant shows up for court and doesn’t cause trouble while free.

    This is dangerously close to presuming someone is innocent of a crime until they have been convicted of it. Seems Unamerican.

    1. They don’t generally arrest peopel for fun, or at least they are not supposed to. Someone isn’t supposed to be arrested unless there is probable cause to think they are guilty of a crime. If they are arresting people without that, that is a big problem but one that has nothing to do with bail.

      Just because someone is presumed innocent at trial, doesn’t mean they are innocent or that they should be treated the same as someone whom there is not probable cause to believe committed a crime. This no doubt comes as a shock to you Hugh since you seem to not know much, but a lot of people who are arrested are actually guilty and no shit threats to society. And just letting them go even though there is probable cause to believe they have committed a crime is not a particularly good idea.

      1. Not convicted = presumed innocent.

        The point of restricting the person’s liberty before trial has to do with preserving the court’s jurisdiction – making sure the guy shows up in court and preventing witness-tampering.

        The reason they don’t always want to just let a guy walk off until the trial is they’re worried they might not see him again, or key witnesses might disappear or “forget” their testimony. A court interested in preserving its own jurisdiction can take such things into account.

        1. But the founding generation seemed to believe that there was a right to bail unless the defendant faced the death penalty and the case against him was strong.

          Without such a right, the presumption of innocence can seem theoretical, which is why the bail reformers have some valid critiques – but from California’s experience, it seems that the establishment is seizing on the reformers’ concerns to lock people up without bail in the name of efficiency and fairness.

  4. Maybe California pulled the football away from the bail reformers and instituted a regime of pretrial detention, but Virginia won’t pull the football away, they swear!

  5. “… accept unpleasant plea agreements, because it’s difficult to negotiate from behind bars.”

    The system might fall apart if prosecutors aren’t able to put the screws to charged individuals in order to leverage a plea deal. The system isn’t set up for trials, it is set up for prosecutors to leverage over-charging poor people while they rot in jail.

    The system can’t handle more trials and prosecutors will hate losing the leverage of imprisonment while awaiting trial.

    Municipalities will also lose fine revenue if they can’t imprison deadbeat poor people who don’t pay their tickets.

    The market forces at play here won’t allow changes to the system on any wide scale. Revenue would go down and costly trials would go up.

  6. Cash bail is the *alternative* to pretrial detention.

  7. Why don’t we just stop imprisoning people at all? He why don’t we just get rid of all laws and make everything legal? Democrats wonder why the lose elections and yet are constantly making proposals like this one. I have heard some pretty ignorant things come out of the mouths of Democrats but this is the best one yet. The concept of cash bail eliminates the holding of defendants for months awaiting trial. What would be the incentive for hardened criminals to return for trial if simply released? Going to jail? Hello?

  8. I essentially started three weeks past and that i makes $385 benefit $135 to $a hundred and fifty consistently simply by working at the internet from domestic. I made ina long term! “a great deal obliged to you for giving American explicit this remarkable opportunity to earn more money from domestic. This in addition coins has adjusted my lifestyles in such quite a few manners by which, supply you!”. go to this website online domestic media tech tab for extra element thank you……
    http://www.geosalary.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.