What Is Virginia Commonwealth University Doing to the Animals?

Two pieces of legislation from Virginia lawmakers target animal research.


Last year stories about painful experiments on dogs conducted at the McGuire VA Medical Center came to light—prompting legislation at both the state and federal level. Researchers had induced heart attacks in the dogs, implanted pacemakers, and forced them to run on treadmills.

In response, Republican Rep. Dave Brat of Virginia introduced a bill to prevent the VA from conducting painful experiments on dogs, and Republican state Sen. Bill Stanley has introduced legislation to bar the use of state funds for painful and medically unnecessary animal experiments.

So you can understand why Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) would not be forthcoming about what it is doing with more than three dozen non-human primates in its care. Understanding, however, is not the same as excusing.

On a form VCU submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture this past fall, the university lists 38 non-human primates "upon which experiments, teaching, research, surgery, or tests were conducted involving accompanying pain or distress to the animals and for which appropriate anesthetic, analgesic, or tranquilizing drugs were used."

It also lists 10 dogs, 17 guinea pigs, 242 rabbits, and 46 pigs in the same category. VCU spokesman Michael Porter says the report is "accurate and is the most current accounting of animal research at VCU."

What sort of primates? VCU won't say. They could be rhesus monkeys, macaques, marmosets, chimpanzees—just about anything short of a silverback gorilla.

There's much more VCU won't say, either. For instance, it won't say what sort of experiments the primates are being used for.

At one point, a VCU web page boasted that "VCU maintains the only colony of primates physically dependent on opiates used to … evaluate the abuse potential of chemical substances."

Last month Porter said the web page "is outdated and unrelated to the report," and had been taken down. But he wouldn't say what the primates are being used to evaluate now.

VCU also has not said whether the primates are held in isolation or in groups, what routines VCU is following to ensure their well-being, the type of enclosures in which they are kept, what benefits VCU hopes to derive from the research, who is funding the research, and what will happen to the animals when the research ends.

The school's freedom-of-information officer, Michele Howell, says VCU could dig up such information, though it would probably charge more than $2,500 to do so—a suspiciously high figure. But even then, "much of the information you've requested may fall under the (Virginia Freedom of Information Act) exemption" for "proprietary" information gathered in the course of research.

Well. Even if the information is exempt from mandatory disclosure, VCU still could release it. FOIA exemptions don't require withholding information; they merely permit withholding. Turning the info loose is always an option. Why does VCU seem so reluctant to?

Let us pause here to note that the research (or teaching, or tests, or what have you) might be not merely defensible, but utterly laudable. It conceivably might lead to a cure for cancer or Alzheimer's or childhood leukemia. It conceivably could reduce the toll of human suffering by an astounding degree. And it conceivably might be no more uncomfortable to the primates than a mild headache.

Or it might be less innocuous. It could involve, say, repeatedly cutting them open to test the efficacy of new types of abdominal sutures, or inflicting mental anguish on young monkeys through startle tests, anxiety induction, and more, as the National Institutes of Health has done.

According to a report in Vice News, primates elsewhere have been infected with dengue fever and HIV, and held in small cages for extended periods. "Of course it's pitiful for the monkeys," one researcher told the news magazine. "Everyone feels the same—you see it and you don't want it. But the point is if you want something different then you have to make something different. It doesn't happen overnight."

A 2016 story in The Guardian reported that the USDA was investigating several research institutions (VCU was not among them) over allegations of mistreatment visited upon primates that animal-welfare advocates called "the stuff of nightmares."

It's nice to think VCU's primates face nothing like that. While the school would not make any researchers available for an interview, Porter claims its experiments are overseen by groups including the VCU Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and that the research "meets rigorous scientific and ethical standards set by the National Institutes of Health."

Perhaps. But are those standards adequate?

In any event, VCU is a public institution, so taxpayers should know how their money is being used. And concerned citizens should know what a government agency is doing to sentient beings that, in many cases, have sophisticated language systems with aspects of grammar and can even learn human sign language.

Controversy roils over the use of primates for research, and little wonder: Roughly 70,000 primates are used for experiments in the U.S. every year, even though the Institute of Medicine declared in a major 2011 report on the subject that "most current use of chimpanzees for biomedical research is unnecessary." How necessary are experiments on other primates?

The National Institutes of Health has ended the use of chimpanzees in medical research. And the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently shut down a research program at the National Center for Toxicological Research in Arkansas after four squirrel monkeys being used for nicotine experiments died. FDA Commissioner Scott Gottleib said the "FDA's animal program may need to be strengthened in some important areas."

The Hastings Center, a bioethics institute, has published "The Case for Phasing Out Experiments on Primates," by Kathleen M. Conlee and Andrew N. Rowan, both with the Humane Society. Primates, they write, "have mathematical, memory, and problem-solving skills and… they experience emotions similar to those of humans—for example, depression, anxiety, and joy. Chimpanzees can learn human languages, such as American Sign Language. Primates also have very long lifespans, which is an ethical issue because they are typically held in laboratories for decades and experimented on repeatedly.

"The other category of ethical concern is how primates are treated. Each year, thousands are captured from the wild, mostly in Asia and Mauritius, and transported to other countries. For example, China sets up breeding colonies, and the infants are sold to various countries, including the United States and European countries. The animals experience considerable stress, such as days of transport in small crates and restrictions on food and water intake… [T]hen they face the trauma of research, including infection with virulent diseases, social isolation, food and water deprivation, withdrawal from drugs, and repeated surgeries."

One argument for using primates in research, despite all of that, suggests primates are helpful for studying human ailments because they are more like humans than rats or pigs. But the similarity between human and non-human primates cuts both ways: Almost nobody would dream of conducting painful tests on humans who are unable to consent to experimentation. So why is it acceptable to experiment on humans' closest cousins?

This column originally appeared in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

NEXT: Trump's NAFTA Antics Will Drive America's Auto Industry Into a Ditch

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “Everyone feels the same?you see it and you don’t want it. But the point is if you want something different then you have to make something different. It doesn’t happen overnight.”

    No, I think the point is that you made a value judgement thaat your funders ( taxpayers) might disagree with, and you aren’t informing them. As the article says, maybe it’s worth it. Maybe not. You don’t really get to decide that researcher guy.

    1. I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

      This is what I do…

  2. Don’t want to be subjected to experimentation like a thug, don’t be a monkey.

    1. Or do be tasty and/or cute and trainable.

  3. non-human primates

    Are there still human primates out their reading the phrase ‘primates’ in any context and thinking ‘You mean people?’

    1. There’s only so many times you can type the word “monkeys” before it starts to look weird.

  4. “Each year, thousands are captured from the wild, mostly in Asia and Mauritius, and transported to other countries. For example, China sets up breeding colonies, and the infants are sold to various countries, including the United States and European countries?

    That’s not an example of wild animals being captured. It is an example of the opposite. Just sayin.

    1. Any animal researcher worth his (or her or xis or xer) salt will use animals from breeding colonies. Wild-caught animals might have diseases or parasites that will throw off the results if you are doing a pharmaceutical study.

      Hinkle is just repeating animal-rights talking points here.

    2. Any wild monkeys captured in Mauritius are non-native invasive species, so it’s understandable that they might be eager to export them all.

  5. Sad that dogs have more protections than the unborn, but that’s life for you.

    1. I always thought there was a disconnect between radical animal rights activists and their generally pro-choice stances. A second trimester human fetus has a bigger brain than a mouse does.

      1. Most animal rights activists dislike humans and think them a cancer upon Gaia, especially the unborn ones.

      2. I always thought there was a disconnect between pro-lifers and animal rights. A dog has a bigger brain than a second trimester human and probably feels more pain.

  6. Well. Even if the information is exempt from mandatory disclosure, VCU still could release it. FOIA exemptions don’t require withholding information; they merely permit withholding. Turning the info loose is always an option. Why does VCU seem so reluctant to?

    Because animal rights whackjobs are so measured and calm in their cause?

      1. My favorite was from Penn & Teller’s Bullshit about a VP of PETA, who deeply opposes animal testing, who was taking insulin developed through animal testing.

    1. Given the long, sordid, and sometimes bloody history of violence by animal-rights whackos, it’s amazing Hinkle doesn’t mention this at all in his article.

      It’s like someone writing an article speculating on the reasons Chinese businessmen would refuse to share personal information with the Chinese government and not include the words “Tianamen Square” once.

  7. Animals are property. Telling someone what the can or can’t do with their property is wrong. Do I like it? Hell no. But I’d rather have no animal abuse laws than the ones being proposed and enforced right now.

    1. Yup. I generally don’t like to see animals tortured needlessly. In this case, the ‘needlessly’ condition is pretty explicitly voided. Passing the law doesn’t make the need to test the drugs on *something* go away. It just shifts the pain and risk off onto existing sufferers and future test subjects.

  8. I don’t like animal testing, either, but as Hinkle mentions in the article, I don’t have a better alternative. Some activists point at trendy toiletries shop Lush as the forerunner in animal rights, and I’d agree with that. They also pay their employees well and have about 15 of them crammed into a store the size of a living room, and the products are handmade in Canada. However, a month of shampoo and conditioner costs $50-100.

    That’s wonderful for everyone involved, but I can’t afford it, and neither can many folks spare that much in superfluous spending.

    The free market at work!

    IIRC, rats have very similar central nervous systems to humans, and rabbits have very similar metabolisms. Monkeys have all of that and similar social and emotional behaviors. Which makes the experimentation both more effective and more heartbreaking.

    1. “The free market at work!”
      Yes, and?

      1. No small portion of the Lush customers I know are die-hard communists who don’t really understand that in such a society, anything other than basic Dial soap would not exist.

  9. The opiate dependent primates are there to detect more substances which can relieve withdrawal symptoms & thus become candidates for prohib’n.

    1. But ‘junkie monkeys’ is just so much fun to say.

      So when monkeys get addicted, do they have humans on their backs?

      1. “Junkie Monkey” was was my favorite Ben-N-Jerry’s flavor in college.

  10. Bailey should have written this, he would (or at least should) have some understanding of the complex scientific issues involved.

    1. What complex scientific issues are you having trouble understanding?

    2. You’re right. Any person who has an issue with animal testing on general principle should shut their touchy feely commie pieholes and leave the discussion to science journalists.

  11. ‘ … primates elsewhere have been infected with Dengue fever or HIV.. ‘

    Seeing as how only primates can be infected with these diseases, you can’t really blame researches for using them.

  12. So why is it acceptable to experiment on humans’ closest cousins?”

    Because they are not human?

    1. The question implicit in this is “Why is it acceptable to experiment on non-humans?” Your answer is not a good answer.

  13. I’m okay with non-sapient animals being used for harmful research. It makes me feel uncomfortable and I wouldn’t do it, but I don’t think there’s anything fundamentally wrong with it, if the researchers try to minimize unnecessary harm.

    I’m not okay with sapient animals (apes and cetaceans, primarily) being used for such research, unless they somehow consent. I don’t see why they wouldn’t have limited rights.

    Non-harmful research, whatever. I don’t give a monkey’s ass.

  14. Do You want to get good income at home? do you not know how to start earnings on Internet? there are some popular methods to earn huge income at your home, but when people try that, they bump into a scam so I thought i must share a verified and guaranteed way for free to earn a great sum of money at home. Anyone who is interested should read the given article…


  15. just before I saw the receipt that said $7527 , I accept that my mom in-law woz like actualey making money in there spare time from there pretty old laptop. . there aunt had bean doing this for less than twentey months and at present cleared the depts on there appartment and bourt a great new Citro?n 2CV . look here……. Clik This Link inYour Browser


    I think it is important to read the features of the dog too

  17. Hello everyone I felt this might be of help to someone out there, I amBETTY DONNIEfrom Texas USA, my mom was diagnosed of stage 2 cancer in 2012 but she is free from the disease now. I was introduced by a close friend to Dr MARK a herbal doctor who treated my mom with herbal cure for a period of time. We have done test several times and have been told the cancer is gone. This same Dr MARK also cured me from herpes simplex which I was suffering from for years now. All thanks to him add him email: (markherbs1960 @ gmail. com)(+2 3 4 8 1 4 3 1 4 6 4 1 3)whatapp number
    I read that the man is so powerful he had cured different types of diseases, Like





    CANCER and so on…

    contact him on email
    (markherbs1960 @gmail. com)whatapp + 2 3 4 8 1 4 3 1 4 6 4 1 3

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.