Turkey, Stuffing, and a Side of Subsidies

You paid for your Thanksgiving meal before you even went to the store.


Money on a plate
Jiri Hera/Dreamstime

It's that time of year again, when millions of Americans gather for Thanksgiving meals of turkey and plentiful sides. I hope you enjoy yourself, because as a taxpayer, a consumer or even a producer of some of that food, you're paying a stiff price for the privilege of celebrating this cherished American holiday.

Every year, the federal government dishes out north of $20 billion in farm subsidies. Five crops (wheat, corn, soybeans, rice and cotton) make up more than 80 percent of agricultural subsidies. They go to big agribusinesses and investors, many of whom are in cities far away from the fields of harvest. The result is that for us taxpayers, the rolls, long-grain rice, stuffing and creamed corn on our plates, as well as the cotton tablecloths we're dining on, cost us before we even went to the store.

Our turkeys are subsidized, too, through government giveaways to livestock producers. And so are our potatoes and cranberry sauce, which benefit from payments by crop insurance programs on a regular basis. Pretty much everything we swallow on Thanksgiving and in the days of eating leftovers that follow will have been subsidized once, if not twice.

As a consumer, you might think that you are a net beneficiary. After all, aren't subsidized goods cheaper? Nope. The economic literature shows that abolishing subsidies would actually lower the world price of crops. For instance, a 2011 study by the World Bank looked at the effects of removing agricultural protection and subsidies from rich countries and found that poverty rates would fall in virtually all of the developing countries included in the sample as a result of the lower world prices for farm products. Rich countries' consumers would benefit, too.

Take the ridiculous protective scheme built around a politically powerful cartel of domestic sugar processing companies. Between protective tariffs that reduce cheap foreign supplies, loan guarantees and bailouts, American consumers pay about double the global average price for sugar. Obviously, consumers are hurt, but so are all the producers of goods that require the use of sugar, such as bakers and candy-makers.

The rationale to use farm subsidies to keep farm households out of poverty might have made some sense in the 1930s, but it doesn't today. Yet advocates of farm subsidies never tire of arguing that providing a safety net for farmers is an important function of these government handouts. But this claim doesn't hold up under examination.

For one thing, according to the Agriculture Department, only 2 percent of farm households fall below the federal poverty line. Second, our country already has a safety net, in the form of such programs as food stamps and Medicaid. If poverty is an issue, why on earth should farmers get treated any differently than other Americans? Finally, a recent study by Montana State University economist Vincent Smith, published at the American Enterprise Institute, shows that farm subsidies do not mostly benefit poor farmers in rural and urban areas.

He writes, "About 70 percent of all crop insurance and other farm income safety net payments flow to 10 percent of the largest crop-producing farm businesses." That's fewer than 100,000 farms with an average income of over $140,000. Considering the median household income in the United States is $59,000, these guys are doing well.

If you include net wealth, the picture becomes even clearer. Taxpayers, consumers and other low-income Americans redistribute a large amount of their wealth to the largest farm operations and wealthiest farming households.

This system is also incredibly unfair to younger farmers. All of these subsidies increase the cost of farmland (whether one wants to rent or buy) and makes it more difficult for newcomers to break into the farm business. It's also worth thinking about the absurdity of a system that puts, in one single piece of legislation, the subsidies that raise food prices and the food stamps that help low-income Americans pay overinflated prices for food.

So this Thanksgiving, as you give thanks for the bounty and beauty of the world we live in, don't forget to thank all the happy warriors—Democrats and Republicans—who have been fighting for years to free your holiday dinner bills from higher prices and taxes, as well as from the unfairness of farm subsidies.


NEXT: Trump's Deregulation Drive Stops at the Border

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “So this Thanksgiving, as you give thanks for the bounty and beauty of the world we live in, don’t forget to thank all the happy warriors?Democrats and Republicans?who have been fighting for years to free your holiday dinner bills from higher prices and taxes, as well as from the unfairness of farm subsidies.”

    May they all get their 72 orphans in Libervalhalla.

    1. I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

      This is what I do… http://www.onlinecareer10.com

    2. What about endless pot subsidies to pot farmers via pot illegalilty and / or over-regulation and / or over-taxation?

      This is a subsidy to ILLEGAL pot-growers, of course…

      It’s a common freakin’ PLANT, fer Christ’s sake? Hunh??!? It should cost $10 per full-grown plant!!!!

      1. My Whole month’s on-line financ-ial gain is $2287. i’m currently ready to fulfill my dreams simply and reside home with my family additionally. I work just for two hours on a daily basis. everybody will use this home profit system by this link………


  2. The result is that for us taxpayers, the rolls, long-grain rice, stuffing and creamed corn on our plates, as well as the cotton tablecloths we’re dining on, cost us before we even went to the store, writes Veronique de Rugy.

    Whoever wrote the blurb for the story should be aware that if you’re making your creamed corn out of field corn (the kind that gets subsidized) instead of sweet corn (the kind that doesn’t need subsidies because people willingly pay good money for it), you’re not eating creamed corn, you’re eating grits.

    1. Someone shit talking grits?

  3. They really should phase these subsidies out… Maybe over 5-10 years or so so it doesn’t shock the system at all and gives everybody time to adjust the types of crops they’re planting etc.

    1. Nope. That just gets everyone time to be able to get together sob stories about how one of John Mellencamp Cougar’s (or whateverthefuckhe’scallinghimselfthisyear) poor ‘family farmer’ relatives is not able to afford a new Mercedes this year or something.

      They benefited from the previous artificially raised prices, they should have set some of that money aside for the time when the country wasn’t out of its damn mind.

  4. Hey everone! I came here to hijack this thread cuz we gotta support net neutraslity against that Trump-selected piece bag of shit, Ahjit Pie!!! Educate yer family at Thanksiginving, cuz the FDA is gonna give ISPs all the power to do whatever they want and the internet’s gonna be totally contrlled by them. Youll have to pay hundres fo dollars a month to see yer favorite websites and theyll block everythign they don’t like and control the whole narrative, say GOODBYE to free speech and human rights!!!! Call yer representtatives and tell them we need net neutrality to save the future.

    Lets do this!!!!!1!!1!1!

    1. What kind of pie is ‘Ahjit Pie’?

      1. A kind that white people aren’t allowed to make, according to Salon.

    2. As Reason’s only true authoritarian, I’m afraid I must decline. This is an opportunity to build toward the quelling of the discordant and treacherous impulses lurking within the People’s internet once and for all; we cannot fail to make the most of this chance.

  5. Let us not forget that the high price of sugar has led many producers to switch to HFCS which has altered the quality of foods. (Nabisco’s Honey Grahams just aren’t the same),

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.