Occupational Licensing

Libertarian State Senator Wants to Make it Easier for People With Criminal Records (And Everyone Else) to Work

Laura Ebke's attempt to rationalize Nebraska's occupational licensing laws gets praised in The Wall Street Journal.


Laura Ebke of Nebraska is the Libertarian Party's only sitting state senator. A bill she introduced to reform her state's occupational licensing regime got an enthusiastic and lengthy write-up this week in The Wall Street Journal (without, alas, naming the senator or her party affiliation).

Laura Ebke Facebook

The Occupational Board Reform Act (L.B. 299) would change the incentive structure and process by which Nebraska decides the most rational and least restrictive way to ensure consumer safety without unduly harming people's ability to work.

The state has been interested in "chipping away at occupational licenses one by one" for a while, Ebke said in a phone interview yesterday. (For example, last year the state eliminated licensing requirements for hair braiders.) Then last year she "was approached by the Institute for Justice to see if I would be interested in carrying some model legislation they had put together, and I was very interested."

One of the more colorful case studies, described in the Journal story, involves massaging horses, which leaves you open in Nebraska to a possible four years in jail and a $35,000 fine if you do it unlicensed. That issue, Ebke says, has been "under control of the veterinarians medical licensure," who had lobbying power. Ebke saw it as a teachable moment: "Does it make sense," she asked her colleagues, "to demand a license to give a rubdown to a 1,200-pound creature?"

The final vote on the measure is expected next week, and Ebke is confident it will make it to the governor's desk and be signed. One of her main allies in the process is a Nebraska-based free market think tank, the Platte Institute, founded by the sitting governor Pete Ricketts.

A Platte Institute study found that "Many of Nebraska's licensing requirements are more burdensome than its neighboring states and the rest of the country, making it harder to create many higher-wage jobs in Nebraska. Nearly 25 percent of the jobs in Nebraska require a government license. Even if a particular worker does not need government permission to do their job, many of the services they depend on in their daily life may be more expensive or less accessible because of Nebraska's unnecessary barriers for workers and entrepreneurs."

Being a Libertarian, Ebke says, has likely helped the bill's so-far positive prospects. "Most of the co-sponsors are Republicans," she says, but "the fact that I'm not a Republican allows some of the more liberal members of the body to come and talk to me." She says she's found such members willing to work on getting the bill into a shape that they can support, "and their willingness to do so speaks to the fact that a lot of times I have been with them" on issues where Republicans were not.

Ebke is also proud that the state branch of the American Civil Liberties Union has been an enthusiastic proponent of the bill, largely because of how it deals with how difficult current occupational licensing laws can make it for those with criminal records to find meaningful work.

The law as written would allow someone with a criminal record to "petition the appropriate occupational board at any time, including prior to obtaining required education or paying any fee, for a determination as to whether the individual's criminal history would disqualify the individual from obtaining an occupational license." Right now many Nebraskans with a record waste time and money seeking a certification they will never get.

Also under the bill,

an individual's criminal history would disqualify the individual only if: (a) The individual has a felony conviction; (b) The felony conviction is expressly listed as a disqualifying offense in the statutes governing occupational licensure by the occupational board; and (c) The occupational board concludes that the state has an important interest in protecting public safety that is superior to the individual's right to pursue an occupation. The occupational board may come to this conclusion only if it determines, by clear and convincing evidence at the time of the petition, that (i) the specific offense for which the individual was convicted is substantially related to the state's interest, (ii) based on the nature of the specific offense for which the 1individual was convicted and the individual's circumstances at the time of the petition, the individual is more likely to re-offend by virtue of having the license than if the individual did not have the license, and (iii) another offense by the individual will cause greater harm than it would if the individual did not have the license.

As the Journal notes, "Recidivism rates are lower in states where former criminals can find gainful employment."

Six pages of Ebke's bill are spent listing 172 distinct occupations regulated by its existing occupational regulations, which as the Journal notes includes "63 lower-income occupations that are the labor force entryway for the poor and least skilled." Ebke's bill would, the paper reports, allow "the state [to] use alternatives like periodic inspections to guarantee clean and safe hair salons and barber shops. That would spare cosmetologists and barbers some 16 months of training" and in general allow "Legislative committees [to] review 20% of existing licensing requirements annually [and] consider whether a license is really necessary, whether the training requirements are overly burdensome, and whether the certification is abused to exclude competition."

Since Nebraska state senators are term-limited after eight years, Ebke believes the 20 percent review every year will help "new members realize what their committees have jurisdiction over." She has found that many senators don't even know what legacy regulations still clog the state's laws "until some special interest comes to you."

Now they'll be required to rethink the sense of occupational regulations more regularly. "It's really a process bill, but it has the potential to require legislators to look more objectively at all the licenses in our state"—and would require them to start regulating occupations in the least restrictive way, with full licensing a last resort. She hoped initially to get legislators and their staffs entirely insulated from the process, via a separate office of occupational licensing review, but "the money wasn't there to create a new office."

In arguing for the bill, Ebke has found that some citizens are "very protectionist and want to protect their [existing] licenses," but many Nebraskans are excited for a chance to do meaningful productive work without jumping through unnecessary and expensive hoops.

NEXT: I Don't Want to Tell the Census That I'm Gay. Don't Erase Me.

Occupational Licensing Libertarian Party Nebraska

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

Please to post comments

22 responses to “Libertarian State Senator Wants to Make it Easier for People With Criminal Records (And Everyone Else) to Work

  1. “enthusiastic and lengthy write-up this week in The Wall Street Journal (without, alas, naming the senator or her party affiliation).”

    Bad for the LP, but maybe good news for the bill if it’s praised without bringing in the “controversial” affiliation of the sponsor.

    1. I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

      This is what I do… http://www.onlinecareer10.com

    2. I am making $200 to $300 by simply working for just 3 hours on Facebook. It gives me an exceptionally well sum for every month. With this sum i can meet my costs effectively and easily. this work is such a great amount of simple for a client. the event that you appreciate my work then you can check my working points of interest by tapping the site join below look here more http://www.richdeck.com

    3. Start making extra cash from home and get paid weekly… By completing freelance jobs you get online… I do this three hr every day, for five days weekly and I earn in this way an extra $2500 each week… Go this web and start your work.. Good luck… http://www.jobs63.com

  2. Wow- a Libertarian Party representative endorsing actual libertarian ideas! Nick Sarwark will surely be smearing her any day now.

      1. hi mikal do you want to earn money at home as i am earning 4360$ every month on laptop.if you want to join just open my link and read how to join?open this link for more details>>>>>>>>>

      2. Things going well, Nick?

  3. ‘ the Libertarian Party’s only sitting state senator’.

    In the state with a unicameral legislature with no official party memberships. (Although I did look it up, and it seems that they are known as ‘senators’.)

    1. Everybody knows what everybody’s affiliation is in the Legislature. They definitely know she’s LP.

    2. If they’re unicamel, they must practice ride-sharing.

  4. …it seems that they are known as ‘senators’.

    I knew that the frugal Cornhuskers thought that an upper house was not just a waste of money but also an elitist offense to good republican values. But that particular piece of trivia had escaped me thus far.

    Thank You for bringing to my attention.

  5. 16 months to cut hair, 6 months to be a cop.

    1. Which one is an individual enterprise, and which one is a state controlled employee?

      1. Start making extra cash from home and get paid weekly… By completing freelance jobs you get online… I do this three hr every day, for five days weekly and I earn in this way an extra $2500 each week…

        Go this web and start your work.. Good luck… http://www.jobs63.com

    2. Cops are trained?

  6. The criminal history bit is important. In most states, you cannot get a license of any form if you have a criminal history. This is actually contributing to a shortage of sewage and water workers. They can’t work without a license, and we can’t get them a license cause they were caught with pot in high school.

    1. Austin looters are into government bribes and work permits, but they had to make an exception for High School hemp kingpins (2 roaches or 20 seeds).

  7. Ath As a Nebraska resident I appreciate the perspective Ebke brings to the legislature, even if she is not radical enough for me personally. It is interesting to note that the Republican governor Pete Ricketts is opposing her and supporting a more traditional conservative, e former director of the Nebraska Family Alliance. This is mostly because of Ebke’s opposition to the death penalty and support for removing occupational licenses for DACA residents.

    This just highlights the incompatibility of libertarian values and the Republican Party and conservatives in general.

    1. So where does she stand on pointing service pistols at Planned Parenthood doctors? Is she fer or agin the 1972 LP Overpopulation plank which promptly became Roe v. Wade?

      1. Ebke (on her own website!) is a Life begins at Erection antilife physician-threatener swimming away from the GOP her own kind is sinking. If enough of them get deported from God’s Own Prohibitionist party to make the LP look like Comstock Law enforcers and born-agin Landover Baptists, they will have eliminated the principled opposition. At least the Dems have sense enough to smell a rat!

  8. For me, this is the very effective post.I am gaining my knowledge after reading this.I share your some points for people help.Keep continuing to update this kind of quality post, If you want to more information about this you can simply connect https://aolsupports.org/, they can provide you the best solution.

Comments are closed.