Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Blew $690,000 on Parking Spaces No One Was Using
And another $840,000 subsidizing parking spaces, despite federal rules meant to limit commuting by car as a way to protect the environment.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wasted $690,000 over two years to pay for an empty parking space, according to a federal audit released this month. The same audit also found that the EPA blew $840,000 on parking fees for employees in Atlanta and Washington, D.C., despite federal rules prohibiting such subsidies.
Those rules, by the way, are meant to discourage commuting by car in order to protect the environment.
The EPA's Office of Inspector General found that 29 percent of the parking spaces at the agency's D.C. headquarters were unused from January 2015 to December 2016, while 27 percent of parking spaces at the regional office in Atlanta were empty during the same period. Each of those spaces cost taxpayers about $290 per month, according to the report.
During the two-year period examined by the audit, the EPA paid about $1.6 million to rent parking spaces from the General Services Administration (GSA) in the parking garage attached to the Ronald Reagan Office Building. Employees at the D.C. office paid about $850,000 in parking costs. In Atlanta, the EPA paid more than $41,000 to rent spaces in a parking garage attached to the Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, where employees parked for free.
Other regional EPA offices do not provide free or subsidized parking for employees and many federal agencies do not either.
"In an age of dwindling federal resources, the EPA's use of taxpayer money—over $840,000 in a 2-year period—to fund employee parking may not be an effective use of federal resources and may take funds away from mission-critical public health and environmental initiatives," the auditors' report says.
In a reponse to the audit, Donna Vizian, acting assistant administrator of the EPA's Office of Administration and Resources Management, said the agency would review parking space usage and stop paying for empty spaces. Of the 73 unused spaces near the D.C. office, Vizian said, 53 will be returned to the GSA. The remaining 20 spaces will be used by "unfilled political appointees" and visitors.
While $1.5 million is not a particularly large sum of money by Washington's standards, the EPA's wastefulness looks particularly bad because it runs counter to stated federal goals about reducing government workers' environmental impact. A 2015 executive order signed by then-President Barack Obama instructed agencies to "promote sustainable commuting and work-related travel practices for Federal employees" and "reward carpooling and the use of public transportation, where consistent with agency authority."
Never would that be more consistent with agency authority, one would expect, than at the EPA.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In an age of dwindling federal resources...
Huh?
That's fedspeak for "resources might at some point stop increasing as fast as we'd like them to."
Only a 3% increase in budget instead of a 5% increase. Don't piss and moan, buckle down and deal - you brought this on yourselves.
In a reponse to the audit, Donna Vizian, acting assistant administrator of the EPA's Office of Administration and Resources Management, said...
...she would finally manage what she's being paid well to manage?
But we can't cut federal spending. Nothing to cut! The cupboard's bare! It's been cut to the bone!
A 2015 executive order signed by then-President Barack Obama instructed agencies to...
...make a costly show of doing some unproven thing for the environment with little to no thought to human nature and likely consequences.
The remaining 20 spaces will be used unfilled by "unfilled political appointees"
FTFY
the EPA blew $840,000 on parking fees for employees in Atlanta and Washington, D.C., despite federal rules prohibiting such subsidies.
So, the people approving such subsidies have been fired and jailed, right? RIGHT?!
Real Talk: there's a good chance the EPA doesn't even have an internal mechanism to figure out who came up with these subsidies.
"So, the people approving such subsidies have been fired and jailed, right? RIGHT?!"
No, but they were promoted up a level. Reference: Peter Principle.
Solution: build tiny houses and park them in those spaces. That's like three birds with one stone!
Or let homeless people sleep in 'em. No more squabbling over whose space it is!
So the message boards are actually functioning?
I'll see your EPA and raise you 50,000 teachers.
So the federal government wastes money?
I am shocked, shocked.
How is this in any way news?
Besides, the EPA will point out that empty parking spaces prove that they are implementing the directive to reduce commuting.
"Those rules, by the way, are meant to discourage commuting by car in order to protect the environment."
Rules are for the plebs.
Could somebody here please explain why we should care about 1 federal agency's paying another for unnecessary parking spaces? It's not like they would otherwise have privatized that space.
You can be sure that no matter how many times that money sloshed around within the Federal government's bloated bureaucracies, it eventually was wasted on some totally unnecessary expenditure to a third party.
I have revised the fourth paragraph for clarity. Apologies to the author.
"During the two-year period examined by the audit, the Government paid about $1.6 million to rent parking spaces from the Government in the parking garage attached to a Government Building. Employees of the Government paid about $850,000 in parking costs to the Government. In Atlanta, the Government paid more than $41,000 to rent spaces in a parking garage attached to a Government-owned Federal Center, where Government employees parked their cars."