Brickbat: Don't Do the Crime

Prosecutors in Madison County, Alabama, have dismissed burglary charges against Stephen McDowell with prejudice, meaning he can't be charged again for those crimes. Cops have even arrested another man for the burglaries he was originally charged with. But it will cost him $600 to get the charges officially expunged from his record. That's in addition to the thousands of dollars it cost him to pay off the bond that got him out of jail.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
'Hey,ya all look alike,Besides,you had to do something sometime .'
Jeff Sessions approves this message.
This justice system brought to you by Ubisoft.
You spelled bend over and take it wrong.
Actually I didn't.
I love the quotes from the prosecutors....
..... but not until you pay us another $600. Then we'll retract our libelous statements about you. Until then, you are a robber who just didn't get convicted.
How about "your say" being "we'll waive all court costs and filing fees, since we are the ones who screwed up"? Is that a bridge too far?
Note that Broussard didn't commit that their say in it would be yes. Just that if they're say was yes, it would help. Slippery fucks.
Then we'll retract our libelous statements about you
I think he actually has a libel and slander case against the government in this case. There must be public records both written and oral about this guy that the state has already determined are false.
Sue the government for damages.
Sovereign immunity.
Because who doesn't rely on the mother of the suspect for identification?
Because who doesn't wait until the threat of media exposure before doing their job?
Police stating is racketeering and BIG business. In all honesty, he ought to consider himself lucky that the charges were thrown out! Many innocent people aren't so lucky. That is what we've come to in the Land of the Free. I say charge the whole government under RICO.
That's why innocent people agree to a plea bargain.
"Pay us money and we won't tell people that you're a possible felon."
Private people can go to prison for uttering such threats.
"Objection, your honor. Irrelevant, immaterial."
There is a reason why we have government agents to keep the common people in check. The same rules simply cannot apply.
Also, it seems that when you go into government you get to forget your mama's instruction to clean up your *own* messes.
Government officials created this mess, they should clean it up themselves, without waiting for the victim to pay them fees.
If he was not convicted, what is there to expunge?
The charge is still a public record.
"Arrested for burglary, but charge dismissed - this guy seems to risky, he probably did it but the prosecutors just couldn't prove it - we'll hire someone who *wasn't* arrested."
And suppose a company hires someone with a burglary arrest and that person does something bad on company time - hello, negligent-hiring lawsuit!
The company is still liable for employees that do something bad on company time- even if said employee had an abolsutely clean record.
this liability arises from respondeat superior, not allegations that hiring someone who was arrested (but not convicted) constitutes negligent hiring.
We need a "loser pays" criminal justice system. If someone is found not guilty or charges are dismissed, the person charged should be made completely whole by the state, including reimbursement of attorney fees.
As long as by "the state" you mean "the prosecutor, personally" and not "taxpayers."
Look like a thug like a thug, get extorted by the state like a thug.
Stay at home mom Kelly Richards from New York after resigning from her full time job managed to average from $6000-$8000 a month from freelancing at home... This is how she done it
.......
???USA~JOB-START
If I click on your link, will you spill my personal information like you did Kelly's by telling the world my name, salary, and where I live?
In IL, expungement consists of filling out a simple form. A clerk will help you. There is no charge.
Brickbat: Don't Do the Crime - Hit & Run : Reason.comis the best post by imo for pc Please visit imo app imo app snaptube for pc snaptube app