Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Copyright

Playboy Sues Boing Boing Over Link to Playboy Centerfolds

Boing Boing has filed a motion to dismiss.

Ed Krayewski | 1.19.2018 1:49 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | katerina Ouzounova/Newscom
(katerina Ouzounova/Newscom)

katerina Ouzounova/Newscom

Playboy is suing Happy Mutants LLC, the company that owns the blog Boing Boing, over a post that linked to an Imgur page containing every Playboy centerfold and to a YouTube video that also collected those images.

"Playboy's lawsuit is based on an imaginary (and dangerous) version of US copyright law that bears no connection to any U.S. statute or precedent," Boing Boing explains in its write-up of the news. "Playboy—once legendary champions for the First Amendment—now advances a fringe copyright theory: that it is illegal to link to things other people have posted on the web, on pain of millions in damages."

Happy Mutants has filed a motion to dismiss the suit. "This lawsuit is frankly mystifying," the document says. "Playboy's theory of liability seems to be that it is illegal to link to material posted by others on the web—an act performed daily by hundreds of millions of users of Facebook and Twitter."

The two links that triggered the lawsuit no longer contain the copyrighted images.

Boing Boing's lawyers point out that Playboy has not alleged "facts that could show that Boing Boing induced or materially contributed to direct infringement by any third party" and that this alone should be reason for their claim to fail. The attorneys also argue that Boing Boing's post was covered by fair use, since it was "made for the favored and transformative purposes of news reporting, criticism, and commentary."

If the motion to dismiss fails, the trial is set to begin February 15. Playboy does not appeared to have brought legal action against either YouTube or Imgur.

The case is just the latest in which a large media company tries to use copyright law to extract damages from a smaller operation. Eventually, one of these cases may be ridiculous enough to spark a backlash. Perhaps this is the one.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Meet the Republicans Who Care About Surveillance Abuse Only When Trump's the Target (UPDATE: Trump Signs 702 Bill)

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

CopyrightFair UseSocial MediaTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Hugh Akston   7 years ago

    Hey, Playboy has to generate revenue somehow.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   7 years ago

    I’m told this lawsuit is very tastefully done. (No bush.)

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      Well, there goes BUCS’s interest.

  3. loveconstitution1789   7 years ago

    I am inducing all who read this to check out where someone posted every Playboy centerfold ever and video.

    Sue me Playboy! Please! I would love to depose every centerfold still alive. (If you know what I mean)

    1. Chipper Morning Baculum   7 years ago

      The Playboy centerfold would never talk to me,
      Cause I hate family get-togethers,
      And I am not an aborigene…

  4. Jerryskids   7 years ago

    Playboy’s just wanting to open up the copyright laws a little bit so when people publish stuff that’s damaging to you, you can sue them and make a lot of money off them.

  5. $park? leftist poser   7 years ago

    They’re coming after you next, Ed, for writing an article linking to a blog post that links to a video. Copyright infringement is no laughing matter!

  6. mad.casual   7 years ago

    This lawsuit is frankly mystifying,

    Wasn’t Frankly Mystifying the transgender playmate they featured a couple months ago?

  7. BlueStarDragon   7 years ago

    Last I heard Play Boy has stop doing centerfolds 🙁 Did they change their mind all of a sudden.

    1. mad.casual   7 years ago

      Last I heard Play Boy has stop doing centerfolds 🙁 Did they change their mind all of a sudden.

      This depends on what exactly you mean by ‘doing centerfolds’. Considering nobody really does centerfolds, page 2, or magazines altogether anymore, yes, they gave up centerfolds. At one point in recent history, they floated the idea of giving up all nudes in print. They have since reversed course on that decision.

  8. Elias Fakaname   7 years ago

    Gonna have to do some……..firsthand research on this matter.

  9. I am the 0.000000013%   7 years ago

    I’d say they were just trying for some free publicity, but suing Boing Boing isn’t going to get them any, so…

  10. JeremyR   7 years ago

    I’m pretty sure Playboy is smaller than BoingBoing

    But it’s funny, if you as an individual post a link to copyrighted material you can get into trouble. But if a corporation does it, it’s not big deal, apparently.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

DOJ Brings Kilmar Abrego Garcia Back to the U.S. After Insisting It Couldn't

Joe Lancaster | 6.9.2025 4:45 PM

Denver Case Highlights the Potentially Deadly Hazards of Police Raids Based on Secondhand Information

Jacob Sullum | 6.9.2025 4:20 PM

Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline

Sophia Mandt | 6.9.2025 12:48 PM

FTC Pivots From Competition to Children

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.9.2025 11:00 AM

This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market

Jack Nicastro | 6.9.2025 10:44 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!