Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Kavanaugh Confirmation Comes Down to Four Senators: Reason Roundup

Plus: millennial men are more socialist than millennial women and changes to juvenile justice programs

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 10.5.2018 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Jeff Malet Photography/Newscom
(Jeff Malet Photography/Newscom)

Jeff Malet Photography/Newscom

Kavanaugh vote scheduled for 10:30 a.m. The professional fate of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is up for grabs today. Following a half-hearted FBI investigation into sexual claims against the judge—the bureau interviewed neither Kavanaugh nor his first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford—senators are scheduled for a first vote this morning on whether to advance the controversial nominee to the high Court bench.

In an op-ed published by The Wall Street Journal last night, Kavanaugh admitted to getting emotional during last week's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, but he said it was because he was there as a "son, husband, and dad." As a judge, Kavanaugh insists, he can turn off the quick temper and tears.

BREAKING - NEW: Cornyn just told me the cloture vote will be tomorrow around 10:30a.

That sets up final Kavanaugh confirmation for around *4:30p* Saturday.

— Lisa Desjardins (@LisaDNews) October 4, 2018

As of last night (and a week ago), most Democrats and Republicans in the Senate had made up their minds about how to vote on Kavanaugh. But a few still seemed conflicted.

Sens. Susan Collins (R–Maine), Jeff Flake (R–Ariz.), Joe Manchin (D–W.V.), and Lisa Murkowski (R–Alaska) have not yet said how they will vote.

Colorado Republican Sen. Cory Gardner's office told The Denver Post yesterday that Gardner "hasn't decided how he'll vote on Judge Brett Kavanaugh." But his office later put out a statement saying that "Gardner has been supportive of Judge Kavanaugh throughout the nomination. He had the opportunity to review the FBI report tonight. Nothing in the report changed his mind and he remains supportive of Judge Kavanaugh's nomination."

FREE MINDS

Getting tougher on juvenile offenders? "The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), a division of the Department of Justice (DOJ), has removed a number of webpages related to ongoing programs and policy guidance, and altered messaging on its website in ways that indicate a shift toward a more punitive approach to juvenile justice under the Trump administration," according to a new report from the Sunlight Foundation, a nonprofit focused on government transparency. It continues:

Information related to girls in the juvenile justice system and the use of solitary confinement among youthful offenders were among the materials removed from its website without notice. Changes have been made to the terminology used to describe juveniles that come into contact with the justice system and the types of programs and services OJJDP supports and provides. The Sunlight Foundation's Web Integrity Project documented those removals and significant language shifts, through an analysis of pages preserved by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, in a pair of reports released today.

The changes come as the office, which is a component of the Office of Justice Programs (OJP), has taken a distinct turn toward more punitive policies under the new administration, advocates and a former OJP official told WIP. The office has toughened its rhetoric as its current director has announced that she intends to "rebalance" its approach to direct more focus on victim's rights and community safety, and away from therapeutic interventions for youth.

More on the worrying shifts here.

FREE MARKETS

Millennial men more socialist than millennial women. A new poll from Buzzfeed looks at socialist leanings among young Americans. The poll—conducted in late September among folks 22 to 37 years old—found "millennial men were much more likely than women to call themselves a socialist or democratic socialist": 39 percent of all men surveyed, compared to just 22 percent of women. Overall, 31 percent of those surveyed said they considered themselves a socialist or a democratic socialist.

Poll questions and data here.

QUICK HITS

  • Today's financial traders are "subject to 24-hour Big Brother-style surveillance that goes beyond the scrutiny of equity and bond desks."
  • So it begins: A woman is suing Facebook for allegedly enabling sex trafficking.
  • Passing laws turns voters off from political parties. Hmmm…
  • Thanks to our copyright regime in the U.S., we already know how aggressive content moderation works, write the folks at Techdirt. "And it's a disaster."
  • Thirty people, including actresses Amy Schumer and Emily Ratajkowski, were arrested Thursday in anti-Kavanaugh protests.

New filing in Democratic National Committee v. Russian Federation, @WikiLeaks et al.: Amended Complainthttps://t.co/ddG0xNqvY5 pic.twitter.com/pa7MnUVs7O

— Big Cases Bot (@big_cases) October 4, 2018

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Fool Me Twice

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupBrett KavanaughSenateSupreme Court
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (254)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    The professional fate of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is up for grabs today.

    Grabassing in the Senate.

    1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

      Does this mean we can stop talking about high school year books on Monday?

      1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        Only until the next nomination.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

          The template has been set?

          1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            This tactic didnt work, so the Lefties will tweek it and try again when Thomas retires and RBG chokes on a swig of whiskey.

            1. Quo Usque Tandem   7 years ago

              There are worse ways to die.

              1. Ron   7 years ago

                I'm sure the pillow over Scalia was a pleasant death

          2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            "The template has been set?"

            Momma always says, 'tem plates ain't gonna set temselves.

            1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

              [narrows gaze]

      2. Derp-o-Matic 6000   7 years ago

        No, every time there is a ruling that the Left doesn't like, we're going to hear about this. See also: Hill, Anita; Garland, Merrick

      3. Rat on a train   7 years ago

        Did he do bunny ears on someone for the class photo?

        1. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

          Worst thing evah.

    2. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

      Hello.

      "Millennial men more socialist than millennial women. A new poll from Buzzfeed looks at socialist leanings among young Americans. The poll?conducted in late September among folks 22 to 37 years old?found "millennial men were much more likely than women to call themselves a socialist or democratic socialist": 39 percent of all men surveyed, compared to just 22 percent of women. Overall, 31 percent of those surveyed said they considered themselves a socialist or a democratic socialist."

      Sounds like women will be taking care of their 'men' down the road.

      Society is gonna have to figure out how to provide for 30% of the population wallowing in their own stupidity and illiteracy. 'But Bernie said I was going to be taken care of!'

      /wimply picks up axe suddenly realizing their flannel shirts and Paul Bunyan and Coureurs de bois beards were a lie.

      1. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

        "But I'm a warrior! Look at my cool samurai-like man bun!"

        1. Ska   7 years ago

          I think it all went downhill when you could only call someone a faggot if you were among your closest friends.

        2. Ska   7 years ago

          I think it all went downhill when you could only call someone a faggot if you were among your closest friends.

          1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            I'm not your friend, faggot.

            1. DiegoF   7 years ago

              But I am, it would appear! Aw shucks; I am quite moved.

              1. Nardz   7 years ago

                You're not a faggot, Diego.
                Faggot = stronger together; a closeted progressive, or, a progressive that couches their positions in "liberty" and collective freedom (see: chemjeff, Reason staff)
                For instance, Tony may be a faggot - but it has nothing to do with his sexuality.

            2. Chipper Jones   7 years ago

              I'm not your faggot, buddy.

      2. Here for the outrage   7 years ago

        Women never get enough credit for their superior rational decision making.

        Unfortunately the loudest ones wear pussy hats and request to be arrested while protesting things that never happened

        1. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

          Women are more pragmatic. Men are more romantic.

      3. Ron   7 years ago

        it makes sense that men would want more socialism so that they won't have marry then divorce then pay for everything like they do now. they have learned form their parents what not to do.

        1. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

          Yes, young men are very aware of the unfairness of public assistance and "child support" going almost entirely to women.

  2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    Kavanaugh! KAVANAUGH! Kavanaugh!

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      Shouldn't you be paying attention to your high school teacher right about now?

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        He's probably a lefty. LC is owning him by posting on here.

      2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        Why? Were you expecting him to be bragging after he got off that hildebeast you call a mom?

    2. Griffin3   7 years ago

      /me drops whiskey stones in the cut crystal tumbler he expects to fill with sweet, sweet tears of despair ... no matter which way the Kavanaugh votes goes.

      1. Bubba Jones   7 years ago

        Are they bullet shaped?

  3. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    So it begins: A woman is suing Facebook for allegedly enabling sex trafficking.

    I hope it's the mother whose child was "stalked" by a guy who, due to her vigilance, didn't get to grab her kid and wanted to post the encounter to warn everyone that there are predators everywhere.

    1. Inigo Montoya   7 years ago

      No doubt.

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        Don't Speak.

        1. Dillinger   7 years ago

          sorry, i'm not home right now.

    2. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

      Nope. It's a woman claiming she was trafficked as a minor by someone who friended her on Facebook using a false identity and that Facebook is responsible for her being trafficked because they didn't detect the guy's phony profile and prevent it.

  4. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    Thirty people, including actresses Amy Schemer and Emily Ratajkowski, were arrested Thursday in anti-Kavanaugh protests.

    Who?

    1. Rich   7 years ago

      Amy Schemer -- you know, Chuck Schemer's daughter.

      1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        Is Chuck that junior senator from nowhere?

      2. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        So that's from where she gets those ample bosoms.

        1. Dillinger   7 years ago

          and copious chocodiles.

    2. Conchfritters   7 years ago

      Emily Ratajkowski: hawt

      Amy Schumer: not so much, unless BBW is your thing.

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        Big Bitchy Women?

    3. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      Why does ENB feel it is important to name only two of the thirty people? Is it because that's what lots of other loser news agencies did? Super non-conforming libertarian.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Thirty people, including actresses Amy Schemer and Emily Ratajkowski, were arrested Thursday in anti-Kavanaugh protests.

    Hollywood cred: ESTABLISHED

    1. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

      Prisoners: Now we just have to sit, wait and become martyrs!

      Schumer; Eww. Fuck that, Chucky is bailing me out.

    2. Derp-o-Matic 6000   7 years ago

      So can we accuse Schumer & Co. for flaunting their white privilege since they weren't shot or brutally beaten by the police?

      I'm still trying too figure out how the grievance hierarchy works.

      1. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

        The whole MeToo thing is conspicuously white.

        1. Dillinger   7 years ago

          can't let #metoo intersect the NBA or NFL the universe will implode.

          1. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

            It's too late. The conflict over sexual behavior between Black men and white women is already boiling. It's one of the most underreported social stories today. Talking about is too fraught with PC violations. Remember how that YouTube video of a white woman being catcalled and followed by Black and Hispanic men while walking in New York got denounced a couple of years ago?

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1XGPvbWn0A

            1. Dillinger   7 years ago

              trouble.

    3. Dillinger   7 years ago

      brawl for who searched Emily.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Millennial men more socialist than millennial women.

    A shot from ENB at Soave from out of nowhere.

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      If Soave gets angry enough, he will release the hounds.

      1. Here for the outrage   7 years ago

        Soave like, literally can't even right now

        I bet he's reading his previous 4 articles on Kavanaugh and thinking... "I can't believe I couldn't gaslight my readers like NYT and Wapo did, how did they know there was no massive gang rape conspiracy?"

        1. Dillinger   7 years ago

          lol

      2. End Child Unemployment   7 years ago

        Or the bees? Or the dogs who have bees in their mouths and when they bark, they shoot bees at you?

  7. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    Millennial men more socialist than millennial women.

    More cannon fodder for the Lefty overlords.

    1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      Translation: Tiime for women to start pulling the wagon for a while.

    2. Inigo Montoya   7 years ago

      I took this as a reflection on women these days being better read and generally more studious than men.

      Back before my time, it was usually boys who were encouraged to develop their brains, while girls just needed to look good and be charming. If that is increasingly reversed, it makes sense that more young women develop a modicum of critical thinking skills while many young men are easily fooled by promises of something for nothing.

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        Can't wait for the gender pay gap to invert.

        1. 0x1000   7 years ago

          Oh man, I can almost feel my free Californian board of directors seat now.

          1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            What are you going to do when your the token male on the Apple board?

        2. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

          They'll never admit that has happened. They'll just start claiming that hotel maids and day care workers should make as much as engineers and lawyers.

      2. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

        A large proportion of young men have grown up in households headed by women who spent at least a portion of their lives living on public assistance and/or "child support" payments. They see it as unfair that men don't have that option.

  8. Rich   7 years ago

    A woman is suing Facebook for allegedly enabling sex trafficking.

    Hey, lady -- don't neglect to sue some car manufacturers while you're at it!

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      Tesla? Tesla.

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        Autonomous pimps

    2. Derp-o-Matic 6000   7 years ago

      While she's at it, She should also sure her internet service provider for enabling this to occur.

      1. Inigo Montoya   7 years ago

        Why stop there? Sue her hubby or BF for impregnating her and causing her to have a traffic-prone child. Also sue the obstetrician who delivered the pimp-target she is now saddled with.

        1. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

          The claim is that she was trafficked as a minor (15) by someone she met on Facebook. The article on the suit makes no mention of pregnancy or a child resulting from the trafficking.

  9. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    New filing in Democratic National Committee v. Russian Federation, @WikiLeaks et al.

    The DNC is NOT going to like the Russian Counterclaim: Novichok

  10. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    It's gonna be a bloodbath for Democrats this November election.

    1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   7 years ago

      I guarantee Democrats will win the House and Senate. Weeks ago I was only confident they'd win the House, but the progressive - libertarian alliance is more energized than ever because of Drumpf's attempted Supreme Court takeover.

      #BlueTsunami

      1. Quo Usque Tandem   7 years ago

        Since pretty much everyone in your parody is actually the opposite of reality, this is a good thing.

      2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        Of course, I know OBL is a parody, but he just made me think of 2016 Cytotoxic. Poof, he disappeared. Never has a human been so vociferously wrong for so long.

      3. Mike Laursen   7 years ago

        Progressive-libertarian alliance?

        1. 0x1000   7 years ago

          Think "the Reason staff circa 2018"

          1. Mike Laursen   7 years ago

            Oh, please.

    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      #LibertarianTsunami

  11. Rich   7 years ago

    Has Reason covered The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate U.S. Companies?

    It is some truly outrageous shit.

    1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      Nope. The USA needs to buy cheap Chinese crap at all costs.

      Nevermind that the Chinese are gearing up for war.

    2. Muzzled Woodchipper   7 years ago

      It should be noted that all of those companies have denied the claim.

      1. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

        According to current theory, that's how you can tell they are lying.

        1. DesigNate   7 years ago

          Well played.

        2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

          Somebody needs to "demand" an FBI investigation.

      2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        Unsupported claims are all the rage these days.

    3. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      The Russians put the Chinese up to it

      1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        The Tibetans are the real masterminds.

    4. Griffin3   7 years ago

      The hardware hack may or not be true. But, probably is, and is such a clever hack, I wish I had thought of it first.

      That Chinese viruses have been dumping terabytes of US gov't data to the PLA specialists for years, now, is pretty much old news. I imagine, half their problem is having enough technical advanced English speakers to interpret it all.

  12. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

    Passing laws turns voters off from political parties. Hmmm...

    If only there were a party supporting fewer laws and regulations.

    1. Rich   7 years ago

      The Keg Party?

      1. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

        The wild party!

    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      I used to visit a website that advocated smaller government, fewer laws and regulations, free market, and more property rights.

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        I think you misread the Infowars mission statement.

        1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          We're on Infowars right now?

          1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

            Sometimes it's hard to tell based on the comments section alone.

            1. TuIpa   7 years ago

              You could clean that up if you'd leave.

              1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

                Never change Tulpa.

                1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

                  Why would Tulpa. He got some action from ENB.

    3. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      MiniAnarchy Partie.

    4. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      None of the Above?

  13. geo1113   7 years ago

    "Following a half-hearted FBI investigation into sexual claims against the judge?the bureau interviewed neither Kavanaugh nor his first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford"

    Why would they? Both gave sworn testimony in the hearing. Kavanaugh said he didn't do it. Ford said all she remembers is that Kavanaugh did it and nothing else except for one beer. If anything, they spared Ford the embarrassment of finding out she is a liar.

    Seems like Reason and ENB wants to follow the Democrats talking points.

    1. Nardz   7 years ago

      "Seems like Reason and ENB wants to follow the Democrats talking points."

      So what's new?
      Seems to be their standard operating procedure

    2. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      They just follow the status quo narrative. This is a conservative publication, in the true sense of the word.

      1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        You can't lump all the writers for Reason into one ideological bin.

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          That's true.

          1. TuIpa   7 years ago

            Yes, some are even worse.

      2. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

        I would call it an "establishment publication".

    3. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

      "Well, why didn't they waterboard Kavanaugh and make him confess?"

    4. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      Don't get me started on that sham bigfoot investigation.

    5. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      Don't get me started on that sham bigfoot investigation.

    6. Fribley   7 years ago

      Because extensive interviews by special agents are exactly the same as 5 minute questions by politicians.

      1. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

        Several hours worth of questions where each Individual question takes 5 minutes to ask. 🙂

  14. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   7 years ago

    New filing in Democratic National Committee v. Russian Federation, @WikiLeaks et al.: Amended Complaint

    I'm proud of the Democrats for acting exactly how a responsible, patriotic party should be acting after being cheated out of the presidency by a hostile foreign power.

    #TrumpRussia
    #LibertariansAgainstWikileaks

    1. geo1113   7 years ago

      They were cheated out of the presidency by a hostile domestic power names Hilary Clinton.

      1. geo1113   7 years ago

        named

        1. Rich   7 years ago

          Hillary

          1. geo1113   7 years ago

            Ha. That too.

      2. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   7 years ago

        Hillary Clinton was the most qualified candidate ever. She selflessly devoted her entire life to fighting for the less fortunate, especially women and children. And how was she treated? The media relentlessly attacked her (the e-mail non-story, the minor fainting incident, etc.), Russia sabotaged her, and the Comey letter probably cost her the election.

        But she still won by 3 million votes!

        #StillWithHer
        #AbolishTheElectoralCollege

        1. geo1113   7 years ago

          Ha. Hillary...selfless...that's a good one!

        2. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

          And she almost got Haiti back on track if it wasn't for those meddling kids!

        3. Quo Usque Tandem   7 years ago

          Frau Hilda von Pantsuit, jah!

        4. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

          But look at what her loss did for sales of butt-hurt salve. Profits must be through the roof.

        5. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

          IT WAS HER TURN!

        6. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

          And don't forget, she is a fine public servant.

        7. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          Hillary 'Landing Under Sniper Fire' Clinton.

  15. Rich   7 years ago

    a half-hearted FBI investigation into sexual claims against the judge?the bureau interviewed neither Kavanaugh nor his first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford

    nor Ford's parents.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      Or me. They never asked me any questions. WTF?

      1. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

        The true definition of half hearted.

      2. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        Are you Squee, Just Sayin'?

  16. Ordinary Person   7 years ago

    I was apparently wrong to believe Kavanaugh was lying about devil triangle and broofing. I'm sorry about that.

    1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      Among other things that you are wrong about.

    2. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      Nothing to apologize for. I thought "boof" was a character from Teen Wolf

      1. Ordinary Person   7 years ago

        That's funny.

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          And true

      2. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        Not from Back To The Future?

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          Do you even Michael J. Fox, brah?

      3. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        You're thinking Boofy the Vampire slayer.

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJWGwGOoKU4

    3. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   7 years ago

      Don't apologize. No matter what we've learned over the past couple weeks, one thing is clear ? Kavanaugh lacks the temperament to be on the Supreme Court.

      #SaveRoe
      #SUPER-PRECEDENT

      1. An Owl Named Dur   7 years ago

        Really? Because unless current Supreme Court advocacy involves the lawyers before it to accuse the Justices of sexual abuse, gang rape and drunkenness, I'm not seeing the relevance.

      2. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        More importantly, he also lacks the proper temperature.

        1. Eddy   7 years ago

          So does Scalia.

          1. Dillinger   7 years ago

            the worms disagree.

        2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          So does RBG.

    4. Mike Laursen   7 years ago

      No, you got that right. I don't know why he went that route when he could have simply said he was a teenager who wrote a bunch of immature brags in his yearbook.

    5. Fribley   7 years ago

      I am going to assume this is sarcasm since so many classmates are coming forward to say he was doing exactly that about both those words and the meaning of Renate Alumnus.

  17. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    Following a half-hearted FBI investigation into sexual claims against the judge?the bureau interviewed neither Kavanaugh nor his first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford...

    Did you see the testimonies? Those two people are extremely off-putting. No thank you.

    1. lap83   7 years ago

      My guess is that the FBI doesn't need to interview them because they don't care enough to charge either one with lying to them. "Half-hearted" is one way of putting it. I'd call it a rare moment of impartiality.

      1. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

        Well said. Ford should be counting her blessings everyone is going to quickly forget she ever existed.

      2. Derp-o-Matic 6000   7 years ago

        "Impartiality," "Indifference," same thing, really.

        1. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

          In this specific case, yes, they are.

    2. Number 2   7 years ago

      Half-hearted investigation by the FBI? The same courageous, heroic, and brutally honest FBI that is protecting Our Democracy (TM) from the evil conspiracy between Putin and Trump to turn us into a fascist Russian protectorate? Aren't we supposed to accept everything the FBI says as a 100% metaphysical certainty? If they say there is nothing to Ford's allegations, it MUST be true! Just ask James Comey.

      1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        "Russia Fever Dreams are different and a Thai prostitute holds the key to unraveling everything. But when the FBI contradicts the narrative then they're baddies"

        - ENB

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          When the special counsel wraps up and no evidence has still been provided about Russian interference or anything to validate the nonsense that totally not insane people have been pimping as true for the past two years, the beclowning will be epic.

          This beclowning is just an appetizer

  18. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    "A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured by Dr. Ford's allies to revisit her initial statement that she knew nothing about an alleged sexual assault by a teenage Brett Kavanaugh, which she later updated to say that she believed but couldn't corroborate Dr. Ford's account, according to people familiar with the matter.

    Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a friend of Dr. Ford's, had urged her to clarify her statement, the people said. ?

    On Thursday, a day after sending to the White House the report on its investigation into the allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, the FBI sent the White House and Senate an additional package of information that included text messages from Ms. McLean to Ms. Keyser, according to a person familiar with the matter."

    - WSJ (10/5/18)

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      So weird that there isn't a link to this story in the roundup

      1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        ENB only wants certain kind of webtraffic.

      2. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        "What difference, at this point, does it make?"

    2. Rich   7 years ago

      What kind of "clarification" is that? I mean, other than clarifying that McLean is a witness-tamperer.

    3. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

      'I had to pivot. These people are crazy! They threatened not only my family but everyone around me within a 3 mile radius plus all the homeless, white people, squirrels and racoons! Not even the Mafia does this!'

  19. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

    Have you driven a Ford lately?

    Too soon?

    1. Ordinary Person   7 years ago

      I don't how you get around the fact she named Kavanaugh years ago.

      1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

        According to her therapist notes, which she refuses to provide to the Senate committee. There are a lot of curious parts of this story. None of them making the accusations "credible"

      2. Here for the outrage   7 years ago

        huh?

        1. Ordinary Person   7 years ago

          I think naming Kavanaugh years ago allows us to believe her sincerity if not her memory.

          1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

            Agreed. None of us know what her motivation is, so this should be the default position unless disproven

          2. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            I actually don't believe a word she says.

            1. Nardz   7 years ago

              Nope.
              She has so many tells, believing in her sincerity is something only a fool, or someone being overly generous, would do.

      3. DesigNate   7 years ago

        Sweet, you've got actual proof that the victim hasn't provided yet. You should get that to the FBI pronto.

        1. Ordinary Person   7 years ago

          There are 4 affidavits from people attesting to her having described a sexual assault in high school and she specifically named Kavanaugh to some of them years ago. Those are swore statements. If the FBI didn't include that in their report that's negligence but more probably evidence of a rigged investigation.

          1. Idle Hands   7 years ago

            Link? I read that she talked about a judge on the bench being the perp but not that she had actually named anyone except to her husband.

            1. DesigNate   7 years ago

              The story keeps changing. When it first came out, she didn't mention a name in the counseling session. Then she said it was a future judge. Then she gave a name. Who the fuck knows.

            2. Idle Hands   7 years ago

              Found it

              Christine did not mention the assault to me again until June 29, 2018, two days after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his resignation from the Supreme Court of the United States," he said.

              On that day, Koegler said Ford revealed to him in an email that the person who had assaulted her in high school was President Donald Trump's "favorite for SCOTUS."

              In his response email, Koegler wrote, "I remember you telling me about him, but I don't remember his name. Do you mind telling me so I can read about him?"

              Ford's emailed response: "Brett Kavanaugh."

              So her husband and a guy she just told when his name came up this summer a couple of weeks before all this broke in an email. I'm sorry that's not enough for me.

              1. Idle Hands   7 years ago

                I get believing her I really do I just think with the way this was handled, the timeline and the politics involved to me the evidence points toward it being more likely a hit job than not.

              2. Rufus The Monocled   7 years ago

                It can mean they were carefully plotting.

          2. Here for the outrage   7 years ago

            "Alexa, define heresay"

      4. Dillinger   7 years ago

        coulda been wrong twice dude.

  20. lap83   7 years ago

    Following a half-hearted FBI investigation into sexual claims against the judge

    Since the FBI is keeping their investigation a secret, the only other thing that "half-hearted" could refer to is the time frame. You could at least pretend not to be completely on the Democrat's side on this issue.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      What you see as obviously partisan rhetoric, they see as mushy moderation that just always seems to align with progressive talking points. In actually, it's just the typical response of a conservative (in the true sense of the word) publication fiercely defensive of institutions and always apt to abide by status quo talking points.

    2. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

      Technically, the FBI isn't keeping the investigation secret. They gave a full report to the Senate Judiciary Committee. It's the committee that's keeping the report secret, at the specific request of the senior Democratic member, Diane Finesteine.

  21. Longtorso, Johnny   7 years ago

    AMERICAN PSYCHO: DEMOCRAT DOXXER THREATENED TO REVEAL SENATORS' CHILDREN'S HEALTH INFORMATION

  22. DiegoF   7 years ago

    Not that it matters a fuck what I think of course; but I, Private Citizen Diego F. (D-N.Y.), who opposed Kavanaugh from the start, only to switch to supporting him when he came under slanderous attack, am hereby switching back to No now that details of that pansy-ass disgrace of a "bar fight" have come to light. I don't care how young he was or how much time has passed; we don't need that Real Housewives of New Haven shit on the Supreme Court. #StopKavanaugh

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      True. I'm really disappointed that we never got to have a national conversation about Amy Barrett's nasty catfight from college.

      1. geo1113   7 years ago

        Dead girls tell no tales.

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          Props to Barrett for finishing what she starts

      2. Idle Hands   7 years ago

        The Amy Barrett show is currently in development hell, which is a shame because would.

    2. Dillinger   7 years ago

      >>>now that details of that pansy-ass disgrace of a "bar fight" have come to light

      he wasn't pussy enough crying in front of the world?

  23. Here for the outrage   7 years ago

    Can I see an article about how stupid you all feel about believing the gang rape stuff?

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      "The Russians hacked the FBI to trick them into attaining sworn testimony that contradicts the credible gang rape accusations. Further, the Russians blackmailed the credible gang rape accuser into changing her story multiple times. Louis Mensch shed light on this story last week."

      - ENB in two days

      1. Here for the outrage   7 years ago

        It's all coming together now... and we know TRUMP is a RUSSIAN PUPPET!!!!!!

        I'm so glad we could come full circle and blame Trump for this.

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          I'm just saying that "Kavanaugh" could be a Russian name, if we're just throwing out wild accusations here, which seems to be the order of the day

          1. Here for the outrage   7 years ago

            Not wild at all. I know nothing about the subject, so my stupidity makes it credible

          2. Rat on a train   7 years ago

            Kavanov?

          3. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

            Bro, never heard of The Brothers Kavanaugh?

    2. Quo Usque Tandem   7 years ago

      That depends on how credible the meaning of credible is.

  24. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

    Thirty people, including actresses Amy Schumer and Emily Ratajkowski, were arrested Thursday in anti-Kavanaugh protests.

    It must be nice to be able to get arrested without having to worry about the consequences.

    1. DiegoF   7 years ago

      Do not mock their ordeal. They did it for you, American citizen.

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        If they really cared about him, they would have made him another sandwich to enjoy.

    2. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

      How stupid do you have to be allowing your emotions to get so out of control you get arrested protesting a potential judge who you think allowed his emotions to get out of control?

      1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   7 years ago

        Well, they know they won't get beaten or shot by cops, ass-raped in prison, or suffer any professional or economic consequences for their actions, so sure, why not?

  25. Sevo   7 years ago

    Study: Brit government pulls numbers out of ass:

    "What's Housework Worth? $1.6 Trillion a Year in U.K., Officials Calculate"
    [...]
    "LONDON ? Household chores like washing dishes and taking care of children have long been undervalued, feminists and others argue. But an official study in Britain has put a price on such unpaid contributions to society: 1.2 trillion pounds a year, about $1.6 trillion. The findings, published on ?"
    https://flipboard.com/@newyorktimes/what%
    E2??s-housework-worth?-$1.6
    -trillion-a-year-in-u.k.,-officials-calculate/
    a-wMLiZjNvQ9WDlojofAychg:a:3195393
    -6115dcc0b3/nytimes.com

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   7 years ago

      "Study: Brit government pulls numbers out of ass:"

      Where would you expect them to pull it from?

      1. DiegoF   7 years ago

        Arse.

        1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

          "Arse" just sounds so much more badarse.

          1. TuIpa   7 years ago

            Not when you say it.

    2. lap83   7 years ago

      So people who have kids to collect more welfare must be the best at parenting because they get paid so much for it!

    3. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

      Wow, I'm going to start a dishwashing and child care business and become a trillionaire!

    4. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      A woman (or man) who stays home to rear children and tend to the home is providing an invaluable service. Which makes it hard to ascribe a price to it.

      1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        You know who else liked to rear children?

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          Roy Moore?

        2. Derp-o-Matic 6000   7 years ago

          Bill Cosby?

        3. Dturtleman   7 years ago

          Michael Jackson?

        4. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

          Anthony Weiner?

      2. Ron   7 years ago

        once you ascribe a price to it makes it easier to tax it.

      3. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

        You're supposed to get paid for providing a service to yourself? How much should I be paying myself for wanking?

  26. DesigNate   7 years ago

    "Following a half-hearted FBI investigation"

    ENB is totally trolling us.

    1. Bubba Jones   7 years ago

      Ford is lucky they didn't go after her for perjury. They did her a favor by not interviewing her again.

    2. Bubba Jones   7 years ago

      Ford is lucky they didn't go after her for perjury. They did her a favor by not interviewing her again.

  27. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    ...altered messaging on its website in ways that indicate a shift toward a more punitive approach to juvenile justice under the Trump administration...

    Super predators.

    1. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

      Just shift them into the high speed sex traffic lane.

      1. DiegoF   7 years ago

        So if you are driving with your sex robot in Houston, is it illegal to use the HOV lane now? I cannot keep up with these things.

        1. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

          It's ok if she is a corporation, that makes her a person.

          1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            Good thing you said "she". All corporations must be run by women.

  28. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

    Is anybody else as creeped out about that mask in the picture as I am? Those eyes are going to be haunting me the next time I'm boofing.

  29. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

    'Cloture' is a stupid word.

    1. geo1113   7 years ago

      Should we use shuthefuckupture.

      1. Aloysious   7 years ago

        Yes. Along with pissthefuckoffture.

    2. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

      I vote for ShutYourFuckingMouthDemocrats

  30. DiegoF   7 years ago

    Live video of cloture vote for those who are interested. McConnell speaking at the moment.

    1. DiegoF   7 years ago

      Yes from Collins.

      1. DiegoF   7 years ago

        Yes from Flake.

        1. DiegoF   7 years ago

          No from Kamala Harris.

          1. DiegoF   7 years ago

            Yes from Manchin and every Republican.

            1. DiegoF   7 years ago

              Take that back. No from Murkowski!

              1. DiegoF   7 years ago

                I heard commenters from a long time back say Murkowski was actually the real wildcard in general--that the more famously "liberal" Collins actually likes to make a lot of noise and then vote rather predictably.

        2. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          Oh man, I bet Welch is inconsolable right now.

          1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

            He's not the only one at Reason.

    2. DesigNate   7 years ago

      Just passed cloture. So when do they hold the floor vote?

      1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

        Supposedly Saturday morning.

  31. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    Good news, everyone, Ron Howard has thoughts in response to the low unemployment rate:

    Ron Howard
    ?
    Verified account

    @RealRonHoward

    Great news! But i remember when #Reagan #trickledown economics temporarily boosted the economy. It was exciting! ... then it fell apart and millions suffered from policies that mostly benefit the wealthy & many never stopped suffering. Very similar. Think it thru & #Vote

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      Hey, Fonz, can you at least teach Richie some basic economics?

      1. Leo Kovalensky II   7 years ago

        I still think of him as Opie.

        1. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

          TMI

    2. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

      Said the wealthy guy.

    3. Tom Bombadil   7 years ago

      Also interesting. The economy is doing its thing without zero % money and QE's.

    4. DesigNate   7 years ago

      You mean when Democrats promise reduced spending for tax increases, then renig(sp) on the spending cuts after the tax increases have been signed into law, it doesn't help the economy? Imagine that.

      Fucking celebrities could at least pay someone to coach them into not sounding completely economically illiterate.

    5. Derp-o-Matic 6000   7 years ago

      If only we could go back to the good ol' days of the Obama economy

      1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   7 years ago

        Actually, wait. Some Very Knowledgeable people on television keep telling me that the good economy is actually the result of Obama's policies finally taking effect (apparently as soon as he leaves office, by some remarkable coincidence).

        These lefties need to get their excuses straight.

  32. chipper me timbers   7 years ago

    Millennial age 22-39
    " Overall, 31 percent of those surveyed said they considered themselves a socialist or a democratic socialist."

    That's actually pretty reassuring. Much lower than I would have guessed. I imagine that historically, that age cohort is usually around 30% socialist anyway.

    1. Don't look at me!   7 years ago

      Well yeah, they don't have real jobs yet, nor do they want one.

      1. Vernon Depner   7 years ago

        "Well, Mom never had a job. Why should I have to?"

  33. Brandybuck   7 years ago

    Overall, 31 percent of those surveyed said they considered themselves a socialist or a democratic socialist.

    This is millennials? Damn, there goes my golden years down the drain.

    "It's no fair you scrimped and saved your whole life for retirement, old man! Now it's time for you to pay for our harebrained schemes!"

    1. 0x1000   7 years ago

      Yeah, because political understanding never evolves as one ages. Doomed, we are.

  34. Conchfritters   7 years ago

    Gardner better vote for Kavanaugh if he wants to continue selling the devil's lettuce in Colorado!

  35. Kivlor   7 years ago

    Thirty people, including actresses Amy Schemer and Emily Ratajkowski, were arrested Thursday in anti-Kavanaugh protests.

    Huh. 30 people... [clicks link]

    300 people were arrested. That's a bit of a typo, since you spelled it out ENB.

    1. Eddy   7 years ago

      It's like Thermopylae!

  36. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

    Is Ratajkowski trying to pay off karma to the sisterhood for appearing unclothed in the supposedly rapey "Blurred Lines" video?

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   7 years ago

      No, she's one of those "I'm going to shake my bare ass and tease showing my tits, but you're not allowed to think about me in a sexual way" types.

      1. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

        She did not tease in that video.

  37. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    Rhode Island gubernatorial, attorney general candidates arrested with 48 pounds of marijuana: police

    The pair, who are leaders of a Christian sect ? The Healing Church ?

    I would vote for them because they are growing pot against the MAN, but these people are walking tragedies.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Attack on Iran Is Unlawful

Eric Boehm | 6.22.2025 11:20 AM

Does Drug Use Lead to Addiction, or Are Some Brains More Prone To Use Drugs?

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

An Empty Pool in Peru Is a Monument to the Drawbacks of Historic Preservation

Bekah Congdon | From the July 2025 issue

Trump Shreds the Constitution By Bombing Iran

Matthew Petti | 6.21.2025 11:04 PM

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!