Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Rape

Antifa Group Calls for 'Revolutionary Violence' Against Black Sociology Professor

"Reactionary violence, like rape and domestic violence and torture, can only be responded to with revolutionary violence."

Robby Soave | 4.16.2018 3:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
UT
Jr1038 / Wikimedia Commons

A far-left group of students and activists at the University of Texas–Austin has called for "revolutionary violence" against a sociology professor.

This is partly because a former girlfriend is accusing the sociologist of pressuring her into unwanted sex six years ago. Activists are also enraged that the professor failed to report a student to the authorities after the student expressed concern that he might not have always lived up to the requirements of affirmative consent.

But the campaign against the professor started for a much milder reason: He dared to say something about consent that the activists deemed heretical.

In an essay for Vox, Assistant Professor Robert Reece summarized conversations he has had with various men—including male students in his Masculinities in America class—about whether they had ever failed to practice affirmative consent, which requires the participants in a sexual encounter to constantly assess whether the other participant is still interested in the activity. "Men discuss the gray areas of intimate encounters" was the subhed.

In the eyes of the activists, there can be no gray areas. By approaching a complicated issue with nuance, Reece has made it clear that "he believes women should get used to rape and abuse as a condition of their gender," claims the Revolutionary Student Front, an anti-capitalist antifa group.

Reece has an impressive intersectional-leftist pedigree. (The American Spectator writes that he "checks so many politically correct boxes that he'd normally be immune from criticism.") He's a person of color who studied critical race theory at Duke; he writes about gender, race, and inequality for a number of left-wing outlets; he collects Black Panther memorabilia. Still, he expressed an opinion that conflicts with the campus Jacobins, and such "reactionary violence" can be remedied only with "revolutionary violence":

But change is not elusive to us. Reactionary violence, like rape and domestic violence and torture, can only be responded to with revolutionary violence. We are inspired by women across the world from revolutionary movements who have turned on abusive husbands and serial rapists, reclaiming violence and wielding it against their oppressors. Fighting back is the first step. The deep social change needed to end the creation of future rapists will not begin in a university classroom or in the highest levels of the US government. In a capitalistic system, men will always be granted some ownership over women and will feel entitled to much more. A feminist movement for working women must be created, one that intends to topple not only patriarchy, but capitalism imperialism as well.

Penning an insufficiently radical op-ed isn't Reece's only crime. A former girlfriend—a D.C.-based pro-choice activist named Jazmine Walker—has accused him of pressuring her to have unwanted sex with him. (She has subsequently claimed that other women told her he mistreated them too.) An uncharacteristically shoddy story in Inside Higher Ed characterizes this as a charge of rape, although Walker's tweets describe not direct coercion but emotional manipulation within the context of a "toxic ass relationship" involving mutually bad behavior.

Reece is also accused of covering for other rapists. In his op-ed, he mentioned that one of his male students seemed uncomfortable during an in-class discussion of sexual violence. Reece later reached out to the student, who confessed that he worried not all of his past sexual encounters had cleared the high bar of affirmative consent. Reece comforted the student and suggested counseling. The activists excoriated Reece for failing to swiftly report the student to the campus authorities.

"We find this to be direct proof that Reece is an active threat to students on campus," the activists write. "Through his course, he is uniquely able to identify potential rapists, yet he does nothing to stop them—and worse, he shows them his sympathy as a fellow misogynist and abuser."

The university administration has apparently caught wind of the controversy. According to Inside Higher Ed,

Walker has tweeted, tagging the university's official Twitter account, to say that Reece is a potential safety risk to the Texas community. She said she's received no response thus far. J. B. Bird, university spokesperson, said via email that Texas "takes all accusations of sexual misconduct seriously and follows up on accusations through its Title IX office and the Office of Inclusion and Equity, following established procedures, as it will do in this case. Sexual harassment or violence in any form is unacceptable and in contradiction of our core values."

Walker said some of what she's heard about Reece from other women…allegedly involves his time at Texas. In any case, universities can investigate rumors and allegations that don't pertain to specific, alleged incidents at their institutions, in the interest of maintaining campus safety. But such investigations are usually confidential until there is any finding of misconduct.

I emailed UT-Austin for clarification regarding whether Reece is indeed the subject of a Title IX investigation. A spokesperson told me the university is aware of the allegations made on social media, but does not generally comment on personnel matters.*

Reece concedes that he has behaved badly in past relationships, though he did not admit specific wrongdoing. It's possible that he hasn't learned from past mistakes, and it's possible that he is a threat to students' safety. But that's a fundamentally different matter than saying his failure to call for punishing all men who fall short of affirmative consent is itself a crime.

[Hat tip: The College Fix]

UPDATE: This post has been updated to include the university's response.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: BuzzFeed Is Publishing NYPD Disciplinary Records, and That's a Very Big Deal

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

RapeCampus Free Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (277)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. BYODB   7 years ago

    Isn’t revolutionary violence basically redundant in the way ANTIFA understands it?

    1. Eman   7 years ago

      Well revolutionary violence is certainly the appropriate response to rape. And that’s what matters.

      1. kotezof   7 years ago

        Start making extra cash from home and get paid weekly… By completing freelance jobs you get online… I do this three hr every day, for five days weekly and I earn in this way an extra $2500 each week…

        Go this web and start your work.. Good luck… http://www.jobs63.com

      2. vutogevuj   7 years ago

        Start making extra cash from home and get paid weekly… By completing freelance jobs you get online… I do this three hr every day, for five days weekly and I earn in this way an extra $2500 each week…

        Go this web and start your work.. Good luck…… http://www.jobs63.com

    2. Square = Circle   7 years ago

      Reactionary violence, like rape and domestic violence and torture, can only be responded to with revolutionary violence.

      The violence being “revolutionary” is what makes it holy, in contrast with “reactionary” violence, which is the essence of evil.

      These kids are “reclaiming violence and wielding it against their oppressors,” which makes them righteous, and not thugs.

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

        “”which makes them righteous, and not thugs.””

        Only if they win. If not, they are criminals and terrorist.

        1. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   7 years ago

          But they can’t be deemed to have lost until all hope of a recovery and eventual win is denied by the heat death of the universe. And even the, don’t black holes preserve information? There’s always hope, especially black hole hope.

          Black Holes Matter.

          1. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

            Black Holes Evaporate.

          2. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

            You mean, Holes of Color Matter?

            1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

              I just came for holes.

          3. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

            Black Hole Son

            1. Quo Usque Tandem   7 years ago

              To paraphrase an earlier comment: “This hole, Smells like shit.”

      2. Eman   7 years ago

        So is revolutionary rape justified too? I don’t see why it wouldn’t be, but I have to spend some more time thinking about it before I can be sure.

        1. Square = Circle   7 years ago

          Justified? I would say it’s a moral duty. Reclaiming rape and using it against our oppressors is the only Path to Justice!

          1. creech   7 years ago

            Just ask the million Russian soldiers who entered Berlin, East Prussia, Vienna, etc. etc. in 1945.

            1. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

              Liberapers?

          2. fdog50   7 years ago

            That’s what Eldridge Cleaver used to say.

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   7 years ago

          STEVE SMITH LEAD THE NEW HIKER RAPE REVOLUTION!

      3. BYODB   7 years ago

        Nevermind the fact their violence is a reaction to something, I’m sure. ^_-

      4. Zeb   7 years ago

        Wouldn’t self defense be “reactionary violence”?

        Seems to me they have it exactly backwards. Reactionary violence (i.e. violence in response to other violence) is really the only kind of acceptable violence. But I don’t pretend to understand the fucked up way these people use the language.

        1. Square = Circle   7 years ago

          My reading is “Reactionary” = “backward-looking, wrong side of history” while “Revolutionary” = “forward-thinking, right side of history (i.e. Progressive).”

          Violence in the name of Yesterday’s Wrongs is Bad; violence in the name of Tomorrow’s Progress is Good.

          1. Zeb   7 years ago

            Yeah, I guess “reactive” is more the word I’m thinking of. “Reactionary” does have that implication. I would argue with their assumption that “revolutionary” is the good side, though. Revolutions very rarely work out well for most people.

            1. BYODB   7 years ago

              Revolutions, like guns, aren’t by default good or bad. It’s how they’re used and what form they take that defines their morality.

            2. Square = Circle   7 years ago

              Revolutions very rarely work out well for most people.

              Arguably, violent revolutions work out approximately 0% of the time, with the caveat that I think the American Revolution can as easily be looked at as the British Crown trying to assert powers it didn’t really have rather than as a people rising up against an established regime.

              Non-violent revolutions on the other hand have a pretty good track record.

              1. Brett Bellmore   7 years ago

                Mainly because non-violent revolutions only work when the tyrant has already lost his will to hold onto power.

                But you’re right, most violent revolutions are 360 degrees. The American revolution wasn’t a revolution at all, the states were already de facto independent, and King George was attempting to undo that.

          2. Mark22   7 years ago

            My reading is “Reactionary” = “backward-looking, wrong side of history”

            “reactionary” = “anything that opposes communism”.

          3. Trollificus   7 years ago

            Well, more accurately…

            “Violence in the name of Yesterday’s Wrongs is Bad; violence in the name of Tomorrow’s Wrongs is Good.”

        2. gormadoc   7 years ago

          Reactionaries, in commie speak, are people who oppose the continual revolution inherent in a socialist system. They are “reacting” against the “revolution.”

      5. Curly4   7 years ago

        Your convoluted thinking is very frightening. You are proposing violence to be used against violence. Violence is never holy especially in a nation that is controlled by laws. By using violence the “revolutionary” is no better than the “reactionary”.
        But we all know from the last year that ANTIFA is more than willing to use violence and destruction to quite those who do NOT believe the way they do. They are willing to deny constitutional rights for others that they claim that they have the right to. We have your number now and realize that what you want to force the government to be formed in your image until it happens and people that do not believe every thing that you espouse and then they will come under your condemnation and destruction.

        1. Trollificus   7 years ago

          Pacifist protester: “VIolence is never the solution to ANY problem!”
          Ali G: “Wot if it’s a violent problem?”

  2. Eidde   7 years ago

    “(The American Spectator writes that he “checks so many politically correct boxes that he’d normally be immune from criticism.”)”

    Oh, that’s cute. Ask the Girondins, Mensheviks, etc. about how they were able to shield themselves just so long as they were leftist enough.

    1. TheZeitgeist   7 years ago

      Lev Kamenev was sure it was paperwork mistake because Boss would never have him shot. At least that’s what he told his executioner.

    2. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

      A lot of French revolutionary talk in the article and comments. This is why I come here.

      1. Elias Fakaname   7 years ago

        If these thugs are ‘revolutionary ‘ then Trump is justified mobilizing the National Guard against them. They should be killed as enemy combatants.

        1. Finrod   7 years ago

          “… all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

    3. Wizard4169   7 years ago

      The only way to remain immune is to always accuse them before they can accuse you. But then sooner or later someone else figures this out and preemptively accuses you. That’s why they call them “revolutions”; they just go round and round.

  3. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

    You know who else was known for toxic ass relationships?

    1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

      Simple Mikey?

      1. Hugh Akston   7 years ago

        That’s less of an ass and more of a cloaca.

        1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

          Great. Now SIV is interested in Mikey.

    2. Earth Skeptic   7 years ago

      Shrek?

      1. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

        Bingo

    3. Eidde   7 years ago

      Ernst Rohm?

    4. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      Stormy Daniels?

    5. mad.casual   7 years ago

      Melvin Ferd?

    6. Brian   7 years ago

      Sir Mix-A-Lot?

    7. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

      Monica Lewinsky?

    8. TheZeitgeist   7 years ago

      Florida Man.

    9. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

      URKOBOLD?

    10. Telcontar the Wanderer   7 years ago

      Native South Americans, according to the conquistadores?

  4. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

    “”In the eyes of the activists, there can be no gray areas. “”

    Why do I have the feeling that they do not do this themselves, and are just trying to tell other people what to do.

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      What if you are genderfluid? Isn’t that a gray area?

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

        I’ve never seen that area on someone who is genderfluid so I don’t know.

      2. Earth Skeptic   7 years ago

        Hmm, how often you gotta change your gender fluid?

        1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

          Might be more of a replacement instead of a change.

        2. Paper Wasp   7 years ago

          Well, I’d say when it starts changing color, only that’s racist.

      3. Brandybuck   7 years ago

        No! Genderfluid is a clearly distinct category in the list of clearly distinct categories of gender that all correct thinking people recognize as distinct. Do not mistake the lack of definition for the lack of distinction, or you will be sent to the killing fields.

        1. TheZeitgeist   7 years ago

          Do not mistake the lack of definition for the lack of distinction, or you will be sent to the killing fields Vasily Blohkin Camp of Socialist Enlightenment.

          FTFY.

    2. Deconstructed Potato   7 years ago

      Funnily enough I was pondering whether or not they’d have the balls (literalisms and gender fluidity aside) to actually perform the summary executions that the Revolution demands.

      1. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

        Yeah, no.

      2. Brett Bellmore   7 years ago

        Based on the historical record of similar movements, I would assume so.

        1. Deconstructed Potato   7 years ago

          These students have it so good, though. Revolutionaries have never had it so easy. Safely insulated in their (pseudo-)academic bubble, and all the while enjoying the comforts and spoils of a capitalist market economy. To actually commit murder would mean saying goodbye to that freedom and comfort for a very long time. They have to believe in, and want whatever progress/martyrdom would come from that, as much as the proverbial seventy-two virgins.

          1. sparkstable   7 years ago

            Because Lenin and Lol Pot had it rough.

            1. Deconstructed Potato   7 years ago

              Point taken, and it had flickered in my mind before posting, but they didn’t have Whataburger and iPhones. Unless these particular revolutionaries shun such things, in which case it would be a simple marketing exercise to get them to opt in to the more conspicuous spoils of capitalism. I have some background in the ad world. “Social justice” was weaponized by marketing in big business long ago, big pharma in particular. You can just about make anything seem revolutionary to enough people impressionable enough to be sucked in by Marxist ideologies.

      3. Ed Grinberg   7 years ago

        “There are few people who are willing to kill a live person for hindering their personal self-assertion. But if a person sees the things he does for his self-assertion as concern for the deliverance of mankind, it is much easier for him to kill those who hinder him.” (Nahum Korzhavin)

        1. Deconstructed Potato   7 years ago

          I wonder if the revolutionary vanguard would read that as a call to arms.

        2. u got review   7 years ago

          But they can’t be deemed to have lost until all hope of a recovery and eventual win is denied by the heat death of the universe.
          https://bit.ly/2EU3mNm

  5. John   7 years ago

    This stuff is a joke only because of the 2nd Amendment. These clowns talk a good game about violence and breaking into people’s houses and such but they are not going to do jack. If they want to start breaking into people’s homes, they better have a death wish.

    If the left ever manages to disarm the public, then this kind of thing becomes deadly serious and real. And don’t think for a moment the left doesn’t understand that. They want to disarm the public so that they can terrorize the public into complying with their demands.

    1. Eman   7 years ago

      What about the game they talk is good?

      1. John   7 years ago

        Nothing to me. But they seem to like it.

    2. dchang0   7 years ago

      While I agree with your post, I don’t think it even rises to the level of the 2nd Amendment.

      It seems that a lot of these Antifa members have never experienced a beat-down with simple fists and feet, much less weapons. It’s too easy to advocate violence having never experienced it firsthand.

      1. The ghOst of mcgOo   7 years ago

        I agree….they all need a good ass-kicking to put things in perspective. Sign me up

    3. sharmota4zeb   7 years ago

      Petty vandalism is more their style. They target the noncomformist, his friends, and his family. Expanding the list of acceptable targets makes it easier to find opportunities to do damage when no one is looking.

      Attending progressive events once in a while so they know that you know how to find them and just being yourself at those events helps.

    4. Quo Usque Tandem   7 years ago

      Another commentor suggested People’s Republic by Kurt Schlichter. I thought it pretty much apocalyptic action adventure stuff, until I read it and then looked at the next day’s new headlines. And then this. It pretty well addresses your scenario of leftists vs deplorable flyover bumpkins with guns and a little know how.

  6. GILMORE?   7 years ago

    “an anti-capitalist antifa group.”

    a necessary qualifier, to distinguish them from “Aspiring-Executives-Antifa” which is extremely bullish on the social benefits of capital investment.

    1. juris imprudent   7 years ago

      That is Iowahawk-worthy.

    2. Ecoli   7 years ago

      I agree with JI, that is first-rate sarcasm.

    3. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

      It’s even funnier cuz Robbo meant that completely seriously.

  7. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

    “””We find this to be direct proof that Reece is an active threat to students on campus,” the activists write.

    Isn’t calling for revolutionary violence against a teacher also an active threat?

    1. Square = Circle   7 years ago

      Isn’t calling for revolutionary violence against a teacher also an active threat?

      No. It’s a call to make the world more safe by purging it of Evil.

    2. Don't look at me.   7 years ago

      Not if it’s the right kind of violence.

    3. damikesc   7 years ago

      Of course not, you racist.

      Sure, antifa tends to be really white and they are threatening violence of a black man…

      …and, sure, they frequently wear masks…

      …and they are mad that he is allegedly raping their women…

      …it’s TOTALLY different than the KKK.

      1. neoteny   7 years ago

        ^^ This guy gets it.

      2. Finrod   7 years ago

        Just wait until they start burning lowercase t’s, for “time to go”.

  8. Just Say'n   7 years ago

    “A far-left group of students and activists at the University of Texas”

    That’s who describe those brave anti-fascists? Why, they’re just like the people that stormed Normandy or some stupid metaphor that only a journalist would find insightful.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      “That’s how you describe these brave anti-fascists”

      I can’t spell. SAD

    2. Earth Skeptic   7 years ago

      If those assholes actually confronted real nazis, with machine guns and grenades and such, I might give them a LITTLE more respect.

    3. Zeb   7 years ago

      Or just like the shit-head commie thugs who fought in the streets against the shit-head Nazi thugs.

    4. Johnny Lawrence   7 years ago

      No joke: I was doing some touristy bullshit in DC this past weekend, and at an exhibit about slavery a woman said: “Ya’ know, the Trump Resistance is the modern-day abolitionist movement.”

    5. MarkLastname   7 years ago

      Pretty sure by leftist standards, the guys who stormed Normandy were also fascists.

  9. DajjaI   7 years ago

    Specific, credible threats of violence cannot be tolerated and must be prosecuted. However ‘revolutionary violence’ is not a case of that. Just sit these kids down and have a chat with them. And of course, we can use lots of satire and ridicule. That is ultimately what will solve the problem. But as long as they interrupt peacefully, they should not be criminalized. That will only radicalize them further.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      “Punch an anti-fascist”

      What’s good for the goose is good for the gander

      1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

        Why are you referring to geese as having input two genders?

        1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

          Only two.

    2. Zeb   7 years ago

      If it weren’t for the support they get from academia and from certain parts of the left, I’d agree and say they deserve about as much attention as neo-Nazi groups. But they are tolerated by people who should really know better.
      No, you can’t criminalize their existence, but if they make real threats or engage in real violence, treat them like the criminals they are.

    3. Elias Fakaname   7 years ago

      Punk kids not receiving enough beatings is what started all this shit in the first place. Best not to deny them any longer.

  10. mad.casual   7 years ago

    he collects Black Panther memorabilia

    *snort* ‘violent black nationalism’ Black Panther memorabilia or ‘White nerd’ Black Panther memorabilia?

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      Neither. He collects things relating to melanistic cougars.

      1. mad.casual   7 years ago

        He collects things relating to melanistic cougars.

        You mean jaguars you speciesist shitlord.

        1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

          We don’t interrupt whatever it is you do, I ask that you don’t interrupt our discussion of black milves.

          1. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

            Black MILFs Matter!

            1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

              All MILFs Matter.

        2. Brandybuck   7 years ago

          He can be a cougar if he wants to. Why do you impose your specieist categories on him?

          1. Telcontar the Wanderer   7 years ago

            SPECIST.

            The spelling is specist.

            Obviously.

    2. MatthewSlyfield   7 years ago

      Both?

    3. Paloma   7 years ago

      From Wakanda Black Panther memorabilia

      1. mad.casual   7 years ago

        Actually, the Professor’s University homepage link above clearly indicates “Black Panther Party memorabilia”.

        Why the clarity would be muddied, I can only guess.

    4. Echospinner   7 years ago

      Those T’Challa statues, helmets and action figures will be worth some money someday.

      1. Elias Fakaname   7 years ago

        Don’t forget the commemorative cups.

  11. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

    Christ, what assholes.

  12. Microaggressor   7 years ago

    Communists behave like communists; Robby writes about it. Starting to sound a little like a broken record.

    1. Just Say'n   7 years ago

      “Yeah. If we just ignore the Cultural Revolution it will probably just go away.”

      – said some Chinese people in 1971 who were shot

    2. Ecoli   7 years ago

      “Robby writes about it.”

      To be sure.

      1. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

        Like nails on a chalkboard and a dog whistle met the Bat Signal.

  13. MP   7 years ago

    It’s possible that he hasn’t learned from past mistakes, and it’s possible that he is a threat to students’ safety.

    When Bailey does this, it’s still kinda amusing, given that it’s more or less an inside joke.

    But FFS Robby, it’s not necessary to caveat every fucking thing you write.

    1. John   7 years ago

      Robby is the king of false equivalence and general equivocation. No matter how awful the leftist’ behavior, Robby can always find a way to equivocate about it and make it seem like both sides are just as bad. Robby never saw a leftist who didn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt. It is his move.

      1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        Something something melanistic kettle.

        1. John   7 years ago

          I am always giving leftists the benefit of the doubt. And I am so known for not being cut and dried about things.

          You called it. And you forgot to tell me to “Leave Robby Alone!!”

          1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

            Yes, that is what I meant. Get out of my head, John!

          2. Elias Fakaname   7 years ago

            Robby would be properly educated if he became the u fortunate subject of ire for these Antifa punks. Then maybe he would realize there is no equivalence, amd they are evil and conservatives are largely good.

      2. Zeb   7 years ago

        I think he’s actually been a lot better lately. Still has a way to go, but he’s learning.

        1. Citizen X - #6   7 years ago

          When he does wrong, we beat him with a stick. When he does right, we beat him with a slightly smaller stick.

    2. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

      It’s possible that all of us haven’t learned from past mistakes, which may be why I still read Robby’s articles

  14. LarryA   7 years ago

    Every time, it’s the folks who “check so many politically correct boxes” who are most surprised when they get lined up against the wall, despite the long and extensive history of such.

    1. John   7 years ago

      They always think being a loyal party member will save them. It never does.

    2. What Smells Like Pee?   7 years ago

      It’ll be different this time.

    3. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

      They don’t seem to get that the Stalins, Maos, etc. will actually consider them more dangerous, seeing them as a threat.

      1. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

        Just remember Mao’s aphorism that “political power flows from the barrel of a gun” and you’ll pretty much get how important checking off all the boxes is

    4. sharmota4zeb   7 years ago

      A socialist is someone who feeds the alligators, hoping that he will be eaten last.

  15. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

    Activists are also enraged that the professor failed to report a student to the authorities after the student expressed concern that he might not have always lived up to the requirements of affirmative consent.

    Ok… so what now?

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

      Profit?

    2. silver.   7 years ago

      Floggings for all involved.

    3. General_Tso   7 years ago

      Enthusiaism.
      Dissillusionment.
      Panic.
      Search for the guilty.
      Punishment of the innocent.
      Praise and honours for the non-participants.

  16. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

    Reece has an impressive intersectional-leftist pedigree. (The American Spectator writes that he “checks so many politically correct boxes that he’d normally be immune from criticism.”) He’s a person of color who studied critical race theory at Duke; he writes about gender, race, and inequality for a number of left-wing outlets; he collects Black Panther memorabilia. Still, he expressed an opinion that conflicts with the campus Jacobins, and such “reactionary violence” can be remedied only with “revolutionary violence”:

    When you make these people your friends, you may acquire over time, the “Herpetologist’s Handshake”.

    1. What Smells Like Pee?   7 years ago

      I like the concept of checking political boxes being able to immunize one from criticism.

    2. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

      I never knew there was inequality for any left-wing outlets. I thought they kind of ruled the roost these days

  17. Migrant Log Chipper   7 years ago

    These people must be a barrel of laughs at campus soirees.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

      Soirees are problematic.

  18. Brian   7 years ago

    “Reactionary violence, like rape and domestic violence and torture, can only be responded to with revolutionary violence.”

    You know who else said there’s only one way?

    1. GILMORE?   7 years ago

      Marlo Stanfield?

      1. Ska   7 years ago

        You want it to be one way. But it’s the other way.

      2. Ecoli   7 years ago

        Proposition Joe snorted.

    2. Square = Circle   7 years ago

      Sly Stone?

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

      My ex-wife?

    4. Morbo   7 years ago

      The Sith?

    5. GILMORE?   7 years ago

      Blondie?

    6. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   7 years ago

      The people who make street signs?

    7. Elias Fakaname   7 years ago

      Sammy Hagar?

  19. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

    The Revolutionary Student Front

    Ha. A bunch of parlor soldiers who will try to goad others into performing this “revolutionary violence”.

    1. Brett Bellmore   7 years ago

      Yeah, people thought the Red Guard were posers at first, too.

  20. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

    “toxic ass relationship”

    Toxic Ass was most certainly someone’s nickname around here.

    1. Enjoy Every Sandwich   7 years ago

      In any case it would be a good name for a band.

    2. John   7 years ago

      And Toxic Ass Relationship was the name of their band.

    3. Brandybuck   7 years ago

      After a few Carolina Reapers my ass gets quite toxic…

      1. Ecoli   7 years ago

        Yeah, and your wang won’t be very healthy either after the Thunderclap comes on.

        1. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

          Have you been…

          *dons sunglasses*

          BEYOND THUNDERCLAP?

    4. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

      Channeling Hihn again, I see.

      1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

        Summoning would be a better word.

        1. I'm Here, for MOAR Hihn   7 years ago

          I have visions of him, alone in a dark room, pacing/walking in circles alternating between mumblings of “aggression” and fits of pure primal rage, yelling wildly and shaking his fist in the air

      2. General_Tso   7 years ago

        Snicker (snort) chortle

  21. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

    Title IX office and the Office of Inclusion and Equity, following established procedures, as it will do in this case. Sexual harassment or violence in any form is unacceptable and in contradiction of our core values.”

    I like how every institution on the planet now feels the need to add the “we don’t go in for all this [_____________]” tagline at the end of every public statement.

  22. Cynical Asshole   7 years ago

    the Revolutionary Student Front

    I wonder what the Student’s Revolutionary Front have to say about this?

    1. Eidde   7 years ago

      Splitters!

      1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

        The Front of Revolutionary Students has harsh words for splitters.

    2. John   7 years ago

      Or the Student’s Front for Revolution.

    3. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      The otters will smash their skulls like a clam on their tummies.

    4. Ariki   7 years ago

      Codified
      Union of
      Networked
      Totalitarian
      Students.

  23. GILMORE?   7 years ago

    “”He’s a person of color who studied critical race theory at Duke””

    …a school founded by a racist, capitalist, murderer of millions through propagation of tobacco… and which promotes hateful and racist ideology in its e Political Institutions and Public Choice Program (PIPC), which has known connections to Koch brothers.

    QED

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

      He’s fighting the system from within.

      1. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

        He’s fucks Coeds so his children won’t have to.

  24. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

    Godamnit, I miss the PM links.

  25. GILMORE?   7 years ago

    Reactionary violence, like rape and domestic violence and torture, can only be responded to with revolutionary violence. We are inspired by women across the world from revolutionary movements who have turned on abusive husbands and serial rapists, reclaiming violence and wielding it against their oppressors. Fighting back is the first step. The deep social change needed to end the creation of future rapists will not begin in a university classroom or in the highest levels of the US government. In a capitalistic system, men will always be granted some ownership over women and will feel entitled to much more.

    Things got a little out of hand. It’s just this war and that lying son of a bitch Johnson

    1. BYODB   7 years ago

      Wow, so their statement there appears to say that women are incapable of being capitalists despite the tremendous amount of evidence that women are just as capable of being successful in business as men.

      So much for equality, huh? Guess they should get their asses back in the kitchen and get pregnant, because they’re women and just don’t understand business.

      Mask slip, or just so stupid that they can’t think any amount of steps ahead of where they are right now?

      1. Square = Circle   7 years ago

        Mask slip, or just so stupid that they can’t think any amount of steps ahead of where they are right now?

        These are college students. It’s the latter.

        1. BYODB   7 years ago

          I agree, but it’s a staggering indictment of higher education if this is the type of thinking they produce. Or, more probably, it’s an indictment of the media in that these are the only types of quotes they seem interested in.

          Ah, nevermind, I’ll blame them both!

          1. Square = Circle   7 years ago

            Ah, nevermind, I’ll blame them both!

            ^ The correct answer.

      2. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

        Once the revolution happens everyone will be infertile and without food, so women can’t possibly be pregnant in the kitchen.

      3. Paper Wasp   7 years ago

        Guess they should get their asses back in the kitchen and get pregnant

        Mercifully, pregnancy with these people should be very difficult to achieve when you require affirmative consent for every step of procreation. May their family tree be a dot.

    2. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

      The deep social change needed to end the creation of future rapists will not begin in a university classroom or in the highest levels of the US government.

      It’s nice how their system believes only in social variables.

    3. sharmota4zeb   7 years ago

      It is socially acceptable in some neighborhoods to punch a guy in order to defend the honor of one’s bitch. These antifata students are basically declaring all women their collective bitches so they can find more excusses to be violent in the future.

  26. Longtobefree   7 years ago

    It’s possible that he hasn’t learned from past mistakes, and it’s possible that he is a threat to students’ safety.

    It’s possible that pigs do fly, and we just never notice – – – – – – – –
    It’s possible that the left is full of kind people bent on individual freedom – – – – – – –

    1. Zeb   7 years ago

      And if someone were claiming that pigs do fly, and you could concede that perhaps they do and still defeat their main argument, it might be a good rhetorical tactic to use.

      1. Square = Circle   7 years ago

        it might be a good rhetorical tactic to use

        Especially when those claiming that pigs fly are a blood-thirsty mob literally advocating violence against anyone who disagrees with them.

  27. Robespierre Josef Stalin Pot   7 years ago

    MAN, THE KIDS THESE DAYS!!!

    No, but seriously, who cares? Butthole President just bombed a sovereign country and you are talking about some kids that are getting a little too excited about a professor’s lecture? Priorities, man…

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

      Grousing about unauthorized war went out of fashion in ’08. Try to keep up.

      1. Robespierre Josef Stalin Pot   7 years ago

        When was it ever in fashion? Certainly not here–at least on a consistent basis.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

          It was fashionable until around November of ’08.

          There used to be an anti-war protest in my neighborhood every weekend, then in November, it just kind of went away. So strange. It was almost as if someone told everyone to just go home.

          1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

            Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize in advance so it was all good.

            1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

              It was a pre-emptive strike by the angelic Nobel committee. This way, Obama was somewhat constrained in his bombing adventures by his sense of propriety and shame, so he would not embarrass himself, the committee, and all the other Nobel Peace Prize recipients.

              1. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

                Right. He only initiated bombing adventures in seven countries (that we know of). The cut-off for having to surrender the Peace Prize is eight

                1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

                  I would love to ask someone on the committee how many people can you kill with bombs and such before you have to return the prize?

          2. silver.   7 years ago

            Except the troops. 🙁

          3. Robespierre Josef Stalin Pot   7 years ago

            It’s almost as if some guy came into office and withdrew troops from Iraq 2 years later.

            1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

              He didn’t exactly withdraw them. He just replaced them with new troops. I think he called them ISIS. The named seemed to be fluid though. Kept kicking different ones around the Office.

            2. MarkLastname   7 years ago

              So air raids don’t count if you’re a democrat, but do if you’re a republican?

              1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

                “‘It’s almost as if some guy came into office and withdrew troops from Iraq 2 years later.”‘

                We still have troops there. So it’s he pulled a Harvey Weinstein. I’m not have having sex with you if I’m only an 1/8 of the way in.

          4. Elias Fakaname   7 years ago

            Remember Cindy Sheehan? Omce Onama was in office the left threw her away like rotten garbage. There never was an anti war movement. It was an anti abuse movement. By people like AmSoc.

        2. Square = Circle   7 years ago

          Certainly not here–at least on a consistent basis.

          Are you implying that people here didn’t criticize Obama for his foreign adventures? If you’re saying there wasn’t any grousing about Iraq during the Bush years I can only take that as meaning you weren’t here.

          In other words, just to spell it out, you’re full of shit.

    2. Incomprehensible Bitching   7 years ago

      How can you talk about Syria, when children are starving in this country?

    3. mad.casual   7 years ago

      Butthole President just bombed a sovereign country and you are talking about some kids that are getting a little too excited about a professor’s lecture?

      What’s to talk about? The closest any of us got to having a say in the matter was a vote for HRC who’s policy was explicitly this and more from Day 1. Got someone you would recommend we vote for in the mid-terms who won’t bomb Syria after a chemical attack? Even Bernie Sanders’ stance isn’t so clear if you frame what’s happening in Syria as a destabilization of the regime or a pursuit of Assad. He’d said no boots on the ground but that action, including military action (backed by or at the behest of the US), needs to happen in Syria.

      The most peace-oriented option we have/had is, “What is a leppo?”

      1. Square = Circle   7 years ago

        “What is a leppo?”

        This is a leppo.

        But yeah – hard to see what RJSP is offering as an alternative here.

      2. Robespierre Josef Stalin Pot   7 years ago

        Got someone you would recommend we vote for in the mid-terms who won’t bomb Syria after a chemical attack?

        Yep, Jill Stein. It’s who I voted for.

        1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

          I echo Jackie Barr talking to Roseanne, “Who is Jill Stein?”

          1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

            Jackie Connor, sorry.

            1. Paper Wasp   7 years ago

              Jackie Harris, she’s not married. *takes trivia prize*

    4. Mark22   7 years ago

      Butthole President just bombed a sovereign country

      As if you give a fuck about bombing sovereign countries.

    5. sharmota4zeb   7 years ago

      You say that as if butthole is an insult. My butthole is popular among my audience on a certain website. My view count rises every time the camera shows it.

  28. DJK   7 years ago

    I can’t imagine a better possible way to ruin sex than to continuously ask whether each escalation or continuation is okay.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   7 years ago

      When someone says “no”?

      Or wait, is the answer Hitler? I always do that wrong.

      1. DJK   7 years ago

        Ha. Good point.

      2. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

        It’s 42

    2. BestUsedCarSales   7 years ago

      In my experience, when your partner starts crying hysterically and pushes you away.

      1. DJK   7 years ago

        I’ve yet to have that experience. What did you do?!?!

        1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

          He dropped his pants.

          1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

            Word is BUCS has a ginormous penis.

            1. Fuck you, Shikha (Nunya)   7 years ago

              Do antibiotics clear up ginormous?

      2. silver.   7 years ago

        For somebody prone to sympathy boners, the crying part could be the beginning of an enjoyable night.

    3. sharmota4zeb   7 years ago

      This is why some cultures wait until marriage and put one spouse in charge of the bedroom after the wedding. Alteratively, you can just pick a safeword.

  29. damikesc   7 years ago

    So, the activists have literally never had sex once in their lives.

    I love how feminism is making women miserable. Most women want a guy to “Take charge” — not basically beg for permission. But, got to let fat, ugly lesbians decide what straight women want.

    1. Zeb   7 years ago

      I’m trying to imagine anyone ever doing the full “affirmative consent” thing in a sexual encounter and I just can’t do it. That’s just not how people have sex. And is most certainly not, in my not all that extensive experience, how most women want men to behave.
      I have yet to have anyone explain to me why saying “no” when you don’t want something to happen is such an unbearable and unreasonable burden.

      1. Brian   7 years ago

        Saying no is hard, because they’re all co-dependent, or something.

        What’s wrong with looking at it like that?

        1. DJK   7 years ago

          Nothing like infantilizing women to empower them.

      2. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

        “”So, the activists have literally never had sex once in their lives.”‘

        Must not.

        “”I’m trying to imagine anyone ever doing the full “affirmative consent” thing in a sexual encounter and I just can’t do it. “”

        For that reason, among others.

        Did you hear about the ANTIFA kid that was so ugly, the stick beat him just to get away.

      3. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

        Don’t worry, it will all be done by Alexa on the future.

        “Bing! Lisa, I haven’t heard any indications of affirmative consent for two minutes. Please confirm you are still comfortable with this encounter. You. Dirty. Slut.”

        1. Ariki   7 years ago

          Shit, if you could train that robot bitch to say filthy things the world would be a better place.
          Life a filthy parrot that plays music.

          1. Paper Wasp   7 years ago

            If you build it they will come.

      4. EscherEnigma   7 years ago

        I’m trying to imagine anyone ever doing the full “affirmative consent” thing in a sexual encounter and I just can’t do it.

        … Are you asking for badly written erotica to demonstrate how it works? ’cause I guarantee I’m not that great an erotica writer. And, y’know, it’d be gay erotica. And probably over-use “you want that dick?” a lot.

      5. UnrepentantCurmudgeon   7 years ago

        Certainly would have ruined the story line in 50 Shades of Grey. And we know that the primary audience for that mass of shlock was … women.

    2. Rod Flash   7 years ago

      The good thing about it is that the “revolutionaries” are making it impossible for them to ever have sex, resulting in breeding themselves out of the population in a single generation. Definitely an undesirable mutation.

  30. Brandybuck   7 years ago

    The left is eating their own. Does this mean the right should not worry? Far from it! It’s like a shark feeding frenzy eating their own innards, you don’t want to be anywhere near it…

    Still, it thins out the shark population.

    1. John   7 years ago

      A whole lot of well meaning liberals who helped create this monster are now shocked to find they are being eaten by it. This is the kind of thing that is supposed to happen to conservatives and deplorables, not liberals.

      1. Brandybuck   7 years ago

        Liberals didn’t create this monster, progressives who created this monster. Liberals merely tolerated it due to not understanding that baby monsters quickly outgrow the chains that restrain them.

        1. BYODB   7 years ago

          Liberalism is about as common as a true Conservative these days (Re: hardly any left) and those who remain seem to actively carry water for Progressive causes because it’s the easiest way not to be eaten whole.

          Most people are some form of in-between and unfortunately Progressivism sounds good to people who have no idea what’s going on and don’t care about knowing.

          Republicans are falling all over themselves to prove how infested with Progressivism they’ve become, even when I’d have to acknowledge that they’re ultimately patient zero.

        2. JuanQPublic   7 years ago

          We’re in sort of a feedback loop.

          For years, the Democratic Party increasingly became out of touch with the working class, while simultaneously condescending to them. The party has never been socially progressive, and has instead been riding the coattails of social change to appear as such (see gay marriage, drug policy, criminal justice reform, etc).

          Trump filled the vacuum in regards to the working class. Extremists on the authoritarian left filled the vacuum on the social issues.

          The Democratic Party now operates in reflexive fashion to Trump, and Trump reacts in reflexive fashion to Democrats, while associating them with the kooky elements on the political left (Antifa, etc). The Republicans are sitting on the sidelines essentially doing nothing.

        3. Mark22   7 years ago

          Liberals didn’t create this monster, progressives who created this monster. Liberals merely tolerated it

          Since you seem a little confused on terminology, here is a handy translation table:

          Actual Old Group —> New Term for the Group (as used by progressives)

          fascist —> liberal, progressive
          liberal —> libertarian, fascist, racist, sexist
          socialist, communist —> democratic socialist, progressive
          conservative —> fascist
          moderate Christian —> theocrat, fascist

          Hope that helps.

          1. Headache   7 years ago

            Liberals didn’t create this monster, progressives who created this monster. Liberals merely tolerated it

            Liberals created the progressive, therefore, created the monster.

      2. NAL   7 years ago

        There aren’t any conservatives with any kind of power on campuses these days, and the students’ only world is the college campus, ergo, lefties eat lefty professor. I find it to be quite delicious.

      3. NoVaNick   7 years ago

        Well they have to start somewhere and they don’t know any conservatives personally, so they target those in their social circles who are fellow progressives. Its not every day you get to punch someone in the face on camera.

  31. JuanQPublic   7 years ago

    In the eyes of the activists, there can be no gray areas.

    We should all be grateful that these righteous, perfect, infallible people are here to zealously re-educate everyone with violent means and fly in the face of the scourge of due process.

  32. Rich   7 years ago

    Administrators did not immediately respond.

    Well, sheesh, Robby — did you threaten them with revolutionary violence?

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      Robby’s idea of revolutionary violence is to stick Milton and Friedrich (his Yorkies) on them.

  33. Trigger Warning   7 years ago

    “Future Rapists” would be a great name for a rock band biopics about Bill and Ted(dy).

  34. Jerryskids   7 years ago

    If this guy – and others like him – were as dangerous as these “activists” claim, he’d just go rape them to death and be done with it.

    I heard some asshole on TV the other day opining that Trump brought out the dark side in people, “normalizing” racist and sexist talk and behavior when we were justthisclose to getting rid of it in our society. Bullshit, Trump simply made it okay to fight back. If I’m going to be accused of being racist and sexist (and all kinds of -phobic) simply by virtue of being a straight white male and there’s nothing I can do to appease my accusers, then, fuck it, I might as well be racist and sexist and multi-phobic. When these shitheads have a galloping conniption fit over “It’s OK To Be White”, it’s time to face the fact that these people do not have good intentions.

  35. GILMORE?   7 years ago

    the RSF, whose logo contains the hammer and sickle communist symbol, states that “Reece’s only solution” after “a male student who, through this course, realized he had not been obtaining consent in all of his sexual encounters,” was “to briefly counsel him over email and suggest ? not enforce ? campus counseling.”

    Commies are mad that someone who realized that they’d been having sex w/o elaborate PC-consent practices wasn’t being persecuted by the institution.

    Why am i not surprised that the thing these types love most of all is punishing thought-criminals for the sake of simply expanding their power-base? Its always an instant leap from this “liberation of the oppressed”-rhetoric to running their own mini-Gulags.

  36. Sandab   7 years ago

    Sounds like a hostile workplace. Sue the school.

  37. yoxinaxi   7 years ago

    My Buddy’s mom makes $77 hourly on the computer . She has been laid off for five months but last month her check was $18713 just working on the computer for a few hours. try this web-site

    +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.Jobpost3.tk

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

      By his “Buddy’s mom” he really means his mom. And Backpage was shut down, so I’m guess his mom is not making $77 hourly anymore.

  38. ejpoleii   7 years ago

    I practice affirmative response. If she says “stop” I get up, put on my clothes, and leave. Mostly forever.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   7 years ago

      No sandwich?

  39. dirtydog1776   7 years ago

    Stop it…….my head is about to explode from listening to all these liberal/leftist/Antifa claptrap.

  40. mtrueman   7 years ago

    “Assistant Professor Robert Reece summarized conversations he has had with various men?including male students in his Masculinities in America class?about whether they had ever failed to practice affirmative consent, which requires the participants in a sexual encounter to constantly assess whether the other participant is still interested in the activity.”

    Thanks to Prof, Reece, casual sex just got a little less casual. Good news for those who like to up the sexual stakes by adding risk into the mix.

  41. Mark22   7 years ago

    he believes women should get used to rape and abuse as a condition of their gender,

    Seems to me the way things are going, women should get used to becoming old spinsters, because only insane men would touch them under these conditions.

    1. mtrueman   7 years ago

      “because only insane men would touch them under these conditions.”

      Or men willing to bear the risk. Not so different from the rest of the animal kingdom, where an amorous male stands a good chance of having his head bitten off and being eaten by the female.

  42. Mark22   7 years ago

    Revolutionary Student Front, an anti-capitalist antifa group

    Given that fascism was primarily anti-capitalist, seems like the Revolutionary Student Front is actually a bunch of brownshirts themselves, using the “antifa” moniker as a cover.

    1. Brett Bellmore   7 years ago

      In practice, fascism and communism are just two competing brands of totalitarian violence, about as different as McDonalds and Burger King.

      The only real difference between them is that after the Hitler/Stalin pact broke down, Stalin became our sorta/kinda ally against Hitler. So, while the Right had to purge itself of fascist elements, the left was free to retain its love affair with left totalitarianism. And to this day is rotten with idiots who think Communism is a great idea that just never got tried right.

      Sometimes I wish that Patton had gotten his wish, and we’d continued WWII for a few more months to polish off Stalin, too. It would be a very different world today.

      1. John C. Randolph   7 years ago

        Patton, like Hitler, badly underestimated the cost of taking out the Soviets. They had more cannon fodder than anyone but the Chinese.

        -jcr

  43. vek   7 years ago

    This is EXACTLY what needs to keep happening.

    As long as the left keeps eating their own for not being sufficiently extreme, they will just keep driving sane people out and eventually collapse. Go SJWs! GO!!!!!!!

    1. BigT   7 years ago

      Yeah. Can we help them in some way? Maybe by indentifying impure leftists?

      No runski, no jogski, no Trotsky!

      1. Nom de Sobriquet   7 years ago

        +1
        I would love to be part of the survey questionnaire writers for this test.

    2. Paper Wasp   7 years ago

      It’s actually a good thing that they’ve created their own minefield around sexual encounters, because it greatly reduces the chances that they’ll breed.

      1. RabbitHead   7 years ago

        Unfortunately, they are more than happy with trying to co-opt our offspring. They know well how to exploit that teen-aged window when our kids are sure that everything we think is wrong, and want to find alternate ideas.

    3. Headache   7 years ago

      Reece deserves everything the Antifa cowards dish out. You reap what you sow, asshole.

      Antifa and their like don’t chasten Islam, or the splinter group Nation of Islam, and further The new Black Panthers because they are no doubt cowards.

  44. VinniUSMC   7 years ago

    Hello antifa. Please start committing revolutionary violence. Then we may strike you facists down, once and for all. Thanks.

  45. Nom de Sobriquet   7 years ago

    This looks like a good movie. I can’t wait til it comes out.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   7 years ago

      People Republic and Indian Country by Kurt Schlichter pretty well covers it; but I seriously doubt that it will ever be made into a movie.

  46. MarkLastname   7 years ago

    I wonder if this group that wants the vast majority of men inarcerated or worse (not women though, because apparently men’s affirmative consent is automatic or something) also proclaims support for criminal justice reform?

    Let’s remember that deep down, all socialists are tankies.

  47. GamerFromJump   7 years ago

    I’ve said before that what’s happening on campuses now is not unlike the “struggle sessions” of Maoist students in China, but this literally is just about the same thing.

  48. TxJack 112   7 years ago

    Progressives have done an excellent job of criminalizing behavior and using their “rules” to punish anyone they think does not have the right mindset. What happened to threatening violence being a criminal act? Apparently at UT, the only criminals are men who do not abide by the insanity of the left.

  49. WJack   7 years ago

    “Masculinities in America class” . . . using tax dollars, in any way shape or form to support this nonsense amounts to fraud.

  50. Headache   7 years ago

    These social classes are an easy grade, because there are no wrong answers as long as you play the game. A good thing they pass up economics. They don’t know what is going to happen to them when the $1.4 trillion student loans, the $20 trillion operating debt, and the $150 trillion unfunded obligations come due. They will surely understand slavery when it arrives.

  51. xarareta   7 years ago

    My Buddy’s mom makes $77 hourly on the computer . She has been laid off for five months but last month her check was $18713 just working on the computer for a few hours. try this web-site

    +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.Jobpost3.tk

  52. aspendougy   7 years ago

    The meaning of consent has changed. Back when President Kennedy had sex with a 19 yr. old virgin intern, he was not charged with rape, or with using his position and power. Now days, that would most likely not pass mustard as being consensual. What I find so disappointing is that such a question is worthwhile to study, but there is no room for that any longer on college campuses.

  53. Empress Trudy   7 years ago

    We should work to burn down every college in America.

  54. Empress Trudy   7 years ago

    We should work to burn down every college in America.

  55. prediksi sydney   7 years ago

    artikel yang sangat bagus

  56. prediksi sydney   7 years ago

    Ya, saya kira “reaktif” lebih kata yang saya pikirkan. “Reaksioner” memang memiliki implikasi itu. Saya akan berdebat dengan asumsi mereka bahwa “revolusioner” adalah sisi baiknya. Revolusi sangat jarang berhasil dengan baik bagi kebanyakan orang.

  57. prediksi singapore   7 years ago

    N’fheadar an bhfuil an gr?pa seo ar mian leis formh?r m?r na bhfear a choth? n? a bheith n?os measa (gan mn?, mar is cos?il go bhfuil toili? dearfach fir uathoibr?och n? rud ?igin) ? r? go dtugann s? taca?ocht do athch?iri? an cheartais choiri?il?

  58. prediksi hk   7 years ago

    bocoran sgp

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline

Sophia Mandt | 6.9.2025 12:48 PM

FTC Pivots From Competition to Children

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.9.2025 11:00 AM

This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market

Jack Nicastro | 6.9.2025 10:44 AM

L.A. Burns

Liz Wolfe | 6.9.2025 9:32 AM

Trump Wants To Revive the Militarization of Police

J.D. Tuccille | 6.9.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!