Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Minimum Wage

Republican Governor Signs $15 Minimum Wage Bill in Terrible 'Grand Bargain'

The Republican governor of Massachusetts just made a deal to give away more freebies and keep taxes high.

Joe Setyon | 6.28.2018 2:40 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
@MassGovernor/Twitter

On Thursday, Massachusetts Republican Gov. Charlie Baker signed into law a bill that will raise the minimum wage in his state to $15 an hour by 2023 and authorize a generous paid leave program. The governor's goal, it seems, was to stave off a threatened reduction in the sales tax at the ballot box.

Baker touted the legislation as a "grand bargain." But in this case, the winners are those advocating for a higher minimum wage and more mandatory paid leave for workers. The losers, on the other hand, are the voters who won't be able to decide on these issues for themselves—and the taxpayers and businesses who will have to face the consequences of the new policies alongside high sales taxes.

According to the Associated Press, had voters approved a ballot measure lowering the sales tax from 6.25 percent to 5 percent, the state would have lost about $1.2 billion a year.

By agreeing to a compromise that kept the sales tax issue off the ballot, Baker was trying to ensure the state won't lose that revenue. At the same time, he also went out of his way to keep voters from deciding whether or not they wanted to lower the state's sales tax.

The legislation will gradually raise the minimum wage from $11 an hour to $15 an hour by 2023. Tipped workers, meanwhile, will see their minimum pay increase from $3.75 an hour to $6.75 an hour over the next five years. Currently, the only other governors in the country to have signed $15 minimum wage bills into law are Andrew Cuomo of New York and Jerry Brown of California, both Democrats.

Roughly 840,000 worker will get a pay raise, according to the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center. However, the bill will also eliminate time-and-a-half pay for Sundays by 2023.

Regarding the new paid leave policy, workers will be able to take as much as 12 weeks off if they need to care for either an ill family member or a new baby. They'll be allowed up to 20 weeks to deal with their own health needs. State Rep. Paul Brodeur (D–Middlesex) said it would be the most generous in the country.

Finally, the bill does not lower the state's sales tax, though it does institute an annual sales tax holiday in August.

"I am thankful that all parties came together, compromised and found common ground to produce a better set of policies than what the ballot questions represented," Baker said Thursday. "The Massachusetts workforce continues to grow with more and more people finding jobs and our administration is committed to maintaining the Commonwealth's competitive economic environment."

Though business leaders are concerned about raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour, some seem to think that it was better to implement an increase via a compromise rather than through a ballot measure.

"A lot of small businesses out there are fearful and angry over a potential $15-per-hour minimum wage and a new paid leave mandate, but we have to look at the reality of what we might be able to do through a compromise instead of what would occur through a ballot initiative," Jon B. Hurst, the president of the Retailers Association of Massachusetts, told the Boston Globe. "You don't reach compromises on the ballot. You reach compromise through the legislative process," Hurst added.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Landlords Fight Back Against Local Governments Waging War on Short-Term Rentals

Joe Setyon is currently an associate story editor for The Western Journal, a publication based in Arizona. He is a former assistant editor at Reason.

Minimum WageMassachusettsRepublican PartyPaid Leave
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (71)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    Republican Governor Signs $15 Minimum Wage Bill in Terrible 'Grand Bargain'
    Massachusetts is a blue state so you mean RINOs did this.

    1. $park? The Misanthrope   7 years ago

      RINOs

      In other words, Republicans.

    2. creech   7 years ago

      Is there any such thing as a DINO politician? maybe in a red state somewhere?

      1. General Skarr's Prize Petunias   7 years ago

        No. And do you know why? Because dinosaurs are awesome, and Democrats are pretty much never awesome.

        1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

          What's your favorite dinosaur?

          1. General Skarr's Prize Petunias   7 years ago

            Among herbivores, I'm partial to Triceratopses and Apatosauruses (or Brontosauruses, which sounds more like them). I also really like the Diplodocuses. As for predators, ALLOSAURUS, BITCH!

            Beyond that, I also think that the one with the club tail was pretty cool. How does that even evolve?

            1. John   7 years ago

              I like the one that has the Thagomizer on its tail.

            2. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

              You are mixing your Jurassic and Cretaceous species, son.

              1. Frank White   7 years ago

                He does what he wants. A true Libertarian.

              2. General Skarr's Prize Petunias   7 years ago

                Bitch they're all dinosaurs, be they Triassic, Jurassic, or the last one with the unspellable name.

              3. CE   7 years ago

                Sort of like "Jurassic" Park, eh?

      2. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   7 years ago

        Bernie.

  2. John   7 years ago

    There are few lower creatures on earth than New England Republicans.

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      Oh, I can think of a few.

      1. John   7 years ago

        Not many. At least New England progs are honest about who they are. NE Republicans don't even have that going for them.

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          How about neocons? Lindsey Graham proves that you don't have to be from new England to be an utter piece of shit

          1. John   7 years ago

            True enough.

          2. Chereth Cutestory maritime aty   7 years ago

            Can't argue with that.

    2. General_Tso   7 years ago

      You should put parenthesis around 'Republicans' when you're referring to the RINOs in this state.

      Virtually no difference between them and the Dems.

      1. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

        Standing athwart History, yelling "Slow down...if that does not seem uncivil and uncompromising of me".

  3. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

    You know who else gave too much away in a terrible bargain?

    1. General Skarr's Prize Petunias   7 years ago

      Neville Chamberlain?

      1. General Skarr's Prize Petunias   7 years ago

        Which is a myth, by the way. Neville realized that the Germans were up to no good, and signing the pact was a way to put up the facade of peace while, at home, he started to rebuild England's military. At the time, England would have required at least two years to be in shape for a war on the continent, and the aftereffects of WWI guaranteed that practically nobody in England would have supported a preemptive strike?Churchill was an outlier by calling for war at this point. Chamberlain making the deal both made him look like he was attempting diplomacy and quite possibly bought him and England some time to prepare.

        The "peace upon the continent" statement wasn't the smartest remark, but he wanted to make it look like he really believed Hitler when he didn't at all. Chamberlain actually made the smart play and didn't really give anything away to get it.

        1. Citizen X   7 years ago

          You know who else knew the Germans were up to no good?

          1. Rhywun   7 years ago

            Everyone watching the World Cup yesterday?

            1. John   7 years ago

              German teams lose but rarely do they engage in true gag job like that. The sadder part of it is that it allowed the Mexicans, who pulled their usual gag job against Sweden, to advance. Mexican soccer fans' tears are always the sweetest tears. Fortunately, Mexico gets Brazil in the Round of 16. So, Mexico's record of never winning a knockout game, something even the US has managed, should remain intact.

              1. Rhywun   7 years ago

                I too enjoy seeing the Mexican team getting knocked down a peg. The glowing admiration of them and their fans from the American commentators gets to be nauseating.

              2. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

                I dunno. The Mexicans knocking out Brazil would be pretty sweet. They can lose right after that.

                1. Rhywun   7 years ago

                  Fair enough - I don't like Brazil either. Unfortunately if I was a betting man I'd reluctantly put my money on them.

                  1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

                    They are not making it past Belgium.

                2. John   7 years ago

                  I am kind of neutral on Brazil. Love them or hate them, you have to respect them. Mexico is just the worst. They suck but their fans think they are good. They deserve to lose and lose badly. Let Brazil lose in the next round. Anything short of a World Cup win will torture their fans anyway. But if Mexico beat Brazil, Mexican fans would not care if they lost the next round. Brazil beating Mexico and then losing in a later round is the result that creates the maximum misery.

        2. John   7 years ago

          Yes. And the reason why Hitler invaded Poland is that he couldn't believe that after not going to war for Czechoslovakia, England would go to war for Poland. It was not an unreasonable assumption on his part.

          The ability to contain Hitler was lost when the allies allowed him to militarize the Rhineland. Doing that allowed Hitler to build fortifications to protect against a French invasion. This meant that he could defend against a French invasion with very few troops giving him a free hand first in Eastern Europe and then to invade France via the low countries and the Ardennes. At the time German militarized the Rhineland, it had very little military power. After the war, the surviving German military leaders were unanimous in their belief that had the allies acted to stop them, they would have easily defeated the German military, humiliated Hitler and likely ended his regime.

          1. Mickey Rat   7 years ago

            The troops Germany sent into the Rhineland were apparently under orders to retreat if the French made a move to stop them. The German military was rather ill-equipped to take on the French at the time. It was a complete bluff on Hitler's part and it made him believe he could get away with anything if he blustered enough.

          2. Jimoxe   7 years ago

            The U.S. not being in the League of Nations is probably the main reason why Britain and France didn't move to push the Germans out when they moved troops into the Rhineland.
            Didn't want to face Germany without US support.

        3. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   7 years ago

          The story about buying time to increase Britain's army is a nice fairy tale when taken out of context, but in context, it did just the opposite. The Czechs had 30-40 trained divisions in good fortifications facing down Hitler; Hitler would have had to leave the French border almost unguarded to invade Czechoslovakia. By abandoning Czechoslovakia, Chamberlain basically increased the size of Hitler's army by all those divisions he would have needed to invade Czechoslovakia.

          1. John   7 years ago

            He also gave him a huge amount of military equipment that allowed him to expand the German Army at a much faster rate than he would have otherwise.

            But Chamberlin made up for it by advocating for negotiated surrender after France fell.

          2. Speaker   7 years ago

            Exactly. Hitler's generals didn't want him going into Czechoslovakia for good reason. Not only did hitler's army increase, but a lot of military industry was gained. Germans were in a lot better military position post Czech abandonment.

            Yet, I keep seeing that nonsense pop up about how smart chamberlain really was.

    2. Citizen X   7 years ago

      The devil?

    3. CE   7 years ago

      Napolean, when selling Louisiana to Jefferson?

  4. Archibald Baal   7 years ago

    "'You don't reach compromises on the ballot. You reach compromise through the legislative process,' Hurst added."

    Translation: "Cronying with millions of voters is too HARD..."

  5. Citizen X   7 years ago

    Christ, what a Masshole.

    1. John   7 years ago

      As advertised...

    2. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      He's a Boston bitch

      1. General Skarr's Prize Petunias   7 years ago

        Boston baked bitch?

        1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

          Is there any other kind?

  6. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    Republican politician makes terrible policy. Still literally Hitler. News at 11

    1. Hugo S. Cunningham   7 years ago

      Massachusetts can elect a Republican governor when Democrats are divided, or put up a terrible candidate (eg Martha Coakley in 2014). Apart from that, however, the State is solidly Democratic, including veto-proof majorities in both houses of the legislature. (Though, as is common in one-party states, moderate and opposition voters participate in the ruling-party primary, pushing the legislative caucus toward the center. The Speaker [senior legislator] of the House is a centrist.)

      State referenda to increase the minimum wage increases have done well nationwide in recent years. There was no reason to believe Massachusetts would be an exception.

  7. John   7 years ago

    Bette Midler is on Twitter today saying that Trump is a fascist who is dismantling every branch of government. I don't think she understands how this works.

    1. Frank White   7 years ago

      I'm mad because it's not true and I wish that it was.

      1. John   7 years ago

        Me too. If only Republicans could ever live up to the charges Progs hurl against them, we would all have a merry Christmas indeed.

        1. Frank White   7 years ago

          See, that's not fair because the progs DO live up to the charges the right throws at them.

          1. perlchpr   7 years ago

            Well, or live down to them...

      2. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

        ""dismantling every branch of government.""

        The branches are Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. The branches aren't the problem. Midler obviously doesn't understand American government at all if she believes Trump is dismantling them. He has done nothing to dismantle Congress, the courts. At best he is trying to dismantle some of the departments under the Executive branch. Someone may call that dismantling the Executive, but Trump is not trying to do away with the presidency.

        But I could understand how people who think the president is closer to a king and thinks there word is law sees it as such.

        1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

          there word - their word.

          Before the grammer socialist come after me.

        2. CE   7 years ago

          I can't seem to find the list of Departments he has dismantled.

  8. Overt   7 years ago

    "Dad, can we have a vote to see where we go to eat tonight?"

    "Let's compromise. You can cook dinner tonight, and I will be reducing your allowance by 20%"

    "How is that a compromise?"

    "Ask Massachusetts."

    1. mad.casual   7 years ago

      I'm glad you provided this analogy. All of mine were way less wholesome.

    2. CE   7 years ago

      More like, "let's compromise. We can go to your favorite restaurant, and you can eat dessert first, and I'll raise your allowance, and you can skip school any 9 weeks during the year you want. And Mom will pay for it."

  9. Get To Da Chippah   7 years ago

    My former employer was already having a difficult time hiring workers in the Boston area, at $14/hr for people who could do physical work and pass a criminal background check, credit check, and drug test. It was all but impossible to find workers at that rate already, but paying more would require them to charge more for services, which would raise the cost of living in the area, which would make idiot proglodytes demand more money for a living wage, etc

    This will increase the flow of Bay State rats fleeing their sinking ship of a state to usher in the destruction of New Hampshire.

    1. General_Tso   7 years ago

      Nashua and Manchester are already Lowell North.

      1. Hunthjof   7 years ago

        And crawling north every chance they get.

      2. Hunthjof   7 years ago

        And crawling north every chance they get.

    2. Hunthjof   7 years ago

      Remember the state has For D's representing it now. Maybe if the state would crack down on the College pukes from Mass and Vermont who register to vote while they are in the state it wouldn't happen.

    3. CE   7 years ago

      Not to mention paying them to not work for 3 or 4 months per year.

  10. Careless   7 years ago

    Spoiler: there are no actual elected Republicans in Massachusetts

  11. Cynical Asshole   7 years ago

    You know who else was a Republican governor of Massachusetts?

  12. BYODB   7 years ago

    The very fact higher minimum wages are super popular should tell you exactly how much American's care about illegal immigrant workers. Not all, is the answer.

    1. BYODB   7 years ago

      *Not at all

      Geez.

  13. CE   7 years ago

    Who said Republican politicians don't like poor people? He just made a lot more people poor.

  14. ILuvPolitics   7 years ago

    The Massachusetts sales tax is on the lower end of the spectrum, no "high sales taxes" as you state. I wonder how much businesses save from not having to pay time-and-a-half on Sundays and holidays, I don't believe this was published. Massachusetts continues to strike a good balance between reasonable taxes and responsible government policy.

  15. josh   7 years ago

    I could see Baker challenging Trump.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!