Playboy Sues Boing Boing Over Link to Playboy Centerfolds
Boing Boing has filed a motion to dismiss.


Playboy is suing Happy Mutants LLC, the company that owns the blog Boing Boing, over a post that linked to an Imgur page containing every Playboy centerfold and to a YouTube video that also collected those images.
"Playboy's lawsuit is based on an imaginary (and dangerous) version of US copyright law that bears no connection to any U.S. statute or precedent," Boing Boing explains in its write-up of the news. "Playboy—once legendary champions for the First Amendment—now advances a fringe copyright theory: that it is illegal to link to things other people have posted on the web, on pain of millions in damages."
Happy Mutants has filed a motion to dismiss the suit. "This lawsuit is frankly mystifying," the document says. "Playboy's theory of liability seems to be that it is illegal to link to material posted by others on the web—an act performed daily by hundreds of millions of users of Facebook and Twitter."
The two links that triggered the lawsuit no longer contain the copyrighted images.
Boing Boing's lawyers point out that Playboy has not alleged "facts that could show that Boing Boing induced or materially contributed to direct infringement by any third party" and that this alone should be reason for their claim to fail. The attorneys also argue that Boing Boing's post was covered by fair use, since it was "made for the favored and transformative purposes of news reporting, criticism, and commentary."
If the motion to dismiss fails, the trial is set to begin February 15. Playboy does not appeared to have brought legal action against either YouTube or Imgur.
The case is just the latest in which a large media company tries to use copyright law to extract damages from a smaller operation. Eventually, one of these cases may be ridiculous enough to spark a backlash. Perhaps this is the one.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hey, Playboy has to generate revenue somehow.
I'm told this lawsuit is very tastefully done. (No bush.)
Well, there goes BUCS's interest.
I am inducing all who read this to check out where someone posted every Playboy centerfold ever and video.
Sue me Playboy! Please! I would love to depose every centerfold still alive. (If you know what I mean)
The Playboy centerfold would never talk to me,
Cause I hate family get-togethers,
And I am not an aborigene...
Playboy's just wanting to open up the copyright laws a little bit so when people publish stuff that's damaging to you, you can sue them and make a lot of money off them.
They're coming after you next, Ed, for writing an article linking to a blog post that links to a video. Copyright infringement is no laughing matter!
This lawsuit is frankly mystifying,
Wasn't Frankly Mystifying the transgender playmate they featured a couple months ago?
Last I heard Play Boy has stop doing centerfolds 🙁 Did they change their mind all of a sudden.
Last I heard Play Boy has stop doing centerfolds 🙁 Did they change their mind all of a sudden.
This depends on what exactly you mean by 'doing centerfolds'. Considering nobody really does centerfolds, page 2, or magazines altogether anymore, yes, they gave up centerfolds. At one point in recent history, they floated the idea of giving up all nudes in print. They have since reversed course on that decision.
Gonna have to do some........firsthand research on this matter.
I'd say they were just trying for some free publicity, but suing Boing Boing isn't going to get them any, so...
I'm pretty sure Playboy is smaller than BoingBoing
But it's funny, if you as an individual post a link to copyrighted material you can get into trouble. But if a corporation does it, it's not big deal, apparently.